
BHP, Vale accused of 'cheating' UK law firm out of $1.7 billion in fees
BHP (BHP.AX), opens new tab said it rejected the allegations "in their entirety" and would contest them. Vale declined to comment.
Pogust Goodhead, which represents the claimants in an ongoing case against BHP over the 2015 collapse of the Fundao dam in Mariana, southeastern Brazil, says it will seek 1.3 billion pounds ($1.7 billion) for unpaid fees.
The firm was representing more than 600,000 Brazilians in the case at London's High Court. A June presentation by BHP and Vale's (VALE3.SA), opens new tab Samarco joint venture – which owned and operated the dam – said around 130,000 people had settled.
In a legal letter sent on Pogust Goodhead's behalf, lawyers representing the firm allege BHP, Vale and Samarco pressured claimants to "settle their claims at far below their true value".
Pogust Goodhead also alleges that a 170 billion-reais ($30.3 billion) compensation agreement which Brazil signed with BHP, Vale and Samarco in October 2024 prevented claimants from discussing the deal with the firm or paying its legal fees.
The firm says it has also incurred an extra $1 billion in borrowing costs to finance the English case over the dam's collapse.
"We reject Pogust Goodhead's claims and allegations in their entirety and dispute their factual and legal basis," a BHP spokesperson said in a statement.
"These allegations and threatened claims are entirely without merit and BHP rejects and will vigorously contest them."
The BHP spokesperson pointed to last year's compensation deal, saying: "We continue to believe Brazil is the most appropriate, effective, and efficient place for compensation for the Fundao dam failure from Samarco to be delivered."
Pogust Goodhead's threat of legal action - in a so-called "letter before action" that is required as part of the process - is the latest development in the litigation, after the High Court last month ruled BHP should face a full contempt of court hearing for funding parallel litigation in Brazil.
BHP, meanwhile, still awaits judgment following a trial of the underlying lawsuit over the dam collapse, in which Pogust Goodhead said it was seeking damages of up to 36 billion pounds.
When the dam burst in 2015, it unleashed a wave of toxic sludge that killed 19 people, left thousands homeless, flooded forests and polluted the length of the Doce River.
The trial began in October and finished in March. BHP denies liability and says the case duplicates legal proceedings and reparation and repair programs in Brazil.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain has lost 1,100 pubs and restaurants since Budget
Britain has lost more than 1,100 pubs and restaurants since Rachel Reeves's Budget, underlining the devastating impact of the Chancellor's tax raid on the hospitality sector. Bars, restaurants, clubs and pubs are closing at a rate of two every day according to new figures from data providers CGA and AlixPartners, with 1,122 venues shutting since last October alone. Graeme Smith, of AlixPartners, said: 'After a period of relative stability for pub and restaurant businesses last year, the first half of 2025 has proved more challenging, with the net closure rate increasing again – the big question for hospitality is what happens from here.' The step-up in closures comes after the Chancellor raised costs for employers in her October Budget, with the changes coming into force from April. Hospitality businesses have been hit particularly hard by changes to employer National Insurance contributions. The headline rate rose from 13.8pc to 15pc, while the threshold at which employers must start paying it fell from £9,100 to £5,000 per year. It means employers must pay the tax on the wages of many part-time staff who until recently were exempt. Estimates suggest the rise in National Insurance contributions has added £1bn to hospitality wage bills. Meanwhile, Ms Reeves's decision to increase the minimum wage by 6.7pc has pushed up costs for the hospitality sector by £1.9bn. Kate Nicholls, the chairman of UKHospitality, said the new figures showed in 'the starkest terms the impact of government-driven cost pressures '. She added: 'Two hospitality venues closing every day is not just a statistic; it represents the hollowing out of our high streets and communities. Independent businesses, the lifeblood of our sector, are being disproportionately crushed under the weight of unfair taxation and soaring employment costs.' The UK now has 98,746 licenced hospitality venues, including sports and social clubs. That total is down by more than 16,000 since before the Covid pandemic hit in March 2020. Ms Nicholls said the sector faced 'the very real risk of being taxed out of existence'. The new figures come amid mounting concerns that the Chancellor's planned shake-up of business rates will pile further pressure on large hospitality companies. Ms Reeves is planning to impose higher levies on companies with bigger premises in order to reduce the rates paid by businesses with smaller sites. Large pub groups including JD Wetherspoon and Fuller's have warned that the planned shake-up will trigger more closures. Sir Tim Martin, Wetherspoon's chairman, said: 'Higher business rates will exacerbate the already ferocious tax disadvantage that pubs are currently labouring under, inevitably resulting in increased home consumption and less pubs.' The British Beer and Pub Association has suggested that one pub would shut every day across Britain this year. CGA's figures show restaurants have seen the most closures over the past year: 633 closed in the year to June, while more than 100 casual dining chain branches and 326 gastropubs have shut. Ms Nicholls demanded 'urgent, decisive action to relieve the burden on a sector that should be a powerful engine for economic growth and job creation across the entire country'. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'The revelation that hospitality venues are closing at the rate of two every day as a result of this Government's choices is very concerning. 'It shows how these staples of high streets and communities are hitting breaking point under the weight of hikes in rates, jobs taxes and employment costs. If everyone in Whitehall worked a shift or two in hospitality this summer, they might understand this better.' A government spokesman said a recent survey by Lloyds Bank suggested UK business confidence was 'the highest in ten years', adding: 'We know the vital importance of hospitality which is why we are protecting pavement pints and al fresco dining, have cut alcohol duty on draught pints and are reforming business rates. 'The tax decisions we took at the Budget last year mean that we have been able to deliver on the priorities of the British people, from investing in the NHS to cutting lists as we deliver on the Plan for Change.'


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why will Heathrow's third runway be such a long haul?
Q On Heathrow: why will it take 10 years to build what is basically a small road? Aaron M A Heathrow airport has just published its long-awaited plans for a third runway. They are basically the same as those recommended by the Davies Commission a decade ago after years of consultation: a 3,500m runway to the northwest of the present airport. In one sense, this is a road a couple of miles long. So why indeed should it take 10 years to build and cost £21bn (plus an additional £12bn for terminal capacity)? First, because even after years of discussion that have led to these 'shovel-ready' proposals, the planning process will drag on for several more years. The Department for Transport is now considering Heathrow's proposals as well as cheaper competing options. When the choice is made, the next process involves work on a Development Consent Order (DCO). That will involve yet another public consultation on Heathrow's expansion and is likely to take around 18 months. The Planning Inspectorate will consider the application and make a recommendation to the transport secretary, who will decide whether to grant the DCO. Assuming the scheme is approved, in line with Labour's commitment to growth, opponents of expansion are certain to launch legal challenges to the minister's decision. Heathrow cannot begin construction until that process is completed. At present, the best hope among proponents of the third runway is that work will begin by July 2029, ie within the lifetime of the present parliament. That leaves six years before the 2035 vow for planes to be taking off and landing. It still looks like a long time for this strip of concrete. But it is rather more complicated than the average road. Hundreds of homes must be demolished first. The third runway is intended to stretch across the current route of the M25, which will be relocated into a tunnel. Vast amounts of work will need to be carried out to connect the new facility to the existing airport, which itself will be extensively remodelled – all the while remaining open to air traffic for 19 hours a day. Accordingly, 2035 begins to look optimistic. Ryanair's chief executive, Michael O'Leary, says the new runway will not open until 2040 at the earliest – not that he has any intention of using the expanded Heathrow, unlike rival easyJet. Q Have you ever been to a destination that you'd never go back to? Lou Gray A Plenty. In almost every case, though, I will not return even though I greatly enjoyed the place on one or more previous visits. It's just because there are so many more places to see. For example, I regard Orkney and Shetland, the Northern Isles of Scotland, as among the most beautiful, intriguing and rewarding destinations in the world. But I have visited each archipelago twice, explored thoroughly, met some lovely people and enjoyed some superb food. With other Scottish islands unvisited, such as Jura and Colonsay in the west, I have no plans to return to the north. The same applies to many other destinations I have been fortunate enough to visit: I thoroughly enjoyed a week in Missouri last year, but don't feel the US state has many secrets left to reveal. And just last week I was in the Greek island of Paros; I don't expect ever to return to its simplicity and beauty since there are dozens of other islands in the Aegean I want to see. If, though, you meant where have I found underwhelming, thankfully, there are very few. On a cruise taking in Greenland and Arctic Canada, I found the ports of call mostly sad places, reflecting the deep social problems faced by these locations – though my view may have been coloured by the shambolic running of the operation by the Canadian travel firm. Conversely, there are some locations to which I will return repeatedly. They are mainly 'world cities' with many dimensions and are constantly reinventing themselves. These include Paris, Istanbul, Mumbai, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sydney, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Chicago and New York. (In different times, I would add Moscow and St Petersburg to that list.) And also great mountain ranges: the Alps, Pyrenees and Himalayas have so many facets and endless beauty. Q I am travelling to New Zealand in December with my partner. We have an eight-hour stop at Hong Kong. Is it straightforward to leave the airport and see the place for a few hours before returning for our next flight? Degsy M A Yes. Your baggage will be checked through to New Zealand, allowing you to explore unencumbered, and you will have your boarding pass for the onward flight. Thankfully, immigration into Hong Kong is invariably swift, and the Airport Express train takes only 24 minutes to reach Hong Kong Island, for a fare of HK$130 (about £10) each way. The final stop locates you perfectly for exploring Hong Kong Central – probably the most exciting part of this hyperactive territory. Head for Man Mo Temple, a Taoist place of worship dedicated to the gods of literature (Man) and war (Mo). Wander through the interior as colourful as it is reverential, with smouldering coils of incense providing a heavenly aroma. A short walk away, explore PMQ: the 'Police Married Quarters' dormitory complex built in 1951. The police officers and their spouses have moved out to cosier accommodation. Bright young sparks have moved in, filling the mid-century architectural masterpiece with workshops, galleries and boutiques. And along at Tai Kwun, you find evidence of the British colonial one-stop shop of crime prevention, comprising Central Police Station, the Central Magistracy (now a restaurant) and Victoria Prison – where, once upon a time, Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh was on trial. Today, the complex is a venue for enlightenment. Begin your journey back to the airport by taking the iconic Star Ferry across the harbour to Kowloon, on the mainland. Make your way to West Kowloon Cultural District, a creative hub appropriately created on reclaimed land. The key attraction: M+, a vast new museum that celebrates Hong Kong's visual culture of the 20th and 21st centuries. Like Tate Modern in London and the Guggenheim in Bilbao, the structure itself is as compelling as the contents. Kowloon station is a five-minute walk away – and in just 22 minutes the Airport Express will whisk you back to the space-age terminal for your onward flight. Security is swift, so plan to be back at the airport just an hour or so before departure.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
A 12pc yield or an 80pc return? This stock presents a tough conundrum
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest Such can be the joys of value-oriented, contrarian investing. We have a capital return (on paper) of more than 80pc in Standard Chartered shares in just over a year, and the emerging-markets focused bank continues to deliver good earnings growth, higher dividends and more share buybacks, as evidenced by last week's strong interim results. We now need to decide what to do next, especially as the valuation is no longer quite so compelling on an earnings basis, but there remains a strong income angle, which merits patient support. Standard Chartered started to report quarterly profits a decade ago, and the second-quarter result this year was the best three-month period of the lot, as pre-tax income rose 44pc year-on-year to $2.4bn (£1.8bn). Robust inflows into the wealth management business drove fee income there and low loan impairments were both notable features, as was a $238m gain on the sale of a start-up Indian e-commerce operation that it had backed. Such a strong performance enabled chief executive Bill Winters and the board to sanction a 37pc increase in the interim dividend and launch a second share buyback for the year – this time $1.5bn – to take the total for the year to date to $3.4bn. It also meant that net asset value (Nav), or book value, per share rose by a sixth year-on-year to $16.80. At the prevailing exchange rate on 30 June that equates to £12.26 a share. The shares trade at a 1.1x premium to that book value figure, rather than the deep discount of which we took advantage in spring 2024. This is why the shares are less enticingly valued than before. But book value should continue to grow and if Standard Chartered can continue to churn out double-digit returns on equity, then 1x Nav could become a floor for the share price, rather than a ceiling. That view justifies retaining a position, even if the further the shares move above Nav the more tempting it becomes to realise some of the paper gains. The dividends and share buyback schemes should be enough to keep income seekers interested, though, as combined they equate to more than 12pc of the bank's current stock market capitalisation. Such a total 'cash yield' easily beats inflation, Bank of England base rates or Gilt yield. Questor says: hold Ticker: STAN Last share price: 1368.5p Update: Croda International Sometimes value investing can involve looking for trouble quite intentionally, and we may have found it in the case of Croda. Shares in the chemicals specialist tumbled after last week's first-half results, even if the headline numbers featured nothing unduly untoward. We shall just have to hang on for now, in the view that the challenges facing the business are cyclical rather than structural. The jury is out on that issue, all the same. Croda's move to launch extra cost savings suggests management is not entirely comfortable with what they see, and a 2pc increase in the interim dividend is not a ringing endorsement of the outlook, even if it maintains a phenomenal growth streak in the shareholder distribution. Analysts are busily downgrading their earnings forecasts yet again thanks to worries over energy costs and regulation in Europe and competition from Asian rivals. Croda trades on more than 20 forward earnings for this year, but that could be deceptive if the profit figure proves to be a tough one. The Yorkshire company now needs to show it can start to expand profit margins once more. Questor says: hold Ticker: CRDA Latest share price: £25.90 Update: Just Group Bingo. So many UK financials' stocks look cheap, perhaps due to concerns over the wider economy, regulation or both, and that does not mean just the banks. Life insurance expert Just Group is a case in point, and a 220p-a-share bid from Brookfield Wealth Solutions means we should be able to cash out of the stock having trebled our money, including dividends. Even that offer price, which represents a 78pc premium to the undisturbed level at which the shares traded before the announcement, represents a near 15pc discount to Just's last reported Nav per share figure of 254p. The shares' failure to go above the offer price suggests the market does not expect a higher counter bid, perhaps because management is recommending BWS' £2.4bn approach, but we can now afford to be patient and wait for the deal to close in the first half of 2026. Questor: hold Ticker: JUST Latest share price: £2.10