
White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say
The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters.
Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new US missile defense system.
Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. 'We'll take a look at everything,' the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6.
In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency 'will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.'
Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment.
The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is 'for political ammunition,' one of the people said.
Whether the US government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest.
'There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts,' said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. 'Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security.'
Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the US government in much of its aerospace and defense work — launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the 'Golden Dome' missile shield planned by Trump.
Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender — his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX.
Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station.
SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
11 minutes ago
- Arabian Post
Trump's 2024 Disclosure Reveals $600 Million Income Surge
Donald Trump's financial disclosure for the 2024 calendar year reveals more than $600 million in gross income and at least $1.6 billion in assets, offering a detailed window into the former president's expansive business empire and the diversification of his revenue streams. The filing, submitted on 13 June 2025, highlights a sharp rise in earnings derived from cryptocurrency ventures, numerous golf and hospitality properties, global licensing agreements, and an array of branded merchandise deals. Income from crypto alone was staggering: $320 million in fees from the $TRUMP meme coin and $57.35 million from token sales tied to World Liberty Financial, a DeFi enterprise in which Trump holds 15.75 billion governance tokens. Golf-related revenues accounted for a significant portion of the total, with Trump's Florida-based resorts—including Jupiter, Doral, West Palm Beach—and the Mar‑a‑Lago club bringing in at least $217.7 million. Trump National Doral generated $110.4 million alone. International properties in Ireland and Scotland added approximately €19 million and £28.7 million respectively. ADVERTISEMENT Royalties and licensing across Trump's branded merchandise further bulged into the tax disclosure. Revenues included $1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible, $2.8 million from Trump Watches, $2.5 million from Trump Sneakers and Fragrances, and $1.16 million from NFT trading cards. Foreign branding deals yielded over $36 million, emanating from projects in Vietnam, India, and Dubai. Passive income from investments—comprising interest, dividends and bond yields—totalled at least $12 million, sourced from holdings of about $211 million. The most notable fund positions were in Blue Owl Capital, Charles Schwab and Invesco government bond strategies. The disclosure confirms the minimal asset estimate of $1.6 billion, calculated using the lowest bounds in declared valuations. However, asset values may be considerably higher, given ranges presented in the filing. Despite assertions that Trump placed his businesses in a blind trust managed by his children, the disclosure underlines that the associated earnings continue to funnel to him directly. Critics argue this arrangement poses ethical concerns and potential conflicts of interest, especially where government policy intersects with crypto or development sectors potentially benefiting his enterprises. First Lady Melania Trump was listed as earning $216,700 from licensing her NFT collection. The disclosure notes Trump Media & Technology—including Truth Social—remains a key asset, though its precise contribution to the total remains unspecified. The financial filing, examined by Reuters and the Washington Post, runs through 2024 and follows extensive public and media scrutiny regarding Trump's financial transparency. He faces ongoing legal challenges—including potential liabilities amounting to nearly $440 million stemming from defamation and state litigation—but those were recorded as pending appeal. Trump's earnings from crypto and golf underscore an evolving business strategy where new digital ventures coexist alongside traditional real estate and leisure interests. The disclosure offers a snapshot of an economic footprint that spans DeFi, luxury goods, hospitality, passive investments and global licensing—reflecting a sophisticated, multi-channel revenue model.


Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Ted Cruz's Fed new plan is a massive distraction
You can count on Senate Republicans to find pointless budgetary gimmicks to avoid talking about serious deficit reduction. In an interview last week with CNBC, Senator Ted Cruz floated the idea that the Federal Reserve should just stop paying interest to banks to save taxpayers money. Budget squeeze solved, easy peasy! Here's Cruz: The Federal Reserve pays banks interest on reserves. For most of the history of the Fed, they never did that. But for a little over a decade they have. Just eliminating that saves $1 trillion... While Cruz wouldn't handicap the odds that such a proposal would make any headway, he went on to say that he and his colleagues had a serious discussion about the matter just a day earlier. He told Bloomberg News that he had made the case directly to the president as well. It's alarming that the senators would entertain such a reckless proposal. Much like Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, the idea comes from the belief that there are simple and painless ways to rein in the budget and curb interest payments. The premise of the Musk boondoggle was that there were large and obvious savings to be had if only the dumb Democrats had known where to look. Also in the category of magical budgetary panaceas are several of the proposals put forth last year by then-forthcoming Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran, including the notion that the US could basically bully other nations into helping it term out its debt. Elon Musk A third example of this phenomenon is Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's idea that we can grow our way out of all our problems: We can just make economic output expand faster than most economists think possible and shrink debt-to-GDP that way! Enter Cruz with the latest distraction from the serious business of the budget. Of course, it's true that the Fed pays interest on bank reserves and that it's a relatively modern development. But how it affects taxpayers is rather complicated, since the Fed is generally self-funding. In normal times, it makes money from its asset portfolio and remits the excess to the Treasury. Since it expanded its portfolio when rates were low and is now paying out interest at relatively high rates, the Fed has been posting operating losses. It isn't remitting profits to the Treasury, and it won't resume doing so until it's generating profits again and has made up for past shortfalls. But that should rectify itself with time and lower short-term borrowing costs. A version of this arrangement has existed since 2008 (except it was previously known as interest on required reserves, or IORR, and some of the particulars are slightly different). But the Interest on Reserve Balance, or IORB, isn't some sort of sketchy corporate charity to banks, as Cruz has hinted. It's a tool to exercise control over short-term interest rates to achieve Fed policy goals. Prior to the financial crisis, the Fed would buy and sell securities to increase or decrease bank reserves with the goal of manipulating interest rates — a so-called corridor system. But that system only really worked in a world of scarce reserves. The Fed's response to the financial crisis included injecting a large amount of money into the system and bank reserves became abundant to the point that the old system wouldn't really work anymore. To maintain control over rates in this new world, the Fed started paying interest on reserves, essentially setting a benchmark for market interest rates — an arrangement known as a floor system. Banks knew that they could always, at a minimum, earn whatever the Fed was paying.

Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump says if Iran attacks, 'full strength' of US military will 'come down'
[Editor's Note: Follow the KT live blog for live updates on the Israel-Iran conflict.] Donald Trump warned Iran on Sunday that it would experience "the full strength" of the US military if it attacks the United States, reiterating that Washington "had nothing to do" with Israel's strikes on Tehran's nuclear and intelligence facilities. "The US had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight. If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before," he said Earlier the US President said "this war in Israel-Iran should end," with his comments coming in a social media post about his call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "The call (between Trump and Putin) lasted approximately 1 hour. He feels, as do I, this war in Israel-Iran should end, to which I explained, his war should also end," Trump said on Truth Social.