Hoffman Estates-based Claire's, known for piercing millions of teens' ears, files for Chapter 11, 2nd time since 2018
Claire's Holdings LLC and certain of its U.S. and Gibraltar-based subsidiaries — collectively Claire's U.S., the operator of Claire's and Icing stores across the United States, made the filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware on Wednesday. That marked the second time since 2018 and for a similar reason: high debt load and the shift among teens heading online away from physical stores.
Claire's Chapter 11 filing follows the bankruptcies of other teen retailers including Forever 21, which filed in March for bankruptcy protection for a second time and eventually closed down its U.S. business as traffic in U.S. shopping malls fades and competition from online retailers like Amazon, Temu and Shein intensifies.
Claire's, based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois and founded in 1974, said that its stores in North America will remain open and will continue to serve customers, while it explores all strategic alternatives. Claire's operates more than 2,750 Claire's stores in 17 countries throughout North America and Europe and 190 Icing stores in North America.
In a court filing, Claire's said its assets and liabilities range between $1 billion and $10 billion.
Forever No More. Operator of mall staple Forever 21 files for bankruptcy protection'This decision is difficult, but a necessary one,' Chris Cramer, CEO of Claire's, said in a press release issued Wednesday. 'Increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail, in combination with our current debt obligations and macroeconomic factors, necessitate this course of action for Claire's and its stakeholders.'
Like many retailers, Claire's was also struggling with higher costs tied to President Donald Trump's tariff plans, analysts said.
Cramer said that the company remains in 'active discussions' with potential strategic and financial partners. He noted that the company remains committed to serving its customers and partnering with its suppliers and landlords in other regions. Claire's also intends to continue paying employees' wages and benefits, and it will seek approval to use cash collateral to support its operations.
Neil Saunders, managing director of GlobalData, a research firm, noted in a note published Wednesday Claire's bankruptcy filing comes as 'no real surprise.'
'The chain has been swamped by a cocktail of problems, both internal and external, that made it impossible to stay afloat,' he wrote.
Saunders noted that internally, Claire's struggled with high debt levels that made its operations unstable and said the cash crunch left it with little choice but to reorganize through bankruptcy.
He also noted that tariffs have pushed costs higher, and he believed that Claire's is not in a position to manage this latest challenge effectively.
Competition has also become sharper and more intense over recent years, with retailers like jewelry chain Lovisa offering younger shoppers a more sophisticated assortment at low prices. He also cited the growing competition with online players like Amazon.
'Reinventing will be a tall order in the present environment,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Much Is Joe Biden's Social Security Check?
If you've ever wondered if former presidents and senators are eligible for Social Security, the answer is yes. Just as every other American who earns pays into Social Security Insurance through taxes, when they reach retirement age, they are eligible to draw benefits. Discover More: Find Out: And after 36 years as a senator, eight years as vice president and four years as president, Joe Biden is not only eligible, but collecting Social Security benefits. In fact, he's collecting well above the average Social Security recipient. How Much Is Joe Biden's Monthly Social Security Check? Unlike President Donald Trump, Joe Biden has released his annual tax returns since 1998. His 2024 return is not released yet, but his 2023 joint federal tax return, with his wife Dr. Jill Biden, states that he received $42,842 in Social Security income. That works out to approximately $3,570 per month. His wife received $21,412 in Social Security for the year of 2023. That works out to about $1,784 per month. The fact that this amount is almost exactly half of Joe Biden's suggests that she is likely drawing spousal benefits since those are capped at 50%, according to the Social Security Administration. Learn More: How Much Did Joe Biden Make as a Politician? You may be wondering why Joe Biden's Social Security is so high. The simple answer is that as a U.S. senator he drew a pretty good salary by most people's standards. Therefore, he paid and earned a high Social Security rate. Biden was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1972, when senators made $42,500 per year, according to the U.S. Senate website. That's more than $333,000 in today's dollars. Over the next few decades, his salary as senator gradually increased to $89,500 in 1987. He then ran for president and lost, but became a senator again from 1990 to 2007, finishing with a salary of $165,200. He then, of course became vice president and president. Biden first began receiving Social Security benefits in 2008 ($6,534) and in full in 2009 ($27,923). What Is the Average Social Security Check Amount? If you're wondering where Biden stands in relation to other Americans drawing Social Security benefits, he's above average. According to the Social Security Administration's (SSA) Monthly Statistical Snapshot, for the month of June 2025, the average benefit for retired workers was $2,005.05. More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on How Much Is Joe Biden's Social Security Check?
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround
By Arsheeya Bajwa (Reuters) -Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan is already facing an uphill battle in turning around the ailing chipmaker. Now, U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that Tan resign over his ties to Chinese firms will only distract him from that task, two investors and a former senior employee said. Trump said on Thursday that Tan was "highly conflicted" due to his Chinese connections. Reuters reported exclusively in April that Tan had invested in hundreds of Chinese firms, some of which were linked to the Chinese military. Tan may now have to mount an effort to reassure Trump that he remains the right person to revive the storied American chipmaker, pulling his focus away from the cost cuts he's trying to implement. "It is distracting," said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, which, according to LSEG data, owns more than 200,000 shares in Intel. "I think Trump will make goals for Intel to spend more, and I don't think Intel has the capabilities to spend more, like what Apple and Nvidia are doing." AI chip market leader Nvidia and iPhone-maker Apple have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to expand domestic manufacturing, which, according to Trump, will bring jobs back home. Until recently, Intel had emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 2022 CHIPS Act, as former CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out plans to build advanced chipmaking factories. Tan, however, has significantly pared back such ambitions, as the company's goal of rivaling Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC's contract manufacturing chops have fallen short. Tan said last month that he would slow construction work on new factories in Ohio and planned to build factories only when he saw demand for Intel's chips, a move that is likely to further strain relations with Trump. The company, its board and Tan were making significant investments aligned with Trump's America First agenda, Intel said in a statement on Thursday, without any mention of Trump's demand. The statement was "bland", said David Wagner, a portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, which owns Intel stock through index funds. "Either defend your leader, which will be the beginning of a difficult road ahead, or consider making a change," Wagner said. Having this play out over a few months is not something that Intel can afford, he said. Tan himself released a statement late on Thursday. "The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company," he said, adding that the board was "fully supportive of the work we are doing to transform our company." "BUILT ON TRUST" Tan, a chip industry veteran, took the helm at Intel about six months ago, after the board ousted previous boss Pat Gelsinger over years of missteps and burgeoning losses. The company's shares are largely flat this year after losing nearly two-thirds of their value last year. Tan was the CEO of chip-design software maker Cadence Design from 2008 through December 2021. Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, Reuters reported. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership. Reuters reported on Wednesday that U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and the criminal case involving Cadence. "There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles," Tan said in his statement on Thursday. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards. My reputation has been built on trust," he said. It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on that list. But Trump's remarks have now forced the limelight on an issue that could erode investor confidence. "If you add in another layer of government scrutiny, and everybody looking into how the company is doing whatever it's doing ... that just makes it harder," said a former senior executive at Intel, who was familiar with the company's strategy under Gelsinger. The source, who declined to be named, was let go as part of Gelsinger's workforce reduction drive last year. Tan's strategy is to "get rid of all of the non-productive parts of the company and really focus on a key few products," the person said. "If (Tan) leaves, it's going to just prolong whatever Intel has to do and needs to do really quickly."
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Putin's phone calls last for hours because of Russian president's ‘monologues,' report says
President Donald Trump's phone calls with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, often last for hours because of the Kremlin's leader's penchant for launching into long, grievance-based monologues, according to a new report. Trump is currently seeking an in-person meeting with Putin in an attempt to thrash out an end to the war in Ukraine, which the president pledged to wrap up within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January. Trump and Putin have held 'multiple calls and passed numerous messages through intermediaries' of late, according to officials cited by The Wall Street Journal. Their conversations are 'typically friendly,' the WSJ's sources said. Still, whereas Trump likes to talk up the prospect of improved U.S.-Russian relations through enhanced economic cooperation, Putin commonly 'lists his grievances and core desires,' such as the international community's refusal to recognize his country's claims over Crimea and the Donbas. His 'lengthy' diatribes and the need for translation can cause the calls to drag on, White House aides said, occasionally testing Trump's patience. 'Putin does this very methodically,' said John Bolton, Trump's estranged former national security adviser from the first term. 'He's very knowledgeable, he knows what he's talking about. When he wants to try and influence somebody, he just talks and talks and talks.' 'Putin's done his homework. He's had years of figuring out who Trump is,' added former White House Russia expert Fiona Hill. The American started this year by rebuking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office for his supposed ingratitude towards his foreign allies for their support, but has lately pivoted to expressing his frustration with Putin. He complained recently: 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'And I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit.'' With the war still rumbling on and Trump said to be privately furious at the failure to make progress, he has begun to threaten other countries that buy oil from the aggressor with higher tariffs, notably hitting out at India and China for, as he sees it, thwarting his efforts to drive Putin to the negotiating table. Fox News' White House Correspondent Peter Doocy reported on Thursday that the Trump administration was 'really optimistic' that the meeting between the two presidents 'might happen next week.' However, his choice of words implied it was still uncertain. Doocy added that none of the advanced logistical work had yet been done by the State Department to prepare for such an encounter, noting that planning of that nature would generally take place 'at least a couple of weeks' before it is required to be put into action. He also said that no location had yet been decided, with Putin expressing a preference for the UAE, but that Trump would probably prefer to host the Russians at his Doral golf resort near Miami, Florida, a suggestion made only partly in jest.
