logo
Ukraine can make way more weapons than the country can buy. Industry figures say there's a simple fix to unlocking its potential.

Ukraine can make way more weapons than the country can buy. Industry figures say there's a simple fix to unlocking its potential.

Yahooa day ago

Ukraine's industry is growing rapidly amid Russia's invasion, and Ukraine is relying less on allies.
But the industry says it has far more capacity that's unused as Ukraine can't spend that much.
Industry leaders say there's a simple way that Ukraine's potential can be reached.
Ukraine's defense industry says it is prepared to produce much more weaponry than it is currently making. The problem is that the Ukrainian government can't afford the multi-billion-dollar price tag for production.
But it says there's a straightforward solution.
Ukraine's defense industry has boomed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, with manufacturers ranging from huge outfits to small companies based in people's garages. These companies are crucial, especially at times when Western support is uncertain.
The host of defense companies that have sprung up over the last three years of war has allowed Ukraine to innovate quickly and make weaponry that is well suited to the country's specific fight, and their insights into the demands of modern war have many Western companies keen to collaborate and learn from them.
Ukrainian Minister of Strategic Industries Herman Smetanin shared earlier this year that "the capabilities of the Ukrainian defense industry have grown 35 times over the three years of the invasion," up from $1 billion in 2022 to $35 billion now.
Industry bodies, each representing around 100 Ukrainian defense companies, told Business Insider that the country's industry is ready to make far more weaponry if someone can fund it, and said it would be a win-win for allies.
Serhiy Goncharov, the CEO of the National Association of Ukrainian Defense Industries, which represents around 100 Ukrainian companies, told BI that Ukrainian producers' capacity is more than three times as large as their purchasing power from current budgets.
He said Ukrainian defense companies get contracts worth around $11.5 billion, but they have the capacity to make as much as $45 billion in weapons.
"We are ready to increase our production. We have the capacity to increase our production," Goncharov said. But for now, "we still work in the limit of the budget of Ukraine."
Government officials have shared similar observations. For instance, Oleksandr Kamyshin, then Ukraine's minister of strategic industries, said in April 2024 that Ukraine's defense production capacity was three times as much as its defense budget.
Ihor Fedirko, the CEO of the Ukrainian Council of Defence Industry, a body that represents more than 100 companies, told BI "there are huge spare manufacturing capacities."
Ukraine's defense companies typically rely on money from the government buying their goods for the military. Units also buy some weaponry and items themselves, but that practice doesn't add up to the same scale or offer businesses the same confidence.
Ukraine's government only has so much money, particularly during wartime.
Ukrainian industry figures outlined a simple solution, one that is already underway on a smaller scale. It's a new way of supporting Ukraine that was launched by Denmark last year.
The model, nicknamed the "Danish model," buys weapons for Ukraine directly from Ukrainian developers instead of purchasing them from European or US companies or taking them from other countries' stockpiles.
Goncharov described actions similar to the Danish model as the "simplest" way partner nations can help Ukraine's industry and the one that gives the "fastest result on the battlefield." He said this approach allows Ukraine to increase its production by giving manufacturers financial assurances and confidence.
Multiple countries have joined this model, and some others, like Germany, say they are working on their own version of it.
The Danish model ensures weapons reach Ukrainian soldiers faster and typically for less money. It also means the weaponry Ukrainian forces need most is prioritized. Goncharov said it helps Ukrainians get "exactly what they need on the battlefield."
Through this approach, even if a partner country has limited stockpiles or a limited defense production capacity, it can still "purchase the artillery for Ukraine from Ukraine."
Around $550 million worth of weapons procurements were finalized last year and boosted the production of key weapons like the Bohdana self-propelled howitzer.
Goncharov said Ukraine's industry has a list of weapons it is ready to increase the production of if it gets money through this type of model. That list includes artillery and armored vehicles.
Fedirko said the Danish model is "the largest hope for the private sector." Other options include using frozen Russian assets and joint manufacturing opportunities with foreign companies.
Goncharov said he has discussed the Danish model and other options for producing more Ukrainian weaponry with members of the European Commission.
Another model he proposed is financing production in Ukraine that depends on a substantial amount of European components. He said many Ukrainian companies import some components from elsewhere in Europe, like some metals and vehicle chassis.
He described this as "more complex" and more medium-term than the Danish model, but it's one solution that also benefits European industry, which is ramping up.
Europe is watching the war in Ukraine closely, with many countries massively boosting their defense spending and warning that Russia could attack elsewhere on the continent.
Countries are hesitant to drain their stockpiles, and new defense orders are creating backlogs in industry, limiting its capacity to produce weapons for others.
Many European countries are studying Ukraine's defense industry and its speed, but it's a work in progress.
Goncharov said many of Ukraine's international partners are not expanding their defense production fast enough, so Ukraine's industry "has no other options only to grow, to cover our demand."
He said working with Ukraine is advantageous for other countries attempting to improve their defenses. They can learn from Ukrainian companies with the advantage of being in direct contact with soldiers and units, allowing them to stay up to date with what is needed against Russia and test their products.
"We unfortunately face this situation when we have war on our territory, and it's not our choice, but it is what it is."
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine's state hydropower operator plans post-war recovery of Kakhovka hydroelectric dam
Ukraine's state hydropower operator plans post-war recovery of Kakhovka hydroelectric dam

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine's state hydropower operator plans post-war recovery of Kakhovka hydroelectric dam

Ukrhydroenergo, Ukraine's state-owned hydropower operator, is prepared to begin rebuilding the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP), destroyed by Russia, as soon as the war ends, though it is cautious about investing in projects that may not be implemented. Source: Bohdan Sukhetskyi, acting General Director of Ukrhydroenergo, as reported by Ukrainian public broadcaster Suspilne Quote: "We have a clear understanding of the preparatory work, including the routes for machinery, the placement of communications and the construction of a temporary dam. If feasible and in line with procedures, the company is ready to commence work." Details: He added that "we've created a 3D model of the Kakhovka reservoir and mapped its bottom and relief to the centimetre, so we know precisely how the reservoir will be filled." Sukhetskyi noted that with average inflows from the Pivdennyi Buh and Desna rivers, filling the Kakhovka reservoir to its design capacity will take over 18 months. Quote: "The company is collaborating with global firms specialising in hydroelectric power plant construction. Several partnership memoranda have been signed and partners are ready to contribute to construction and design and provide modern technologies, offer innovative solutions and even invest." Background: On the morning of 6 June 2023, Russian forces blew up the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant. According to the United Nations, the damage caused amounts to US$14 billion. On 18 July 2023, Ukraine's Cabinet of Ministers (government) approved a resolution for an experimental project titled Construction of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Complex on the Pivdennyi Buh River. It was previously reported that rebuilding the Kakhovka HPP will take at least seven years. Repairing the plant itself will require several years, with an additional 2-3 years to fill the reservoir. Further time will be needed to repair and restore canals and irrigation systems built in the 1970s and 1990s. Ukrhydroenergo estimates that the rebuilding of this complex hydroelectric facility will take at least five years. European Pravda obtained an explanatory note to the draft government decree, detailing the specific requirements for rebuilding the Kakhovka HPP. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic Alliance
G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic Alliance

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic Alliance

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In a significant diplomatic step with implications for global alliances, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced he will attend the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, this month, after being invited by Canada. Prime Minister Mark Carney's office confirmed the invitation was made in a call with Modi. Why It Matters Modi's attendance at the G7, of which India is not a member, signals an improvement in the relationship between India and Canada after a very rocky period and came after reports that no invitation would be forthcoming for Modi this year, triggering criticism of Modi from his political opponents. India's association with the G7 group of industrialized democracies underlines its strategic importance for the United States and its allies at a time of growing geopolitical polarization. While India is the world's largest democracy, it is also part of the BRICS alliance alongside Western rivals China and Russia, making the world's most populous nation a key pivot point in global affairs. Russia was excluded from what was formerly the G8 in 2014 after annexing Crimea. What To Know Prime Minister Modi took to X on Friday to announce he had received and accepted a personal invitation from newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Modi posted: "Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit." The Carney-Modi call marks the highest-level dialogue between the two countries since ties soured under his predecessor Justin Trudeau's government. President of India Narendra Damodardas Modi is welcomed by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on day two of the 50th G7 summit at Borgo Egnazia on June 14, 2024 in Fasano, Italy President of India Narendra Damodardas Modi is welcomed by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on day two of the 50th G7 summit at Borgo Egnazia on June 14, 2024 in Fasano, Italy Photo by Alessandra Benedetti - Corbis via Getty Images Carney's new administration appears to have shifted to a more pragmatic tone: prioritizing trade, diaspora ties, and democratic values over lingering espionage-related disputes. India, for its part, views reengagement as a sign of Western acknowledgment of its strategic indispensability. India-Canada relations have been in the deep freeze since September 2023, primarily stemming from Canadian allegations—vigorously denied by India—linking Indian agents to the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen and Sikh separatist leader. Canada's intelligence service had also identified India as one of the countries that could attempt to meddle in Candian elections. What People Are Saying Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi: "As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's Office: "The two leaders discussed the longstanding relationship between Canada and India, including deep people-to-people ties and significant commercial links. Importantly, there was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns. Danish Singh, president of the WSO Canadian Sikh group: "For Sikhs in Canada, this is a betrayal, not just of our community, but of core Canadian values. Prime Minister Carney's decision to invite Narendra Modi." What Happens Next Modi's attendance at the G7 will mark another sign of India's increasing prominence on the world stage and in an alliance with global democracies that can potentially counter the rise of autocratic powers including China and Russia.

This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel
This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel

CNBC

time36 minutes ago

  • CNBC

This uranium company wants to break the grip that foreign state corporations have on U.S. nuclear fuel

President Donald Trump's push to dramatically increase nuclear power in the U.S. will require a tremendous amount of fuel, but the country remains heavily dependent on foreign state-owned companies for its supplies, the CEO of the only publicly traded uranium enricher in the world told CNBC. "There's barely enough Western enrichment, if at all, to satisfy existing operating plants," Centrus Energy CEO Amir Vexler said in an interview. "If the nuclear industry is to add all this generation capacity, there will have to be a tremendous amount of enrichment capacity that's added." Trump issued a series of executive orders on nuclear power last month that set a target for the U.S. to quadruple the sector's capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Nuclear energy is one of the few issues in deeply polarized Washington these days that enjoys some level of bipartisan support. Trump's push expands on former President Joe Biden's goal to triple nuclear power by midcentury. Most nuclear plants worldwide use low-enriched uranium, or LEU. The U.S. relied on foreign countries for around 70% of the fuel for its reactors in 2023, according to data from the Energy Information Administration. About 27% of U.S. fuel purchases came from Russia that year, one of the principle geopolitical foes of the U.S. But Russian uranium will be forced out of the U.S. supply chain by 2028 at the latest, after Biden signed legislation in 2024 to ban imports over Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. faces a looming nuclear fuel supply gap due to the loss of Russian uranium. Western enrichment capacity, meanwhile, is dominated by two players that are not American owned. They are France's Orano and a British-Dutch-German consortium called Urenco, according to the World Nuclear Association. The European enrichers are reliable partners and have done a good job supporting the market, Vexler told CNBC. But trade tensions threaten to disrupt global supply chains, he said on the Centrus first-quarter earnings call. "We don't have any domestic fuel cycle capacity, almost at all," Vexler told CNBC, referring to American-owned companies. "We don't mine anything, we don't convert anything. We don't enrich anything. We rely on others. And others are all state-owned enterprises, maybe with a few minor exceptions." The only commercial enrichment facility operating in the U.S. is owned by Urenco, the European consortium. It is located in Eunice, New Mexico. Centrus wants to break the stranglehold that state-owned corporations have over the U.S. nuclear fuel supply chain. "The circumstances in the market are such that we believe and we're staking everything we have on the fact that the market needs another enricher," Vexler said. "It needs competition." Trump directed federal agencies on May 23 to develop a plan to expand uranium enrichment capabilities in the U.S. to meet the needs of the civilian and defense sectors. The president's order is sparse on concrete details about how domestic enrichment will be stood up in the U.S. But Centrus' stock has gained 46% as of Thursday's close since Trump's announcement as Wall Street sees the company playing a key role in the effort. The company's shares have risen more than 7% this week as Meta's deal to buy nuclear power from Constellation Energy has reinforced the view that demand is increasing as the tech sector hunts for electricity for its data centers. Centrus is one of just two companies that are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to produce low-enriched uranium in the U.S., the other being Urenco. Bethesda, Maryland-based Centrus is also the only company in the U.S. that has a license to produce a type of fuel that some next-generation nuclear plant designs, such as small modular reactors, are planning to use. The U.S. wasn't always dependent on foreign countries. It was the first country to enrich uranium for the commercial market and was a dominant player in the market through the 1980s. The federal government owned and operated the nation's enrichment facilities during that period. The U.S. sold its enrichment business through a company called the United States Enrichment Corp. in a public offering in 1998. USEC went bankrupt in 2014 as nuclear plants struggled to compete against cheap natural gas and support for the industry declined in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan. Centrus emerged from the reorganization of USEC later that year and is now profitable. "We were just not able to compete with other government, state-owned competitors," said Vexler, who took over the helm at Centrus in 2024. When times got tough for the industry, national governments in Europe and Russia would not allow their state-owned enrichers to fail, he said. Centrus operates an enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio, about 95 miles east of Cincinnati that could one day supply a major portion of U.S. nuclear fuel needs. The Ohio facility has a footprint the size of the Pentagon and could produce enriched uranium equivalent to about 25% of the total purchased by U.S. power plants in 2023, according to Centrus. This is nearly equivalent to the amount of enriched uranium imported from Russia that year. "If that is not sufficient, if domestic requirements, national security requirements, export requirements exceed that, then obviously we have the capability to expand as well," Vexler said. The Ohio plant has not launched commercial operations yet. It is currently producing a small amount of the fuel that the developers of advanced reactor designs are banking on, called high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU. The Department of Energy buys the fuel that Centrus produces. Centrus' main business right now is importing LEU for U.S. nuclear plants with contracts that run through 2040. It has a waiver to import Russian LEU through 2025 and has applied for waivers through 2027. Under U.S. law, exceptions that allow Russian imports will cease by 2028. Centrus plans to transition away from its trading business as it stands up its domestic enrichment capacity. The vast majority of the enriched uranium produced in Ohio will be sold on the commercial market and potentially for export, Vexler said. "I would certainly aim for us to not only backfill sort of the vacancy that the Russians are creating, but I also hope that we're going to gain market share, both in the LEU and in the HALEU market," Vexler said. But this will require some level of government support given the state-owned competition, he said. Congress has passed $3.4 billion to support domestic enrichment and reduce U.S. dependence particularly on Russia. Centrus is one of several companies competing for the funding. "We've always said that it has to be a public-private partnership," Vexler said. "We've been raising our own funds. We've been raising our own financing. We will contribute significantly to this, but we have to have government support." "There is a path here where we could have a prosperous, commercially competitive American industry," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store