logo
The data that reveal growing strains in the special relationship

The data that reveal growing strains in the special relationship

Yahoo04-03-2025

Britain, the US and Russia have participated in 2,681 votes together at the United Nations Security Council since 1946.
In that time, the US has sided with Russia over the UK on just 22 occasions.
The most recent instance came last Monday, when the UK and Europe abstained from a US-drafted resolution calling for an end to the Ukraine conflict that omitted any criticism of Russia's actions.
The short resolution was adopted, much to the dismay of Ukraine and its European allies.
Before the vote that was held, on the third anniversary of Vladimir Putin's invasion, other than a disagreement over humanitarian relief to Gaza in 2023, you would have to go back to 1980 to find another example.
The Security Council is one of the six principal organs of the UN, with a mandate to promote international peace through negotiation, the imposition of sanctions or, if necessary, the authorisation of force.
A revolving roster of 10 nations joins the table for two-year terms, but five members have been permanent since its creation in the wake of the Second World War – the US, UK, France, China and Russia (formerly the USSR).
According to UN Digital Library records of all resolutions voted upon over the past 70 years, the UK and France are the closest permanent members, voting the same way 98.2 per cent of the time.
The US, for its part, was most aligned with the UK (97.1 per cent) and understandably, given their history, found least common cause with Russia (87.8 per cent).
But the current turmoil is bucking these long-term trends and suggests the two nations are drifting apart in their special relationship'.
The US and UK have only split votes 77 times, meaning entire years have often gone by with the pair 100 per cent like-minded.
Over the past 12 months, however, this rate fell to 94.4 – its lowest level since 1997.
In December, the US abstained in a vote on the establishment of an African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia, citing dissatisfaction with its funding model. Last March, it did the same during a call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan.
More broadly, the breakdown of the transatlantic alliance echoes growing disunity within the wider Security Council and the UN as a whole. The majority of resolutions put forward, despite being put to a vote, are to give assent to agreements already made. The most common form of dissent, therefore, is to abstain.
The share of abstentions among all votes cast has risen steeply over the past decade, from 0.06 per cent in 2010 to beyond eight per cent last year.
Only the five permanent members have recourse to a more drastic measure – their negative vote counting as a veto.
According to Security Council Report, vetos empower them to 'defend their national interests, to uphold a tenet of their foreign policy or, in some cases, to promote a single issue of particular importance to a state'.
There were eight vetos last year, the highest annual total since 1989 and the eighth-highest in 79 years overall.
Three distinct phases emerge when looking at which country did the vetoing: the USSR was primarily responsible over the opening decades of the Cold War, the US then took the lead until 2008, from which point on Moscow began throwing up the most barriers once more.
The USSR and Russia have been behind almost half (47.1 per cent) of all no-votes cast, a share that creeps up to 57.9 per cent over the past three years, coinciding with the three-year long Ukraine war.
Speaking at an event after last Monday's event, Yevheniia Filipenko, Ukraine's ambassador, asked countries to continue their support for rebuilding Ukraine and seeking accountability for crimes committed since Russia's invasion.
'The road ahead is very challenging but when we are united we can prevail,' she said.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Train service between Moscow and North Korea's Pyongyang to resume this month, says Russia
Train service between Moscow and North Korea's Pyongyang to resume this month, says Russia

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Train service between Moscow and North Korea's Pyongyang to resume this month, says Russia

(Reuters) -Russia and North Korea plan to restart a direct passenger train service between Moscow and the North Korean capital Pyongyang this month for the first time since 2020, Russia's state-owned rail monopoly said on Monday. Russian Railways said it had agreed with North Korea's railways ministry to resume a twice-monthly service between the two capitals on June 17, a journey it said took eight days and which, at over 10,000 km (6,213 miles), was the longest direct rail journey in the world. Another service between Pyongyang and Khabarovsk, a Russian city close to China's northeastern border, will restart two days later. The services will be operated by Korean State Railway, the state operator, and in the case of the Moscow-Pyongyang route will see a North Korean passenger railcar hitched to the regular Moscow-Vladivostok service and then re-attached to another train. Passenger rail traffic between Russia and North Korea was suspended in February 2020 at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. Moscow and Pyongyang have since ratcheted up cooperation, including in the military sphere since President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty last year. North Korea confirmed in late April that it had sent more than 10,000 troops and weapons to Russia to assist in its war in Ukraine, aid which proved crucial for Moscow in recapturing Russia's western Kursk region from Ukraine. The two countries already operate a passenger rail service between Vladivostok in Russia's Far East and Rason, a North Korean port city. The nations are also linked by freight rail networks, although Russia does not disclose the size of the cargo traffic.

Greta Thunberg Intercepted By Israel In Boat To Gaza
Greta Thunberg Intercepted By Israel In Boat To Gaza

Buzz Feed

time32 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Greta Thunberg Intercepted By Israel In Boat To Gaza

In the early hours of the morning, Greta Thunberg and members of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition were intercepted by Israeli forces. Here's everything we know so far: What is the Freedom Flotilla Coalition? In their own words, they're "a grassroots people-to-people solidarity movement composed of campaigns and initiatives from different parts of the world, working together to end the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza." They've sent a number of boats to Gaza, which has had its land, sea, and air blockaded by Israel since 2007. Aid to Gaza has been severely limited recently, resulting in mass starvation. Palestinians have been killed by Israeli gunfire en route to get food. Israel has maintained that "the maritime zone off the coast of Gaza is closed to unauthorized vessels under a legal naval blockade, consistent with international law." What was going on with the Madleen? Madleen is the name of the boat that set sail for Gaza on June 1. The ship contained emergency supplies, such as food, baby formula, and medical products. As Greta put it, 'We are seeing a systematic starvation of 2 million people. The world cannot be silent bystanders, Every single one of us has a moral obligation to do everything we can to fight for a free Palestine.'To a certain extent, the trip is symbolic. As Amnesty International's Secretary General notes, 'During its voyage over the past few days the Madleen's mission emerged as a powerful symbol of solidarity with besieged, starved and suffering Palestinians amid persistent international inaction. However, this very mission is also an indictment of the international community's failure to put an end to Israel's inhumane blockade. Activists would not have needed to risk their lives had Israel's allies translated their rhetoric into forceful action to allow aid into Gaza." Who was on it? 12 people from various countries. This included Greta and European Parliament Member Rima Hassan, as well as a journalist. How did people react to the mission? Depends on who you ask. Senator Lindsey Graham posted, "Hope Greta and her friends can swim!" Critics have repeatedly referred to it as the "selfie yacht." Were they doing anything illegal? No. A number of UN experts called for safe passage of the boat and said, 'As the Freedom Flotilla Coalition's ship approaches Palestinian territorial waters off Gaza, Israel must adhere to international law and comply with orders from the International Court of Justice to ensure unimpeded access for humanitarian aid." Amnesty International has called the detention of the crew illegal. What did Greta say about the boat being intercepted? In a prerecorded message posted to her Instagram account, Greta said, "My name is Greta Thunberg and I am from Sweden. If you see this video, we have been intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupational forces, or forces that support Israel. I urge all my friends, family, and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible." The Israel Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying, "The 'selfie yacht' carrying Greta Thunberg and the other so-called 'celebrities' is continuing its journey toward an Israeli port. Upon arrival, arrangements will be made for their return to their respective home countries." They further posted a video saying that the members of the ship were "safe and unharmed" and "provided with sandwiches and water." Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, further said they will be shown footage of the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel. Israel has further claimed that "more than 1,200 aid trucks have entered Gaza from Israel within the past two weeks" and "the tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the 'celebrities' will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels." It's worth noting that the UN has estimated that around 600 trucks would be needed daily. How have foreign governments reacted? French officials have called for the swift return of their citizens. The Turkish Foreign Ministry said that the incident "once again demonstrates that Israel is acting as a terror state." Spain has called on its top Israeli diplomat in Madrid. We'll keep you posted with updates.

How drones & AI are changing the defense sector & warfare
How drones & AI are changing the defense sector & warfare

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How drones & AI are changing the defense sector & warfare

The growing frequency of wartime drone attacks is causing a shift in the nature of both the defense sector and modern warfare. Tony Bancroft, Gabelli Funds portfolio manager, joins Asking for a Trend with Josh Lipton to discuss the outlook for the use of drone technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and automation in warfare. Bancroft also shares some of his top stock picks in the defense sector, including parts-makers like Textron (TXT), Honeywell (HON), L3Harris (LHX), and Ducommun (DCO). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. There's a shift on the horizon in modern warfare. Ukraine recently dealt a blow to several Russian air bases with the use of drone attacks. As of February 2025, tactical unmanned aerial vehicles account for 60 to 70% of damaged and destroyed Russian systems. That's according to the Royal United Services Institute. For more on the changes to modern warfare and ripple effects for the defense sector, we have Gubelli Funds portfolio manager Tony Bancroft. Tony, it is always good to see you and the reason, of course, Tony, you are the perfect guest for this segment, is not only are you well-known analyst, you are in fact Lieutenant Colonel, uh, Tony Bancroft, United States Marine Corps. So, we we are lucky to have you. And I want to start, Tony, with those reports we saw, uh, Ukraine's really unprecedented drone operation striking deep inside Russian territory. When you saw that, Tony, when you saw those reports, what was your reaction? Thanks, Josh. Always great to be back. And you know, I think, you know, Ukraine, uh, one-upped, um, Israel on on next, uh, next level next generation, uh, warfare and you know, the US Department of Defense has taken notes, uh, and this is how things are going to be going, uh, going forward. Uh, you're going to see a lot of, uh, asymmetric warfare, obviously a lot of use of of drones and and, uh, you know, artificial intelligence and, um, cyber, you know, cyber attacks, uh, you name it. Uh, however you can imagine it is going to be how it's going to be done. And you know, that was just sort of a case in point the fact that, you know, 117, you know, how many or $1,000 drones took out a third of the, uh, third, second or third largest air forces' um, uh, strategic bomber capability is is legitimate. So, you're going to see drones, you know, be be a lot of DOD and European spending going forward. I think right now it's about 15 billion in the US DOD budget, um, and it's probably going to go to 25 billion as expected about by 2030 and and doubling that almost in 2035. So I think we we we like the industry, we like the, uh, companies that are going to supply parts to them and, uh, we're we're definitely, you know, bullish on it. What are some of those companies, Tony? Yeah, you know, we we sort of like the the parts maker. I mean, you know, I know there's a lot of drone suppliers out there but, uh, you know, companies like, um, Textron and Honeywell and L3 Harris, um, Ducommun, uh, all make, you know, all sort of make these parts that go into all these, you know, these systems that are obviously, you know, they're pretty, you know, they're pretty, uh, intricate, uh, high technology systems that need certain structures and certain, uh, electronics in them and we sort of like those those guys. And they're diversified as well because they're on multiple programs and they're also on the commercial side. And, uh, they're they're good cash flow businesses with, you know, long secular tailwinds. I have to ask you a broader question, maybe, you know, as as you talk about how you you think maybe the the future battlefield changes and yes, it'll still involve tanks and fighter jets and battleships that more increasingly rely on AI and autonomous systems. Is the US well prepared for that shift, Tony, in your opinion? You know, I think they are. I think the US is actually, um, I I I I I think sometimes, you know, the the narrative is that the US is is fighting the last battle and and and and it's somewhat true. And that's somewhat true always when you talk about, you know, warfare. I'm sure all the way back to to Sun Tzu and and you name it. Uh, but the US is pretty capable and the weapon systems we have are are are lethal and you know, we're still by far the largest drone builder in the world. I mean there's, you know, as far as for military drones. Um, you know, uh, the US is is the most dominant. Always have been and I think will we will continue to be. And we'll we'll we'll sort of we'll pair that with, uh, you know, with our with our manned systems that are able to control it. You know, a lot of this is going to come down to as as we go further into it, you know, who is going to be able to essentially out hack who or who is going to be able to jam out jam who. And at some point you're probably going to need, you are going to need some type of, uh, manned manned system that can be closest, you know, the node they would they would call it, be closest to, uh, you know, the the autonomous systems or or things that are are capable of being jammed. And you're you're going to need the systems that the US has like the F-35 along with our, you know, the collaborative, uh, collaborative combat aircraft and other and other systems. There's a lot that we have and our long-range fires are by far dominant, you know, when when it comes to, um, being able to reach out and touch somebody. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store