World Bank not informed of India's decision on Indus Waters Treaty
The World Bank (WB) has said that it hasn't been informed of India's decision to keep the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in 'abeyance,' sources confirmed to The Hindu. Throughout the history of the treaty, the WB has played a key role as a mediator in cases of disputes arising between India and Pakistan on water sharing agreements, as laid out in the IWT.
On Thursday (April 24, 2025), Debashree Mukherjee, Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources, wrote to her Pakistan counterpart, Syed Ali Murtaza, that India was keeping the treaty in abeyance with 'immediate effect.'
'The obligation to honour a treaty in good faith is fundamental to a treaty. However what we have seen instead is sustained cross border terrorism by Pakistan targeting the Indian Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir,' her letter says.
The 'security uncertainties' have directly impeded India's 'full utilisation rights' and Pakistan's action of not responding to previous requests by India to renegotiate the treaty was a 'breach of trust' on its part.
A Government source told The Hindu that, as Pakistan had been informed about India's position on the treaty, therefore there was 'no need' to inform the WB.
A spokesperson for the WB said that 'it did not opine' on 'treaty-related sovereign decisions taken by its member countries.'
Following the Pahalgam attack, India announced on Wednesday (April 23, 2025) that it would hold the IWT, in place since 1960, 'in abeyance.' On the surface, this implies that India will stop its periodic communication with Pakistan on sharing hydrological data on the Indus rivers or keep them apprised of infrastructural work on hydro-electric projects in the Chenab, Jhelum and the Indus main, also known as the Western rivers.
However, even prior to the Pahalgam incident, the Permanent Indus Commission – or the teams of experts from India and Pakistan that attempt to resolve disputes regarding the sharing of the waters of the Indus basin – hasn't convened since 2022. India in 2023 had called on Pakistan to 'renegotiate' the treaty primarily because several of the original circumstances that prevailed when the treaty was formed had changed. Among them were, changes in the population structure, water requirements, the threat from climate-related cataclysms and 'cross border terrorism' were among the reasons India cited to renegotiate the six-decade-old treaty.
The main ask was to evolve a new dispute resolution mechanism.
Under the terms of the IWT, India cannot create significant hydropower storage on the Western rivers – Indus, Jhelum, Chenab – and must maintain water levels at prescribed levels, to ensure that no untoward flooding or disruption of Pakistan's agriculture happens. Its prominent hydropower projects on these rivers such as the Kishenganga project, Baglihar project are run-of-the river, meaning diverting the flow of the river to generate electricity. These projects do not halt the flow of the river via creating storage structures, though in nearly all of the disputes over the years regarding developing hydropower projects, Pakistan has accused India of modifying the design of structures to be able to perniciously control the flows of the rivers with India then clarifying that its intentions were purely to keep the projects running in optimal conditions. 'For India to weaponise the waters of the Indus, it has to completely ignore the IWT. Under the current terms of the treaty, this can't be done,' a scientist affiliated to the Central Water Commission.
Following the Pahalgam attack, sources have told The Hindu that India will explore 'options that it has never considered' under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). This could include withdrawing from talks around evolving a new 'Dispute Resolution Mechanism,' change the design of its hydropower electric projects to allow it to store greater quantities of water and deploy 'draw down flushing' of its reservoirs.
Flushing, normally done to keep the water-bearing tunnels free from silt and debris, can also be used to control the flow of rivers downstream. Nearly 80% of Pakistan's agriculture depends on water from the Western rivers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
World Bank lifts ban on nuclear power, considers upstream gas projects
The World Bank's board lifted its ban on supporting nuclear power, and is discussing whether to fund natural gas exploration and production, as it seeks ways to bolster access to electricity to realize its core development goals. Meeting rising power demand is 'one of the most urgent and complex development challenges we face,' the bank's president, Ajay Banga, said in a staff note viewed by Bloomberg. The shift on nuclear power, adopted by the bank's executive board on Tuesday, will be done in conjunction with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Banga said. The work would intend to 'extend the life of existing reactors in countries that already have them, and help support grid upgrades and related infrastructure.' He added that bank would also work to help develop small modular reactors, which can be produced in factories and assembled on site are expected to eventually be cheaper and faster to build than their conventional counterparts. Governments, particularly in developing economies, could tap nuclear as a source of clean, stable power as their demand is expected to double by 2035. Annual investment needs to meet their consumption could rise to $630 billion by 2035, from $280 billion today, it said. The rise of artificial intelligence is also expected to drive power consumption in the coming years. The US, which is the World Bank's largest shareholder, had supported the decision. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in April said it the technology 'could revolutionise energy supply for many emerging markets. He added that the bank should 'go further in giving countries access to all technologies that can provide affordable baseload generation.' Banga has called for an 'all of the above' approach to energy, although he flagged in the note Wednesday that engaging in upstream gas 'will require further discussion.' 'The mix will vary,' he said of supply options. 'But the objective remains the same: accessible, affordable, reliable energy at scale — delivered in a way that manages emissions responsibly.' Since its founding near the end of World War II, the bank has only funded one nuclear project, a plant in southern Italy in 1959.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
History Today: When Ronald Reagan famously entreated Soviet Leader Gorbachev to 'tear down this wall'
On June 12, 1987, US President Ronald Reagan, standing before the Berlin Wall, famously challenged Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev: 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' Encapsulating Cold War tensions and the desire for liberation, the speech became a symbolic catalyst that foreshadowed the Wall's fall and reshaped the future of Europe read more US President Ronald Reagan speaks to the crowd gathered at the Brandenburg Gate after his arrival in West Berlin to help celebrate the city's 750th anniversary, June 12, 1987. File Image/Reuters On this day in history — June 12 — United States President Reagan delivered his iconic 'Tear down this wall!' speech in Berlin, Anne Frank received the diary that would become her legacy, and the first ride of a two-wheeled vehicle was recorded. As part of its History Today series, Firstpost revisits these pivotal moments. 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' Standing before the solemn grandeur of the Brandenburg Gate on June 12, 1987, US President Ronald Reagan delivered one of the most iconic speeches of the Cold War era. With tens of thousands watching on both sides of the Iron Curtain, Reagan boldly addressed Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev: 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This symbolic plea reverberated across the world and later became a defining moment in the collapse of Soviet-dominated Eastern Europe Following World War II, the Allied powers divided Germany into zones, eventually crystallising into West Germany (Allied-administered) and East Germany (Soviet-controlled). In August 1961, East Germany fortified its border, encasing West Berlin with walls, barbed wire, and guard towers to stem the mass exodus of citizens fleeing to the West — 2.5 million had left before the barricade went up. By 1987, Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev had initiated glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring), but East German leaders resisted these reforms. Reagan's visit to Berlin during the city's 750th anniversary — and shortly after attending the Venice G7 summit — culminated at the Berlin Wall, where he seized an opportunity to send a dramatic message to the Soviet leadership . Reagan began by acknowledging the fear and division permeating Europe, pledging support for freedom while affirming Western resolve. He acknowledged Soviet gestures toward reform but cautioned they might be mere token measures — 'Are these the beginnings of profound changes… or token gestures?' At the heart of the address, standing before the wall with the Brandenburg Gate behind him, Reagan made his historic demand: 'General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity… come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He stated that the wall represented not just a German division, but a scar on humanity and a challenge to freedom worldwide. Immediate reactions were mixed. Western media found the speech bold yet impractical; the Soviet news agency TASS branded it provocative and bellicose. Gorbachev privately noted the rhetoric but described Reagan later as 'cooperative and courageous.' Former US President Ronald Reagan looks susprised when is was handed a hammer and chisel to work on one of the last remnants of the Berlin Wall, September 12, 1990. File Image/Reuters American officials, including those at the State Department and National Security Council, had initially cautioned Reagan against making such a direct demand, worried it could undermine ongoing detente. Reagan's speech proved more transformative in hindsight. It resonated deeply with Berliners and freedom advocates worldwide, embedding itself in popular culture and political discourse. Less than three years later, on November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall fell — opening a path to German reunification and the eventual end of the Cold War . Reagan's words came to symbolise a shift in global geopolitics — affirming that powerful rhetoric, backed by political will, can challenge authoritarian barriers and inspire change. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Today, the speech is remembered as a powerful challenge to tyranny and a testament to the persuasive power of words. Reagan's demand remains inscribed on the Brandenburger Tor memorial, a permanent reminder of a pivotal moment that changed the course of history. Anne Frank receives a diary On June 12, 1942, Anne Frank turned thirteen and received a red-and-white checkered diary — her beloved 'Kitty' — as a birthday gift from her parents in Amsterdam. Anne began writing that day, documenting everyday thoughts, challenges and aspirations. Within weeks, she and her family went into hiding in a secret annex to escape Nazi persecution. Her diary became a poignant chronicle of life under threat, reflecting both fear and enduring hope. Posthumously published as The Diary of a Young Girl in 1947, Anne's words now echo worldwide as a powerful testament to resilience amid atrocity. First ride of a two-wheeler On June 12, 1817, German inventor Karl Friedrich Christian Ludwig Freiherr von Drais von Sauerbronn embarked on a groundbreaking journey in Mannheim, riding his Laufmaschine — or 'running machine' — for approximately seven kilometres to the Schwetzinger Relaishaus and back. This pedal-less, steerable two-wheeler, propelled by foot, is widely regarded as the precursor to the modern bicycle. The entire round trip took him just over an hour — half the time required on foot — ushering in a new era in personal transport. Despite early bans on pavements and road use, the Laufmaschine marked a monumental leap in mobility and engineering ingenuity, eventually evolving into today's bicycles. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
‘Will come back to haunt you': Jaishankar warns West against terrorism
Brussels: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, during his visit to Brussels this week, met European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the EU's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, where he highlighted India's strategic importance, its global positioning, and expressed reservations on key EU policies. Speaking amid ongoing EU-India free trade agreement negotiations, Jaishankar made a strong case for India as a reliable economic partner. "India - a nation of 1.4 billion - offers skilled labour and a more trustworthy economic partnership than China," he said. Turning to recent global coverage of the Pahalgam terror attack in Kashmir, in which 26 lives were lost, Jaishankar pushed back against the narrative that equates India's response with regional tensions. "Let me remind you of something - there was a man named Osama bin Laden. Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistmilitary town, right next to their equivalent of West Point?" he said. "I want the world to understand - this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you." On India's position regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Jaishankar reaffirmed India's non-prescriptive stance. "We don't believe that differences can be resolved through war - we don't believe a solution will come from the battlefield. It's not for us to prescribe what that solution should be. My point is, we're not being prescriptive or judgemental - but we are also not uninvolved." Responding to criticism over India's refusal to join sanctions against Russia, he said, "We have a strong relationship with Ukraine as well - it's not only about Russia. But every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests." He further offered a historical perspective on India's foreign policy outlook. "India has the longest-standing grievance - our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries."
