US continues spate of executions as Texas lethally injects man behind 2012 burning death of store clerk
WASHINGTON, May 21 — A man who pleaded guilty to killing a convenience store worker by setting her on fire was put to death in Texas on Tuesday in the second of three executions to be carried out in the United States this week.
Matthew Johnson, 49, was executed by lethal injection at the Texas State Penitentiary in Huntsville and pronounced dead at 6:53 pm local time (2353 GMT).
Johnson was sentenced to death for the 2012 murder of Nancy Harris, a 76-year-old grandmother.
He admitted at trial to pouring lighter fluid on Harris and setting her alight during an early morning robbery of a store in Garland, Texas.
Harris suffered severe burns and was taken off life support five days later.
In his final statement, Johnson thanked God and asked for forgiveness from the victim's family, saying 'I never meant to hurt her.'
He also apologized to his wife and asked for her forgiveness, along with the forgiveness of their three daughters.
'Just know that it's nothing that y'all did,' he said to his family. 'I made wrong choices, I've may wrong decisions, and now I pay the consequences.'
Johnson's execution was scheduled to take place just hours after the midwestern state of Indiana carried out its second execution since 2009.
Benjamin Ritchie, 45, was put to death by lethal injection overnight at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City for the 2000 murder of officer Bill Toney, the Indiana Department of Correction said in a statement.
Toney, a father of two, was shot to death after pursuing a van that had been stolen by Ritchie and another man from a gas station in the town of Beech Grove.
The other execution scheduled this week is in the southern state of Tennessee.
Oscar Smith, 75, is to be put to death by lethal injection on Thursday for the 1989 shooting and stabbing murders of his estranged wife, Judy Smith, and her two sons, Chad and Jason Burnett.
There have been 18 executions in the United States this year: 14 by lethal injection, two by firing squad and two using nitrogen gas.
The death penalty has been abolished in 23 of the 50 US states, while three others – California, Oregon and Pennsylvania – have moratoriums in place.
President Donald Trump is a proponent of capital punishment and called on his first day in office for an expansion of its use 'for the vilest crimes.' — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
27 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Disgraced movie mogul Weinstein concedes he acted ‘immorally' as jury deliberations pause
NEW YORK, June 7 — Disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein conceded that he acted 'immorally' but insisted he did nothing criminal as jury deliberations on his fate in his sex crimes retrial paused for the weekend yesterday. Jurors said after two days that they needed 'more time' to deliberate on a verdict for Weinstein. He is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the original proceedings. The former movie industry titan's 23 year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offenses. Although Weinstein did not take the stand, he spoke out in an interview aired by FOX5 television yesterday as the jury considered six weeks of testimony. 'I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally..., but never illegal, never criminal, never anything,' he said. Weinstein pointed to comments by his defence attorney Arthur Aidala who suggested the three women who testified against him at trial 'had four million reasons to testify, as in dollars.' Judge Curtis Farber issued initial instructions Thursday to jurors, one of whom had to be swapped out for an alternate after falling ill, before they retired to consider their verdict. He called on the panel to use 'common sense' for this 'very important decision' and reminded them that Weinstein was 'presumed innocent.' Yesterday, the jury panel of 12 heard a read back of emotional testimony from Weinstein's former assistant Miriam Haley. The jury must decide whether Weinstein — accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator — is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on Haley and former model Kaja Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of then-aspiring actress Jessica Mann. 'Playground stuff' One juror came forward yesterday to report tensions between his fellow panellists, alleging 'people are being shunned. It's playground stuff.' He asked to resign as a juror, but Farber denied his request. Aidala requested that a mistrial be declared, but the judge denied his motion, and the jury will continue to deliberate Weinstein's fate Monday. On Wednesday, prosecutor Nicole Blumberg summarized the evidence of the three alleged victims of Weinstein who testified at the trial for jurors saying simply 'he raped three women, they all said no.' The Hollywood figure had 'all the power' and 'all the control' over the alleged victims, which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. 'The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him. 'There is no reasonable doubt; tell the defendant what he already knows — that he is guilty of the three crimes.' Weinstein's defence attorney insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, pointing to a 'casting couch' dynamic between the movie mogul and the women. Weinstein, the producer of box office hits Pulp Fiction and Shakespeare in Love, has never acknowledged wrongdoing. The cinema magnate, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, has been on trial since April 15 in a scruffy Manhattan courtroom. He is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California in a separate for raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago. — AFP
Malay Mail
27 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Rent for sex? Diddy's ex says she felt trapped by sleazy ‘love contract'
NEW YORK, June 7 — An ex-girlfriend of Sean Combs testified yesterday of sex with a network of paid male escorts at the music mogul's behest and that he asked her to transport drugs for him. The woman speaking under the pseudonym Jane took the stand for a second day in the sex trafficking and racketeering trial, delivering emotional, graphic testimony in the federal criminal proceedings against Combs, the 55-year-old superstar known as 'Diddy.' He faces life in prison if convicted in the case, and has denied all charges. Jane told jurors in the Manhattan courtroom that she, assistants of Combs or the artist himself would book travel for the escorts, who would frequently be paid by Combs in the thousands of dollars in cash or via apps. The payment was in exchange for choreographed sexual encounters that would sometimes last days, 'hotel nights' that Jane described in lurid detail. Her description closely tracked with the testimony of a previous star witness, Casandra Ventura, who said the encounters were called 'freak-offs.' Jane, who was identified as a social media influencer and single mother, spoke through tears as she recounted instances that she told Combs she did not like having sex with the escorts while he watched. The encounters virtually always left her sore and in pain and she suffered frequent infections, Jane testified. But when she protested or said she only wanted to be with him, Jane said Combs was 'dismissive' and 'belittling.' Evidence read in court included lengthy text exchanges between Jane and Combs, as well as diaristic notes Jane had taken for herself on her phone that corroborate her testimony. Among the tranche of texts was one message in which she described the pattern of hotel nights as a 'Pandora's box' she couldn't shut. 'I'm so much more than being loved in the dark in hotel rooms doing things that make me feel disgusted,' she texted Combs. 'I don't want to play this role in your life anymore.' 'It's dark, sleazy and makes me feel disgusted with myself,' she continued, saying that she felt he was paying her rent in exchange for the sex parties. 'I don't want to feel obligated to perform these nights with you in fear of losing the roof over my head,' Jane wrote. 'Girl stop,' Combs wrote back. Her feeling of obligation had escalated in 2023, when the pair made a verbal 'love contract' stipulating that while so-called hotel nights would feature into their relationship, so would a $10,000 monthly payment from Combs to Jane. She told jurors yesterday that Combs continues to make her that payment, which she uses for rent, even as he is incarcerated. Flying with drugs Jane's testimony of paying for the travel of escorts is key to the prosecution's argument that Combs trafficked men and women across state lines with the intent of prostitution. She also told jurors that she transported illegal drugs for Combs on two occasions. When she expressed to a high-ranking staff member of Combs that it felt 'unsafe' to fly with drugs from Los Angeles to Miami, the staffer replied that 'it's fine' and 'I do it all the time.' In their opening statements, the defence insisted that Combs's relationship with Jane was consensual. But she described struggling to get through the hotel nights without the aid of drugs, namely Ecstasy. She recounted one instance when she attempted to stay sober while complying with Combs's demands that she have sex with multiple men for hours, to the point that she threw up, saying she was 'repulsed.' 'Sean came in and I told him I had just thrown up and he was like, 'that's good then you'll feel better.'' ''Let's go because the guy is here, the third guy,'' Jane said he told her. Jane previously told jurors that her relationship with Combs continued up until his arrest in September 2024. Prosecutors say he ran a criminal enterprise of employees and bodyguards who enforced his power and fulfilled his desires with illicit acts including trafficking, kidnapping, bribery and arson. Along with Ventura — whose testimony included harrowing accounts of physical and psychological abuse — and Jane, witnesses have included former employees of Bad Boy Enterprises, Combs's company. Jane's testimony could last days, with court proceedings expected to continue at least another month. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
14 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
EU ‘deeply regrets' US sanctions on ICC judges
Neither the United States nor Israel was a party to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court in 2002. (AP pic) BRUSSELS : The EU 'deeply regrets' the US sanctions imposed on four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the European Commission said Friday, voicing full support for the Hague-based court. 'The ICC holds perpetrators of the world's gravest crimes to account and gives victims a voice,' Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen posted on X. 'It must be free to act without pressure.' 'We deeply regret the decision to impose sanctions on four additional individuals,' added commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper. 'We will provide the full support and contribution to ensure the protection of the court and its staff,' she told reporters. The sanctions imposed Thursday – in part over the ICC arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – come as Washington ramps up its efforts to neuter the court. Neither US nor Israel are party to the Rome Statute that established the court in 2002, to prosecute individuals for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to the warrant being issued for Netanyahu last November. The other two, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of proceedings that led to a probe into allegations US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan. European Council chief Antonio Costa earlier underscored the EU's support for the ICC, which he said 'does not stand against nations – it stands against impunity.' 'We must protect its independence and integrity. The rule of law must prevail over the rule of power,' Costa wrote on X.
