
Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore ‘two genders' shirt to school
Two conservative justices – Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – dissented from the decision to not hear the case.
So long as the appeals court's decision is on the books, Alito wrote, 'thousands of students will attend school without the full panoply of First Amendment rights. That alone is worth this court's attention.'
Liam Morrison wore the shirt to Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Massachusetts, in 2023 to 'share his view that gender and sex are identical.' School administrators asked him to remove it and, when he declined, sent him home for the day. Weeks later, he wore the same shirt but covered the words 'only two' with a piece of tape on which he wrote 'censored.'
Morrison and his family sued the district in federal court, asserting a violation of his First Amendment rights. The district court ruled against him and the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision.
In a landmark 1969 decision, Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court affirmed students' First Amendment rights at school, but the court qualified those rights, allowing school administrators to regulate the speech if it 'materially disrupts' instruction at the school. The Vietnam-era case permitted a group of students to wear black armbands in protest of the war.
The appeals court held that schools can regulate a student's speech under Tinker if it 'assertedly demeans characteristics of personal identity' of other students if the message is 'reasonably forecasted' to poison the 'educational atmosphere.' Morrison, who is represented by the religious legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, argues that decision 'sidelined' Tinker and 'gave near-total deference to the school's determination of what speech demeans protected characteristics and substantially disrupts its operations.'
In their written response to the Supreme Court, school officials noted they are aware of transgender and gender-nonconforming students 'who had experienced serious mental health struggles, including suicidal ideation, related to their treatment by other students based on their gender identities' and that those struggles could impact the students' ability to learn.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of benefiting from billions in U.S. government contracts while paying little to no federal taxes. Warren Accuses Musk Of Dodging Taxes On Monday, Warren took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that "Elon Musk's SpaceX is worth over $350 BILLION – after receiving billions in government contracts – but could be paying LESS in taxes than you." She blamed Donald Trump's tax reforms, saying Republicans "rigged the tax code with loopholes for billionaire corporations" and demanded "no more corporate handouts." Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Her remarks followed a New York Times report that SpaceX has avoided paying federal income tax on about $5 billion in taxable income since its founding in 2002 by using a legal tax strategy known as a net operating loss carryforward. The provision, expanded indefinitely under Trump in 2017, lets companies offset future income with earlier losses. Musk Previously Defended Tesla's Tax Strategy Musk currently has a net worth of $375 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the wealthiest individual on Earth. In February earlier this year, Musk and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) VP of Finance Sendil Palani denied claims that Tesla evaded taxes, saying that the company legally carried forward past losses under IRS provisions. At the time, Musk acknowledged Tesla didn't pay U.S. federal income tax for several years, including 2024, since most profits come from overseas sales, but highlighted the need for comprehensive tax reform to address excessive Revenue Soars, Taxes Stay Low Documents reviewed by the publication show that more than 75% of SpaceX's revenue in 2020 and 2021 came from federal contracts. Despite that reliance on taxpayers, SpaceX paid only minimal taxes — including $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes in 2021. SpaceX's business is also booming. Revenue is expected to reach $15.5 billion in 2025, double the $7.4 billion reported in 2023. Starlink, its satellite internet service, now generates more revenue than its rocket division, with 2.5 million users and $8 billion in 2023 sales. Warren Broadens Criticism Of Musk Warren has previously also targeted Musk over what she describes as conflicts of interest and misuse of government influence. In June, her office released a report titled "130 Days of Elon Musk," alleging more than 100 abuses of power during his time as a Trump administration adviser. She has also criticized the Pentagon for awarding Musk's AI startup xAI a $200 million contract just days after its chatbot Grok was caught making antisemitic remarks. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo Courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald On UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Toddlers and Sharing: What's Realistic and How to Support Them
Sharing isn't natural for toddlers, and that's not a parenting fail, but here's how to guide them Here's the truth: sharing is hard for toddlers. At this stage, their thinking is self-focused. They're still learning that other people have feelings, wants, and needs too. That means when your toddler refuses to share, it's not a reflection of your parenting, it's simply where they are developmentally. Most kids don't fully grasp the concept of sharing until closer to the age four. Before then, expecting them to happily hand over a favorite toy on demand is unrealistic. Instead of forcing it, we can focus on laying the groundwork: Modeling, practicing patience, and creating opportunities for sharing in ways that match their age and stage. Building the foundation for sharing Model it yourself. Show them what sharing looks like in daily life. Exaggerate the fun and be clear about how it feels. 'You're sharing your blueberries with me? Wow, that makes me so happy. Thank you!' Point it out in real life. Sharing happens around us all the time. Narrate it when you see it. Mommy's friend is borrowing my book. When she's done, she'll give it back. I feel happy sharing, and she feels happy too. Practice turn-taking. Simple back-and-forth games help toddlers learn patience and fairness. Start with very short turns: It's your turn with the toy. Now it's my turn. Now it's your turn again. This helps them trust that waiting doesn't mean losing forever. Use music or play. Toddlers love routines around turn-taking. Try alternating songs: 'Mommy's song first, then your song.' When you play their request, name the process: 'We took turns. My favorite song, then your favorite song.' As kids approach age three, they'll start to understand sharing better, but it's still a skill in progress. Expect practice, not perfection. Sharing with other kids Sharing at home with a parent is one thing, but put two toddlers in the same room with one toy, and suddenly you've got a front-row seat to the 'Mine!' Olympics. When kids play together, sharing feels even harder because they're balancing their own wants with someone else's in real time. Here's how to handle it depending on your child's age: Under 18 months: Distraction works best. If one child grabs a toy, redirect the other with something new. 'Let's play with this truck while we wait!' 18 months and up: Try verbalizing what's happening. 'You both want the doll. Your friend is playing with it right now. It's hard to wait, but when she's done, you'll have a turn. Let's play with the blocks until then.' Kids this age are practicing patience in tiny doses, and every attempt (even if it ends in tears) is part of the learning process. When a sharing tantrum happens Even with the best preparation, sharing often ends in tears. And that's okay, for toddlers, waiting their turn can feel like the end of the world. Tantrums over toys don't mean you've failed. They mean your child is still learning patience and emotional regulation. In these moments, your calm response is the anchor they need. Here are some strategies that can help: Visual timers (after 2½ years). 'We'll set the timer for two minutes. When it dings, it's your turn.' If it causes more chaos, put the toy away: 'This toy needs a break. We'll try again later.' Stay calm and guide. Narrate what's happening, empathize, and reassure them: 'You want the doll, but your friend is still using it. You'll have a turn soon. Let's play with the truck while we wait.' Hold boundaries gently. Tears don't mean you should change the rule, because consistency helps them trust the process. Tantrums during sharing aren't setbacks, they're practice. Each time you guide them calmly, you're helping your child build the skills to handle big feelings and trust that turns do come back around. The bottom line Sharing isn't something toddlers instantly know how to do. It's a skill they grow into with practice, patience, and lots of guidance from you. Refusing to share doesn't mean they're selfish, and it doesn't mean you've failed as a parent. It simply means they're still learning. Your job isn't to force it, but to coach it: modeling what sharing looks like, giving them small chances to practice, and staying calm when big feelings show up. Over time, those messy moments add up to real progress. So the next time your toddler clutches a toy like it's made of gold, remember: this isn't the finish line, it's just practice. And with your steady support, they'll eventually learn that sharing isn't about losing, it's about connection. If you like tips like these, the PedsDocTalk newsletter shares more parenting insights, including practical advice you can actually use and plenty of reassurance for the tough days, too.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I just want to make things easier for my kids during back-to-school season. I'm learning they don't need me to.
While back-to-school season is exciting, it's also stressful — more for me than for my kids. They often have short-lived crises that I want to solve for them. I've realized they can actually do a lot for myself, and I don't need to be a helicopter parent. The start of school is always exciting — the fresh notebooks, the first-day photos, the promise of new beginnings. But it's also always a bit more stressful than I anticipate. Not for my kids so much, oddly enough. For me. My kids' crises pass quickly, but they still throw me off Last year, my middle daughter was driving herself to school for the first time. The morning had all the nerves you'd expect: traffic, new routines, figuring out parking. She came home in tears. "I hate the minivan," she said. "I hate the spot I got. I hate that guy." "That guy" was the student parked next to her. She'd bumped her car into his while trying to back out of her assigned space. Not a major accident, but enough to unravel her on day one. I sprang into action. Should we call the school and request a new spot? Should she drive our smaller car? Should I drive her again? I spent days brainstorming possible fixes. I even dreamt about it — as I'm prone to do when I have something on my mind. A few days later, I cautiously suggested a few solutions. She blinked at me. "Oh, it's fine now," she said. "We're actually friends. He helped me back out today." Crisis over. Emotional storm, passed. No intervention needed. This year, it was my youngest daughter who sent me spiraling. She started at a new high school — a great one, but very different from her last. And not the same one her sister goes to. "I wish I had stayed at my old school," she said that first afternoon. "It's so big and different." My mom-heart panicked. My brain lit up with possible fixes. Could I transfer her back? Get more involved? Organize a social? Learn lunch schedules and stage a "spontaneous" meet-cute with potential friends? But by the end of the first week, she was chattering about teachers she liked, the friends she was sitting with, and the conversation she had with a senior who walked her to the library. She was fine. I often want to step in even when my kids don't need it Turns out, I react more strongly to these transitions than my daughters do. I wouldn't call myself a helicopter parent — I don't monitor their grades or email their teachers. But when one of them feels off, even for a moment, I feel it in my whole body. I don't want to take over, I just want to fix the hard parts. Smooth the path. Pad the corners a bit. But they rarely need me to do any of that. They have their own resilience, their own coping skills, their own ways of figuring things out. And they do figure things out — often faster than I do. It's humbling. And honestly, a little uncomfortable. My girls are growing up. They are becoming themselves in ways that don't require my full-time emotional project management. And while I'll probably never stop feeling deeply when they're struggling, I can learn to sit with those feelings instead of acting on them. I'm still here to listen, offer support, and yes, quietly dream up backup plans. But I'm working on not letting my own discomfort steer the ship. Sometimes parenting means holding back — not because you don't care, but because you do. So I'm trying to helicopter less. Or maybe just hover at a higher altitude. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword