Iran suspends cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog
On June 25, a day after a ceasefire took hold, Iranian lawmakers overwhelmingly voted in favour of the bill to suspend cooperation with the agency.
State media said on Wednesday that the legislation had cleared the final hurdle and was in effect.
The text, published by Iranian media, states that the legislation aims to "ensure full support for the inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran" under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and "especially uranium enrichment".
The issue of enrichment was at the core of disagreements between Washington and Tehran in nuclear negotiations that had been derailed by the war.
Israel and some Western countries had for long accused Iran of seeking to quire nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has consistently denied.
The text of the law did not specify concrete moves linked to the suspension of cooperation with the IAEA, whose inspectors have had access to declared nuclear facilities.
Following the parliament vote, the bill was approved by the Guardian Council, a body tasked with vetting legislation, before a final ratification from the presidency.
Iranian President "Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency", state TV said on Wednesday.
Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA for what they described as the agency's "silence" in the face of the Israeli and US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.
'Deceptive and fraudulent'
Tehran has also lambasted the UN agency for a resolution adopted on June 12 that accuses Iran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations.
Iranian officials said the resolution was among the "excuses" for the Israeli attacks.
On Wednesday, senior judiciary official Ali Mozaffari said that IAEA director Rafael Grossi should "be held accountable" for what he called "preparing the groundwork for the crime" against Iran, referring to Israel's air raids.
Mozaffari accused Grossi of "deceptive actions and fraudulent reporting", according to Iranian news agency Tasnim.
Iran has rejected a request from Grossi to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war, and earlier this week Pezeshkian decried his "destructive" conduct.
Iran has said Grossi's request to visit the bombarded sites signalled "malign intent" but insisted there were no threats against him or against inspectors from his agency.
France, Germany and Britain have condemned unspecified "threats" against the IAEA chief.
Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper has recently claimed that documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed.
Damage
On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the parliament vote to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the "concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion".
The 12-day war began when Israel launched a major bombing campaign on Iran and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists, with Tehran responding with waves of missiles and drones launched at Israel.
On June 22, Israel's ally the United States launched unprecedented strikes of its own on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.
More than 900 people were killed in Iran, according to the judiciary.
Iran's retaliatory attacks killed 28 people in Israel, according to authorities.
US President Donald Trump said the US attacks had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme, though the extent of the damage was not clear.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has admitted "serious" damage to nuclear sites.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
22 minutes ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy faces toughest battle as Ukraine protests controversial law
The Ukrainian parliament passed on Tuesday a controversial bill that effectively eliminates the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions. The 12414 bill subordinates the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) to Ukraine's prosecutor general. Activists had urged Ukrainian lawmakers to vote against the bill before the vote, warning that it would make it impossible for the anti-corruption agencies to investigate senior officials without approval from President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's administration. But despite the civil society calls and pressure, the Verkhovna Rada passed the bill, triggering the first protests in Ukraine since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion. Thousands of people hit the streets in Kyiv, Lviv, Odesa and Dnipro, protesting against the 12414 bill and calling on Zelenskyy to veto it even after the parliament's green light. But according to the official legislative website, Ukraine's president did sign the bill later on Tuesday. What are NABU and SAPO? The two agencies were created in 2015 as part of pro-Western reforms following Ukraine's 2014 Revolution of Dignity, which ousted former pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. NABU investigates top-level corruption, and its cases are overseen and prosecuted by SAPO. Those cases are subsequently tried by Ukraine's High Anti-Corruption Court. The two institutions were established with the aim of being able to independently investigate and prosecute leading Ukrainian officials suspected of graft, without being subject to political influence or interference. Corruption cases were supervised by the chief anti-corruption prosecutor, who was independent from Ukraine's prosecutor general. However, the newly signed law removes this independence and places NABU and SAPO under the direct supervision of the country's top prosecutor. In his overnight address, Zelenskyy said "the anti-corruption infrastructure will work, but without Russian influence". "We need to clean up everything. And there should be more justice. Of course, NABU and SAPO will work. Ukraine has really ensured the inevitability of punishment for those who go against the law. And this is what Ukraine really needs. Cold cases must be investigated," he added. Raids on NABU While Zelenskyy normally delivers his daily address via his Telegram channel at about 8 pm local time (7 pm CET), the latest update was not posted until about 1 am local time, after parliament rushed to pass the bill and protesters gathered to voice their discontent. "For years officials who have fled Ukraine have been living abroad for some reason in very nice countries and without legal consequences," he said in the latest address. "This is not normal. There is no rational explanation for why criminal proceedings worth billions have been hanging around for years. And there is no explanation why the Russians can still get the information they need. It is important to do it without Russians." Ukraine's SBU state security service on Monday said it had launched a series of raids on NABU and conducted more than 70 searches as part of an investigation into allegations that officials within the agency have been cooperating with Russia. The SBU said it had arrested one official at the NABU on suspicion of being a Russian spy and another over alleged business ties with Moscow. Other NABU officials had ties to a fugitive Ukrainian politician's banned party, according to the state security service. NABU criticised the raids and said that they went too far. "In most cases, the grounds cited for these actions are the alleged involvement of certain individuals in traffic accidents," it said in a statement. "However, some employees are being accused of possible connections with the aggressor state [Russia]." According to NABU, there is no evidence that its employee detained by the SBU was involved in anti-state activities. Backlash and bill criticism The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International said the bill undermined one of the most significant reforms since the Revolution of Dignity and would damage trust with international partners. The watchdog had also condemned the SBU's raids on NABU, saying that the authorities were exerting "massive pressure" on Ukraine's anti-corruption activists and fighters. NABU and SAPO expressed their concern about the new law in a joint statement. "The head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office," the agencies said. In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos said that she was "seriously concerned" about the law. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back," she wrote. "Independent bodies like NABU and SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very centre of EU accession negotiations." Zelenskyy's harshest critics Yet the harshest criticism against Zelenskyy over the law has come from home, rather than abroad. War veteran Dmytro Koziatynskyi urged citizens to "take cardboard from boxes and make posters to write everything you think about the recent onslaught". Protesters across Ukraine have carried signs reading "Veto the law," "Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future," or simply "We are against it." People were carrying handmade sings and writings, chanting "Get your hands off NABU and SAP," "Veto the law," and "No corruption in government." The demonstrations included war veterans, active-duty soldiers, civilians and anti-corruption activists. People were chanting "Shame", "Corruption is the death of the future", and "Power belongs to the people" as they urged Zelenskyy to veto the bill. Both NABU and SAPO expressed gratitude and support for the protests. "We perceive this support as a sign of trust in our institution. And we will do everything to justify it," NABU said in a social media post. "We were particularly impressed by the decisive stance of young people — the future of the country for which we work. We will continue to work and defend the independence of our investigations from interference." The SAPO also thanked the demonstrators for their support. "Despite immense pressure and disgraceful decisions, we continue to fight for justice, integrity, and dignity," SAPO said. For many protesters and critics, the importance of this bill is comparable to Yanukovych's 2013 decision to reverse Ukraine's European integration, which triggered the Revolution of Dignity, also known as the EuroMaidan revolution, leading to the president's ousting. At the Tuesday protests, many Ukrainians were holding signs referencing the 2014 uprising, calling on Zelenskyy not to repeat the mistakes of his predecessor. Many were holding the picture of Zelenskyy from 2019, when shortly after being elected, he was urging people not to tolerate any cases of corruption and to contact the NABU immediately. "We will never overcome corruption if you keep turning a blind eye to it. Are you being asked for a bribe? Being offered a 'kickback'? Please, don't stay silent! Contact the NABU hotline – 0 800 503 200. Each of you can start changing the country today," Zelenskyy said at the time. On Tuesday, thousands of Ukrainians reminded him of this address and also of what happened to the former President Yanukovych, who went against the will of the people of Ukraine. The protesters are set to continue the demonstrations on Wednesday, as they found out that Zelenskyy signed the bill that the people urged him to veto.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
China rebukes EU over Russia sanctions targeting its banks
China's commerce minister lodged "solemn representations" to his EU counterpart over two Chinese banks' inclusion in the bloc's sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war, Beijing said Wednesday, July 23. EU bosses Antonio Costa and Ursula von der Leyen will be in Beijing on Thursday for talks with top Chinese leaders over tense topics like trade and the war in Ukraine, but in which few concrete outcomes are expected. The summit comes less than a week after the European Union adopted a sweeping new package of sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war, looking to pile more pressure on the Kremlin by lowering a price cap for Moscow's oil exports. The 18 th round of economic measures from Europe against Russia since its 2022 invasion comes as allies hope US President Donald Trump follows through on his threat to punish Moscow for stalling peace efforts. Among other targets, sanctions will be placed on a Russian-owned oil refinery in India and two Chinese banks as the EU seeks to curb Moscow's ties with international partners. And in talks with EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic on Tuesday, the Chinese commerce ministry said Commerce Minister Wang Wentao "made solemn representations regarding the inclusion of two Chinese financial institutions in the EU's 18 th round of sanctions against Russia." Brussels says China's deepening political and economic relations with Russia since the 2022 invasion represent tacit support for Moscow that has helped its economy weather sweeping Western sanctions. China denies the claims.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Meta ran ads to fundraise for Israeli Defence Forces, analysis shows
Ads run on Meta to fundraise for the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) bypassed EU legislation, according to a new analysis. Global advocacy group Ekō said it identified at least 117 ads run on Meta platforms by two parallel funding groups from March 2025 to June 2025 that explicitly raised money for Israeli military units. Ekō claims both groups targeted users in the United Kingdom and the European Union, raising roughly $2.4 million (€2.05 million) for the IDF from ads on their landing pages. Euronews Next is working to independently verify this number. A previous Ekō analysis into Meta IDF fundraising found similar ads last year. The platform removed the ads when they were reported but 'did nothing to stop the same publishers from launching new campaigns for the same military equipment,' the rights group said in a statement. 'Meta's actions reveal a clear pattern: its advertising platform is not just failing to block these fundraising efforts — it is actively enabling them,' Ekō said in a statement sent to Euronews Next. What did the ads say? One of the ads run by US-registered charity Vaad Hatzedaka used the story of a rabbi to solicit donations for thermal drones that could 'detect and eliminate deadly threats from Hamas,' to keep their fighters 'one step ahead'. The donation page includes information to donate generators, underwater drones, or thermal drones to the Israeli soldiers. Another ad campaign reported by Ekō shows a repost by an Israeli singer where unit snipers in Jabalia, northern Gaza, are asking for shooting tripods. The embedded link redirects users to the Chesed Fund, a US-registered charity that lets users send bulletproof vests, thermal drones or tactical helmets to the IDF on the frontlines. Ekō said the ad was flagged to Meta, who eventually took it down. The Chelsed Fund ad violated Meta's ad policy about social issues, elections or politics, the advocacy group said. Anyone who wants to post ads in the EU about political values and government or security and foreign affairs has to go through an 'authorisation process' before being published on Meta platforms, according to the tech company's guidelines. The authorisation process requires ad posters to send in a piece of government-issued ID along with the page they run to Meta for review. The ads also have to have a 'paid by' disclaimer to show who is funding it. Anyone who violates Meta's ad policies several times by running these ads without authorisation could face 'permanent restrictions,' the company said, but it doesn't expand on what these might be. Euronews Next reached out to Meta but did not receive an immediate reply at the time of publication. How did these ads get past European laws? The European Commission's Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large online platforms with a reach of more than 45 million EU citizens a month to maintain a public ad repository and assess how their systems are manipulated or could contribute to societal risks. Meta has a monthly user base of roughly 259 million in the EU, according to Commission estimates. Platforms with these large user bases, such as Meta, have to disclose more information about ads they are seeing online, including why a user could be targeted by a specific campaign over others. Maen Hammad, a researcher at Ekō, argues that the DSA also comes with obligations for Meta to 'swiftly remove illegal content,' especially if it could break national charity laws. 'Ads fundraising for military gear, including drones allegedly used by a military under investigation for genocide to enforce a 'kill zone' in Gaza, likely break charity laws in several EU countries,' he said. Hammad said Eko will be bringing these findings to the European Commission to see whether it breaches the act. If the Commission decides to go ahead with an investigation, it could first request more information from Meta about its ad policies, conduct interviews with the company or inspect the company premises. Penalties for a DSA infringement could go up to six per cent of a company's global turnover. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see whether it had received the Ekō report or a request for an investigation but did not receive an immediate reply.
