Gov. DeWine's proposed budget seeks to get more high school students to stay in Ohio for college
On the campus of The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Graham Stokes for the Ohio Capital Journal. Republish photo only with original story.)
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine's two-year state budget proposal seeks to get more high school students to stay in Ohio for college through increased scholarship funding. But overall funding for the Ohio Department of Higher Education dips in the second year of his plan.
The proposed budget would give ODHE $3.16 billion in fiscal year 2026 and $3.04 billion in fiscal year 2027.
Steve Mockabee, president of the University of Cincinnati's American Association of University Professors chapter, was disappointed to see ODHE funding decrease during the second year of the proposed budget.
'Public education provides a good return on investment,' he said. 'It feels like a missed opportunity for the state to be decreasing its investment in higher ed.'
The governor's total state budget is $218 billion. Lawmakers are now tasked with working on a budget to send back to DeWine, which he must sign by July 1.
DeWine's budget would continue the Governor's Merit Scholarship, which gives the top 5% of each high school graduating class a $5,000 scholarship each year to go to an Ohio college or university.
'This scholarship will continue to encourage Ohio's best and brightest students to stay in the state of Ohio and go to college,' DeWine said during Monday's press conference where he unveiled the budget. 'These kids will much more likely then stay in Ohio, get a job in Ohio, be Ohio citizens and be productive members of society.'
The Governor's Merit Scholarship was enacted through the last state budget two years ago. Ohio's high school graduating class of 2024 included 6,250 eligible students and about 76% of them accepted the scholarship, DeWine said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Normally, we'd expect that number to be about 60%,' DeWine said. 'That means, thanks to the merit scholarship, almost 1,000 more of our top students are now going to college in the state of Ohio, and we would expect that to continue year after year.'
The Governor's Merit Scholarship is estimated to cost $22.7 million for fiscal year 2025. It would cost $47 million for fiscal year 2026 and $70 million for fiscal year 2027, according to the governor's proposed budget.
'It's always a positive thing, in my mind, when there are more resources available for students to have access to higher education,' Mockabee said.
Funding for the Ohio College Opportunity Grant is included in the budget, which gives financial support to students who have the highest level of financial need, but funding for it would decrease in the budget's second year.
The estimated cost for OCOG this fiscal year is $197.3 million and it would cost $220.6 million for fiscal year 2026 and $207.4 for fiscal year 2027, according to the governor's proposed budget.
'We remain focused on making college more affordable for all students,' DeWine said, but didn't explain the reason for the decreased funding in the second year.
The State Share of Instruction (SSI), an allocation formula based on student outcome, only saw a recommended 0.1% increase for fiscal year 2026 and no change for fiscal year 2027 — for a total of $2.12 billion, according to the proposed budget.
'That's the primary funding mechanism, and it's disappointing that it would be flat, given that inflation has certainly not been flat over the last couple of years,' Mockabee said. 'In real terms, it's a cut because inflation has eaten away at the value of those dollars.'
DeWine's budget proposal would also add an additional factor to determine how much state funding colleges receive: how many graduates are getting jobs. Currently, the funding that colleges receive from the SSI is determined by how many students are completing courses, certificates, and degrees.
'That will become one of the factors,' DeWine said. 'Our budget does exactly that, making Ohio the first state, we believe, in the nation to tie a significant portion of funding for colleges and universities to whether their graduates are, in fact, getting jobs.'
DeWine said this is in line with what students and families want.
'They want to know what they're getting for their money,' he said.
Mockabee is curious to see the specifics of the proposal.
'The devil is often in the details,' he said. 'There's always a potential for unintended consequences with these funding formulas, and I think we've seen that in the past, that sometimes they may be well intentioned, but the way that things are actually implemented may not be the best thing for students at some of our institutions.'
Also included in DeWine's budget is funding for the Choose Ohio First scholarships, which helps students in STEM related fields. The estimated amount for these scholarships for fiscal year 2025 is $32 million. The recommended amount in the budget for fiscal year 2026 is $34 million and $36 million for fiscal year 2027, according to the budget proposal.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers propose residency requirement for Ohio scholarship
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Governor's Merit Scholarship has already helped high-achieving Ohio high schoolers attend college in-state, and Ohio senators want to ensure those students stay after graduation, too. The scholarships give $5,000 per school year to students in the top 5% of their class who agree to attend schools in the Buckeye State. Senators continued funding for the Governor's Merit Scholarship in their state budget draft, but proposed revoking the funds if students move out of state in the three years after graduating. 'Because of this scholarship, this year, an additional 1,700 of our top students have decided to go to college in Ohio and not go to college out of state,' Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said. South-Western City Schools teachers, board clash over contract The scholarship began in 2023 as a way to incentivize high-achieving Ohio high school graduates to stay in state for college, and DeWine said 87% of students offered the scholarship this year accepted it. DeWine said before the scholarship, between 35-40% of Ohio's top high school graduates attended college in another state. He said keeping students in the state is even more pertinent because two-thirds of American students work in the state they graduate from. Now, senators want to ensure students are part of Ohio's workforce. Beginning in 2027, first-time scholarship recipients would have to commit to living in Ohio for the three years after graduation. Under the Senate's proposal, students would have to sign a promissory note that would require them to pay back the scholarships if they don't stay in Ohio. The Senate budget changes would also adjust student eligibility. In the 2025-2026 school year, Senators proposed giving the scholarship to just the top 2% of students at each high school. 'While no final language has been approved, our office appreciates the Ohio General Assembly's support of the Governor's Merit Scholarships,' a governor's office spokesperson said. 'We will continue to work with the General Assembly through the budget process.' Students from public schools, homeschooled, recovery dropout programs or chartered nonpublic high schools are eligible for the scholarship, which does not require an application. Instead, schools are given a specific number of scholarships to award to the top 5% of the graduating class by Nov. 1 of their graduating year. Students must actively accept the scholarships by March 1. Senate Bill 1 cosponsor calls Ohio State's Juneteenth guidelines an 'intentional overreaction' In the 2023-2024 school year, Ohio's most recently available data, there were just under 1.6 million students enrolled in eligible high schools. Although class sizes and circumstances vary, that would mean around 400,000 students graduate annually. In 2026, the top 5% of students would amount to 20,000 possible scholarship awardees. By switching to the top 2% of students, just 8,000 students would qualify in fiscal year 2027. The Senate budget allocates $47 million for fiscal year 2026 and $56,410,000 for 2027. This would allow 9,400 students to receive the full scholarship amount in 2026 and allow 11,282 students to receive the full amount in 2027. The scholarship gives 'up to $5,000' in case more students are eligible and nominated, which would lead to a prorated award. The Senate did not keep a change to the scholarship program included in the House budget draft that would let private, for-profit universities accept Governor's Merit Scholars if they signed a commitment to comply with Senate Bill 1. S.B. 1 is a sweeping anti-DEI higher education bill that goes into effect for public colleges at the end of June, but the Senate removed this provision. What potential fallout awaits when Ohio State sexual abuse documentary debuts Both the Senate and the House included provisions requiring all state institutions to accept students who graduated in the top 10% of their class, and any student in the top 5% of their class must be accepted to the main campus. Both the House and Senate followed a DeWine recommendation to guarantee high-performing high schoolers admission to state schools. The Senate budget requires all public universities to accept Ohio residents who graduated in the top 10% of their class. If students are in the top 5%, they must be accepted to the university's main campus. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Voter rights groups say Ohio GOP voting overhaul threatens the state's citizen initiative process
Field staffers for the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol deliver boxes containing petitions with 222,198 signatures to Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, July 5, 2023, at the loading dock of the Office of the Ohio Secretary of State, 180 E Broad St in Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Graham Stokes for Ohio Capital Journal. Republish photo only with original article.) A coalition of government watchdog groups are warning state legislation could hobble Ohio's initiative process. Direct democracy has been available to Ohioans since 1912, and citizen-led groups can organize initiated statutes or constitutional amendments. The proposals would create strict new paperwork requirements and add other administrative hurdles like requiring many circulators wear a badge identifying themselves as 'paid' even if they're given something as small as a pen for signature collection. Above and beyond changes to the initiative process, the bills would also eliminate ballot drop boxes and require all voters to show proof of citizenship to cast a ballot. 'Bottom line, this is attack on direct democracy,' Jen Miller from Ohio's League of Women Voters argued. 'This is an attack on local control. It's an attempt to bully, intimidate, harass, and possibly prosecute people just because they want to take part in democracy,' Common Cause Ohio Executive Director Catherine Turcer praised the people who grab clipboards and collect signatures to put proposals on the ballot. 'This extreme legislation is an attempt to bully, intimidate, and hassle these front-line heroes,' she argued. The paperwork involved in signature gathering is already complex and time consuming. She explained circulators have to fill out a standard form — name, address, employer, etc. — when they turn in petitions. But the new bills would ratchet up the stakes of that relatively banal procedure. Right now, if the circulator messes something up, they can cross it out and write their initials. Opponents warn of harm to eligible voters if Ohio lawmakers require citizenship documents 'And it is accepted as a change that was legally made,' Turcer explained. 'House bill 233, and Senate bill 153, would make it so that any error here, anything that you made a mistake on, it would mean that the entire booklet would be invalid. And just, I can't imagine the number of signatures that would just get tossed out.' She added that provisions requiring circulators to wear a badge identifying themselves as 'paid' if they accept 'anything of value,' sets an unrealistic standard. 'If I were to give a clipboard and a pen to a volunteer, and a t-shirt that says the name of the campaign,' she explained, 'anything of value would then mean that a circulator would have to get a badge.' That's more paperwork, she said, and thus more chances for something to go wrong. Turcer also criticized a provision requiring an individual to be registered to vote prior to signing a petition, rather than by the time the petition gets filed with election officials. 'One of the things that we often do is check registration before we before people sign,' Turcer explained, 'so that we can get somebody registered as we're doing a ballot measure.' Taking that opportunity away doesn't just reduce their signature count, Turcer argued, 'it also stops that opportunity for a voter-to-voter conversation about, well, this is why you should get registered. These are the things that are coming up on the upcoming ballot.' Ohio Unity Coalition Executive Director Petee Talley drew a straight line from 2023's Issue 1 defeat, which rejected a GOP-led effort to make it harder to amend the state constitution, and the current slate of legislation. She argued the latest bills are 'retribution' for that defeat. Talley took particular offense at the provision requiring signature gatherers wear a badge if they're compensated. 'If I wanted to give a can of cold pop and a slice of pizza to someone and maybe even a t-shirt that (Turcer) alluded to, suddenly they're going to have to add wearing a badge to all of that stuff?' she asked. 'It's nothing but intimidation. It's nothing but bullying,' she argued. 'It's voter harassment, and this is an attack on our voice and our rights, and we're not going to stand for it.' Miller walked through the follow-on consequences of requiring paid circulator badges. Some voters will mistakenly think volunteers who got a slice of pizza are actually getting a paycheck, she said. 'We should expect opposition trackers attempting to catch circulators without their badges,' she added. 'And with the increase in uncivil and polarized rhetoric in political venues, this could result in intimidation or even violence against circulators or voters signing those petitions.' What's more, Miller said, 'boards of elections would have to become badge police.' It's a task they don't have the money, manpower or expertise to carry out, she argued. The requirement voters be registered before signing a petition? Miller said that might be a problem, too. 'We don't even know if boards of elections have the technical capacity right now to verify that a voter registration was valid on the date that the voter signed,' she said. One reason that might not have come up is that, so far, county boards haven't been able to weigh in. The bill's first and second hearing happened during the early voting period for this May's primary election. The third hearing landed on the day boards had to certify the election. Asked whether she thought that was intentional, Miller said, 'I don't think it matters. It's shameful, either way. There is no more important constituent when it comes to democracy bills than the boards of elections.' Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
National, Ohio Republican budgets prioritize corporate welfare and donor handouts over Ohio families
The Ohio Statehouse. (Photo by David DeWitt, Ohio Capital Journal.) Budget bills being shepherded through Congress and the Ohio Statehouse by Republican majorities are a reflection of priorities. Not mine and maybe not yours, but they are an explicit manifesto of the 'values' most prized by the controlling party. The federal budget bill and the one being hammered out in Ohio both put a premium on corporate welfare, as opposed to social safety nets, and the continued prosperity of fat cats who write big campaign checks, as opposed to everyone else. Federal lawmakers — more fearful of upsetting their Dear Leader than screwing their constituents out of healthcare and food aid — are doubling-down to enact a $2.4 trillion-dollar operating budget with unpaid tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the ultra-wealthy and corporations while millions go hungry and lose medical insurance. Besides the moral depravity of kicking the working-class poor to the curb to reward multi-millionaires and billionaires with lavish tax breaks, this deficit-ballooning monstrosity is predicted to explode the national debt to more than $50 trillion within ten years. The so-called deficit hawks who howl about paid-for spending budgets that increase revenue, reduce federal deficits, and reverse the unsustainable trajectory of today's roughly $29 trillion in public debt, will ram through the Trump's country club giveaway to the rich. They will vote for what the felon-in-chief (corruptly enriching himself on an epic scale) values above all else — money and power — while bankrupting the country, leaving 11 million Americans uninsured, and forcing countless families to ration meals. Trump supporters will lose what keeps them afloat, but what matters to the congressional invertebrates who represent them is only what matters to their amoral god king. They will spurn the many who struggle to survive to indulge the few who luxuriate in multiple homes and on super yachts. While sparse food banks turn away seniors on the edge of poverty and mothers desperate to stave off their children's hunger, the richest Americans will walk away richer, thanks to one party that prioritizes the interests of zillionaires and modern-day robber barons to maintain political dominance. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Ohio Republicans are using the same playbook as their federal counterparts to hand the wealthiest Ohioans a billion-dollar handout by lowering the state income tax on those making six figures plus with a single flat rate for everybody. But less than 3% of this tax cut would go to the bottom 80% of working Ohioans, according to Policy Matters Ohio. A tax expert with the nonpartisan research group testified that the other 97% 'goes to Ohioans in the top 20% of earners, making at least $139,000' while the top 1% alone (with an average income of over $1.7 million) rakes in 40% of the tax cut benefits. So much for equity in a regressive tax code proposal that eliminates graduated brackets for the gated community to pay a higher share of its considerable income. Who cares if Ohio's general revenue fund takes a 1.1 billion hit in lost revenue as a result? State lawmakers' rational for their fiscally irresponsible tax cuts to the mega-rich is identical to the one congressional Republicans offer for the bulk of their tax cuts going to the richest households and greediest corporations. It's the old, punctured 'trickle-down theory' that pretends fat cats with fatter wallets ignite economic growth. Proof to the contrary is abundant. So is evidence that subsidizing billionaire owners of sports teams with public money to build multi-billion-dollar stadiums is a bad bet for taxpayers. But that hasn't stopped leading Republicans in the Ohio Senate and Ohio House from bending over backward to accommodate Jimmy and Dee Haslams' ask for $600 million to take the Browns out of a perfectly good stadium on the lakefront and plop a new one into a working-class suburb right next to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. The pols bow to the Haslams as deep-pocketed Republican donors and are committed to finding some way to finance the couple's private interests with public funds. But the party that engineered gerrymandered supermajorities in the legislature and exerts absolute rule in Ohio insists the state can't find any extra money for food banks (reeling from deep funding cuts under the Trump regime) and has unified around slashing food bank funding by nearly 25% despite rising demand across Ohio. Republicans also argue that fully funding public education in the state — under a bipartisan spending formula that came closest to meeting long ignored constitutional obligations — is not sustainable under a tight budget. But swelling state investments in a voucher boondoggle predicted to cost $1.25 billion by 2027, according to the Columbus Dispatch, to offset tuition costs for affluent families who can afford the private schools their darlings already attend is sustainable?? Statehouse Republicans blame budget constraints for cutbacks on opioid recovery programs, public libraries, public transit, safe drinking water initiatives, continued Medicaid coverage for kids up to age 3, and even no-cost breakfast and lunch for all Ohio students. They punted on property tax relief with clawbacks from fiscally responsible school districts yet managed to remove all elected members of the state education board in the Ohio House budget bill. But cash for brand new stadiums, a billion-dollar tax cut for the wealthy, and an open government spigot for expanded private school vouchers? Those are GOP priorities that value money and power above all else.
