logo
I jailed Babes in the Wood child murderer after an incredible event

I jailed Babes in the Wood child murderer after an incredible event

Daily Mirror24-05-2025
As a victim of 'Babes in the Wood' killer Russell Bishop describes how the monster has cast a dark shadow over her life, we speak to the Detective Inspector responsible for putting him behind bars
Malcolm Bacon's first major inquiry as a Detective Inspector was more than 30 years ago but he can remember the details as if it were yesterday. Rachael Watts was just seven years old when she was kidnapped in broad daylight before being sexually assaulted and strangled.
The schoolgirl survived against the odds and helped to convict evil Russell Bishop, who had been wrongfully acquitted of murdering Nicola Fellows and Karen Hadaway a few years before in the infamous ' Babes in the Wood ' case. Now 42, Rachael is the subject of a new Sky documentary about the impact of the monster's attack on her life.

Retired police officer Malcolm appears in the two-part programme and is convinced Bishop would have struck again if he hadn't been caught. "He was a psychopath, a really dangerous person who would absolutely have killed again," he told The Mirror. "I'm fully convinced he thought he had killed Rachael. He thought he could get away with it but she turned into an incredible witness."

Rachael became a victim of predator Bishop in 1990, soon after moving to the Brighton area of East Sussex with her family. She had planned to roller skate to a friend's house but bumped her head, returned home and was given a pound by her father to buy sweets from the local shop.
The schoolgirl took a wrong turn on her way home and asked a man for directions. It was Bishop, who was tinkering with his red Ford Cortina. Without saying a word in reply to her, he threw her in the boot of his car and drove his victim to a well-known beauty spot in the South Downs.
"When the information came in that a girl had been discovered at Devil's Dyke, the main thing was to preserve the scenes," said Malcolm. "The first 'scene' was Rachael herself and the second was the Dyke, which was a huge area. There were only a few roads in and out, so once we sealed them off, we were fairly happy we had a sterile area."
When the predator reached Devil's Dyke, he put Rachael on the back seat of his car and removed her clothing before sexually assaulting and strangling her. He then discarded her underneath some gorse bushes.
"He disposed of me like he was flytipping," said the survivor, fighting back tears in the documentary. "Just like I was an old mattress or something, just thrown into a bush somewhere. He left me thinking I was dead."

The terrified schoolgirl came around in the dark, and as she stumbled out of the bushes, a nearby couple who had been enjoying the sunset wrapped her in a blanket and sought help. Heartbreakingly, she asked them: "You two aren't kidnappers, are you?".
The former DI is convinced Bishop thought he had killed his victim, saying: "She was strangled and suffocated to the point what's known as petechial haemorrhages took place (tiny pinpoint spots of bleeding under the skin caused by straining for a long time) which are quite indicative of a strangle injury. Usually, they only come out at the point of death, really. That's how close to death she was."

The young girl's memory of her ordeal until she was strangled unconscious would prove vital. "Rachael was a fabulous witness," said the retired cop. "She was able to explain everything she saw, the man in the red car with a moustache. In the boot of the car, she saw a can of WD40, the same that her dad used. She found a hammer too and started banging on the boot lid."
Incredibly, Rachael had the presence of mind to take off her roller skates in the boot of the car, to aid any chance of escape once the boot was opened. "She formulated an escape plan," said Malcolm. "She offered Bishop the pound she had been given if he would let her go."
Four years earlier, a double child murder had taken place in Brighton's Wild Park, which became known as the 'Babes in the Wood' murders in the press after the children's tale of the same name. Nicola and Karen were nine-year-old schoolgirls when they went out to play and never came home.

Their bodies were found in the park close to their homes the next day. They had known Rachael's future attacker, Bishop, then 20 and a local labourer and petty criminal, and he was charged with killing them.
But the monster's then-girlfriend, Jennifer Johnston, changed her story in the witness box after previously saying a blue sweatshirt found close to the scene had been his. And to the horror of police and psychologists involved in the case, Bishop was found not guilty by a jury at Lewes Crown Court in December 1987.

With the predator free to roam the streets once more, the experts' worst fears came true. Rachael was his next victim, with retired DI Malcolm describing her as an "articulate, intelligent seven-year-old girl who met a monster". This time, Bishop wouldn't be able to evade justice thanks in large part to the bravery of his victim, who picked him out of an identity parade and testified against him in court.
"Her first account got us all going," said Malcolm. "The red car was mentioned in a first briefing, and an intelligence report had come through days before saying Bishop had been seen in a red car.
"He went on to admit to driving it and put himself at the point of the abduction at the relevant time. I arrested him on suspicion of kidnapping and indecent assault, and we got his car, opened up the boot and in there was WD40 and a hammer with chip marks on the boot, corresponding to what Rachael had said."

"He tried to become chatty with us," added the former police officer. "'What's going on? You trying to fit me up? Of course, it's not me. He was a psychopath; his whole entity was to look after himself. He would try and manipulate things, but he wasn't very bright."
Bishop was later jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 14 years for attempted murder, kidnapping and indecent assault.

"He was prowling, we suspect he had been following other little girls around," said Malcolm. "We did get another report from another girl who was followed by a man in a red car. If the circumstances were correct, she might have been another victim."
Dubbed 'Britain's bravest girl' for stopping a paedophile killer from striking again, Rachael's life was irreparably blighted by Bishop, suffering from crippling depression, agoraphobia and complex post-traumatic stress along the way.
As a teenager, she had frequent nightmares where the predator would climb through her window and kill her. The survivor had four children and, in the course of her adult life, moved around a lot and changed her name a couple of times in a bid to remain anonymous.

But in 2022, Rachael told her children the secret she was "going to take to my grave" after Bishop died from brain cancer. Today, she's speaking out in public to rid herself of the "boulder" of a secret that has cast a dark shadow over her life.
As for the families of the 'Babes in the Wood', they finally achieved some form of justice in 2018, after the 2005 scrapping of the 'double jeopardy' rule combined with advances in forensic technology meant evil Bishop was able to be tried for a second time. This time, he was rightfully convicted for his abhorrent crimes, receiving two life sentences and ordered to serve a minimum of 36 years behind bars.
In April last year, Nicola and Karen's families received apologies from Sussex Police for failures in the original investigation into their murders. And in 2022, Bishop's ex-girlfriend, Johnson, who had changed her evidence at his original trial to devastating effect, was jailed for six years for perjury and perverting the course of justice.
Watch The Girl Who Caught a Killer on Sky and streaming service NOW
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I called police on my neighbour for selfish act during rainstorm but he won't stop'
'I called police on my neighbour for selfish act during rainstorm but he won't stop'

Daily Record

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Record

'I called police on my neighbour for selfish act during rainstorm but he won't stop'

The neighbour's act has directly impacted the person's home. Neighbourhood squabbles are a common occurrence, after all, you don't get to pick and choose who lives next to you. In most cases, low-level issues can either be solved or ignored. ‌ But sometimes a neighbour's actions directly impact another person's home - and that's when they really have to step in. This is the situation for one householder who is at their wit's end. ‌ The man living next door is consistently acting in a selfish manner during heavy rain. And it's more than just a nuisance for the householder - it's actually causing damage to their property, The Mirror reports. ‌ Despite attempts at mediation and even getting the police being involved, the neighbour is refusing to budge. Unsure what else to do, the raging resident has turned to social media for advice. Posting on Reddit's Bad Neighbours forum, they revealed that the man next door had been sticking a sandbag in front of his property during heavy rain. While that may seem like an innocent way to keep his property drier, it was actually diverting a flow of rainwater down the side of the poster's home. And it was more than just an inconvenience, as the increased water was causing the ground on their property to erode much quicker than normal. Sharing an image of the sandbag on the pavement, they wrote: "Neighbour puts sandbag on the sidewalk to direct more rainwater on my property. Really annoying because it increases the amount of water running down the side of the house and makes the ground erode much faster than it should." ‌ The photo has racked up dozens of comments, with many forum users offering their advice. One person said: "There's a very good chance that intentionally directing water runoff onto a neighbouring property is a code violation." Another agreed, commenting: "In my town that is against the law. You aren't allowed to change your grading or direct water to run onto other properties." ‌ Someone else suggested: "Go ask him what he's trying to do. Just discuss it with him." In a new post to update the situation, the resident revealed they had taken further action - but the situation had actually got worse. They shared a new photo of the street outside and, two weeks on from the lone sandbag, there were now at least five sandbags taking up the pavement and directing even more down the side of the poster's house. ‌ They said: "So this is the new form of blocking the sidewalk. It crosses the entire sidewalk causing a tripping hazard to anyone who using the sidewalk. "I've called the village to complain about the bags and they sent the police out a couple times to have them removed but they keep getting put back each time it rains. ‌ "I have purchased my own sandbag to stop the increased amount of water from rushing down the sidewalk next to my house to help control the problem he is causing to some degree. "Not sure what else to try to do. Talking to him is not a good idea because he and we do not get along and it will lead nowhere just as it has in the past." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ A number of Redditors were furious on the poster's behalf, urging them to take action. One said: "If they are on a public sidewalk, they must be available for the public to take." Someone else added: "The sidewalks are not private property. Anything left on pubic property is subject to being picked up and thrown out. "Grab them, toss them in a trunk and dispose of them in several random dumpsters. Maybe he'll get tired of spending money on new bags every time it rains." Several others also suggested the householder call the police or their local councillor every time it happens.

‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films
‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films

Scottish Sun

time15 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films

Sky is cracking down on TV pirates OUT OF STREAM 'Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BRIT has been told to pay £860,000 in damages to Sky after being caught running illegal streaming services. The dodgy apps allowed Brits to watch Sky Sports and Sky Cinema on the cheap. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 A Brit has been caught sharing illegal Sky Sports and Sky Cinema streams Credit: Getty Michael Green, of Glasgow, operated a now-shuttered app called Incredible Streams. He was charging users as little as £50 a year to get full access to Sky's premium telly. It meant that Brits could watch the content illegally, dodging Sky's fees to access footie streams and Hollywood movies. Green was ordered by the Court of Session to pay Sky £863,781.68 in damages. The damages relate to "his involvement in operating and supporting illegal IPTV services". In his judgement, Lord Richardson legally barred Green from running or creating any IPTV services for streaming Sky broadcasts. "This ruling underscores the serious financial and legal consequences of illegal streaming," said Sky's Matt Hibbert. "Sky is committed to protecting its content and will continue to pursue legal action against those who undermine its services and violate copyright law," Hibbert, the group director for anti-piracy at Sky, continued. "Customers should be aware that not only are IPTV services often linked to organised crime, but illegal streams can also carry serious risks from malware to theft of money or personal information." Green is also barred from running or helping out with any platforms that enable illegal access to TV. Sky insider reveals little-known voice tricks for your TV - including hack to NEVER lose the remote That includes websites, forums, social media or software. He's banned from publicly sharing Sky's broadcasts, or helping anyone to "infringe Sky's copyright". STREAMING CRACKDOWN Sky says it invests "billions of pounds" in entertainment for customers. "It's therefore important that companies like ours do what they can, alongside the Government and the rest of the media and technology industries, to help protect copyright," the broadcaster explained. 2 Sky is now owed hundreds of thousands of pounds in damages from a TV pirate Credit: Getty "Such protection makes sure that consumers continue to benefit from TV programmes, movies and music both now and in the future. "This means taking effective action against online piracy and copyright infringement." A regular Sky Sports package costs £22 a month on a 24-month contract. That works out at £528 over the full term. And Sky Cinema costs £13 a month on a 24-month contract, or £312 for the full two-year run. Combined, they would cost Brits £420 a year if paying Sky lawfully for the services. That's why some Brits are willing to pay £50 a year for pirated streaming services, despite the risks and illegality. Sky works with police and courts to prevent dodgy websites, apps, and "cracked" streaming sticks or boxes from being used in the UK. HOW SKY CATCHES PIRACY CROOKS Here's how Sky says it catches dodgy streaming barons... "Copyright holders who believe broadband users have unlawfully shared content online have the option of taking their cases to court," Sky explained. "They can present evidence based on IP addresses, a unique code that identifies a broadband connection. "Internet service providers like Sky have records of their customers' IP addresses. "So, copyright holders can ask the court for an order obliging them to reveal the names and addresses associated with the IP addresses presented. "If the order is granted, the service provider must comply. "The copyright holder is likely to contact the customer directly and may ask them to pay compensation." Picture Credit: AFP That includes Brits who try to watch the footie without paying. The broadcaster has had dozens of illegal streaming websites blocked through High Court orders. "On 13th March 2017, the High Court ordered the UK's major internet service providers, including Sky, to try and block certain servers from illegally streaming Premier League matches," Sky said. "We support this as the hosts of these streams are breaking the law and by watching the stream you infringe Sky's copyright. "If you were watching a Premier League game on your Kodi box or IPTV device then it's very likely that you were watching this game via an illegal stream." Sky and the police have also warned that Brits accessing illegal streaming services are putting themselves at risk. A victim previously told The Sun that thousands was accessed from their bank account within minutes of signing up to a dodgy streaming service while trying to watch F1 illegally. "There were all sorts of transactions on my bank account for quite a large amount of money which were on various times and various dates for different amounts," they said. "It's scary really, they attempted thousands." The Sun has previously warned over the dangers of using dodgy streaming devices.

‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films
‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films

The Sun

time15 hours ago

  • The Sun

‘Dodgy Sky' streaming kingpin told to pay £860,000 in piracy sting over apps showing Premier League & Hollywood films

A BRIT has been told to pay £860,000 in damages to Sky after being caught running illegal streaming services. The dodgy apps allowed Brits to watch Sky Sports and Sky Cinema on the cheap. 2 Michael Green, of Glasgow, operated a now-shuttered app called Incredible Streams. He was charging users as little as £50 a year to get full access to Sky's premium telly. It meant that Brits could watch the content illegally, dodging Sky's fees to access footie streams and Hollywood movies. Green was ordered by the Court of Session to pay Sky £863,781.68 in damages. The damages relate to "his involvement in operating and supporting illegal IPTV services". In his judgement, Lord Richardson legally barred Green from running or creating any IPTV services for streaming Sky broadcasts. "This ruling underscores the serious financial and legal consequences of illegal streaming," said Sky's Matt Hibbert. "Sky is committed to protecting its content and will continue to pursue legal action against those who undermine its services and violate copyright law," Hibbert, the group director for anti-piracy at Sky, continued. "Customers should be aware that not only are IPTV services often linked to organised crime, but illegal streams can also carry serious risks from malware to theft of money or personal information." Green is also barred from running or helping out with any platforms that enable illegal access to TV. Sky insider reveals little-known voice tricks for your TV - including hack to NEVER lose the remote That includes websites, forums, social media or software. He's banned from publicly sharing Sky's broadcasts, or helping anyone to "infringe Sky's copyright". STREAMING CRACKDOWN Sky says it invests "billions of pounds" in entertainment for customers. "It's therefore important that companies like ours do what they can, alongside the Government and the rest of the media and technology industries, to help protect copyright," the broadcaster explained. "Such protection makes sure that consumers continue to benefit from TV programmes, movies and music both now and in the future. "This means taking effective action against online piracy and copyright infringement." A regular Sky Sports package costs £22 a month on a 24-month contract. That works out at £528 over the full term. And Sky Cinema costs £13 a month on a 24-month contract, or £312 for the full two-year run. Combined, they would cost Brits £420 a year if paying Sky lawfully for the services. That's why some Brits are willing to pay £50 a year for pirated streaming services, despite the risks and illegality. Sky works with police and courts to prevent dodgy websites, apps, and "cracked" streaming sticks or boxes from being used in the UK. HOW SKY CATCHES PIRACY CROOKS Here's how Sky says it catches dodgy streaming barons... "Copyright holders who believe broadband users have unlawfully shared content online have the option of taking their cases to court," Sky explained. "They can present evidence based on IP addresses, a unique code that identifies a broadband connection. "Internet service providers like Sky have records of their customers' IP addresses. "So, copyright holders can ask the court for an order obliging them to reveal the names and addresses associated with the IP addresses presented. "If the order is granted, the service provider must comply. "The copyright holder is likely to contact the customer directly and may ask them to pay compensation." Picture Credit: AFP That includes Brits who try to watch the footie without paying. The broadcaster has had dozens of illegal streaming websites blocked through High Court orders. "On 13th March 2017, the High Court ordered the UK's major internet service providers, including Sky, to try and block certain servers from illegally streaming Premier League matches," Sky said. "We support this as the hosts of these streams are breaking the law and by watching the stream you infringe Sky's copyright. "If you were watching a Premier League game on your Kodi box or IPTV device then it's very likely that you were watching this game via an illegal stream." Sky and the police have also warned that Brits accessing illegal streaming services are putting themselves at risk. A victim previously told The Sun that thousands was accessed from their bank account within minutes of signing up to a dodgy streaming service while trying to watch F1 illegally. "There were all sorts of transactions on my bank account for quite a large amount of money which were on various times and various dates for different amounts," they said. "It's scary really, they attempted thousands."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store