logo
Lib Dem-led council spends £10k to cut down ‘important' palm trees

Lib Dem-led council spends £10k to cut down ‘important' palm trees

Telegraph31-03-2025

A Lib Dem-led council has been criticised for spending £10,000 to cut down two 'really important' palm trees on a seaside promenade.
The 35ft-tall trees were planted on the historic Esplanade in Weymouth, Dorset, in 2012, but town officials claimed they grew into a trip hazard after their roots made the surrounding ground uneven.
They will be replaced with two smaller 'cabbage palm' trees instead, officials said.
But the proposal has angered residents who said their removal would cause 'reputational damage' to Weymouth.
Dennis Clark, who lives nearby, said the trees are 'really important to the town' and a 'valuable feature'.
He added: 'I spoke with some of my friends about the palms and I was struck by the clarity of feeling about them
'The trees advertise and promote Weymouth and I believe they are an iconic feature of pride and quality for seaside towns.'
Councillor Helen Toft also said the removal of the trees would damage the town's reputation and called the decision to fell them 'wrong'.
Others took to social media to criticise the £10,000 proposed cost to remove the trees, branding it 'a waste of money'.
Christopher Bates said: 'Shouldn't council taxpayers be asked if this is an expense they want to have?'
He suggested the council should auction the palm trees to go towards raising money to pay for the work.
James Williams called the price of removal 'ridiculous', adding 'leave them be and stop dreaming up unnecessary projects'.
Another said: 'Del Boy would be proud to sell you a couple of trees for that sort of cash.'
A Weymouth town council spokesman said leaving the palms trees as they are will only increase the risk and cost.
They added: 'The trees have grown significantly since they were put in over a decade ago and are now causing structural damage to the promenade which needs to be managed now before any further repairs are needed.
'Councillors agreed they should be replaced with palms like those found further along the promenade which would still have visual impact. The stonework planters would also be repaired.
'Other palms along the seafront would be managed in the same way in future years.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As thousands of Gaza babies face death by starvation, Israel must come to its senses
As thousands of Gaza babies face death by starvation, Israel must come to its senses

Scotsman

time5 days ago

  • Scotsman

As thousands of Gaza babies face death by starvation, Israel must come to its senses

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Yesterday Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats, an Israeli political party formed by the merger of Labor and Meretz, warned his country was 'on the path to becoming a pariah state, like South Africa once was, if it does not return to acting like a sane country... a sane state does not wage war against civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby...' Around the same time, Tom Fletcher, the United Nations' Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, told the BBC that Israel must allow aid trucks containing baby food into Gaza because 14,000 babies 'will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them... it's chilling, it's utterly chilling'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel was an atrocity in which innocent men, women and children were murdered without mercy. Israel had no choice but to attempt to militarily defeat these despicable terrorists, who boasted they would launch similar attacks. Palestinians struggle to get food rations outside a distribution centre in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip (Picture: Bashar Taleb) | AFP via Getty Images 'Morally unjustifiable' However, Israel's decision to cut off aid to the Gaza Strip in order to pressure Hamas into releasing the hostages has created a devastating humanitarian crisis – and the cruel Hamas is unlikely to be swayed by the plight of their fellow Palestinians. Aid cannot be used as a weapon of war and no one can argue that babies are anything other than innocent. Given the situation, Foreign Secretary David Lammy was entirely right to describe Israel's actions as 'morally unjustifiable' and 'wholly disproportionate'. 'We must call this what it is. It is extremism. It is dangerous. It is repellent. It is monstrous and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms,' he told MPs. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government has summoned Israel's ambassador, suspended negotiations over a new free trade agreement with Israel, and is reviewing its cooperation with Netanyahu's administration. To do anything less would be a scandal. The international community must urgently persuade Israel to change course.

Geert Wilders: the fall of an extremist
Geert Wilders: the fall of an extremist

New European

time5 days ago

  • New European

Geert Wilders: the fall of an extremist

Wilders has long been at odds with the government that he helped form, after his party, the PVV, won elections in 2023. On several occasions he clashed publicly and spectacularly with Dick Schoof, the non-party-aligned prime minister. And last week he presented the cabinet with a list of demands on asylum that even anti-immigration media outlets thought were unrealistic. The bizarre, 11-month-long sock puppet show that called itself the government of the Netherlands has come to an end, thanks to the puppet master himself. Geert Wilders, the 62-year-old, far-right anti-Islam Dutch leader, has pulled his party out of the ruling coalition, saying he now wants to be prime minister himself. But with elections scheduled for the autumn, he could end up frozen out of power. Schoof, now caretaker prime minister, labelled Wilders's withdrawal from the coalition 'unnecessary and irresponsible' during a debate in parliament on Wednesday. While the outgoing prime minister is unlikely to play a role in the upcoming campaign, his remarks signal a line of attack on Wilders that the other parties have already taken up. This is now the second time that Wilders has brought down a government dominated by the right, the type of government he has always said he wanted for the Netherlands. Former prime minister Mark Rutte called Wilders a 'quitter politician' in 2012, after the far-right frontman withdrew support for the minority government he was leading at the time. In the subsequent elections, the PVV paid a heavy price, and the party was left out in the cold for over a decade. The other parties are bound to highlight Wilders's apparent unreliability to end his dream of leading the country – for good this time. The fractious coalition between the PVV and three more centrist right-wing parties managed to last for almost a year, but the end was never far away. Three of the four parties, the PVV, the farmers' party BBB, and a largely Christian Democrat offshoot, NSC, had no previous government experience, and neither did Schoof. From the start, negotiators were hit by ethics scandals, as were ministerial candidates. Trust and approval ratings among the electorate were low almost from the start. In contrast to some other right-wing European leaders, such as Giorgia Meloni in Italy and lately Bart de Wever in Belgium, the PVV-led coalition was never able to project competence, or stability. Rumours abounded in The Hague about the inefficient and unprofessional ways in which ministers ran their departments. Suggested Reading The right spells trouble for von der Leyen Ferry Biedermann Beside inexperience, the root cause of public disenchantment, and falling PVV polling numbers, might well have been the string of unrealistic promises the party made. In quitting the coalition, Wilders made much of the government's inability to fulfil his election promise of an 'emergency law' to limit asylum seekers. Instead, the government worked on a 'fast-track' law that complied with Dutch and EU rules. On other key issues, such as easing the increasingly onerous nitrogen requirements for Dutch farmers, the coalition saw its approach blocked by the courts that forced it to stick to European targets. On broadly supported socio-economic initiatives, such as free childcare, the coalition ran into logistical and budgetary constraints. In the end, Wilders was unable to make the transition from firebrand opposition leader to responsible statesman. He did, as demanded by his coalition partners, damp down his anti-Islam rhetoric while the PVV was in power. Wilders has been living under police protection and in safe houses since 2004, after receiving death threats following some of his remarks on Islam. Asked during the parliamentary debate on the fall of the coalition whether he would now resume his diatribes against Islam, he said it had not been foremost on his mind. The question is whether Wilders will continue in his more moderate guise, in order to maintain his viability as a future coalition partner. But this seems unlikely and unnecessary. His current coalition partners had no issue doing business with him after the previous campaign, in which he was clear about wanting 'less Islam' in the Netherlands. And voters rewarded him by making the PVV the largest party. Despite the decline in the polls, there is no reason why he shouldn't be able to repeat that feat in the upcoming elections. While many might blame him for bringing down the most right-wing government since the end of the Second World War, his base might applaud him for putting a clearly outmatched team out of its misery. Still, other movements in the polls, particularly the revival of the Christian Democrats, could mean he'll be left without coalition partners. While Wilders could triumph once again, his path to power might well be blocked.

Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict
Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict

Western Telegraph

time5 days ago

  • Western Telegraph

Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict

Parliament moved a step closer to setting up a probe after MPs agreed that the Gaza (Independent Public Inquiry) Bill should be listed for a debate later this year. The draft new law would 'require the inquiry to consider any UK military, economic or political co-operation with Israel since October 2023', the month when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel and killed around 1,200 people and kidnapped more than 250 others. Israel's retaliatory offensive has seen more than 54,000 people in Gaza killed, according to the territory's health ministry. Smoke from an Israeli bombardment in the northern Gaza Strip (Maya Alleruzzo/AP) 'Our future history books will report with shame those that had the opportunity to stop this carnage but failed to act to achieve it, and so we will continue our campaigns in this House and outside because we're appalled at what is happening,' the former Labour Party leader told the Commons. Mr Corbyn, the Independent MP for Islington North, had earlier said: 'In the aftermath of the Iraq war, several attempts were made to establish an inquiry surrounding the conduct of the British military operations. 'The government of the day spent many years resisting those attempts and those demands for an inquiry, however, they could not prevent the inevitable and in 2016 we had the publication of the Chilcot Inquiry, which Sir John Chilcot had undertaken over several years.' Mr Corbyn added that when he was the Labour leader, when the 12-volume report came out, he 'apologised on behalf of the Labour Party for the catastrophic decision to go to war in Iraq' and added: 'History is now repeating itself.' He warned that 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever – entire families wiped out, limbs strewn across the street, mothers screaming for their children buried under the rubble, human beings torn to pieces, doctors performing amputations without anaesthetic, children picking grass and dirt from the ground thinking they might find something edible to eat'. Jeremy Corbyn said 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever' (PA) Mr Corbyn alleged that the UK had a 'highly influential role in Israel's military operations', including by supplying weapons, and also said a future inquiry should seek the 'truth regarding the role of British military bases in Cyprus' and Government 'legal advice over an assessment of genocide'. He said the inquiry would uncover the 'murky history of what's gone on, the murky arms sales and the complicity in appalling acts of genocide'. Deputy Speaker Nus Ghani called 'order' when several MPs applauded, as Mr Corbyn presented his Bill. The Bill will be listed for its next debate on July 4.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store