logo
Lib Dem-led council spends £10k to cut down ‘important' palm trees

Lib Dem-led council spends £10k to cut down ‘important' palm trees

Telegraph31-03-2025
A Lib Dem-led council has been criticised for spending £10,000 to cut down two 'really important' palm trees on a seaside promenade.
The 35ft-tall trees were planted on the historic Esplanade in Weymouth, Dorset, in 2012, but town officials claimed they grew into a trip hazard after their roots made the surrounding ground uneven.
They will be replaced with two smaller 'cabbage palm' trees instead, officials said.
But the proposal has angered residents who said their removal would cause 'reputational damage' to Weymouth.
Dennis Clark, who lives nearby, said the trees are 'really important to the town' and a 'valuable feature'.
He added: 'I spoke with some of my friends about the palms and I was struck by the clarity of feeling about them
'The trees advertise and promote Weymouth and I believe they are an iconic feature of pride and quality for seaside towns.'
Councillor Helen Toft also said the removal of the trees would damage the town's reputation and called the decision to fell them 'wrong'.
Others took to social media to criticise the £10,000 proposed cost to remove the trees, branding it 'a waste of money'.
Christopher Bates said: 'Shouldn't council taxpayers be asked if this is an expense they want to have?'
He suggested the council should auction the palm trees to go towards raising money to pay for the work.
James Williams called the price of removal 'ridiculous', adding 'leave them be and stop dreaming up unnecessary projects'.
Another said: 'Del Boy would be proud to sell you a couple of trees for that sort of cash.'
A Weymouth town council spokesman said leaving the palms trees as they are will only increase the risk and cost.
They added: 'The trees have grown significantly since they were put in over a decade ago and are now causing structural damage to the promenade which needs to be managed now before any further repairs are needed.
'Councillors agreed they should be replaced with palms like those found further along the promenade which would still have visual impact. The stonework planters would also be repaired.
'Other palms along the seafront would be managed in the same way in future years.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chepstow Tennis Club revised clubhouse plan approved
Chepstow Tennis Club revised clubhouse plan approved

South Wales Argus

time4 days ago

  • South Wales Argus

Chepstow Tennis Club revised clubhouse plan approved

Plans were first approved for a replacement base for Chepstow Tennis Club four years ago in July 2021. But while a fourth court, for juniors with a practice wall, and LED floodlights approved in 2021 have been put in place at Mathern Road the not-for-profit community sports club was struggling to finance the new clubhouse. In May this year it submitted revised plans for a lower-cost above-ground clubhouse structure in place of the originally approved design which would also have a reduced height, at a maximum of three metres, and a smaller floor area compared to the original plans. The originally proposed building was to be finished in render with timber cladding while the alternative will be finished in timber cladding with part natural colour and part grey. The roof will be grey coloured bitumen sheets. Monmouthshire County Council planning officer Kate Young said no third parties would be affected by making the building smaller or by altering the finishing materials and the difference in materials aren't so signficiant the impact would affect the street scene and the changes could be accepted as non-material amendments and approved. When the revised application was made, by club official Ben Durman, he said it had around 50 per cent of the funding required will be looking for support from grant giving bodies and it has worked with a quantity surveyor to manage costs. Mr Durman said at the time of the application: 'We hope to be able to go full steam ahead with fundraising once the planning permission hopefully comes through.'

‘This isn't a political gesture — it's a human one': Co Down men to undertake 48-hour silent run to fundraise for women of Palestine
‘This isn't a political gesture — it's a human one': Co Down men to undertake 48-hour silent run to fundraise for women of Palestine

Belfast Telegraph

time24-07-2025

  • Belfast Telegraph

‘This isn't a political gesture — it's a human one': Co Down men to undertake 48-hour silent run to fundraise for women of Palestine

Two friends from Co Down are aiming to undertake an extreme endurance challenge next month to raise funds for an organisation offering support for women and families currently living in Palestine. Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 54,381 Palestinians and wounded 124,054 to date, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The Government Media Office updated its death toll to more than 61,700, saying thousands of people missing under the rubble are presumed dead. An estimated 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023, and more than 200 were taken captive. As of the 2nd March this year, there has been a complete block on all supplies entering Gaza, increasing the risk of famine. Cahir Clancy and Gerard McAnulty have now decided to pound the pavement for two days in their hometown of Newcastle as an act of solidarity and to raise as much money as they can for the people of Palestine affected by the war. The two men are going to remain completely silent and will fast for the duration of the run, which will total 100 miles once completed – the equivalent to four times the length of the Gaza strip. They will also sleep outdoors with no shelter during the 48-hour challenge to mimic the conditions the Palestinian people are currently enduring. Cahir told Belfast Telegraph that the purpose of the challenge is to highlight, in a small symbolic way, 'the physical and emotional hardship experienced by civilians in Gaza — particularly women and children'. 'By placing ourselves under controlled discomfort, we hope to raise awareness of the daily reality faced by those living in conflict-affected areas with limited access to food, safety, and shelter,' he said. 'We are raising funds for the Union of Palestinian Women's Committees (UPWC), a grassroots organisation that provides essential support to women and families in Gaza. 'Their work includes access to emergency aid, psychosocial support, education, and protection for those affected by ongoing crisis. 'Every donation raised will go directly to UPWC.' The Co Down man added that he always believed that 'physical endurance can be a vehicle for something more meaningful.' 'This challenge isn't about performance — it's about using discomfort as a way to connect with people we'll never meet, but whose lives matter,' he said. 'I'm a parent myself, and I can't ignore the suffering of children and families. This is just a small way to show solidarity and hopefully contribute to practical support.' Israel 'tarnishing reputation', Lammy says as country rejects UK warnings Gerard said that it 'isn't a political gesture — it's a human one.' 'You don't need to take a side to understand that people are suffering, and that families are living in unimaginable conditions,' he told this newspaper. 'We wanted to do something physical, visible, and direct. 'By taking on this challenge, we hope to draw attention to the situation in a respectful and focused way — and ensure funds go to an organisation making a real difference on the ground. 'We're grateful for any support — whether that's spreading the word, donating, or simply learning more about the work of UPWC.' The fundraiser will take place on the Newcastle Promenade from 1 August until 3 August.

Glasgow lap dancing club could need to remove sign
Glasgow lap dancing club could need to remove sign

Glasgow Times

time06-07-2025

  • Glasgow Times

Glasgow lap dancing club could need to remove sign

Seventh Heaven on Hope Street asked the Scottish Government to reconsider a ruling by Glasgow City Council, which claimed a new sign and awning would be 'detrimental' to a listed building. But a reporter, appointed by the government, has dismissed the appeal, upholding the initial decision. The dispute centres on a sign with LED backlights on aluminium fascia and a retractable awning. The council refused listed building consent as it said the awning would be an 'incongruous addition' and add 'visual clutter to the existing historic frontage'. (Image: LDR) It also ruled the size and nature of the sign was 'detrimental to… the appearance and special character of the building'. A council report from December stated an initial proposal had been changed after talks between planners and the applicant, with an application then approved. However, it added the 'plans in the granted decision notice had not been commenced' and instead the 'original proposal had been implemented'. 'This was subsequently reported to planning enforcement,' the report continued. Council planners told the reporter the sign within the application 'does not reflect what is currently on site so it is unclear if this application is to replace the retrospective work'. In the appeal, Andy Cox, of Seventh Heaven, said the club feels the sign and awning are 'both elegant and subtle against the grandeur of the Category A listed façade' and the 'high quality' materials are 'in keeping with neighbouring properties'. READ MORE: Glasgow lap dancing club's move to Hope Street takes step ahead However, the reporter, Alison Kirkwood, appointed by the Scottish Government ruled the changes would have a 'detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the listed building and conservation area'. She said she was 'required to assess the proposal shown on the submitted drawings, which is not necessarily the same as that which has been installed'. Responding to the appeal, council planners had said policies were clear that 'without historic justification then the property will be unable to house an awning' and the 'design of the building doesn't lend itself well to the installed awning'. They also said the aluminium panel is 'deemed inappropriate as it detracts from the intricate stonework of the A-listed building'. 'There was a policy compliant proposal that was approved by Glasgow City Council which was not commenced,' officials added. 'As the application stands, it would be an incongruous addition.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store