Kingston causeway workers get severance pay nearly a year after bridge torn down
Social Sharing
After months of waiting, workers who operated the LaSalle Causeway lift bridge in Kingston, Ont., have finally received their severance.
It comes nearly a year after the century-old crossing was demolished following what was supposed to be a repair job, but instead ended with the entire structure being scrapped.
"I'm glad it's over. It's a chapter in my life I don't have to worry about again," said Doug Stewart, who worked as a bridge operator for about a year-and-a-half before it was torn down.
Stewart, along with bridge master Tom Vilneff, was among the three causeway workers laid off at the end of January.
Their collective agreement said they should have received the thousands they were owed within 30 days, but as the weeks added up without any pay, their savings began to take a beating, the men told CBC in a story published May 6.
The next day, they heard from the pay centre for Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), the federal department responsible for the bridge.
In a phone interview on Wednesday, Stewart described the update from PSPC as a "relief."
"It was three months before I got any any action out of the PSPC, and it was only the day after the CBC story ran about that I saw any real action," he explained.
Vilneff confirmed he has also since received a compensation package and severance pay. CBC has not been able to confirm whether the third worker received their severance.
PSPC did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent Wednesday morning.
In a statement back in May, the department said it was aware of "issues faced by its former employees" and was working to resolve them as quickly as possible.
At the time, a spokesperson also said that in the previous fiscal year, 89 per cent of its severance cases were processed within 30 days.
Grievance filed over financial distress
The crossing connects downtown to the city's eastern suburbs and was known as the "singing bridge" for the sound made by the tires of thousands of commuters who crossed it every day. A temporary span is currently in its place.
Stewart said he's filed a grievance with PSPC about the severance not being paid in a timely fashion, causing financial distress for his family.
"I'm not really after any extra money out of them," he said "I'm just [sending a] 'do better next time' note to my government."
Stewart has since found work as a tour guide around the city and said he's happy to have a new way to share his knowledge and show his appreciation for Kingston's history.
Still, the former bridge operator said he remains frustrated by how both the crossing and his career there were discarded, adding the way the workers were treated showed a "lack of respect."
"It was sort of, 'OK you're done, now off you go.' We weren't responsible for the catastrophes that happened to that bridge," he said.
"And I still miss it. I miss the sound of it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's financial regulators need to reduce money laundering. A task force review might speed that up
Canada's financial regulators are about to find themselves in the hot seat. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global body that sets standards to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, is conducting a review of Canada's efforts to combat financial crime. One topic that will figure prominently in that evaluation is the effectiveness of regulators, including the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada – the federal financial intelligence unit – and the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions – the country's top banking regulator. Both FinTRAC and OSFI, as they are known for short, are responsible for supervising the anti-money laundering compliance of banks. The FATF has cited issues with Canada's approach to regulation, supervision and monitoring in past reviews, but this year's evaluation comes in the wake of financial-crime scandals including one involving Toronto-Dominion Bank. 'Supervisors play a crucial role in preventing money laundering and terrorist financing,' states the FATF's guidance. 'Effective supervisors also ensure that these businesses comply with their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations and take appropriate action if they fail to do so.' The FATF's last review of Canada in 2016 recommended that FinTRAC and OSFI co-ordinate more effectively on the supervision of banks. Specifically, it said FinTRAC had increased its supervisory capacity but still had 'somewhat limited' expertise about banking, adding OSFI was conducting its supervision with limited resources. Ottawa to overhaul financial-crime laws in new border security bill Recent money laundering scandals, however, have caused both FinTRAC and OSFI to lose face. Last fall, TD became the first bank in the United States to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and the largest bank in U.S. history to plead guilty to failing to maintain an anti-money laundering (AML) program that complies with federal regulations. American banking regulators and the U.S. Department of Justice imposed more than US$3-billion in fines and various non-monetary penalties. The Federal Reserve Board also required the Canadian bank to relocate to the United States the parts of its anti-money laundering compliance program that are responsible for complying with U.S. law. 'This program will be subject to oversight by U.S. regulators,' stated its release. Months before publicly announcing that requirement, U.S. regulators privately questioned their Canadian counterparts about why they previously failed to spot and remedy problems with TD's anti-money laundering risk controls, The Globe and Mail reported in May 2024. On Thursday, meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that Norway's US$1.9-trillion sovereign wealth fund was placing TD 'under observation' for four years over financial-crime concerns. There have also been separate allegations of wrongdoing involving Wealth One Bank of Canada and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Canada). As a result, OSFI's stop-start approach to supervising financial-crime compliance in recent years will naturally be probed by the FATF. OSFI returned to AML oversight in 2024 after taking a three-year hiatus. In 2021, OSFI rescinded its guidance on deterring and detecting money laundering and terrorist financing, and handed over its regulatory responsibilities to FinTRAC. At the time, the objective was to make FinTRAC the exclusive overseer of banks' financial-crime compliance obligations. Task force to evaluate Canada's ability to fight money laundering and terrorist financing But OSFI did an about-face in 2024. Not only did it issue a new integrity and security guideline, but it stressed that it considers money laundering and the financing of terrorism third-party and foreign-interference risks that could harm the safety or soundness of banks. Trouble is, banks are once again confused about which federal regulator is in charge. They are also understandably frustrated that their massive spending on compliance programs has failed to yield successful convictions in court. Total financial-crime compliance costs for financial institutions hit US$2-billion in Canada, according to a 2023 study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Regulators, meanwhile, are also suffering from a breakdown in trust with the public because they operate behind a veil of secrecy. And, unlike their U.S. counterparts, they are barred from discussing problems at individual banks – even the widely publicized case involving TD. 'I would like to be forthcoming about our involvement in this case because I think that information would contribute to public confidence in the Canadian financial system,' OSFI Superintendent Peter Routledge told a Parliamentary committee in November. 'That said, Canadian law prohibits me or any OSFI official from disclosing confidential information obtained from federally regulated financial institutions in the course of OSFI's regulation and supervision activities.' Recent money laundering scandals have provided a withering assessment about the effectiveness of Canada's regulators. Maybe the FATF will finally persuade Ottawa to set them up for success.
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Inside job
Investigation When an account gets hacked, social media giant Meta offers little support, spawning a shadowy network of brokers and Meta employees who profit from helping them get back online Kathryn Blaze Baum Alexandra Posadzki Financial and cybercrime reporter The Globe and Mail Illustration by The Globe and Mail/istock to view this content.
CBC
41 minutes ago
- CBC
Metal casket maker ready for trade war to end after steel hit with 50% tariff
Social Sharing At precisely noon, the casket welders, sanders and paint sprayers are turned off and a quiet hum settles over the Magog Caskets factory floor in southeastern Quebec. "The new closing time," says one of the workers as he removes his ear buds. "New" as a result of the imposition of tariffs and counter-tariffs between the United States and Canada. "The Trump administration is charging me a tariff. It's like, whatever I do, [the U.S.] is trying to strangle me," said Nicolas Lacasse, the owner of Magog Caskets. "And when I try to defend myself, it's like Canada is holding my hand, so I can't defend myself." Magog Caskets is the only manufacturer of metal caskets in Canada, which it sells primarily in Quebec and the U.S. And the primary material used to make those caskets? Steel. Not only has the U.S. imposed a 50 per cent tariff on aluminum and steel, but Canada has imposed a reciprocal tariff of 25 per cent. So Lacasse has had to reduce his employee workload from 39 hours a week to only 15 to 20 hours because he no longer makes a profit. Best response in world of bad options Like thousands of businesses across Canada, Lacasse has had to come up with the least painful option when faced with tariffs and counter-tariffs. His first option is to continue buying Canadian steel but face a 50 per cent tariff on the finished caskets going into the U.S. Option 2, and the one he chose: buy American steel, eat the cost of the exchange rate and pay the 25 per cent counter-tariff on the raw material. "That was the most cost-effective one, actually," Lacasse said. "It's still creating trouble here, though. I'm running at a loss." According to an analysis by Statistics Canada, 53 per cent of import-export companies in Canada think the tariffs will have a high-to-medium impact on business within the next three months. April saw Canada's largest recorded merchandise trade deficit, as companies attempted to minimize the damage to consumer pocketbooks. "We are seeing a large number of companies take all sorts of aggressive steps to either cancel contracts, avoid shipping or otherwise renegotiate pricing, for example, with their customers or their suppliers," said William Pellerin, a trade lawyer with the firm McMillan LLP. "It's very destabilizing. There's no question about it." Option to pass cost to customer impossible Lacasse says while some businesses have the option to pass the increased tariff-related costs on to customers, that's impossible for him. As the only Canadian metal casket manufacturer, the company only competes with those in the United States. Those companies aren't raising prices, so he can't. As a result, he has appealed to the Canadian government to give his niche business an exemption. "Right now, it's only my cash flow that keeps me going," he said. "We need to get help from the government to at least avoid that 25 per cent tariff, like they did in the automotive industry. That's the only way we can make it survive at this point." The Canadian government has been giving exemptions, but there is a backlog in demands. In April, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said those exemptions are meant to help companies in the short term. "We're giving Canadian companies and entities more time to adjust their supply chains and become less dependent on U.S. suppliers," Champagne said. "There are definitely clients that have benefitted greatly from the various exemptions, including a remission, which is a large-scale exemption that the government of Canada offered in mid-April," said Pellerin, the lawyer. "The government's looking at it based on the best interests of Canada. These exemptions are retroactive, but we're expecting that they're going to take four to six months before they're granted."
