Colombia's ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest
The sentencing hearing on Friday also resulted in Uribe, 73, receiving a fine of $578,000 and a ban from serving in public office for 100 months and 20 days — or just over eight years.
He is now required to report to authorities in Rionegro, in his home province of Antioquia. Afterwards, Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia has ordered him to 'proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest'.
With his conviction on July 28, Uribe has become the first former Colombian president to be found guilty in a criminal trial.
But Uribe's defence lawyers have already announced that they plan to appeal.
The sentencing culminates a six-month trial and nearly 13 years of legal back-and-forth for the popular conservative leader, who is considered one of the defining forces in modern-day Colombian politics.
His house arrest also comes less than a year before Colombia is set to hold presidential elections in May 2026.
Allegations of human rights abuses
The case centres around Uribe's role in Colombia's more than six-decade-long internal conflict, which has seen government forces, right-wing paramilitaries, left-wing rebel groups and drug-trafficking networks all fighting for control over parts of the country.
During his tenure as president from 2002 to 2010, Uribe led a strong-armed offensive against left-wing rebels like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the largest such group at the time.
But that approach earned him criticism for alleged human rights abuses, which he has denied.
Under his presidency, the Colombian military faced increasing accusations that it was killing civilians in order to boost the number of enemy combatants it could report as dead.
This practice, known as the 'false positives' scandal, has been implicated in the deaths of at least 2,000 people, with experts indicating that the number could be far higher. As many as 6,402 killings have been investigated.
Critics have also questioned Uribe's ties to right-wing paramilitaries, another allegation the ex-president has rejected.
But more than a decade ago, Uribe took action to silence one of his most prominent critics, leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, sparking his current trial.
Cepeda and others had drawn connections between Uribe's rise in politics in the 1990s and the creation of the paramilitary group Bloque Metro.
A legal boomerang
In 2012, Uribe filed a libel complaint against Cepeda with Colombia's Supreme Court, after the senator launched a probe into the ex-president's paramilitary contacts.
But in 2018, the case took a surprising new direction: The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint against Cepeda, and the court system instead started to weigh charges against Uribe instead.
Prosecutors accused Uribe of seeking to pressure paramilitary witnesses to change or suppress their testimony. While Uribe has admitted to sending lawyers to meet with former members of Colombia's paramilitaries, he has denied taking illegal actions.
Two paramilitaries have testified that Uribe's lawyer Diego Cadena, who also faces criminal charges, offered them money to give favourable evidence.
Their witness statements were also being used in a murder trial featuring Uribe's brother, Santiago Uribe.
Uribe's conviction was announced after a 10-hour hearing in which Judge Heredia said there was ample evidence that the ex-president sought to change witness testimony.
But that decision has sparked backlash from the United States, where the administration of President Donald Trump has shown willingness to place political pressure on countries like Brazil that pursue criminal cases against former right-wing leaders.
On Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media in defence of Uribe, repeating charges of judicial bias that have become commonplace under Trump.
'Former Colombian President Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland,' Rubio said. 'The weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent.'
But Democrats in the US accused Trump of seeking to subvert the rule of law overseas for political gains.
'The Trump Admin is saying that foreign leaders shouldn't be subject to rule of law if they say nice things about Trump,' Representative Jim McGovern wrote in reply to Rubio's message.
'It is very wrong to support impunity for a strongman held accountable by courts in his own country. This statement is shameful, and you know it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
19 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump announces August 15 meet-up with Putin in Alaska, warns of land swap
United States President Donald Trump has confirmed he will meet with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on August 15 in Alaska to discuss efforts to end the war in Ukraine But, Trump added, any peace deal would involve 'some swapping' of territory, a controversial prospect. 'We are going to have a meeting with Russia. We'll start off with Russia,' he said on Friday, as he hosted leaders from Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House. Trump offered few details on what, if anything, had changed in his months-long effort to bring about a deal to end Russia's invasion. Still, he suggested any breakthrough would require the exchange of territory. 'It's very complicated. But we're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched. There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both, but we'll be talking about that either later, or tomorrow,' he said. Ukraine and its European allies have long opposed any agreement that involves ceding occupied territory — including Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — to Russia. But Putin has repeatedly said that any deal must require Ukraine to relinquish some of the territories Russia has seized since 2014. He has also called for a pause to Western aid for Ukraine and an end to Kyiv's efforts to join the NATO military alliance. Questions about the meeting's location Still, the prospect of Trump meeting Putin has raised logistical questions in recent days, particularly since the Russian leader faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC). Prosecutors have sought his arrest for alleged war crimes perpetrated in Ukraine, and Putin's travel through any ICC member countries could result in his detention. The US, however, is not an ICC member and does not recognise the court's authority. While the Kremlin had previously floated the possibility of meeting in the United Arab Emirates, another non-member, Trump announced on Friday in a Truth Social post that he would welcome Putin to the US northernmost state, Alaska. The state's mainland sits approximately 88 kilometers — or 55 miles — away from Russia across the Bering Strait, and some smaller islands are even closer. Friday's announcement came on the same day as a deadline that Trump had imposed on Russia to reach a ceasefire passed without any new agreement. In recent weeks, Trump had grown increasingly frustrated with Russia over the country's continued attacks on Ukraine and its apparent unwillingness to come to an accord. The August 15 meeting is slated to be the first tete-a-tete between the two leaders since 2019, during Trump's first term. 'Great progress' Trump had broken with decades of diplomatic precedent by seeming to embrace Putin during much of his time in the White House. Earlier this year, for instance, Trump appeared to reject Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in favour of Putin. He also blamed Ukraine's ambitions of joining NATO for provoking Russia's full-scale invasion of its territory in February 2022. 'Putin went through a hell of a lot with me,' Trump yelled at one point during a confrontational meeting with Zelenskyy broadcast from the White House in February. But Trump has positioned himself as a self-described 'peacemaker', and his inability to bring the Ukraine war to a close has become a source of resentment between him and Putin. At the same time, he took an initially permissive approach to Putin, but has since expressed growing frustration with the Russian leader amid Russia's continued attacks. Last week, Trump denounced Russia's renewed attacks on Kyiv. 'I think it's disgusting what they're doing. I think it's disgusting,' he said. He also demanded that Russia pause its attacks or face new sanctions and secondary tariffs on key trading partners. On Wednesday, Trump appeared to begin to make good on that threat, raising tariffs on Indian goods to 50 percent in response to its purchase of Russian oil. Still, this week, Trump hailed 'great progress' in the peace negotiations as his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, visited Putin in Moscow. But as of Friday, the date of the new deadline, no new US actions or Russian capitulations had been announced. Some analysts have argued that Putin is intentionally teasing out talks to extend the war. It remains unclear if Trump's mercurial approach has meaningfully changed the ceasefire equation since he took office.
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Majority seek end to Israel weapons sales: Survey spanning three continents
A majority of people in five nations – Brazil, Colombia, Greece, South Africa and Spain – believe that weapons companies should stop or reduce trade with Israel as its onslaught on Gaza continues, a poll released on Thursday reveals. Spain showed the highest support for weapons deals to be halted, with 58 percent of respondents saying they should stop completely, followed by Greece at 57 percent and Colombia at 52 percent. In Brazil, 37 percent of respondents believed arms companies should completely stop sales to Israel, while 22 percent believed they should be reduced. In South Africa, those levels stood at 46 and 20 percent, respectively. Commissioned by the Global Energy Embargo for Palestine network, endorsed by the left-wing Progressive International organisation, and fielded by the Pollfish platform last month, the survey comes in the wake of a call by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory, on countries to slash financial relations with Israel as she decried an 'economy of genocide'. 'The people have spoken, and they refuse to be complicit. Across continents, ordinary citizens demand an end to the fuel that powers settler colonialism, apartheid and genocide,' said Ana Sanchez, a campaigner for Global Energy Embargo for Palestine. 'No state that claims to uphold democracy can justify maintaining energy, military, or economic ties with Israel while it commits a genocide in Palestine. This is not just about trade; it's about people's power to cut the supply lines of oppression.' The group said it chose the survey locations because of the countries' direct involvement in the import and transport of energy to Israel. More than 1,000 respondents in each nation were asked about governmental and private sector relations with Israel to measure public attitudes on responsibility. Condemnation of Israel's action in Gaza as the humanitarian crisis escalates was the highest in Greece and Spain and lowest in Brazil. Sixty-one percent and 60 percent in Greece and Spain respectively opposed Israel's current 'military actions' in Gaza, while in Colombia, 50 percent opposed them. In Brazil and South Africa, 30 percent were against Israel's war, while 33 percent and 20 percent, respectively, supported the campaign. To date, Israel's genocide in Gaza has killed more than 60,000 people – most of them women and children. Now home to the highest number of child amputees per capita, much of the besieged Strip is in a state of ruin as the population starves. As the crisis worsens, arms dealers and companies that facilitate their deals are facing heightened scrutiny. In June, as reported by Al Jazeera, Maersk divested from companies linked to Israeli settlements, which are considered illegal under international law, following a campaign accusing the Danish shipping giant of links to Israel's military and occupation of Palestinian land. On Tuesday, Norway announced that it would review its sovereign wealth fund's investments in Israel, after it was revealed that it had a stake in an Israeli firm that supplies fighter jet parts to the Israeli military. In recent months, several wealth and pension funds have distanced themselves from companies linked to Israel's war on Gaza or its illegal occupation of the West Bank. Responding to the poll, 41 percent in Spain said they would 'strongly' support a state-level decision to reduce trade in weapons, fuel and other goods in an attempt to pressure Israel into stopping the war. This figure stood at 33 percent in Colombia and South Africa, and 28 and 24 percent in Greece and Brazil, respectively. 'The message from the peoples of the world is loud and clear: They want action to end the assault on Gaza – not just words,' said David Adler, co-general coordinator of Progressive International. 'Across continents, majorities are calling for their governments to halt arms sales and restrain Israel's occupation.'
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Ghana helicopter crash kills defence, environment ministers
Ghana helicopter crash kills defence, environment ministers NewsFeed Footage from a forest in Ghana's Ashanti region showed smouldering wreckage from a helicopter crash that killed the country's defence and environment ministers. Three other officials and three air force crew members were also killed. Video Duration 01 minutes 17 seconds 01:17 Video Duration 01 minutes 06 seconds 01:06 Video Duration 00 minutes 30 seconds 00:30 Video Duration 01 minutes 52 seconds 01:52 Video Duration 01 minutes 40 seconds 01:40 Video Duration 00 minutes 44 seconds 00:44 Video Duration 00 minutes 43 seconds 00:43
