Former Manitoba premier violated Conflict of Interest Act by pushing silica sand project: ethics commissioner
The report says Stefanson, then-deputy premier Cliff Cullen and then-economic development minister Jeff Wharton tried to get approval for the Sio Silica project after the Tories lost the 2023 election, but before the new NDP government was to be sworn in.
Ethics commissioner Jeffrey Schnoor says their actions violated the Conflict of Interest Act and contravened a long-standing parliamentary principle that forbids outgoing governments from making major decisions in most cases.
Schnoor is recommending penalties of between $10,000 and $18,000 per person, although the legislative assembly gets to make the final decision.
The mining project would have created thousands of wells over 24 years across a large swath of southeastern Manitoba, although only an initial phase was being considered for approval.
The NDP government rejected the project in February 2024, citing the potential impact on drinking water among other concerns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
5 minutes ago
- CBC
Conservatives say the justice system favours non-citizens. Experts disagree
Social Sharing The Conservatives want to change the Criminal Code to eliminate what they say is a double standard in the justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians who have been convicted of the same crime. "When it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a form of two-tier justice," Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said Wednesday in Ottawa. "This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system." Deportations are automatically scheduled to allow time for appeal, but certain criminal sentences remove the right of the offender to challenge their removal. "Removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer," Rempel Garner said. "Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right." But immigration experts say the Conservatives' characterization of Canada's justice system as being biased in favour of non-citizens is simply false. They say the law is designed to ensure the sentence fits the crime, regardless of the offender's status. WATCH | Conservatives want judges to stop considering immigration status in sentencing: Conservatives vow to introduce bill preventing judges from weighing immigration status in sentencing 5 hours ago Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner says she'll introduce legislation when Parliament returns that would amend the Criminal Code, preventing judges from considering a non-citizen's immigration status during sentencing. Rempel Garner said her party will introduce a private member's bill when the House of Commons returns in September, promising the change will "restore the value of Canadian citizenship." The bill "will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or that of their family members, should not be taken into consideration," the Conservative Party says in a statement. Rempel Garner's suggestion that Canada has "two-tier" sentencing provisions is, she said, the direct result of a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that clarified sentencing guidelines. One of several factors to consider In the ruling, Canada's top court said that when sentencing a non-citizen, a judge can use an offender's immigration status as one of several factors when considering what sentence to impose. "That's what judges do in sentencing. They take into account factors that are individual that are relevant; this is just one more of them," said Audrey Macklin, a law professor at the University of Toronto. Macklin said other factors commonly considered during sentencing are whether the offender has a substance abuse issue; whether they are a single parent and what will happen to their child; or the prospects that they can be rehabilitated. "Sentencing always takes into account factors unique or specific to that individual," she said. "It's a misrepresentation to suggest that this is two-tier justice." Macklin said the 2013 ruling also clarified that while immigration status can be considered, it could not be used to reduce the sentence below the standard minimum. Losing the right to appeal deportation Under the law in Canada, a person who has been ordered to be removed from the country cannot appeal their deportation order if: They were convicted of a crime in Canada and given a sentence of six months or more. They were convicted of a crime outside Canada punishable in Canada by a sentence of 10 years or more. They were involved in organized crime. They violated human or international rights law, by, for example, committing war crimes. Toronto immigration lawyer Pantea Jafari says she has argued similar cases. She told CBC News that the 2013 ruling was crafted to ensure the consequences of a sentence are proportional to what the judge intends. In a case where a judge may think someone has committed a minor offence and only deserves a slap on the wrist, Jafari said the judge may decide to give them a six-month sentence. For a Canadian citizen, the punishment would be six months in jail. But for a non-citizen, it could result in deportation without the ability to appeal. Jafari said the 2013 ruling simply gives the judge in her example the authority to lower the sentence to six months less a day so they can still appeal their deportation. She said this would ensure a citizen and non-citizen receive comparable sentences. "When [a judge] is considering a sentence, they can't be blind to the fact that this person is not a naturalized Canadian, is still an immigrant and therefore will have additional consequences as a result of the sentence," Jafari said.
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
UR Pride says work ‘isn't finished' in response to legal challenge moving forward
WATCH: Following a court of appeal ruling allowing a challenge against Sask's pronoun law to proceed, UR Pride says it's a win, but their work isn't finished.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Nipissing First Nation elects a new chief
It would appear that Nipissing First Nation has elected a new chief. An undated photo of the Nipissing First Nation Band Office. (Nipissing First Nation/Facebook) It would appear that Nipissing First Nation (NFN) has elected a new chief. Cathy Bellefeuille Unofficial results show that Nipissing First Nation has elected Cathy Bellefeuille to serve as chief for the next three-year term of council. An undated photo of Bellefeuille posted to social media on Jan. 4, 2023. (Facebook/Cathy Bellefeuille) Unofficial results show Cathy Bellefeuille has been elected chief for the next three-year term. Scott McLeod, who has served as chief for nine years, will step down when this council term ends at the end of July. There were six names on the ballot and more than 1,400 votes to be cast on Friday. 'A Vote for Unity' was Bellefeuille's campaign motto. Her campaign focused on working for all members both on and off the reserve, protecting NFN inherent and treaty rights while promoting economic development in order to build the community. 'I believe our First Nation has a solid foundation with a fantastic future that has been built over the years of hard work of the previous councils,' said Bellfeuille in her campaign platform. 'I am a strong advocate for health care, education, economic stability, culture, language and social development.' Bellefeuille has served as a court worker for 15 years with the North Bay Indigenous Friendship Centre, has served as band representative and a child welfare coordinator and is actively involved with Nipissing First Nation's Ojibway Women's Lodge. She also served on NFN Council, being elected in 2015. During her tenure, she held the economic development portfolio and the health and social portfolio. Outgoing Chief McLeod posted congratulatory messages to 'all the candidates who put themselves out there to serve our great Nation,' on social media prior to the election. Scott McLeod Scott McLeod, who has served as Nipissing First Nation Chief for nine years, will step down when this council term ends at the end of July after losing his re-election bid. An undated photo of McLeod posted to social media on June 10, 2023. (Facebook/Scott McLeod Shabogesic) 'The community always makes the choice they feel is needed and we must all support the outcome,' he said. True to his words, McLeod formally congratulated Bellefeuille on her win in a subsequent social media post on Saturday morning. 'Congratulations to our new NFN Chief Cathy Bellefeuille and our newly elected Council,' he wrote. 'There are many challenges ahead. Let's all give them our full support as we move forward together.' McLeod briefly reflected on his time as chief. 'I have given my community the best I have to offer and would do it all over again in a heartbeat,' he said. 'Being Chief has been a tremendous honor and a big part of my identity for the last 9(sic) years. Letting that go, although difficult, is a necessary transition for our Nation.' McLeod told the community he will be taking some time to reflect and determine what is next but said he will post more thoughts 'in the near future.' Fred Bellefeuille, NFN's Electoral Officer, states a full report with official election results will be released on Monday. Officials with NFN told CTV News that the face for Chief was a close one but they do not expect any calls for a recount.
