Fort Worth residents stand against FedEx parking permit request. Will it matter?
FedEx applied for a conditional use permit to allow parking of semi-trucks and trailers on a 9-acre lot at 4700 Martin St. in Southeast Fort Worth, near Loop 820.
The Fort Worth Environmental Coalition of Communities, a group of residents fighting environmental racism, held the protest to ask the city to deny the parking permit.
Councilwoman Jeanette Martinez, who represents the area where the FedEx hub is located, was not present, prompting the council to table the vote.
A May Zoning Commission meeting showed FedEx previously had a special exception that allowed it to park semi-trucks and trailers, but that permit expired in March 2020.
The commission questioned how the company missed the expiration date — and didn't realize it for five years. The reason was due to 'oversight' by FedEx, which didn't realize the lapse because it's a 'huge corporate entity,' according to Sean Tate, a lawyer representing FedEx. When the company learned about it from city officials, it immediately worked to rectify the problem, Tate added.
Tate said there would be no operational changes or expanded use at the FedEx hub and that it will continue to be used as a storage facility. He added there would be new landscaping and a wood screen fence to replace the chain-link fence.
Tate said there were two meetings, on March 10 and April 5, with local neighborhood associations, to help fund the purchase and maintenance of a air quality monitor, implement new signs to deter truck traffic and create a formal complaint process for reported truck route violations.
The city's Zoning Commission said the permit is compatible with the surrounding industrial land uses and approved the permit with a vote of 10-1 to advance the matter to the City Council for a vote.
Letitia Wilbourn, a member of the Fort Worth Environmental Coalition of Communities and Echo Heights resident, said they want to deny it because of FedEx's poor communication and the community's desire to downsize the industrial and commercial footprint in their neighborhood.
Wilbourn said both meetings were held on short notice and residents were not given the answers they wanted in terms of how many trucks they had, what changes they wanted and more.
She added how residents complained to FedEx that the trucks will drive though residential streets, making the routes dangerous for children, or will park and idle, polluting the air.
'Today is the City Council meeting, and because of the lack of information that we have with FedEx, the lack of trust with FedEx, the inconsistencies with Fed Ex, the pollution from FedEx, we feel like it's important for us to go out and protest,' Wilbourn told the Star Telegram before the City Council meeting.
Fort Worth has designated Echo Heights and surrounding areas as an Industrial Growth Center through the Comprehensive Plan & Future Land Use plan that the city developed in 2000. Over the last few years the city and community members have clashed over efforts to reduce the amount of pollution in the neighborhoods.
Caleb Roberts, executive director of Downwinders at Risk, a clean air and environmental justice group, said adding this permit goes against what the community and environmental groups have been fighting for.
Roberts says it's disrespectful to constantly have to fight the city over the community's frustration with industrial growth in their neighborhood.
'It does seem like the city itself is helping these businesses set up shop and continue operating in these communities, and I don't think the city is helping the community in the same way,' Roberts said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
2 hours ago
- Business Journals
St. Charles data center dead after developers withdraw their proposal, mayor says
The developers of a massive, secretive and controversial data center project in St. Charles have withdrawn their offer from the city. St. Charles Mayor Dan Borgmeyer told KSDK on Monday that City Council members will no longer vote on "Project Cumulus" after the application's withdrawal. "The vote was whether or not they could use diesel generators for power. That's all the vote was about. As soon as people heard diesel fuel a million gallons in the well field, they became upset. Well, there's 125 generators, so it's not a million gallons someplace. Disrespectful of all that, we don't want one generator to leak. They had measures in place to take care of a lot of that, but the fact of the matter is that it was a lack of information. The culprit was transparency," Borgmeyer said. The data center has received widespread pushback from over 5,500 residents over concerns of water pollution, energy bill increases, and general community impacts. Two members of the City Council recently . GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events Councilmember Justin Foust, who represents Ward 6 in the city, previously said it would be "nearly impossible" for him to support the project. He expressed disappointment after the developers pulled their offer. "Residents deserve better communication, real transparency, and the chance to have their voices recorded through an open vote," Foust said in a statement. "Unfortunately, the decision to pull the application was made by the applicant, not the City Council." Foust urged residents to still attend Tuesday's City Council meeting to make their voices heard on the matter, in case "this applicant returns or another comes forward." The council meeting is scheduled to be held at the St. Charles Convention Center's Junior Ballroom on the first floor. Developers were having little success in convincing residents that the data center would be an ultimate good for the community. Many residents have shown up to give passionate speeches against the data center at past City Council and planning and zoning meetings. A petition to "Stop the Hazardous Data Center" was signed by nearly 5,000 residents a week after it launched. "No Data Center" fliers were recently sent out across St. Charles. The fliers claimed the project was dangerous and wrong for the city for numerous reasons, along with listing numerous data center projects that have been stopped across the country, including in Arizona, Virginia and Tennessee. The flyer was paid for by the "Good Government Committee" and urged people to contact their council members. Some residents said that the format of a recent open house made it difficult to get exact answers about the project, in part because everyone needed to talk over each other to be heard. Others had hoped for the opportunity to speak publicly on their issues, but officials didn't give them a chance to do so. "I think it's very important that people understand, we listened and even if they hadn't withdrawn it, I'm almost positive it would not have made it on Tuesday," Borgmeyer said. Tim Kline, a longtime farmer in the St. Charles area, has been watching the area for years. "The contaminated area is on the far east end of the protected area and this was going to be developed on the far west end of the area, which is over a mile away from where the contamination was from UE and Findett corporations, and I just hope we can get this stopped down here," Kline said. Kline wanted to thank everyone who signed the petition and showed up at the open house. And while he's gotten his wish for now, he's worried the industrial zoning of the area will allow Project Cumulus or another company to try again. "It's our protected water source. So, we need to get together and see if we can get it re-zoned back to agricultural and stop the filling on top of our water source," Kline said. After the open house, Borgmeyer decided to withdraw his support from the project. He added that the non-disclosure agreement went much further than the ones they "do all the time." "This one went to the point where it was just ridiculous. And they needed to step back, and there's a lot of good things about the project, but there's a lot of bad things about the project. And I think until the full scope of it's understood, they've withdrawn. I don't know if they'll come back or not," Borgmeyer said. He also addressed rumours that the original land owners are his cousins, which he says was brought to light by his last opponent for the mayor's office. "I think it's a second or third cousin. I have no idea who the people are. I'm related to just about everybody in St. Charles, the Boscherts, the Echols, and everybody else. I've talked to [St. Charles County Executive] Steve Ehlmann. We had lunch yesterday. He said, 'Yeah, we are,' I'm even related to Steve Ehlmann. So it was a political shot," Borgmeyer said. Project Cumulus attorney Korb Maxwell said he wants residents to know they were heard and that's part of why they pulled the application. "It was time to re-evaluate the approach that we made to the site and look at really focusing on what changes can we make to the site that may garner more support, but also what changes can we make to the process," Maxwell said. KSDK's Laura Barczewski asked Maxwell if they are looking elsewhere or if they will try again on the same site. "I think the project fellows team is always keeping our options open and looking at options all across the nation and in the Ameren service territory, but we really like this site. I think it has a lot to offer. I think it could be a incredibly compelling opportunity for the St. Charles region and for us, if we're able to get out our message effectively and communicate with both the businesses and the city," he said. This is the full statement released by Project Cumulus: "The Cumulus team announced today that it is withdrawing its conditional use permit application from consideration at the August 19th St. Charles City Council meeting. The decision will allow the team to incorporate recent community feedback and prepare a revised proposal for future review. "Over the past months, Project Cumulus has conducted extensive analyses of the project, its impacts, and its anticipated community benefits. While this work has been substantial, the team recognizes the importance of strengthening its outreach process to ensure information is accessible and clearly communicated to the public. "Project Cumulus is committed to working hand-in-hand with the City of St. Charles and its residents. Cumulus believes this project has the potential to deliver significant benefits to the city and the greater St. Louis region, and we want to ensure it is done the right way — with open dialogue and meaningful collaboration. "The Cumulus team will continue working closely with city officials and the public in the coming months to develop a proposal that reflects shared priorities and delivers long-term value to the community." Representatives for the project will still be at the council meeting on Tuesday, and the council will still take public feedback on the issue despite the withdrawal. View KSDK's full report and video here.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Richard Smith nominated to FedEx's board of directors
Richard Smith may soon have some more responsibilities at FedEx. The FedEx executive and son of the company's late founder, Fred Smith, has been nominated for the company's board of directors. The Memphis-based logistics giant's annual stockholders meeting is Sept. 29. Richard Smith currently serves as chief operating officer, International, and chief executive officer, Airline, at FedEx. He started at FedEx in May 2005. His jobs at the company have included serving as president and CEO of FedEx Express. "Richard possesses extensive FedEx experience and will represent the legacy and values of his father and family on the Board of Directors," R. Brad Martin, chairman of the FedEx board of directors, said in a letter. Fred Smith died of natural causes on June 21 in Memphis. A celebration of life event in honor of Smith was held on Aug. 11 at FedExForum in Downtown Memphis. FedEx hosted the event that was open to the public to celebrate the life of Smith on what would have been his 81st birthday. Memphis Mayor Paul Young presented a key to the City of Memphis to Fred Smith's family. Young also declared Aug. 11 as "Fred W. Smith Day." During the event, Richard Smith reassured Memphians that FedEx isn't going anywhere. Corey Davis is the Collierville and Germantown reporter with The Commercial Appeal. He can be reached at or 901-293-1610. To keep up with the latest news from the Shelby County suburbs, sign up here for our Suburban Pulse weekly newsletter. This article originally appeared on Memphis Commercial Appeal: Richard Smith nominated to FedEx's board of directors Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CBS News
7 hours ago
- CBS News
Amid layoffs, Denver City Council prepares for $26,000 mountain retreat
Ten of Denver's 13 city council members are planning to attend a $26,000, two night, one day retreat in Colorado's foothills next week for team building and professional development, at the same time the city is laying off workers and trying to find ways to cut costs and save money. "We signed this contract prior to knowing of any budget shortfall," said Council President Amanda Sandoval, who pushed for the trip at the Lone Rock retreat ( in Park County. "We signed this contract prior to knowing of any furlough days, we signed this contract prior to knowing of any layoffs," said Sandoval. She said the council retreat had been in the works since December 2024, and the contract was signed May 8. Two weeks later, Mayor Mike Johnston revealed the depths of the city budget problems that would necessitate city workers being laid off, others needing to take furlough days and belt-tightening across city agencies. "I would never have done any of this had I known any of this information prior to signing that contract," said Sandoval. The council president said she tried to void the contract and get the city's money back or change the date of the retreat, but could not, so council members will travel to the location near Bailey the evening of Aug. 27 and return the morning of Aug. 29 -- a city furlough day. The city will pay $16,000 for facility use, meals and rooms, $2,600 for transportation with ADA accommodation and $7,600 for a facilitator and assessment tool. The money will come out of the Denver City council central budget. Three council members have conflicts and will not attend, said Sandoval, but three council staff members will attend. Sandoval said she previously went to a retreat at the facility and was impressed by its ADA accommodations. On its website, the Lone Rock says it has 60 individual cabins each with an "oxygen enrichment system," a fitness center and yoga room along with meeting spaces, restaurants and 'breathtaking views." While the timing may not be ideal, Sandoval maintains that the retreat is still appropriate. "So just because we're having a time of crisis doesn't mean council shouldn't learn to work better together. It really doesn't." Asked if city council could have found a less expensive option for a retreat, Sandoval said, "I've done research on places ... and there's not a lot of options. We do not have a facility like that in Denver." "Ultimately," said Sandoval, "this is about bringing council together to work better together so we can serve the residents of Denver."
