logo
Border Agents' Aggressive Tactics Against Black Organizer Raises Alarms About Dissent Suppression

Border Agents' Aggressive Tactics Against Black Organizer Raises Alarms About Dissent Suppression

Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE Source: Douglas Rissing / Getty
Devin Springer's recent detention and interrogation by U.S. Border Protection and Customs agents took a page out of an old playbook used to repress dissent and punish outspoken Black leaders. Last week, agents detained and interrogated Springer—a Black, queer, Muslim organizer and journalist known by friends and colleagues as Musa— upon their return from traveling to a sanctioned trip to Cuba.
Springer shared details of their detention and interrogation by Customs and Border Protection agents in a statement posted on the Mondoweiss website, where they are a contributor. According to the statement, Springer was subjected to an aggressive search, which they estimated lasted longer than three hours without access to a lawyer. According to their statement, an agent informed Springer that upon returning home from international travel, 'most of your rights are suspended.'
'For roughly over three hours, I was held without access to legal counsel, aggressively questioned, patted down, and subjected to an invasive groin search,' they said. 'My passport was taken, all of my belongings were searched, and eventually my devices—my cell phone and laptop—were seized without justification. After seizing my devices, three CBP agents attempted to coerce me into powering on the devices and surrendering my device passwords; when I refused, which I knew was my right to do, they were very visibly aggravated.'
Springer further explained that agents used their travel to Cuba, on Southwest Airlines, and in accordance with the limited exceptions available to Americans, and solidarity organizing on behalf of Palestinian liberation as justification for the detention and aggressive questioning. Part of Springer's advocacy has also included recent support of a friend who was an international student targeted by the Trump administration and forced to self-deport.
'CBP agents asked whether I had received so-called 'military training' in Cuba or the Middle East, questioned if I was involved in political activity on the island, and pressed me for information on my potential connections to several foreign students and professors engaged in Palestine solidarity,' Springer said. 'This experience is part of a broader pattern. Across administrations, DHS has operated as a politically charged agency to escalate surveillance, harassment, and criminalization of individuals involved in movements for justice, liberation, and in this case, against genocide. Now, we're witnessing a dangerous heightening of this weaponization.'
The Center for Constitutional Rights, which is representing Springer, filed a motion in federal court demanding the government return the seized devices. The motion outlined the government's retaliation against Springer's constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment, including how agents reviewed Springer's personal and professional research and writings, claiming to have 'found something' on a page of a notebook. It further notes how the agents searched for Springer's work online, making mention of abortion and Palestine, a possible reference to Springer's work for a Georgia reproductive justice organization and their solidarity with the Palestinian people and movement for liberation.
Springer is the second U.S. citizen from Georgia to make the news this week. Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, a 20-year-old Georgia man wrongfully detained by ICE in Florida despite being born in the U.S., was accused of being unlawfully present in the country despite his mother's insistence that he was born here. Authorities detained Lopez-Gomez for 48 hours.
Citizens and non-citizens are increasingly reporting incidents of detentions and seizures upon returning to the U.S. after traveling abroad. In a video posted to social media, an attorney from the Center for Constitutional Rights placed Springer's incident in the context of other reported occurrences across the country.
'Incidents like these are extremely troubling and have been happening with increasing frequency during the Trump administration, reflecting a dangerous trend of suppressing voices critical of U.S. officials and policies,' said the attorney. 'As Musa said in their statement, Customs and Border Patrol does not merely police borders. They police dissent.'
You can donate to support Springer's fundraiser here.
SEE ALSO:
Oakland Voters Say 'Barbara Lee Speaks For Me!'
NY AG Letitia James Calls Mortgage Fraud Claims 'Baseless'
SEE ALSO
Border Agents' Aggressive Tactics Against Black Organizer Raises Alarms About Dissent Suppression was originally published on newsone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Prices for Common Groceries Have Changed Since Trump Took Office
How Prices for Common Groceries Have Changed Since Trump Took Office

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Prices for Common Groceries Have Changed Since Trump Took Office

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, grocery prices at the national level have remained elevated and, in many categories, are rising even further. Federal forecasts and multiple price trackers show continuing inflation for common items such as eggs and beef, and the USDA Economic Research Service projected overall food prices will increase over the remainder of this year and 2026. Why It Matters Food represents a large and visible share of household spending, and high grocery bills influence public perceptions of the economy and the administration's performance. A mid-2025 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that a majority of Americans reported stress over grocery costs, and retailers have reported shoppers shifting purchases toward cheaper brands and smaller sizes. Roughly 53 percent of respondents said grocery costs were a "major" stressor. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, Florida. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, To Know Trump campaigned on promises of lowering grocery costs, but federal forecasts and private trackers showed only modest easing overall and price gains in several food staples. The USDA Economic Research Service reported that the all-food Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.3 percent from May to June and was 3 percent higher than June 2024. It also projected overall food prices would rise 2.9 percent this year and 2.7 percent in 2026. "Most headlines lean on 'core CPI,' which excludes food and energy," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "That's fine for economists, but for real households, those are the two biggest non-discretionary expenses. So when they say prices are 'stabilizing,' it leaves out the areas where people actually feel it the most." The exact price increases vary by grocery item. NBC News' grocery-price tracker showed eggs, chicken and beef remained higher year-over-year in the most recent update. While eggs were up 64 cents, chicken cost 81 cents more and beef had seen an increase of 67 cents. The USDA projected egg prices to have strong volatility, with a 24.6 percent change forecast for 2025, and beef and veal prices were anticipated to rise substantially, 8.8 percent, this year. "The reality is that inflation is weighted across categories," Thompson said. "If your personal diet leans heavy on protein, beef, chicken, coffee, or soda, you've likely felt double-digit increases while the official number is closer to 3 percent. Everyone's 'personal inflation' is different, and for many it feels far higher than the reported average." Trump previously warned of short-term effects from trade policy, saying, "We may have, short term, a little pain." What People Are Saying Trump said during his campaign: "When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One." Thompson also told Newsweek: "Tariffs during Trump's presidency did raise costs on imported goods, and new tariffs under the current administration are continuing that trend. Immigration policy does have some effect on labor costs in agriculture and food processing, but the bigger driver of food prices has been weather, disease, and global supply chain issues not immigration directly." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "All of the inflationary pressures that were in place prior to 2025 have largely remained the same, with some everyday items actually going higher in price, if only incrementally so. The prevailing problem is the pricing structure on many consumer goods is formed through a domino effect which includes costs of production, shipping, stocking, and everything in between. "In order for prices to go lower, not only do you have to have falling demand, but also the series of transactions that make it ready to buy have to trend lower in order for businesses to continue to generate a profit. Until this happens, we're going to continue to see higher costs." What Happens Next The USDA ERS forecasts and monthly CPI releases from the Bureau of Labor Statistics will remain primary sources to measure whether grocery prices fall back, stabilize or resume faster growth in coming months. Since Trump's tariffs have gone into effect, the higher costs will likely be passed down to the consumer, Thompson said: "Businesses may absorb some costs in the short term, but over time those costs show up in the checkout line. The current tariff environment has raised the baseline market price, which means U.S. producers can charge more too, capturing extra margins. "Going forward, unless there's a consistent and predictable tariff policy, shoppers should expect continued price volatility. Once markets adjust to a clear set of rules, prices may stabilize, but likely at a higher level than before."

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation's capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation's largest U.S. attorney's office. That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said in a statement that the change is based on guidance from the Justice Department and the Office of Solicitor General and conforms with two Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been a vocal critic of local officials' crime-fighting efforts since Republican President Donald Trump installed her in office in May. Her policy shift means federal prosecutors will not purse charges under the D.C. law that made it illegal to carry rifles or shotguns, except in limited cases involving permit holders. The change also overlaps with Trump's declaration of a crime emergency in the city, flooding the streets of Washington with patrols of hundreds of federal agents and National Guard members. The White House says 76 firearms have been seized since the crackdown started this month. The new policy also coves large-capacity magazines, but it does not apply to handguns. 'We will continue to seize all illegal and unlicensed firearms, and to vigorously prosecute all crimes connected with them,' Pirro said, adding that she and Trump "are committed to prosecuting gun crime.' Pirro said a blanket ban on possessing shotguns and rifles violates the Supreme Court's ruling in 2022 that struck down a New York gun law and held that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. She also pointed to the high court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller striking down the city's ban on handguns in the home.

Khamenei's advisor: 'New war between Israel and Iran may occur at any time'
Khamenei's advisor: 'New war between Israel and Iran may occur at any time'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Khamenei's advisor: 'New war between Israel and Iran may occur at any time'

Seyed Yahya Rahim Safavi, an advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, announced the possibility of renewed conflict between Israel and Iran on Sunday, Persian media reported. Seyed Yahya Rahim Safavi, an advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alluded to the possibility of renewed conflict between Israel and Iran on Sunday, Persian media reported. "A new war between Iran and Israel may occur at any time. We must adopt an offensive strategy; the best defense is an attack," Safavi said in a video statement. "There is no agreement between us and the Israelis and Americans," Safavi said, adding that Iran is reportedly preparing for the "worst-case scenario." Both Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and the commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, made similar claims earlier this month. "A 1% threat must be perceived as a 100% threat. We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency. At the same time, Araghachi claimed that "everything is possible, and it is not just Iran that should be worried in concerned," in an interview with the Iranian Student News Agency. Ongoing cyber war Even so, despite the current impermanent ceasefire, the ongoing cyber war between Iran and Israel has never stopped. 'Although there is a ceasefire in the physical world, in the cyber arena, [the attacks] did not stop,' Boaz Dolev, chief executive of the Israeli cyberintelligence company ClearSky, told the Financial Times. Cyberattacks came from both sides. Israel launched a cyberattack campaign with over 20,000 attacks during the 12-day war, mainly to gather intelligence. At the same time, Iran attempted to maximize civilian casualties by including messages that appeared to be from the Home Front Command, which advised Israelis to avoid bomb shelters. "You can do whatever you want in cyberspace," said Menny Barzilay, a cybersecurity expert who served as the chief information security officer of the IDF intelligence services. "And probably no one will say anything.' This is a developing story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store