Canada weighing recognition of Palestinian statehood: source
The Canadian government is weighing whether to recognize Palestinian statehood, and whether that recognition would come with conditions, according to a government source.
No decision has been made yet, the source says, but Prime Minister Mark Carney is expected to hold a virtual cabinet meeting Wednesday afternoon, at which time the situation in the Middle East will be discussed.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday the U.K. will recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, allows the UN to bring in aid and takes other steps toward long-term peace.
The two leaders spoke Tuesday, according to Carney's office, about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the U.K.'s statement on the recognition of a Palestinian state.
WATCH | Starmer says U.K. plans to recognize Palestinian state:
Media Video | U.K. will recognize Palestinian statehood by fall unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' on Gaza, PM says
Caption: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, speaking Tuesday from London as his government faced protests over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, said the U.K's goal remains a 'safe and secure Israel' alongside a 'viable and sovereign Palestinian state.'
Open full embed in new tab Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage than loading CBC Lite story pages.
France announced a similar plan last week, but without conditions. French President Emmanuel Macron said Friday there was "no alternative" to recognizing the state of Palestine and intends to do so at the UN General Assembly in September.
Asked last week whether he would follow France, Carney said Canada will continue to support a two-state solution with "a free and viable Palestine living in peace and side-by-side in peace and security with Israel."
Days later, Ottawa announced $10 million in funding for the Palestinian Authority's preparations to lead a globally recognized country that includes Gaza and the West Bank. The federal government is also adding $30 million to its humanitarian funding for desperate Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
Trump says recognition rewards Hamas
Starmer, who is under mounting domestic pressure over the issue as scenes of hunger in Gaza horrify many Britons, convened a rare summertime cabinet meeting to discuss the situation in Gaza. It came after he discussed the crisis with U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in Scotland on Monday.
Trump told reporters he didn't mind Starmer "taking a position" on statehood. But he told reporters on board Air Force One travelling back to the U.S. that recognizing a Palestinian state would reward Palestinian militant group Hamas.
"You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded," he said.
Starmer said Tuesday that Britain will recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly "unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution."
"And this includes allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank," he said.
Israel's Foreign Ministry rejects British move
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds.
"The shift in the British government's position at this time, following the French move and internal political pressures, constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of hostages," Israel's Foreign Ministry said on X.
Starmer also repeated U.K. demands that Hamas release all the hostages it holds, agree to a ceasefire, disarm and "accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza."
In a televised statement, he said that his government will assess in September "how far the parties have met these steps" before making a final decision on recognition.
Britain has long supported the idea of an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel, but has said recognition should come as part of a negotiated two-state solution to the conflict.
But Starmer said Tuesday Britain was willing to take the step because "the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many years."
He said that despite the set of conditions he set out, Britain believes that "statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people."
Announcement follows France
France would become the first among the G7 to recognize a Palestinian state.
More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, including a dozen in Europe.
As with France, British recognition would be largely symbolic, but could increase diplomatic pressure for an end to the conflict — especially as Starmer appears to have the tacit approval of Trump.
Both Israel and Hamas are facing pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal following almost two years of war, with the humanitarian situation inside Gaza deteriorating and Israelis worried about the conditions in which hostages are being held.
Netanyahu condemned Macron's decision, saying that such a move "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
a few seconds ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
CP NewsAlert: Carney announces support measures for softwood lumber industry
KELOWNA – Prime Minister Mark Carney says the federal government will grant a series of financial aid measures to Canada's forestry sector. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The move comes as the U.S. ratchets up duties on Canadian softwood lumber as bilateral trade tensions rise. More coming.

CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Let's be smarter than the U.S. is': Experts discuss trade strategy amid Trump tariffs
As Canadians continue to navigate the ever-changing trade policies of U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, experts say officials in Ottawa are walking a tight rope between appeasement and retaliation. '(Trump) takes retaliation very personally, so I'm not sure it's worth the calculation,' Drew Fagan, professor at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, told BNN Bloomberg in a Tuesday interview. 'Canada's a big country, it's the tenth biggest economy in the world, but we're a middle weight fighting with a super-heavy weight, I don't think you want to go punching with them and thinking you're an equal; you're not.' A Friday deadline passed without a trade deal between the U.S. and Canada, and the Trump administration implemented a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods entering the U.S. that are not already covered under the existing North American free trade agreement. Most Canadian products exported to the U.S. do fall under the Canada-United States-Mexico agreement (CUSMA) and thus remain duty-free for now. That deal, however, is slated for renegotiation in 2026. 'For (Canada), the bigger negotiation is the one over the renewal, the review and the renegotiation of CUSMA next year,' Fagan argued. 'When (Trump) negotiated the renewal of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) in his first term, he put additional pressure on Canada by putting tariffs... on steel and aluminum that are key products that we export to the U.S.' It's possible, Fagan said, that Trump is carrying out a similar strategy now. 'The only thing that's really stopping him are the courts in the United States,' he said. From the start, Trump's legal justification for the tariffs placed on Canadian goods came through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the U.S. president authority to enact economic measures typically reserved for the U.S. Congress. 'There is a significant court case going on now… it's possible that the court will strike (the tariffs) down, but of course this president has a way of kind of working around court decisions… but we should expect that it'll be a bit of a full tilt in 2026,' said Fagan. Canada's next moves Although most Canadian exporters with U.S. customer bases are free to operate without tariffs for the time being, it remains unclear what moves Washington or Ottawa will make next in the ongoing trade conflict. But those industries that export non-CUSMA compliant goods to the U.S. need relief as soon as possible, says John Boscariol, leader of the International Trade and Investment Law Group at McCarthy-Tétrault LLP. 'For our exporters in the steel, aluminum and auto sector and now copper, they continue to face sectoral tariffs, so they are continuing to be hurt by those tariffs,' he told BNN Bloomberg in a Tuesday interview. 'What we are anticipating hopefully is that, as this agreement is being negotiated, we're going to see some kind of deal, some kind of resolution over those sectoral tariffs going forward and that's really how we will judge whether this is a good deal or not.' Many within the Canadian business community had been hoping for a new trade deal before last week's deadline to ease the burden on companies impacted by current tariff rates. But it's unclear if an imminent agreement is in the cards, Fagan noted. 'Conversations are continuing… the (U.S.) president and the prime minister are expected to talk this week,' he said. '(But) I don't expect, and I don't think many people expect a deal to be done soon with regard to Canada and the United States.' Prime Minister Mark Carney has said repeatedly since taking office this spring that Canada needs to diversify its economic partnerships around the world and become less dependent on the U.S. in light of the trade developments this year. But many of those partnerships are still in the early stages, and most Canadian exporters will continue to rely on U.S. markets at least in the near and medium term, Boscariol said. 'There is that opportunity to diversify and certainly the provinces are trying to do their part in reducing provincial barriers but in the short to medium term, we're looking to these trade negotiations to provide some sort of relief or resolution,' he said. While in search of that resolution, Fagan said that Canada's leaders should rely on their strengths, which have always been different than those of their U.S. counterparts. 'Let's be smarter than the U.S. is; we always are in negotiations,' he said, 'that's our superpower and I think we will be in the upcoming negotiations as well.'


CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
OPP say they are investigating the mayor of North Bay
Ontario Provincial Police said Tuesday they are investigating allegations involving North Bay Mayor Peter Chirico. In an email to CTV News, an OPP spokesperson said the North Bay Police Service referred a complaint about Chirico to the OPP. The complaint was 'concerning allegations involving the mayor of the City of North Bay, who also serves on the North Bay police services board,' OPP spokesperson Gosia Puzio said in the email. 'We can confirm that the OPP has opened an investigation into the matter.' Personal expenses Chirico has been in the spotlight since it emerged this spring that he had used the corporate credit card to pay for personal expenses, including golf club memberships, gifts and cigarettes. He has said he repaid $16,000 in personal items he charged to the city credit card. North Bay city council rejected a motion calling for a forensic audit into the mayor's expenses, and for Chirico to step down from the police board while the audit was being conducted. However, city integrity commissioner Guy Giorno has been asked by Chirico to investigate. It also emerged in July that Margaret Karpenko, the city's outgoing chief financial officer, recommended in early 2024 that Chirico's credit card be taken away. That recommendation was ignored and he continued to charge personal items on the card into late 2024. He has since surrendered the card and Karpenko has announced she is leaving North Bay to become CFO in Greater Sudbury. CTV News has contacted the City of North Bay to respond to the news that the OPP is investigating allegations involving the mayor.