logo
Age verification UK explained: How is it impacting the UK?

Age verification UK explained: How is it impacting the UK?

Leader Live28-07-2025
In short, social media and other platforms are required to implement safety measures protecting children or face large fines.
This means that age verification tools are now being used on sites where they could access harmful content.
Here's all you need to know about the new rules and how they are being implemented.
Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act!
Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. pic.twitter.com/LGtISAmReC
The Online Safety Act is a piece of legislation that received Royal Assent on October 26, 2023, with the aim of protecting children and adults online.
The Government website adds: "It puts a range of new duties on social media companies and search services, giving them legal duties to protect their users from illegal content and content harmful to children.
"The Act gives providers new duties to implement systems and processes to reduce risks their services are used for illegal activity, and to take down illegal content when it does appear.
As of July 25, internet platforms have a legal duty to protect children from harmful content.
Companies within the scope of the act must introduce safety measures as part of this, which include age verification.
The Guardian reports: "This means all pornography sites must have in place rigorous age-checking procedures."
They continued: "Social media platforms and large search engines must also prevent children from accessing pornography and material that promotes or encourages suicide, self-harm and eating disorders."
Platforms will also have to suppress other material that could be potentially harmful to children.
This could include "the promotion of dangerous stunts, encouraging the use of harmful substances and enabling bullying".
Ofcom, the media regulator, has set out a number of ways websites can verify the age of users.
This can be done through credit card checks, photo ID matching and estimating age using a selfie.
Whatever format platforms choose, they must be "technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair," BBC News reports.
Pornhub and a number of other major adult websites have confirmed they will introduce enhanced age checks, BBC News reports.
Recommended reading:
90 per cent of passwords can be hacked in under 6 hours (How to improve yours)
Tech expert reveals 5 habits that are killing your iPhone battery life
Mobile expert reveals 5 ways you can save money on your phone bill
Reddit has already introduced checks to stop people aged under 18 from looking at "certain mature content", while X and Grindr have committed to this as well.
Discord gives UK users a choice of face or ID scanning as a way to verify their age, after testing methods, and Bluesky says it will give UK users a range of different verification options, external.
BBC News adds: "Many more services which allow sexually explicit material may need to bring in measures to comply with the new rules."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I stayed in a popular hotel before finding a strange man under my bed, I still suffer from PTSD & won't forget his smell
I stayed in a popular hotel before finding a strange man under my bed, I still suffer from PTSD & won't forget his smell

The Sun

time5 minutes ago

  • The Sun

I stayed in a popular hotel before finding a strange man under my bed, I still suffer from PTSD & won't forget his smell

MANY people love to check into a hotel to unwind - but one woman was left horrified after claiming she discovered a strange man under her bed. Natali Khomenk, who lives in Thailand, shared how she had visited Japan on a solo trip in March as she had thought it was a very safe country. 3 3 On the first day, she had checked into her hotel and 'everything was fine' and 'looked legit', and she had accessed her room with a key card that only let her on her floor and in her room. She set off sightseeing the following day, but had the traumatic experience upon her return. In a clip on her @natalisi account, she claimed: 'I came back around 7:30 p.m., unlocked my room like usual, took off my clothes, lay down on the bed, and then I noticed a weird smell. 'At first, I thought it was coming from my hair or the bed sheets, but then I realised it was coming from under the bed. 'Jokingly, I thought, 'What if there's a dead person laying under the bed?' 'But when I leaned over to check, I saw a pair of eyes staring at me. I saw an Asian man under my bed.' Natali said she started to scream and jumped to her feet as the man climbed out from under the bed. He then stared at her for three long seconds, and she added: 'Those seconds felt like my life is over.' Speaking to The Guardian, she described him as 'east Asian, between 20 and 30, slightly overweight, a bowl haircut and black clothes.' She said: 'I began to hyperventilate and froze on the spot, unsure whether he was about to jump on me, choke me or even try to kill me.' Hotel slammed for using endangered red pandas to wake up guests by letting cuddly critters crawl into their beds The man then started the scream and ran out of her room. Natali said she immediately called the hotel administration and the police, and they found a power bank and USB cable under her bed. She kept asking the hotel how the scary situation had happened, but they didn't have any answers for her. Natali continued: 'Even more, they suggested upfront that police won't find the intruder because they had no cameras.' As she was understandably feeling scared and unsafe, she moved to another hotel and demanded a full refund the following day. However, she claims the hotel didn't contact her or send an email with the incident report. She then reached out to Agoda, who she had booked the hotel through, and they offered her $178 (£133) in coupons, which she felt was 'ridiculous', given she had paid $600 (£450) for three nights. After contacting the hotel directly once more, they finally agreed to refund the payment, but said the police hadn't been able to identify the man. She continued: 'The next days of my trip were a nightmare. I couldn't sleep. I was constantly on edge, checking every corner of my room.' EMOTIONAL COMPENSATION Natali eventually wrote to the hotel demanding 'compensation for emotional damage', and asked for $1,600 (£1,200). However, she claims they declined giving her the money as it 'wasn't in their policy.' Now, she's been left wondering how someone could get into her room and that they knew she was alone there. She added to the Guardian: 'I eventually returned to my home in Thailand struggling with anxiety and PTSD. 'I have found it difficult to stay informed about what's happening with my case, and worry that nothing will come of it. But I haven't given up – I'm exploring options so that it can be properly investigated. "Sadly, though, I've also had men write to me, claiming it's my fault or that I just want to denigrate Japan. 'I used to think I was invincible, and that there was more good in this world than bad. Now I'm not so sure.'

Planned Palestine Action protest will not try to overwhelm police
Planned Palestine Action protest will not try to overwhelm police

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Planned Palestine Action protest will not try to overwhelm police

A campaign group has denied that its planned mass protest in support of Palestine Action will try to overwhelm the police and justice system. The Metropolitan Police and other forces nationwide have warned anyone found to be expressing support for Palestine Action will be arrested, following the Government's decision to ban the organisation last month. Defend Our Juries said it planned to bring together at least 500 people for its planned demonstration against the ban on Saturday with organisers 'very confident' they have recruited enough participants, a spokesperson for the campaign group said. A formal announcement will be made on Tuesday as to whether that figure has been reached and the demonstration will go ahead. More then 200 people were arrested at a wave of protests across the UK in response to the proscription last month, as part of the campaign co-ordinated by Defend Our Juries. Many of the protesters were detained after writing and holding up the message 'I oppose genocide I support Palestine Action' on placards or pieces of cardboard. A Defend Our Juries spokesperson told the PA news agency: 'It is wrong to characterise this (planned demonstration) as a plan to overwhelm the police and court systems. 'If we are allowed to protest peacefully and freely, then that is no bother to anyone.' In a further statement on its website, the campaign group said the Government had 'overreached itself' by banning Palestine Action and it was 'vital' that its campaign succeeded. 'Our groups and movements are coming together like never before, finding unity under repression,' it added. 'By refusing to give into fear and by standing together, we will face down this assault on us all.' No location for the protest has so far been shared, but it is understood that it will take place in London and will be the only demonstration that Defend Our Juries organises on Saturday. The Metropolitan Police said it would have 'the resources and processes in place to respond' to the planned large gathering. A force spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. 'Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' Those interested in joining the demonstration have been asked to come to briefing calls on Tuesday or Thursday, while some have had non-violence training arranged for them, Defend Our Juries said. The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident it subsequently claimed, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. A High Court ruling on Wednesday decided that Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori had several 'reasonably arguable' beliefs in her challenge over the group's ban that would be heard at a three-day hearing in November, but a bid to pause the ban temporarily was refused. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.

From 'Surveillance society' to ‘papers please' society, readers discuss the OSA
From 'Surveillance society' to ‘papers please' society, readers discuss the OSA

Metro

time3 hours ago

  • Metro

From 'Surveillance society' to ‘papers please' society, readers discuss the OSA

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. It's clear that the Online Safety Act (OSA) is paving the way for compulsory digital ID. The government will say that the ID will make our lives easier because websites will automatically know whether we're over 18; rather than us having to manually prove our age each time. This would make our lives easier, at the cost of the government (and various corporations) knowing what we're looking at, where we are and how we're spending our money. Deliberately or not, the people in power have found a way to sweeten the pill of digital ID. And the more power these people get, the more they'll want. That's why we have to take a stand now, before we need to give out our personal details just to buy a pint of milk. It will sound ridiculous until it happens. We already live in a surveillance society. Do we really want to live in a 'papers please' society, too?! Rob Slater, Norfolk The OSA has inadvertently blocked a whole host of important websites, from news outlets to work platforms to resources for victims of sexual abuse. It has forced people to hand over their personal information to unregulated companies and forced people who refuse to do that to use a VPN – which pushes up the cost of living, as VPNs are not cheap. As for people with no ID and no money, they've basically been banned from accessing parts of the internet. This is just the start of an endless laundry list of problems with the OSA. Now, say if this law had been cobbled together in a few weeks with no research, then I would understand why it's such a complete mess. But that's not what's happened. The previous government started developing the OSA in 2017 – so our politicians have had eight years to perfect this legislation. Eight years to research, learn from experts, consult companies and the public, take questions in Parliament, scrutinise every detail and create a law that works. And this is what they came up with. A crock of nonsense. This all demonstrates a simple truth: We can't carry on like this, with the wrong people always in positions of power. It's bringing our country to its knees. Charlie Parrett, Stoke I have to take issue with Chris Shepherd (MetroTalk, Fri) stating Labour have reversed all their pre-election pledges. More Trending In 2010, the Tories inherited an NHS with its highest ever approval ratings of 70 per cent, when they left office in 2024 it had hit its lowest ever rating of 21 per cent with more than 7 7 7 million on waiting lists. The NHS are now delivering record amounts of treatment and waiting lists have fallen every month since Labour took power. On immigration, the Tories presided over a quadrupling of immigration. In Labour's first year, immigration was half what it was in the Tories' final year. GDP in Labour's first year was 0.9 per cent compared with the Tories' final year of 0.7 per cent. It takes more than one year to repair the colossal damage caused by Tory incompetence. They changed leader five times while the country went down the tubes. I'll judge Labour after four or five years in office, not 12 months. Robert Johnson, Harlow MORE: England defeat to India shows finishing touches are missing ahead of the Ashes MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: Our pick of the best bathroom paint shades for your next bank holiday DIY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store