logo
B-R high stakes override votes are Saturday and Tuesday. Taxes, cuts, where, when and more

B-R high stakes override votes are Saturday and Tuesday. Taxes, cuts, where, when and more

Yahoo18-06-2025
Bridgewater and Raynham voters will be heading to the polls in the next few days to decide the fate of a pair of high stakes Proposition 2 1/2 overrides that would add hundreds of dollars to annual property tax bills to avert "devastating" cuts in B-R schools.
Bridgewater's override election will be held Saturday, June 21, followed close behind by Raynham's election on Tuesday, June 24.
'What's happening is the cost of the schools' core needs is outpacing the revenues that communities can allot. To avoid a critical step back of the progress the schools have made, this is needed,' said Dennis Gallagher, state representative for 8th Plymouth District, representing Bridgewater and Raynham. Gallagher adds he's in support of the overrides.
Proposition 2.5 overrides are notoriously difficult to pass.
Here are all the facts regarding the upcoming special town elections both communities are holding:
Under a Massachusetts law called Proposition 2 1/2, cities and towns can only increase the amount of money they collect through property taxes each year by 2.5% plus an amount corresponding to how much "new growth" the city or town has seen.
If a town wants to increase its property tax revenue by more than 2.5% plus new growth, a majority of voters must approve a Proposition 2 1/2 override at the ballot box.
See who and where This former B-R boys basketball standout is headed to the Ivy League
Bridgewater will hold its Special Town Election on Saturday, June 21, from 7a.m. – 8 p.m. The polling location is Bridgewater Middle School, 166 Mount Prospect St.
Raynham will hold its Special Town Election on Tuesday, June 24, from 10a.m. – 8 p.m. The polling location is Raynham Middle School, 420 Titicut Road.
In Bridgewater, the override is for $8 million. Of that, $6 million is for B-R schools. The remaining $2 million is for the funding of town services, including roadway repairs, and meeting town demands by hiring and retaining staff numbers for Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks & Recreation, and the Building Department.
In Raynham, the override amount on the ballot is $3.9 million, all for the school budget.
The Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District's budget is funded by both towns, as well as state aid.
Due to continuing inflation and shortfalls in state aid to the school district, back on March 26, the Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School Committee voted to increase the district's budget for the 2025-2026 school year by 17%, totaling a budget of $106 million.
The school committee requested from Bridgewater an increase of $7.6 million or 23% and from Raynham an increase of $4.6 million, or 22%.
This amount was many times higher than what the towns of Bridgewater and Raynham both indicated they would be able to fund — an increase of 4.7% from Bridgewater and 3% from Raynham, respectively.
Superintendent of Schools Ryan Powers, speaking on behalf of the Administration and School Committee, said he realizes the impact this override will have on families.
'It's not lost on us,' he said, but 'the budget is reflective of the needs of the district, and what the kids deserve.'
'Rolling the dice on a big number' B-R passes budget that will require override votes
According to assessments done by both towns, the impact on property taxes for residents if the overrides were to pass are as follows:
Raynham: The annual property tax bill would increase by $636.75 for the average single-family home, based on an average assessed value of $590,000.
Bridgewater: The annual property tax bill would increase by $926.63 for the average single-family home, based on an average assessed value of $594,000.
Both towns have tax estimate calculators for this vote on their town websites if residents want to get the exact additional amount of property taxes they will be paying with this override.
Gallagher, the state representative, said he believes voters 'need to look at what quality of education do they want for their community' when they go to the polls to decide on the override. He adds it's a tough personal choice, 'everyone's financial situation is different,' and 'it's a pretty big increase.'
In a May 1, 2025, letter to the school community, Superintendent Powers said dozens of layoffs are on the table, between 30-45, if the override does not pass.
Powers said the district cut 24 positions before the start of the current school year, and, coupled with the threat of 30-45 more cuts, means losing between 55-70 positions over two years. He called that 'devastating' and said that 'greatly impacts our ability to provide our students with the education they deserve.'
Powers said at Raynham Town Meeting the school district has grown by 400 students over the past five years to its current enrollment of 5,682, and 'expenses are growing faster than our revenue," especially for transportation costs and special education, which, he said, presently comprises 20% of the district's student population.
Presentations at B-R School committee meetings said enrollment increases have led to large class sizes, and if the district can't bring back those 30-40 positions then class sizes will reach as high as 45, depending on grade.
In addition, as many as 40 elective classes won't be offered to high school students due to lack of available teachers.
If the override passes, the re-hiring or reestablishing of 30-40 positions can keep classroom sizes down to a high of 27.
Because it is a regional school district, both towns would have to approve overrides for B-R to get the increased funding. However, even if Bridgewater rejects its override Saturday, the Raynham override vote isn't cancelled. Both votes will happen, which will determine how the school district moves forward.
A special B-R school committee meeting is currently scheduled for Wednesday, June 25 at 7 p.m., in the auditorium of Raynham Middle School, where Powers said they will discuss options for the district if at least one of the override votes fails.
Powers told the Gazette there are several different options on the table for the School Committee to decide on, and 'it really is a series of dominos' as the outcome of the votes will influence how the district moves forward.
If one town votes for the override, but not the other, Powers said there would be an opportunity for the opposing side to reconsider or put forth a new override vote.
In Bridgewater's case, for example, with one-fourth of the total override amount for town services, the Council might decide it would figure out with current available savings on how to fund that number, thereby reducing the override amount, which may be more appealing to the voters.
The school committee also has the option of putting forth a reduced budget for the towns, one that's either within current agreed limits, or is still higher than the agreed percentage increase, which could require another override vote at a lower amount.
If one or both overrides is rejected, the B-R district may go through a 1/12 budget process, which is a monthly temporary budget that the state can impose for the entire fiscal school year. Powers said, basically, its last year's operating budget, plus the new percentage increase of state aid. 'That's not nearly enough to cover the true operating expenses,' said Powers.
Powers said because of the proximity of the end of the current fiscal year, June 30, a situation could pan out where the start of the fiscal year begins with a 1/12 budget plan, but could be replaced by the start of the school year due to new override votes or a new proposed budget.
The school district could also hold a joint town meeting, with voters from both towns, to vote whether or not to pass the proposed budget, which could result in either service cuts across both communities, or the scheduling of another override election.
Powers said, whatever the outcome, it's important that residents just get out and vote.
This article originally appeared on The Taunton Daily Gazette: Bridgewater-Raynham override elections: When, where, taxes, cuts
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You Can't Look Away From Lisa Murkowski's 'Creepy' Death Stare At NBC Reporter
You Can't Look Away From Lisa Murkowski's 'Creepy' Death Stare At NBC Reporter

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

You Can't Look Away From Lisa Murkowski's 'Creepy' Death Stare At NBC Reporter

If looks could kill, NBC News' Ryan Nobles wouldn't be standing right now. (Watch the video below.) The network's chief Capitol Hill correspondent was on the receiving end of what's been described as a prolonged death stare from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). He recounted the confrontation in a viral X post with the video. 'Sen. Lisa Murkowski stares me down for more than 10 secs after I ask her to respond to Sen. Rand Paul's critique of the deal she struck to get her to a YES and pass the OBBB,' Nobles wrote. Murkowski voted Tuesday to approve the so-called 'big beautiful bill,' paving the way for Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking tally for its passage. The senator received concessions to make the bill's cuts to Medicaid and SNAP less severe in her state, prompting Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to call out his colleagues for choosing 'to add more pork and subsidies for Alaska to secure [the vote].' Nobles caught up with Murkowski and told her: 'Sen. Paul said that your vote was a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country.' Murkowski locked into his eyes like a prize fighter at a weigh-in. 'I'm just asking for your response,' Nobles said. 'My response is I have an obligation to the people in the state of Alaska. And I live up to that every single day,' she said. 'Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interest,' she added. NEW: Sen. Lisa Murkowski stares me down for more than 10 secs after I ask her to respond to Sen. Rand Paul's critique of the deal she struck to get her to a YES and pass the OBBB.'Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests.'w/ @ — Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles) July 1, 2025 Some observers on X were not impressed.'Does she think that stare down makes her look tough?' one observer wrote . Another called it 'creepy' while a critic mused, 'That stare is all this muppet is capable of.' Whatever it was, it was no match for this guy. How Republicans Got Lisa Murkowski To Vote For The Tax Cut Bill GOP Senator Says 'We Are All Afraid' Of Retaliation By Donald Trump Lisa Murkowski Rips GOP For Being 'Afraid' Of Criticizing Trump, Elon Musk

Arellano: Trump was winning with Latinos. Now, his cruelty is derailing him
Arellano: Trump was winning with Latinos. Now, his cruelty is derailing him

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Arellano: Trump was winning with Latinos. Now, his cruelty is derailing him

The Pew Research Center is one of the most trusted polling firms in the country, especially when it comes to Latinos. Last week, it published findings that should have been a victory lap for Donald Trump and his tortuous relationship with America's largest minority. According to Pew, Trump won 48% of Latino voters in the 2024 presidential election — the highest percentage ever recorded by a Republican presidential nominee and a 12 percentage point improvement from his 2020 showing. Latinos made up 10% of Trump's coalition, up from 7% four years ago. Latino men went with a Republican for the first time. Trump even improved his share of support among Latinas — long seen by Democratic leaders as a bulwark against their macho Trumpster relatives — by a 13-point margin, a swing even greater than that of Latino men. These stats prove what I've been warning about for years: that Latinos were souring on illegal immigration — even in blue California — and tiring of a Democratic Party too focused on policies that weren't improving their lives. This gave Trump a chance to win over Latino voters, despite his years-long bloviations against Mexico and Central American nations, because Latinos — who assimilate like any other immigrants, if not more so — were done with the Democratic status quo. They were willing to take a risk on an erratic strongman resembling those from their ancestral lands. Read more: Arellano: How an 'American Cholo' went from Hillary Clinton fan to Trump voter Pew's findings confirm one of Trump's most remarkable accomplishments — one so unlikely that professional Latinos long dismissed his election gains as exaggerations. Those voters could have been the winds blowing the xenophobic sails of his deportation fleet right now. All Trump had to do was stick to his campaign promises and target the millions of immigrants who came in illegally during the Biden years. Pick off newcomers in areas of the country where Latinos remain a sizable minority and don't have a tradition of organizing. Dare Democrats and immigrant rights activists to defend the child molesters, drug dealers and murderers Trump vowed to prioritize in his roundups. Conduct raids like a slow boil through 2026, to build on the record-breaking number of Latino GOP legislators in California and beyond. Trump has done none of that. He instead decided to smash his immigration hammer on Los Angeles, the Latino capital of the U.S. Instead of going after the worst of the worst, la migra has nabbed citizens and noncitizens alike. A Times analysis of data obtained by the Deportation Data Project at UC Berkeley Law found that nearly 70% of those arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement from June 1 through June 10 had no criminal convictions. Instead of harassing newcomers with few ties to the U.S., agents are sweeping up migrants who have been here for decades. Instead of doing operations that drew little attention, as happened under Presidents Obama and Biden — and even during Trump's first term — masked men have thrown around their power like secret police in a third-rate dictatorship while their bosses crow about it on social media. Instead of treating people with some dignity and allowing them a chance to contest their deportations, the Trump administration has stuffed them into detention facilities like tinned fish and treated the Constitution like a suggestion instead of the law of the land. The cruelty has always been the point for Trump. But he risks making the same mistake that California Republicans made in the 1980s and 1990s: taking a political win they earned with Latinos and turning it into trash. Next year will mark the 40th anniversary of the last amnesty for immigrants in the country illegally. It was signed into law by Ronald Reagan, who famously said that Latinos were Republicans who didn't know it yet. The Great Communicator knew that the best way to bring them into the GOP was to push meat-and-potato issues while not demonizing them. The 1986 amnesty could have been a moment for Republicans to win over Latinos during the so-called Decade of the Hispanic. Instead, California politicians began to push for xenophobic bans, including on store signs in other languages and driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants, arguing that these supposed invaders were destroying the Golden State. This movement culminated in the passage of Proposition 187 in 1994, which sought to make life miserable for undocumented immigrants and was eventually declared unconstitutional. We all know how that worked out. My generation of Mexican Americans — well on our way to assimilation, feeling little in common with the undocumented immigrants from southern Mexico and Central America who arrived after our parents — instead became radicalized. We waved the Mexican flag with pride, finding no need to brandish the Stars and Stripes that we kept in our hearts. We helped Democrats establish a supermajority in California and tossed Republicans into the political equivalent of the La Brea Tar Pits. Read more: Prop. 187 forced a generation to put fear aside and fight. It transformed California, and me When I covered anti-ICE protests in June outside a federal building in Santa Ana, it felt like the Proposition 187 years all over again. The Mexican tricolor flew again, this time joined by the flags of El Salvador, Guatemala and other Latin American countries. The majority of protesters were teens and young adults with no ties to the immigrant rights groups I know — they will be the next generation of activists. I also met folks such as Giovanni Lopez. For a good hour, the 38-year-old Santa Ana resident, wearing a white poncho depicting the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl, blew a loud plastic horn as if he were Joshua trying to knock down the walls of Jericho. It was his first protest. 'I'm all for them deporting the criminals,' Lopez said during a short break. 'But that's not what they're doing.... They're getting regular people, and that's not right. You gotta stand up for regular raza.' Since then, I've seen my social media feeds transform into a barrio CNN, as people share videos of la migra grabbing people and onlookers unafraid to tell them off. Other reels feature customers buying out street vendors for the day so they can remain safely at home. The transformation has even hit home: My dad and brother went to a 'No Kings' rally in Anaheim a few weeks ago — without telling each other, or me, beforehand. When rancho libertarians like them are angry enough to publicly fight back, you know the president is blowing it with Latinos. Back to Pew. Another report released last month found that nearly half of Latinos are worried that someone they know might get deported. The fear is real, even among Latino Republicans, with just 31% approving of Trump's plan to deport all undocumented immigrants, compared with 61% of white Republicans. California Assemblymember Suzette Martinez Valladares and state Sen. Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh are among those GOP skeptics. They signed a letter to Trump from California Republican legislators asking that his migra squads focus on actual bad hombres and "when possible, avoid the kinds of sweeping raids that instill fear and disrupt the workplace." When proud conservatives like Ochoa Bogh and Valladares, who is co-chair of the California Hispanic Legislative Caucus, are disturbed by Trump's deportation deluge, you know the president's blowing it with Latinos. Yet Trump is still at it. This week, the Department of Justice announced it was suing the L.A. City Council and Mayor Karen Bass, arguing that their "sanctuary" city policy was thwarting "the will of the American people regarding deportations." By picking on the City of Angels, Trump is letting us set an example for everyone else — because no one gets down for immigrant rights like L.A., or creates Latino political power like we do. When mass raids pop up elsewhere, communities will be ready. Many Latinos voted for Trump because they felt that Democrats forgot them. Now that Trump is paying attention to us, more and more of us are realizing that his intentions were never good — and carrying our passports because you just never know. You blew it, Donald — but what else is new? Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Possible 2028 Democrats target Vance on GOP megabill tiebreaker
Possible 2028 Democrats target Vance on GOP megabill tiebreaker

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Possible 2028 Democrats target Vance on GOP megabill tiebreaker

Democrats considered potential candidates for the 2028 presidential election quickly pounced on Vice President Vance for casting the tiebreaking vote to pass President Trump's massive tax and spending bill in the Senate. From Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, the Democratic hopefuls placed blame squarely on Vance, who could launch his own bid to succeed Trump in 2028. 'JD Vance was the deciding vote to cut Medicaid across the country,' Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a post on the social platform X. 'An absolute and utter betrayal of working families.' 'VP Vance has cast the deciding vote in the Senate to cut Medicaid, take away food assistance, blow up the deficit, and add tax breaks for the wealthiest,' Buttigieg, a former 2020 presidential primary candidate, wrote in a post on X. 'This bill is unpopular because it is wrong. Congress votes this week, but it's our voices – and our votes – that will have the final say,' he added. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who often serves as a foil to the president, similarly took to X, telling supporters to 'Bookmark this' in response to news that the 100-seat legislative body passed the bill in a 51-50 vote. The vice president, in his constitutional role as president of the Senate, is called in to cast a vote in the event of a tie. 'JD Vance is the ultimate reason why 17 million Americans will lose their healthcare,' Newsom said. The final Senate vote on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act came on Tuesday after hours of tense negotiations that lasted through the night. Lawmakers worked through the weekend before launching a 27-hour marathon of amendment votes on the floor, during which Republican leaders sought to win the support of holdouts. GOP Sens. Thom Tillis (N.C.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Susan Collins (Maine) voted against the measure, along with every Democrat. The bill includes the largest cuts to Medicaid since the program began in the 1960s, a move expected to cause a spike in the number of uninsured Americans over the next decade. Almost 12 million lower-income Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The bill is projected to cost more than $3 trillion over the next decade, but it would be partially paid for with about $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid. Trump and most congressional Republicans say the reductions aren't true cuts. They argue nobody who should be on Medicaid will lose benefits. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' Trump said at the White House last week. It still needs to pass the House again, where some moderate Republicans have expressed concerns about the cuts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store