logo
Viral trad wife Nara Smith pregnant with 4th child aged 23 – as trolls say ‘that's insane, as I'm sure the name will be'

Viral trad wife Nara Smith pregnant with 4th child aged 23 – as trolls say ‘that's insane, as I'm sure the name will be'

The Sun4 hours ago

NARA Smith has announced she's expecting her fourth child.
The 23-year-old, who went viral as one of the first 'trad wives', took to Instagram to reveal that she and model husband Lucky Blue Smith will soon be growing their family again.
5
5
5
In a video, Nara modelled a low-slung white skirt and an off-the-shoulder cream top, which she lifted up to reveal her burgeoning bump.
Lucky, who looked thrilled at the news of his wife's pregnancy, gave her a tight hug, before giving her stomach a tender kiss.
"Baby no. 4 loading," she wrote over the top of the clip.
"Our little surprise," she added in the caption.
With the majority of people in the comments section offered their congratulations, others questioned what the baby would be called - considering the couple have chosen unique monikers for their other three children.
Their first child, born in October 2020, is called Rumble Honey, while their current middle child, three, is called Slim Easy.
Their youngest, who turned one in April, is named Whimsy Lou.
Lucky is also dad to daughter Gravity, whose mother is model Stormi Bree.
"4 kids by 23? That's insane as I'm sure the name of the baby will be too!" one wrote in the comments section.
"Congratulations, patiently waiting for the name of the baby," another added.
Channel 4 star horrifies fans as she reveals 'truly awful' baby names ahead of birth of second child
"Omg congrats!!! Can we revisit Bubble for the name," a third commented.
"Congratulations. I can't wait for the name announcement," someone else admitted.
Others harked back to an interview Nara and Lucky had given to GQ magazine back in 2024, when they said that despite originally wanting six children, they were "absolutely done" with three.
"After Whimsy, we are absolutely done now," Nara told the publication.
"Having toddlers is the best sort of birth control, because they're wild."
While Lucky added: "We feel like we couldn't be as good of parents if we added in any more."
Are Unique Baby Names Worth The Hassle?
YOU may think having a unique name helps you to stand out, but is it all it's cracked up to be?
Fabulous' Deputy Editor Josie Griffiths reveals the turmoil she faced with her own name while growing up.
When I was a child, all I wanted was one of those personalised keyrings with my name on it.
But no joy, the closest I could find was Rosie, Joseph (not great for a little girl) and Joanne.
Josie is short for Josephine, which is a French name, and I managed to reach my 20s without ever meeting anyone who shared it.
When I try to introduce myself to people, I get all sorts of random things - like Tracey and Stacey - which can be pretty annoying.
Although I have come into contact with a couple of Josies over the last year - there seems to be a few of us around my age - it's still a much rarer name than most of my friends have.
On the whole I don't mind it, at least it's not rude or crazily spelt.
And it means I can get away with 'doing a Cheryl' and just referring to myself as Josie.
I'm getting married this year and some friends are shocked that I'm changing my surname, as it's not seen as very cool or feminist to do so these days, but I explain to them that I'm not that attached to Griffiths as I'd always just say 'hi it's Josie' when ringing a mate up.
I think it's nice to be unique and I'll definitely try and replicate this when naming my own kids.
It's the rude names you've got to watch out for, so after nine years as a lifestyle journalist I'll definitely be avoiding those.
"Is no one gonna talk about how she was done after 3 kids and is popping out another one AGAIN?" one person wrote in the comments.
"I'm almost certain you said you didn't want anymore… hmm. Well congrats anyways!" another added.
"Didn't she say she's done with 3 kids?" a third questioned.
"Loving this for you honey but it makes me laugh how last year you were dead set on 3 babies!" someone else said.
"She literally killed me during her GQ couples quiz when she said she was absolutely done having kids," another wrote.
"But I guess she's changed her mind about having 6!"
"They took the mission of populating the earth very seriously," someone else joked.
5

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Distracted Yankees star makes throwing error mic'd up on ESPN after vowing to bring 'smoke' vs Red Sox
Distracted Yankees star makes throwing error mic'd up on ESPN after vowing to bring 'smoke' vs Red Sox

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Distracted Yankees star makes throwing error mic'd up on ESPN after vowing to bring 'smoke' vs Red Sox

Jazz Chisholm Jr. was not focusing on just baseball while playing third base for the New York Yankees on Sunday night, as he made a critical throwing error during a mid-game interview. During one of ESPN's mic'd up segments during the third inning of a national broadcast against the rival Red Sox, the ball was hit to the 27-year-old. On what would have been a tough play even if Chisholm was not giving an interview answer, the speedy infielder had to deliver a spinning throwing across the diamond, which ended up way off line for an error. His horrible throw came after Chisholm promised to bring 'smoke' against Boson after Red Sox rookie pitcher Hunter Dobbins said he'd rather retire than suit up in pinstripes. 'I think there should be more trash talk in baseball!!! Anyone agrees!? Anyway free smoke at 7,' Chisholm posted to X hours before the error. Fans took the opportunity to dunk on Chisholm for a bit of karma, or think that ESPN should have been charged with the error, not the Yankees star. "DAMMIT" — Talkin' Yanks (@TalkinYanks) June 8, 2025 He made a throwing error during a mid-game interview on Sunday night during an interview 'Now i know why (Juan) soto didin't want to wear the mic during the subway series,' one MLB fan said on social media. 'Stop the interviews. It's so distracting and selfish by mlb and espn in my opinion,' a second person added. 'This franchise used to win championships,' a third continued. 'If you wanted attention you could just be good at baseball,' a fourth stated. A collection of social-media messages about Jazz Chisholm's throwing error on ESPN The throwing error did not lead to any scoring from the Red Sox, although Boston came on strong later in the game to win 11-7. Dobbins got the win, allowing only three runs in five innings of work, absorbing any excess smoke from the Bronx. Chisholm did not have a hit in three at bats, but did draw a walk and drive in a run. The teams meet again later this week, with plenty chances for smoke from Chisholm should he choose to dish it out.

Sophie Habboo opens up on husband Jamie's reaction after 'pregnant' comment
Sophie Habboo opens up on husband Jamie's reaction after 'pregnant' comment

Daily Mirror

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Sophie Habboo opens up on husband Jamie's reaction after 'pregnant' comment

Sophie Habboo shared a hilarious story about the time she told Jamie Laing she might be pregnant and he 'went green', just months before she announced that she was expecting for the first time Sophie Habboo has revealed the moment Jamie Laing turned "green" after she teased him with a surprise baby revelation, months before the couple discovered they were actually expecting. The pair, who first met on Made In Chelsea before tying the knot two years ago, took to Instagram last Tuesday (June 3) to share the delightful news that they're expecting their first child, receiving a flood of well-wishes from fans and fellow celebs. ‌ In addition to their baby joy, the duo also announced a major change to their popular NewlyWeds podcast, which has now aptly been renamed NearlyParents as they gear up for the new adventure. ‌ However, casting her mind back to the time before the pregnancy was confirmed, Sophie recounted how Jamie was initially apprehensive about fatherhood. She reminisced about his pale-faced response during a meal out last year when she quipped about possibly being pregnant. On their revamped NearlyParents podcast, Jamie probed Sophie for a "totally honest" account of his reaction when she first expressed her desire for children. Sophie revealed: "You went green. You went green. In fact, we went for lunch with my sister and I said just as a joke, maybe I'm pregnant. I was like a day late on my period." ‌ She continued: "We were not trying at this point. We hadn't really discussed it, and Jamie left the restaurant and never came back." Trying to shed light on his past reaction, he admitted feeling "panicked" about becoming a dad, recalling the episode as: "I was having a mild panic. This was like last year and that was a bit... Honey, it was scary for me at that point." He also expressed the fears many feel on the brink of parenthood: "You don't understand how scary it is when you're like going into this world of having, or even thinking about having kids." Yet, speaking of his change of heart, he's now eager to embrace fatherhood, eagerly anticipating the arrival of their first child in the upcoming months. As for Sophie, she reminisced over the shock of learning she was expecting, after doing a pregnancy test back in December. Jamie meanwhile, shared his overwhelming joy upon her announcing the pregnancy, comparing the elation to their wedding day, stating he felt like he was "floating" when she delivered the wonderful news.

Materialists review: This 'captivating' romantic drama explores love and money with 'piercing honesty'
Materialists review: This 'captivating' romantic drama explores love and money with 'piercing honesty'

BBC News

time39 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Materialists review: This 'captivating' romantic drama explores love and money with 'piercing honesty'

Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans and Pedro Pascal make for a starry love triangle in this exquisite new film from director Celine Song, who previously made the Oscar-nominated Past Lives. If you've seen any of the trailers for Celine Song's Materialists, ignore them. In those previews and on paper, the film seems like a well-cast but stock romantic comedy, with Dakota Johnson as a professional matchmaker torn between a former love (Chris Evans) and a dazzling new possibility (Pedro Pascal). In fact, the film is hardly a romcom at all, but something far more original and captivating: a piercingly honest exploration of love and money and the inevitable connection between the two. (Just ask Jane Austen about the connection between a man with a fortune and the want of a wife.) Song doesn't reinvent the romcom here. She cleverly sidesteps it. Materialists is more akin to her first film, the nuanced Past Lives, than it might seem. As in Past Lives, with its delicate story of a woman whose childhood love from Korea re-enters her happily married New York life, Materialists is exquisitely made, character-driven and talky, with some glittering dialogue. It's the kind of idiosyncratic film a director sometimes gets to do after a great success – Past Lives earned Oscar nominations for Best Picture and Original Screenplay – and Song makes the most of it. Lucy's job as a matchmaker for high-end clients might seem like a strained device, but Song herself briefly had that job before she broke through as a playwright and film-maker. And Lucy is very good at her job, as we see when she cajoles a reluctant bride (Louisa Jacobson) on her wedding day to go through with the marriage. From there the plot follows a romcom trajectory, setting up a choice. At that wedding Lucy meets the groom's rich, handsome brother, Henry (Pascal), and is served a drink by John (Evans), the ex she broke up with after five years, who is still a struggling actor working the wedding as a waiter. A quick flashback shows that they broke up over money. Eating dinner from a food cart on their fifth anniversary was not what Lucy wanted. As always, Song creates great textured backdrops, with the breakup happening on a crowded New York street filled with traffic. In Lucy's new life, her non-negotiable demand is for a rich husband. "Marriage is a business deal and it always has been," she says. That might have come across as harsh and cynical, but Johnson's smooth performance makes Lucy seem refreshingly honest with herself about the life she wants, a reflection of the film's clear-eyed view of how money can make or break a long-term relationship. Pascal makes Henry utterly charming and suggests a layer of vulnerability beneath that charm. He has very little chemistry with Johnson, and whether that's intentional or not the film gets away with it because their characters' bond is based on a shared sense that money and lifestyle matter. "Once you've had your first $400 haircut you can't go back to Supercuts," Henry says, a line that suggests it's improbable Lucy can go back to John. But Song is too smart to make Lucy's decision easy or obvious. Henry doesn't simply check all the boxes for her. He actually listens to her, and they might genuinely fall in love. Maybe she can have love and money. Johnson does have chemistry with Evans, who makes it clear from John's first glance at Lucy that she is the woman he will never get over, whatever happens in the future. They have some lovely, tender moments together, which they realise they have to snap out of – or not. Why recycle a past that didn't work? Song gets comedy from Lucy's clients and their impossible checklist of demands for a mate, from men's height and amount of hair to women's age and fitness. Johnson is so convincing we almost believe Lucy when she tells them, "I promise, you will marry the love of your life." When she finally snaps in exasperation at one of them, she sarcastically says that of course she can deliver their perfect match "because I'm Dr Frankenstein". But there is also drama, when another of Lucy's clients has a date that turns violent. That's a twist you'd never see in a standard, breezy romcom, a sign of how much Song is determined to keep the film tethered to reality. Towards the end, Lucy dances at yet another wedding with one of her suitors to the old standard That's All, the least materialistic love song ever, with its lyric, "I can only give you love that lasts forever." It is the perfect song for a film that questions whether that kind of love can be real or if it's just a fantasy in today's material world. Moving on from its cynical beginning, Materialists takes the long way around to an ending that is decidedly hopeful. It offers an unblinkered, earned romanticism that suits this moment, and bolsters Song's reputation as one of our most astute observers of relationships. Materialists is released in US cinemas on 13 June and UK cinemas on 15 August. ★★★★★ -- If you liked this story sign up for The Essential List newsletter, a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X, and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store