China rolls out world's first 10G broadband; here's how fast it is
China has launched the world's first commercial 10-Gigabit (10G) broadband network, marking a significant development in next-generation internet infrastructure.
The network went live in Sunan County, Hebei Province, as a joint initiative between state-owned telecom operator China Unicom and technology firm Huawei.
According to the companies, the system is based on 50G Passive Optical Network (PON) technology, which dramatically boosts data transmission across existing fibre-optic cables.
Real-world tests recorded download speeds of up to 9,834 Megabits per second (Mbps), upload speeds reaching 1,008 Mbps, and latency as low as 3 milliseconds. These figures reflect a tenfold improvement over conventional 1G broadband services.
The upgrade enables high-bandwidth activities such as ultra-high-definition 8K video streaming, virtual and augmented reality experiences, cloud-based applications, and seamless smart home operations. A 20GB file, for instance, can now be downloaded in under 20 seconds.
Officials say the launch positions China ahead of other nations in rolling out commercial-grade 10G networks. While countries like South Korea, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar have deployed advanced broadband systems, none have yet announced live 10G services for public use.
The Hebei deployment is being viewed as a model for future expansion. Authorities have indicated that national rollout will depend on infrastructure readiness and consumer demand.
In addition to consumer applications, the network is expected to benefit sectors requiring reliable high-speed data. These include telemedicine, remote education, precision agriculture and industrial automation.
Huawei stated that the adoption of 50G PON was critical to achieving the 10G milestone without requiring widespread replacement of existing fibre systems.
The development aligns with China's broader digital strategy, which includes increasing broadband access, improving cloud infrastructure, and preparing networks for the expected growth of smart devices and artificial intelligence.
The announcement did not specify the pricing or subscription model for the new service.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
01-08-2025
- Business Recorder
Solar inverters from China: New values on import of various types issued
ISLAMABAD: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation, Karachi has issued new customs values on the import of 23 different types of solar inverters from China. In this regard, the directorate has issued a new valuation ruling (2015 of 2025) on Thursday. The directorate has issued custom values on the import of three different categories of solar inverters including hybrid solar inverters (9 types), off-grid solar inverters (3 types) and on-grid solar inverters (11 types). Different customs values would be applicable on the import of Hybrid Solar Inverters, On-Grid Solar Inverters and Off-Grid Solar Inverters. The values mentioned for hybrid solar inverters are for brands that are recognised as manufacturers of solar inverters classified as Tier-I companies/internationally or nationally established companies and include: Huawei, Inverex, Goodwe, Growatt, Solis, Sungrow, Fronius, Solax, Sineng, ABB, SMA, and others. These brands import Ingress Protection (IP 65 and IP 66) solar inverters and if other brands import IP 65 and IP 66 hybrid solar inverters, relevant values shall also apply on these goods. Generally, off-grid solar inverters above 06 KWs are not imported. Besides, in case of any further ambiguity regarding the description of mentioned goods, the clearance Collectorate may refer to the manufacturer's website and/or get it tested from reputable labs such as NED or UET, ruling added. Details of the issue revealed that the customs values of solar inverters were previously determined under Section 25-A of the Customs Act, 1969, vide Valuation Ruling No1913 of 2024. This ruling was subsequently challenged under Section 25-D of the Customs Act before the Director General of Customs Valuation, Karachi. In response, the Director General issued Order-in-Revision No 08/2025 dated 04.02.2025, directing are evaluation of the determined values and recommending a further subdivision of the categories (capacities) outlined in the impugned ruling. Accordingly, the Directorate of Customs Valuation initiated a re-determination exercise in line with the provisions of Section 25-A of the Customs Act, 1969. The importers contended that the customs values assigned to solar inverters under the disputed valuation ruling were excessively high and warranted revision. They further proposed that the categorisation of inverters be refined by introducing sub-divisions based on their respective capacities to better reflect market dynamics. In response, the Director of Valuation instructed the stakeholders to furnish relevant documentary evidence-including export Goods Declarations (GDs), Letters of Credit (LCs), and other banking instrument to substantiate their claims. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding definitional ambiguities related to 'off-grid inverters'. These issues were deliberated upon in detail, leading to a clarification of the distinctions between hybrid, on-grid, and off-grid solar inverter types: (i) Hybrid Inverters: A hybrid solar inverter is an inverter that can integrate solar PV power, battery storage and the electrical grid connectivity. This allows solar energy to be used directly, stored for later use, or fed back into the grid (if in excess). As such, generally hybrid invertors contain a separate terminal for feeding excess power into grid. (ii) On-Grid Inverters: An on-grid solar inverter converts solar power for direct use in the public electricity grid without battery storage (No battery connection ports). This type of inverter operates only when connected to the grid and will enter standby mode if a grid failure is detected. (iii) Off-Grid Inverters: An off-grid inverter can function from the power of solar energy (PV Modules), battery storage, and AC/Grid/Genset connectivity through its input ports. Such units can use solar PV power, battery storage, and AC input power. Such units are especially suited where grid power is unstable or if there is no need to feed the surplus solar PV power to the grid (no net metering function). Automatically switches (by pass the household load) to AC or generator power when solar/battery storage is unavailable. As such the presence of AC input does not make it a hybrid inverter. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
22-07-2025
- Business Recorder
China's Q2 smartphone shipments down 2.4%, says Counterpoint
BEIJING: Smartphone shipments in China were down 2.4% for the second quarter compared with a year ago, Counterpoint Research said on Tuesday. Apple's sales in China fell 1.6% year-on-year while Chinese mobile maker Huawei's sales rose 17.6%, Counterpoint said in a press statement. Huawei, the top vendor had a shipment share of 18.1%, followed by Vivo, Oppo and Xiaomi.
Express Tribune
16-07-2025
- Express Tribune
From maps to minerals
Listen to article China's recent actions on India's northern frontier have gone beyond mere symbolism. From altering maps to weaponising minerals, the intent is clear: to recast geopolitical narratives in Beijing's favour while undermining India's sovereignty. The depiction of Jammu & Kashmir as "Occupied Kashmir" and Arunachal Pradesh as "South Tibet" on official Chinese maps is a strategic move, not a cartographic slip. It is the sign of ever-tougher stance, as geography is turned into the instrument of policy — or, rather, the instrument of influence. Take for instance the re-designation of Ladakh as "Chinese territory" and the integration of Aksai Chin into Xinjiang's administrative structure. These are bureaucratic acts with military and diplomatic weight. When a state sets on the institutionalisation of its claims, it is not just doing the same in preparation of international negotiations, but long-term strategic consolidation as well. The Line of Actual Control which was infested with tensions experiences even more tensions when such pressures are mounted. Yet the map is only one layer. Economic coercion now forms a parallel front. It is not surprising to see China suspending its export of rare earth magnets to India especially since the magnets are important in both the auto industry and the defence sector. This is following the India blockade of any Chinese tech firms such as Huawei or TikTok. In that regard, China is playing with power of dominance in its critical supply chains. It is not just retaliation on India although it must be seen as sending a common message: decoupling with China has its costs. This pressure is so subtle and effective that it makes it insidious. To make the situation worse, India is caught between a two-front dilemma. Those stand-offs with border contention against China and Pakistan are getting combined. Be that as it may, the strategic net is woven the same way; Indian bandwidth is exhausted. It has to cope not only with physical defence but with the economic and diplomatic effect of two antagonist sides. This will have a pinch effect as the regional fault-lines intensify which can be seen to create a weak spot in India in terms of military deterrence as well as economic resilience. Compounding the challenge, China, with its expanding regional influence and growing engagement in South Asian geopolitics, is subtly positioning itself as a potential arbiter in the Kashmir issue, thereby inserting itself into one of India's most sensitive domestic matters. Meanwhile, the Pak-China synergy, going beyond CPEC, is matured into an enlarged regional combination that is currently extending to the incorporation of Afghanistan, Iran and Central Asia. These backbones are not merely economic backbones, they are turning around the strategic houses of the region. The outreach via Afghanistan is associated with several advantages: it enhances the use of transit, the reconstruction, and the prevention of extremism along vulnerable boundaries. A more stable western frontier of Pakistan and China is an economic advantage as well as cushioning them against unrest spilling over from Afghanistan. Ultimately, the lines being redrawn - both on maps and through policies - reveal a seismic shift. China, with Pakistan as a strategic partner, is not just challenging India. It is reshaping South Asia's geopolitical reality. For India, the response must go beyond reaction. It must think in terms of long-term regional recalibration, economic self-reliance and narrative control. It's because the battlefield now stretches from borders to supply chains, from digital bans to diplomatic boards. And in this new terrain, ambiguity is no longer an option.
