logo
Jennifer Aniston: We were mourning Matthew Perry a long time before his death

Jennifer Aniston: We were mourning Matthew Perry a long time before his death

Perry, who was one of the most familiar faces on television, died aged 54 from the 'acute effects of ketamine' in October 2023, according to a post-mortem examination.
While Perry's on-screen character Chandler Bing brought joy to many, he had spoken candidly about his struggle with drug and alcohol addiction when filming the series.
Speaking about his addiction, Aniston told US magazine Vanity Fair: 'We did everything we could when we could.
'But it almost felt like we'd been mourning Matthew for a long time because his battle with that disease was a really hard one for him to fight.
'As hard as it was for all of us and for the fans, there's a part of me that thinks this is better. I'm glad he's out of that pain.'
The actress played Rachel Green in the hit US sitcom – which also starred Lisa Kudrow, Courteney Cox, David Schwimmer and Matt LeBlanc.
Aniston said: 'What helped raise me is something I got to put into the world and help other people. If (Friends) was the only thing on my resume, I would be very happy and blessed.'
A post-mortem report summary said Perry was receiving 'ketamine infusion therapy for depression and anxiety', with his last known treatment one-and-a-half weeks prior to his death.
The medical examiner ruled that 'the ketamine in his system at death could not be from that infusion therapy', but was not able to specify the 'exact method of intake' in Perry's case.
A woman charged with selling Perry the dose of ketamine that killed him is headed for a September trial.
Jasveen Sangha, who prosecutors say was known to her customers as the Ketamine Queen, is charged with five counts of ketamine distribution, including one count of distribution resulting in death.
The Morning Show star Aniston also spoke to the magazine about the media frenzy she faced in the 2000s, a time when her high-profile relationship with Brad Pitt hit the headlines, particularly amid their divorce in 2005.
Aniston said: 'It was such juicy reading for people. If they didn't have their soap operas, they had their tabloids.
A post shared by Vanity Fair (@vanityfair)
'It's a shame that it had to happen, but it happened. And boy did I take it personally.'
She added: 'I didn't have a strong enough constitution to not get affected by it. We're human beings, even though some people don't want to believe we are.
'They think, You signed up for it, so you take it. But we really didn't sign up for that.'
A man was recently charged with stalking Aniston and crashing his car through the front gate of her home, but a judge ruled he was mentally incompetent to stand trial.
Referencing this, Aniston said: 'People are out of their minds. Who wants to put that energy out there.'
She added that her security team is 'not glamorous in any way. It's a necessity'.
Read the full story in Vanity Fair's September issue and on VanityFair.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan Markle left 'inconsolable' after scathing attack from 'role model'
Meghan Markle left 'inconsolable' after scathing attack from 'role model'

Daily Mirror

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Meghan Markle left 'inconsolable' after scathing attack from 'role model'

The Duchess of Sussex was slammed by a biographer and friend of Princess Diana who said 'all her ideas are total crap' which apparently left a raging Meghan in tears Since meeting Prince Harry, joining the royal family and then exiling herself from the monarchy, Meghan Markle is no stranger to the spotlight. ‌ But there was one scathing criticism that reportedly cut deeper than the rest, because the Duchess admired the author who savaged her. ‌ Tina Brown, a former editor of Vanity Fair and Tatler, launched a searing attack on Meghan's judgement which according to another royal commentator, Neil Sean, left her "inconsolable with tears and at the same time outraged". ‌ Brown was a friend of Princess Diana and had lunch with her just weeks before her tragic death at the age of 36. She wrote the hit biography The Diana Chronicles on her, which Meghan is thought to have read to get a better understanding of her husband's past. It comes after claims Prince Harry 'admits he is still part of the Royal Family and finally sees sense'. Speaking on the The Ankler podcast with Janice Min last October, Tina, who also penned the bestselling book The Palace Papers in 2022, said: "The trouble with Meghan is that she has the worst judgment of anyone in the entire world. She's flawless about getting it all wrong. All of her ideas are total crap, unfortunately." Her words were reportedly particularly hard for Meghan to hear. "According to a source Meghan was bereft because she'd admired Tina Brown and in particular read her books simply because of her connection to Princess Diana and get this because she wanted to find a better connection so she could understand her husband Prince Harry and how he felt about his mother," Neil said, according to The Express. Tina also aired her views on Prince Harry, who she claimed was "always going to leave the Royal Family". She labelled him a "very impetuous man" and said many who worked at the Palace knew he was always going to leave the royal fold. ‌ "He was so fragile, so combustible, he was so unhappy, frankly, in the constraints of the Royal Family," she claimed, adding: "He was terribly impressed by Meghan. He thought that she knew all. She persuaded him that she was the savvy Hollywood wheeler-dealer who could come in and make them stars and all the rest of it. And he just sort of blindly followed her like a child, really." However she did have praise for the Duke of Sussex, who she reckoned excelled at being a Prince: "The thing about Harry is he's very good at being Prince Harry. And that's the tragedy of all of this; he is the most talented member of the royal family, without doubt, in terms of being a prince, which is all he does know how to do. He's really sort of flawless at it." It's not the first time Tina has aired her thoughts on Meghan and Harry. She has previously said she doesn't think Diana would have approved of the couple leaving the Royal family because ultimately she supported the monarchy. "Diana would have been very, very protective of Harry and I believe very anxious about this direction they [he and Meghan] have taken," she told the Daily Beast in 2022. She also said she didn't believe she would have been a fan of her daughter-in-law: "I think she would have felt Meghan was steering Harry in a direction that was not good. I don't think Diana would have been the great fan of Meghan that Meghan herself might perhaps imagine," she said.

I stuffed my bra before a Wizz Air flight — it saved me a fortune
I stuffed my bra before a Wizz Air flight — it saved me a fortune

Metro

timea day ago

  • Metro

I stuffed my bra before a Wizz Air flight — it saved me a fortune

I was in the airport toilets, standing in front of the mirror, trying to wedge a bikini top into the side of my brand-new pink DD bra. Next in went my unused gym kit, followed by my fishing vest (more on that later). With every item, my reflection became a little… curvier. As someone who's never had much going on in that department, it might appear like a cheap boob job. But this wasn't vanity – it was strategy. I was flying home from Lisbon with Wizz Air in January, and they only allow a tiny 40 x 30 x 20cm cabin bag for free. I'd managed the outbound flight just fine thanks to a fishing vest with over 15 pockets, but I really wanted to give a different hack a go for my return. I cautiously zipped up my jacket and took one last look in the mirror before heading for my gate, praying no one would notice I was basically wearing half my suitcase on my chest. Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here. The idea started earlier that morning, when I'd been rifling through the sales rack in Lisbon's H&M hoping to find something to test out. I'd hoped for a hoodie with deep pockets or a slim bag I could tuck under my coat, but instead my hands landed on a large bra with the price reduced to €5. I was about to push it away when an idea came to me: what if this bra was the answer to bonus luggage space? The concept of wearing extra clothes to avoid fees certainly isn't new. There's a reason why Joey Tribbiani's 'Could I BE wearing any more clothes' moment in Friends is still a popular meme. It perfectly sums up the theatrics we have to resort to just to get a few extra outfits on board without paying more. However, I'd never seen anyone use a bra for this purpose. And the logic was solid: airlines weigh and measure your bag, not your body. My coat pockets had been carrying overflow snacks and chargers for years, so why not give my chest a piece of the action too? On the day of my flight, I wasn't about to stroll through security looking like I'd got a Portuguese breast enlargement – this was about getting through the scales and bag sizers. Technically, clothes wouldn't trigger alarms, but the thought of a pat-down revealing wads of fabric was enough to make me blush. So I stuffed the bra in my bag, sailed through security, and headed straight for the toilets to transform. On went the bra – over my shirt for speed – and then the stuffing began. My bikini and gym kit slid neatly into one cup, my fishing vest into the other. With each addition, my silhouette changed and I couldn't help but let out a cackle, reminded of playing dress-up as a child and stuffing wads of toilet paper down my top. Zipping my jacket was a slight challenge, and the moment the zip reached the top, the temperature began to rise. Lisbon might have been in winter mode, but under my layers, I was experiencing my own private heatwave. When I emerged, James – my boyfriend and travel companion – looked me up and down, his eyebrows creeping higher with each passing second. He didn't say a word, but his expression said it all: what on earth have you done now? At the gate, I braced myself. I'm always slightly on edge when pushing the boundaries of airline rules. You hear horror stories of passengers being told to unpack their bags, shove them into baggage sizers, or pay last-minute fines that cost more than the flight itself. I imagined a gate agent pointing me out, demanding to know why I looked like I'd swallowed a small rucksack. In reality, no one batted an eyelid. Boarding went smoothly, but I couldn't wait to reach my seat to rid myself of my ridiculous get-up. I hastily unzipped my coat on the plane before realising my faux pas – I forgot that my bulging bra was on the outside of my shirt. Naturally, it took me an age to unclip the clasp at the back, much to the entertainment of my fellow passengers. Settled, I was finally able to reflect on the hack at hand. Did it work? Yes. I avoided paying for another bag and breezed through without question. But the downsides were obvious. You can't pack much without looking completely unnatural, it's sweltering, and you will inevitably embarrass yourself if you decide to take it off. More Trending Would I do it again? Nah. This was a one-and-done. For me, there are far better hacks out there: The neck pillow trick – fill it with underwear or lightweight clothes. It's surprisingly roomy and no one questions it (just stick to your least-worn garments for the return journey…). The fishing vest hack – it's basically a wearable cupboard, complete with deep pockets for chargers, snacks, and even a laptop. The duty-free bag dodge – pick up a bag from duty-free, slip a jumper or two inside, and stroll on board looking like you've just bought perfume. The large backpack gamble – my personal go-to. Risk it all by taking a bag that's actually too big. I find that as long as you wear it on your back and keep facing the front, they often don't care. All of these have worked several times for me without the heat, bulk, or awkward mid-flight unzipping. So, if you're in a real fix and have a spare big bra lying around, sure – give it a go. If you don't have big boobs already, it will likely work and you might save a bob or two in fees. But for the sake of your comfort (and perhaps even your dignity), a jacket with deep pockets will do the job just as well – so when you unzip mid-flight, you'll look completely normal and not like you got dressed in the dark. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: The UK's 'prettiest village' is a magical place — but time your visit wisely MORE: We swerved a beach honeymoon for a European city break — we're itching to go back MORE: I've been to 175 countries – but I always go back to these underrated gems

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store