logo
Driverless trucks are rolling in Texas, ushering in new era

Driverless trucks are rolling in Texas, ushering in new era

Axios23-04-2025

Drivers along a 200-mile stretch of I-45 between Dallas and Houston should get ready for something new: the semi-truck in the next lane might not have anyone in the driver's seat.
Why it matters: Autonomous trucking companies have been testing their fleets on Texas highways for several years, but always with backup safety drivers in the cab.
Now, one company, Aurora Innovation, says it's ready to go completely driverless, a key milestone that promises to reshape the trucking industry.
Driving the news: After years of development, Pittsburgh-based Aurora is launching commercial driverless operations this month on a popular freight route between Dallas and Houston.
The first autonomous truck is expected to roll down I-45 in the coming days, although Aurora officials declined to share any details.
The company has said it will begin slowly, with one truck, and will gradually expand the fleet over time.
The big picture: Trucking is the backbone of the American economy, yet the industry is strained by high driver turnover rates, supply chain inefficiencies and rising costs.
Autonomous trucks can help alleviate these challenges, advocates say.
Critics, however, worry about inadequate safety oversight, cybersecurity threats and job reductions.
What they're saying:"Everybody is looking at the same economics," Jeff Farrah, CEO of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, tells Axios.
"The federal government is saying we have to move 50% more freight by 2050, but there's a shortage of drivers. How do I solve this puzzle with more freight to move and less drivers to do it?"
The other side: Members of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association are skeptical of AV trucking companies' safety claims, especially since there are no federal regulations for AVs.
"It's absurd that AVs, which are unproven and unmanned, are given more latitude on American highways than professional drivers with years of experience like me are given," Lewie Pugh, the group's executive vice president, said in an interview.
AV companies are self-regulated, while drivers are subject to many federal rules.
Drivers are required to take regular breaks for safety reasons, for example, while AV trucks can operate 24/7 — better efficiency, the industry argues.
Where it stands: At least 10 companies are known to be developing driverless technology for trucks.
Most expect to "pull the driver" — or go fully autonomous — on public roads later this year or sometime in 2026.
They all plan to begin in Texas, known for its vital freight corridors, favorable regulatory policies and good weather.
Kodiak Robotics, which intends to go public soon, says it has already surpassed 750 hours of driving on private roads across West Texas's Permian Basin without a human driver on board.
How it works: Most AV companies plan to license their driverless technology to truck manufacturers.
Those manufacturers then sell or lease the automated trucks to fleet customers. Under this "driver-as-a-service" model, those fleet customers pay for virtual drivers by the mile, but still manage their own logistics operations.
Between the lines: Trucking and logistics providers have strong financial incentives for automation.
The industry has struggled to attract enough long-haul drivers, despite big incentives, because of the grueling nature of the job.
Without driver salaries, fleet operators could reduce their operating costs per mile by as much as 42 percent, according to a McKinsey analysis, even with the added costs of the AV technology and new operations centers to monitor the trucks remotely.
What to watch: Autonomous heavy-duty trucks will account for 13 percent of trucks on U.S. roads in 2035, according to McKinsey projections.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anna Wintour to Step Down as Editor-in-Chief of US Vogue
Anna Wintour to Step Down as Editor-in-Chief of US Vogue

Bloomberg

time10 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Anna Wintour to Step Down as Editor-in-Chief of US Vogue

Anna Wintour, the longtime editor of Vogue magazine, said the Condé Nast publication is seeking a new head of American editorial content. The person filling the newly created position will take over daily editing duties of a magazine that's considered a trendsetter in the fashion industry. Wintour, who serves as chief content officer for Condé Nast and global editorial director of Vogue, took on expanded duties after a company reorganization four years ago, the company said in an email. Other markets, including Japan, the UK and France, already have appointed dedicated heads of editorial content. Bloomberg's Tiwa Adebayo joined Francine Lacqua to discuss Wintour's decision to step down from her role as editor-in-chief of American Vogue after 37 years. (Source: Bloomberg)

Jennifer Hochschild: Chicago's solution to public pension debt is a generational scam
Jennifer Hochschild: Chicago's solution to public pension debt is a generational scam

Chicago Tribune

time24 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Jennifer Hochschild: Chicago's solution to public pension debt is a generational scam

Chicago is drowning in debt that no one alive today created, yet everyone must pay. The city of Chicago owes a staggering $35 billion to $60 billion to public sector pension funds — several times the annual city budget. Chicago is in deeper arrears than almost all other American cities, including New York. This is not new. Back in 1917, just a decade after social worker Jane Addams helped establish the innovative teachers pension fund, the Illinois General Assembly warned that the condition of the pension system was 'one of insolvency' and 'moving toward crisis' because the 'financial provisions (were) entirely inadequate for paying the stipulated pensions when due.' Commissions have repeated the message ever since then. The response? While solemnly promising to pay up, politicians have steadily increased benefits while adding a provision to the state constitution declaring pension recipiency to be an 'enforceable contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.' Ever-rising pension provisions, even in the face of ever-rising deficits and interest payments, are easy to explain. Although public sector jobs may not pay especially well, the promise of a secure and substantial income after retirement is a strong economic incentive for workers and a morally honorable stance for city residents to uphold. In addition, promises of added pension benefits are politically valuable to all contract negotiators. Union leaders can assure members of a constitutionally guaranteed gain. Mayors can postpone new strains on their overstretched budgets while avoiding strikes by firefighters, police, teachers and garbage collectors. Aldermen need not raise taxes during their terms in office. Existing pension funds can be used as huge credit cards to cover urgent expenses of schooling, policing and health care. Voters are unaware or uninterested. The real mystery isn't why Chicago has this problem — it's why every American city hasn't generated ever-increasing pension deficits. As pension debt ballooned along with the proportion of the city's budget (slowly) dedicated to funding pension systems and as property taxes rose, observers began taking more notice. By the mid-2010s, all three major credit agencies downgraded both Chicago and Illinois with ratings that, as The Economist noted, put the state 'on par with Botswana' — prompting an incensed Tribune editorial to ask what Botswana had done to deserve such an insult. After passing more laws that further increased pension promises without any financial offsetting, Illinois legislators acted in 2010. Their solution was to make future workers — people who couldn't oppose the bill because they weren't yet employed or possibly even adults — absorb the rising costs. In the classic Illinois tradition, the Tier 2 bill was introduced one morning without any notice, debate or analysis; it passed both houses of the legislature that day. Then-House Speaker Michael Madigan noted that 'we don't have actuarial numbers relevant to this Amendment' but nevertheless claimed that it would save 'over a hundred billion dollars' over an unspecified time frame. The speaker's prediction may turn out to be right; those savings are coming entirely at the expense of young workers who took jobs after the tier system was established. Even Chicago's Civic Federation — a longtime advocate for reducing pension deficits — calculated disapprovingly that Tier 2 teachers pay almost 2% of their salaries to subsidize their predecessors' benefits. The teachers pension fund managers calculated, in fact, that on average, Tier 2 recipients would receive a small net negative outcome from their pension contributions. Experts fear that newer workers are receiving pensions so low that they might violate the federal 'safe harbor' law prohibiting payouts less than what Social Security would have paid that worker. But there's an even more troubling dimension that has gone almost unmentioned in public discourse and probably unnoticed by most observers: the racial wealth transfer. From 1940 through 1980, Chicago's non-Hispanic white population declined from about 90% to about 40%. Today, the city is roughly one-third Black, one-third Hispanic and one-third white. These demographic shifts mean that Chicago's increasingly diverse young workforce is financing more and more of the retirements of a generation of predominantly white pensioners. I see no easy resolution to this conjunction of demographic change, financial insouciance and political expediency. But Chicagoans should at least recognize the irony. Once again, white Americans are benefiting from the labor of their nonwhite compatriots — with no controversy, and the blessing of state law and advocates of responsible governance.

Aurora hits a self-driving trucking milestone. But the road ahead is still bumpy
Aurora hits a self-driving trucking milestone. But the road ahead is still bumpy

Fast Company

time24 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Aurora hits a self-driving trucking milestone. But the road ahead is still bumpy

Self-driving vehicle startups have often drawn skepticism for overpromising and underdelivering—see: Argo AI and GM's Cruise subsidiary, both now in corporate junkyards—but in early May, one of them achieved a milestone that had long eluded the industry: delivering a truckload of cargo for a paying customer on public roads—with no human behind the wheel. Aurora's May 1 announcement that it had begun commercial deliveries for its first customers, Hirschbach Motor Lines and Uber Freight, on two autonomous semitrailer trucks between Dallas and Houston followed some eight years of work by the Pittsburgh-based firm. Aurora reached that milestone about half a year later than it had planned last year, owing to extra time needed to complete its 'safety case' testing and self-certification. 'This is a multiyear journey,' says Aurora president Ossa Fisher. 'A few months seemed minuscule in the grand scheme of both the opportunity that lies ahead of us and what came before.' But barely two weeks after the announcement, the company was back to having safety operators sitting behind the wheels of the two trucks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store