New Ryanair, easyJet and Wizz Air bag rules coming for Spain and Greece
The European Union is planning a change in the rules on carry-on bags on flights, which would cover planes flying between the UK and countries including Spain, Portugal, Greece, France and Italy. At the minute, some airlines charge passengers for each item they want to take aboard.
Different airlines have different rules - meaning the size of the bag you can take aboard and how much it will cost you - is different each time. The new EU rule would set a specific size of bag you would be allowed to take on flights operated by companies like easyJet, Ryanair and Wizz Air.
And the rule would stipulate that the take-on bag would be free, the airline would not be able to charge you extra to take a bag aboard the plane.
The rule would change the confusion that see people being charged extra when they get to the airport for bags deemed too big, or too heavy. And people being charged for a bag by one airline but allowed to take it without additional fees by another.
EU transport ministers this week proposed standardised sizing for free underseat baggage on EU airlines. It will become law if it is accepted by the European Parliament. The new rule would mean passengers are guaranteed one free personal item, measuring up to 40x30x15cm (including wheels and handles) - or which could reasonably fit under a plane seat.
The rules would apply to EU-based airlines, including when they are carrying passengers from a non-EU country like the UK to an EU country and vice-versa.
11 years ago, an EU court ruled that hand baggage should not be subject to an additional fee so long as it is a reasonable size. But the ruling did not define 'reasonable'.
Currently, Ryanair allows a free carry-on bag of 40x20x25cm, while easyJet's rules for a free bag are 45x36x20 cm, including wheels and handles. The new rule would cover under-seat bags, but does not currently mention bags you put in overhead lockers.
In November, five airlines in Spain were fined £150million for 'abusive practices', including charging for hand luggage. Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry said it planned to ban charging extra for carry-on luggage.
Ryanair told the BBC it fully complied with EU law. A spokesman said: "If airlines were forced to include additional carry-on bags as part of the basic fare, it would reduce choice and drive up air fares for all passengers, which would harm consumers."
Industry group Airlines For Europe said charging different amounts depending on baggage "allows passengers to choose the exact services that best suits their needs".
Travel consumer expert Jane Hawkes, told the BBC: "A one-size-fits-all kind of approach would make it a lot simpler for passengers."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Full details of Heathrow's plans for a third runway revealed
Heathrow Airport has said it can build a third runway for £21bn within the next decade. Europe's busiest travel hub has submitted its plans to the government - with opponents raising concerns about carbon emissions, noise pollution and environmental impacts. The west London airport wants permission to create a 3,500m (11,400ft) runway, but insists it is open to considering a shorter one instead. 5:31 In January, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the government supports a "badly needed" expansion to connect the UK to the world and open up new growth opportunities. But London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan is still against a new runway because of "the severe impact" it will have on the capital's residents. Under Heathrow's proposal, the runway would be constructed to the northwest of its existing location - allowing for an additional 276,000 flights per year. The airport also wants to create new terminal capacity for 150 million annual passengers - up from 84 million - with plans involving a new terminal complex named T5XW and T5XN. Terminal 2 would be extended, while Terminal 3 and the old Terminal 1 would be demolished. The runway would be privately funded, with the total plan costing about £49bn, but some airlines have expressed concern that the airport will hike its passenger charges to pay for the project. EasyJet chief executive Kenton Jarvis said an expansion would "represent a unique opportunity for easyJet to operate from the airport at scale for the first time and bring with it lower fares for consumers". Thomas Woldbye, the airport's chief executive, said in a statement that "it has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow". "We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity," he added. "With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit-for-purpose, regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country. "We are uniquely placed to do this for the country. It is time to clear the way for take-off." The M25 motorway would need to be moved into a tunnel under the new runway under the airport's proposal. London mayor still opposed Sir Sadiq says City Hall will "carefully scrutinise" the proposals, adding: "I'll be keeping all options on the table in how we respond." Tony Bosworth, climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth, also said that if Sir Keir Starmer wants to be "seen as a climate leader", then backing Heathrow expansion is "the wrong move". Earlier this year, Longford resident Christian Hughes told Sky News that his village and others nearby would be "decimated" if an expansion were to go ahead. 2:33 It comes after hotel tycoon Surinder Arora published a rival Heathrow expansion plan, which involves a shorter runway to avoid the need to divert the M25 motorway. The billionaire's Arora Group said a 2,800m (9,200ft) runway would result in "reduced risk" and avoid "spiralling cost". Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will consider all plans over the summer so that a review of the Airports National Policy Statement can begin later this year. It also comes after Sky News reported on a Heathrow Airport-funded group sending leaflets supporting a third runway to thousands of homes across west London. The group, called Back Heathrow, sent leaflets to people living near the airport, claiming expansion could be the route to a "greener" airport and suggesting it would mean only the "cleanest and quietest aircraft" fly there. 3:21 Opponents of the airport's expansion said the information provided by the group is "incredibly misleading".
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Heathrow submits plans for third runway - and says it can be built within a decade
Heathrow Airport has said it can build a third runway for £21bn within the next decade. Europe's busiest travel hub has submitted its plans to the government - with opponents raising concerns about carbon emissions, noise pollution and environmental impacts. The west London airport wants permission to create a 3,500m (11,400ft) runway, but insists it is open to considering a shorter one instead. 5:31 In January, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the government supports a "badly needed" expansion to connect the UK to the world and open up new growth opportunities. But London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan is still against a new runway because of "the severe impact" it will have on the capital's residents. Under Heathrow's proposal, the runway would be constructed to the northwest of its existing location - allowing for an additional 276,000 flights per year. The airport also wants to create new terminal capacity for 150 million annual passengers - up from 84 million - with plans involving a new terminal complex named T5XW and T5XN. Terminal 2 would be extended, while Terminal 3 and the old Terminal 1 would be demolished. The runway would be privately funded, with the total plan costing about £49bn, but some airlines have expressed concern that the airport will hike its passenger charges to pay for the project. EasyJet chief executive Kenton Jarvis said an expansion would "represent a unique opportunity for easyJet to operate from the airport at scale for the first time and bring with it lower fares for consumers". Thomas Woldbye, the airport's chief executive, said in a statement that "it has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow". "We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity," he added. "With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit-for-purpose, regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country. "We are uniquely placed to do this for the country. It is time to clear the way for take-off." The M25 motorway would need to be moved into a tunnel under the new runway under the airport's proposal. London mayor still opposed Sir Sadiq says City Hall will "carefully scrutinise" the proposals, adding: "I'll be keeping all options on the table in how we respond." Tony Bosworth, climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth, also said that if Sir Keir Starmer wants to be "seen as a climate leader", then backing Heathrow expansion is "the wrong move". Earlier this year, Longford resident Christian Hughes told Sky News that his village and others nearby would be "decimated" if an expansion were to go ahead. 2:33 It comes after hotel tycoon Surinder Arora published a rival Heathrow expansion plan, which involves a shorter runway to avoid the need to divert the M25 motorway. The billionaire's Arora Group said a 2,800m (9,200ft) runway would result in "reduced risk" and avoid "spiralling cost". Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will consider all plans over the summer so that a review of the Airports National Policy Statement can begin later this year. It also comes after Sky News reported on a Heathrow Airport-funded group sending leaflets supporting a third runway to thousands of homes across west London. The group, called Back Heathrow, sent leaflets to people living near the airport, claiming expansion could be the route to a "greener" airport and suggesting it would mean only the "cleanest and quietest aircraft" fly there. 3:21 Opponents of the airport's expansion said the information provided by the group is "incredibly misleading".
North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
