FIU police chief pledges no racial profiling under pending deal to help ICE
At an emotional, two-hour forum attended by nearly 200 students, faculty and community members, Casas faced pointed questions about ICE's controversial 287(g) program which the university signed onto in April. If enacted, trained FIU officers would be given the authority to stop, question, and in some cases detain individuals suspected of being in the country illegally.
Seated on a panel with immigrant rights advocates and legal experts — FIU law professor Juan Carlos Gómez; Alana Greer of the Miami-based Community Justice Project; Renata Bozzetto, deputy director for the Florida Immigrant Coalition; and FIU students Dariel Gomez and Kassandra Toussaint — Casas promised that FIU officers wouldn't question individuals on campus without a warrant or probable cause.
But when asked by moderator Clara-Sophia Daly, Miami Herald's education reporter, to define what could constitute probable cause to determine if a person was undocumented, Casas said, 'I couldn't tell you.' Probable cause would be determined on a case by case basis, he said.
Other key details of the yet-to-be-finalized agreement remain uncertain — including how much the program will cost the department, what mechanisms exist for reimbursement and when officers would undergo the required 40-hour training.
'It's a mess,' Casas told the Miami Herald prior to the forum. 'What do we do? What do we not do?'
As signs reading 'NO ICE ON CAMPUS' and 'PAWS OFF OUR STUDENTS' waved in the crowd, Casas attempted to assuage other concerns about the plan, emphasizing it wouldn't extend the university police department's presence into K-12 schools or hinder its ability to address other issues on campus.
One student asked what would happen if someone on campus alerted FIU's police department to the immigration status of another student.
'Will there be a culture of chivatos at this university,' the attendee asked, using the Spanish word for snitch.
Casas said that any such accusations would still require further investigation, but that such information could potentially initiate probable cause. This created tension during the meeting which Casas tried to calm.
'No,' he said. 'We don't have a culture of snitches.'
The exchange illustrated the widening gap between what FIU's police sees as preventative policing and what students fear is the beginning of an atmosphere of surveillance and suspicion. Despite Casas' repeated insistence that officers would not ask about immigration status without legal cause or engage in racial profiling, some professors said their students had already stopped attending class due to fear of detention.
Panelist Greer pushed back on the idea that racial profiling could be entirely avoided under the proposed agreement. She pointed to the troubled track record of similar programs nationwide, where efforts to deputize local police in immigration enforcement have repeatedly led to racial profiling, breakdowns in communication with federal agencies and costly lawsuits against local departments.
'I commend you for your commitment to not racially profile,' Greer said, addressing Casas. 'But when you have an agreement that has such historical baggage of opening opportunities for racial profiling to happen, for distrust and clearly putting people into harm's way, the community does not have a way back.'
FIU's student body is largely Hispanic — about 68 percent, according to the U.S. News and World Report — and many are permanent residents or are protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which provides temporary protection from deportation for some immigrants who came to the U.S. as children.
Casas told forum attendees that students won't be required to carry immigration documents, but added: 'If, by all means, you think that will help you dispel any suspicion that should arise, I'm not gonna tell you not to do that.'
When asked on Wednesday whether he was under pressure from the governor to enter the agreement, Casas said 'no.'
The forum unfolded against a backdrop of rising campus anxiety over immigration enforcement. In recent weeks, 18 FIU international students had their F-1 visas revoked, prompting protests and an emergency faculty meeting last month. At the time, interim President Jeanette Nuñez — who served as DeSantis' lieutenant governor until February — defended the revocations, saying that it was the university's responsibility to remove students who had engaged in criminal activity. It remains unclear whether those students, who have since had their visas reinstated and have been reenrolled, had violated any laws.
Nuñez, who is slated to take over the presidency permanently, also backed FIU's agreement with ICE, stating at last month's emergency meeting that Casas told her he signed on to the program because he felt that campus police were better positioned than outside agencies to handle cases involving suspected undocumented students due to their community ties.
One professor challenged that reasoning, which Casas repeated during the panel on Wednesday, telling the police chief that for students with fragile immigration statuses, being detained by university police would feel like a betrayal.
'I understand that,' Casas responded. 'I think that's my burden to bear.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

32 minutes ago
FTC sues ticket reseller, saying it illegally exceeded purchase limits for Taylor Swift, other shows
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Monday against a ticket broker, alleging the company used illegal tactics to exceed purchasing limits for popular events and then resold tickets at significantly higher prices. In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, the FTC said Maryland-based ticket broker Key Investment Group has used thousands of fictitious Ticketmaster accounts and other methods to buy tickets for events, including Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. According to the FTC, Key Investment Group – which does business under brand names like Epic Seats and Totally Tix – purchased at least 379,776 tickets from Ticketmaster between Nov. 1, 2022, and Dec. 30, 2023. The company spent nearly $57 million to buy the tickets and resold them on secondary marketplaces for approximately $64 million. For just one Taylor Swift concert, Key Investment Group allegedly used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets, dramatically exceeding the Eras Tour's 2023 six-ticket purchase limit per event, the FTC said. Fans were so frustrated by the difficulty getting tickets for Swift's tour that the U.S. Senate wound up grilling Ticketmaster in a 2023 hearing. In a statement released Monday, Key Investment Group said it will vigorously defend itself against the FTC's lawsuit. 'The case threatens to dismantle the secondary ticket market for live events, further consolidating power in the hands of the industry's largest monopoly,' the company said. Key Investment Group said the FTC is misapplying the Better Online Ticket Sales Act, a 2016 law which it said was meant to target malicious software, not legitimate resale businesses. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to try to prevent the agency from using the law against it, saying it uses human employees — not bots — to buy tickets. But the FTC said that law also prohibits anyone from circumventing security measures and other controls meant to enforce posted ticket limits. In March, with Kid Rock by his side in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing U.S. officials to ensure ticket resellers are complying with Internal Revenue Service rules. The order also directed the FTC to ensure 'price transparency at all stages of the ticket-purchase process' and to 'take enforcement action to prevent unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive conduct in the secondary ticketing market."

32 minutes ago
India's Modi to meet China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
NEW DELHI -- NEW DELHI (AP) — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will meet with China's top diplomat on Tuesday in a sign of easing tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbors after a yearslong standoff between the Asian powers. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who arrived in India on Monday, is scheduled to hold talks with Modi and other leaders, including National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, about the disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. Reducing the number of troops on the border, and resuming some trade there, is expected to be on the agenda. The rebuilding of ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a longtime ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the U.S. along with Australia and Japan. India and China's decades-old border dispute worsened in 2020 after a deadly clash between their troops in the Ladakh region. The chill in relations affected trade, diplomacy and air travel as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 3,488-kilometer (2,167-mile) border. Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank, said relations are still at an uneasy level of normalization. 'Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level,' said Joshi, who also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. He asserted that the countries are "still talking past each other when it comes to the border dispute and issues surrounding it." On Monday, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing is willing to take Wang's India visit as an opportunity to work with the Indian side to 'properly handle differences and promote the sustained, sound and stable development of China-India relations.' Mao said Wang's meeting with Modi's national security adviser will 'continue in-depth communication to jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas.' The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Modi is set to met Xi when he travels to China late this month — his first visit in seven years — to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter U.S. influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a 'dragon-elephant tango' — a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020. The renewed engagement comes as New Delhi's ties with Trump are fraying. Washington has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which includes a penalty of 25% for purchasing Russian crude oil. The tariffs take effect Aug. 27. India has shown no sign of backing down, instead signing more agreements with Russia to deepen economic cooperation. Trump's renewed engagement with India's arch rival, Pakistan, has also encouraged New Delhi's overtures to China, said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, who led Indian military's Northern Command from 2014 to 2016. In June, Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief for a White House lunch and later announced an energy deal with Islamabad to jointly develop the country's oil reserves. Both followed Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after the two sides traded military strikes in May. 'China is heavily invested in Pakistan and, practically speaking, you can't have any expectation that Beijing will hold back support to Islamabad," Hooda said. 'But you can't have two hostile neighbors on your borders and simultaneously deal with them also.'


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oklahoma to test teachers from New York, California to guard against ‘radical leftist ideology'
Oklahoma will require applicants for teacher jobs coming from California and New York to pass an exam that the Republican-dominated state's top education official says is designed to safeguard against 'radical leftist ideology,' but which opponents decry as a 'MAGA loyalty test.' Ryan Walters, Oklahoma's public schools superintendent, said Monday that any teacher coming from the two blue states will be required to pass an assessment exam administered by PragerU, an Oklahoma-based conservative nonprofit, before getting a state certification. 'As long as I am superintendent, Oklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New York,' Walters said in a statement. PragerU, short for Prager University, puts out short videos with a conservative perspective on politics and economics. It promotes itself as 'focused on changing minds through the creative use of digital media.' Quinton Hitchcock, a spokesperson for the state's education department, said the Prager test for teacher applicants has been finalized and will be rolling out 'very soon.' The state did not release the entire 50-question test to The Associated Press but did provide the first five questions, which include asking what the first three words of the U.S. Constitution are and why freedom of religion is 'important to America's identity.' Prager didn't immediately respond to a phone message or email seeking comment. But Marissa Streit, CEO of PragerU, told CNN that several questions on the assessment relate to 'undoing the damage of gender ideology.' Jonathan Zimmerman, who teaches history of education at the University of Pennsylvania, said Oklahoma's contract with PragerU to test out-of-state would-be teachers 'is a watershed moment.' 'Instead of Prager simply being a resource that you can draw in an optional way, Prager has become institutionalized as part of the state system,' he said. 'There's no other way to describe it.' Zimmerman said the American Historical Association did a survey last year of 7th- to 12th-grade teachers and found that only a minority were relying on textbooks for day-to-day instruction. He said the upside to that is that most history books are 'deadly boring.' But he said that means history teachers are relying on online resources, such as those from Prager. 'I think what we're now seeing in Oklahoma is something different, which is actually empowering Prager as a kind of gatekeeper for future teachers,' Zimmerman said. One of the nation's largest teachers unions, the American Federation of Teachers, has often been at odds with the Donald Trump administration and the crackdown on teacher autonomy in the classroom. 'This MAGA loyalty test will be yet another turnoff for teachers in a state already struggling with a huge shortage," said AFT President Randi Weingarten. She was critical of Walters, who pushed for the state's curriculum standards to be revised to include conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election. 'His priority should be educating students, but instead, it's getting Donald Trump and other MAGA politicians to notice him,' Weingarten said in a statement. Tina Ellsworth, president of the nonprofit National Council for the Social Studies, also raised concerns that the test would prevent teachers from applying for jobs. 'State boards of education should stay true to the values and principles of the U.S. Constitution,' Ellsworth said. 'Imposing an ideology test to become a teacher in our great democracy is antithetical to those principles.' State Rep. John Waldron, the Oklahoma Democratic Party chairman, decried the test as 'political posturing.' 'If you want to see a textbook definition of indoctrination, how about a loyalty test for teachers,' said Waldron. 'It's a sad echo of a more paranoid past.' Waldron, a New Jersey native, said he would have been in the target demographic for this kind of test when he moved from Washington, D.C., to Oklahoma to teach social studies in 1999. He said it would have struck him as an indication that the state 'wasn't serious about attracting quality teachers.' 'Teachers are not rushing here from other states to teach. We've got an enormous teacher shortage and it's not like we have a giant supply of teachers coming in from blue states anyway,' he said.