
China, Philippines make rival claims in disputed South China Sea
China and the Philippines have staked rival claims to a spit of land in the South China Sea, moves that could further inflame tensions in one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.
In recent days, both Chinese and Philippine personnel have planted their national flags on Sandy Cay, a collection of sandbars close to two key military outposts controlled by Beijing and Manila. China's claims to much of the South China Sea—a thoroughfare for about a third of global maritime trade—overlap with those of some of its neighbors, including the Philippines.
The dispute threatens to escalate a standoff between the two nations just as the U.S. holds its annual military exercises in the Philippines, an American treaty ally.
Sandy Cay has geopolitical significance because parts of it remain above water even at high tide, entitling it to 12 nautical miles of territorial sea under international maritime law.
Chinese state media said last week that Chinese coast-guard personnel landed on Sandy Cay, known as Tiexian Reef in Chinese, in mid-April, where they 'enforced maritime management and exercised sovereign jurisdiction." The reports said the coast guard had cleaned up debris, investigated reports of Philippine activity on the island and taken photos of personnel holding a Chinese flag.
The permanent occupation of Sandy Cay by either the Philippines or China could have implications for both countries' claims to more important South China Sea features.
Located within 12 miles of Sandy Cay is Subi Reef, an artificial island that is one of China's most important military outposts in the disputed waterway. However, it doesn't generate its own territorial sea because its original features are submerged at high tide.
The Philippines, meanwhile, controls nearby Thitu Island, where it has garrisoned soldiers and expanded the runway.
Jonathan Malaya, the assistant director of the Philippines National Security Council, said Monday that China hadn't seized Sandy Cay. 'We found no evidence of alleged Chinese occupation," he told local broadcaster ABS-CBN.
The U.S. and Philippines are currently conducting joint military drills that include some 9,000 American troops and 5,000 personnel from the Philippines, along with smaller contingents from Australia and Japan. On Monday, U.S. and Filipino forces were scheduled to hold an exercise on the Philippine island of Palawan, about 300 miles from Sandy Cay, aimed at countering an attempted landing by enemy forces.
Beijing has responded to the exercises, known as Balikatan, or 'shoulder-to-shoulder" in Tagalog, by projecting its force. Last week, it sailed one of its aircraft carriers near the Batanese Islands in the Luzon Strait, the waterway between Taiwan and the Philippines, where U.S. and Philippine personnel are also conducting drills.
'I always see this as a positive when China reacts to us," said Philippine Army Brig. Gen. Michael Logico. 'It only means that we have probably done something worthy of their attention."
Sandy Cay was at the center of a previous standoff between the Philippines and China in 2017 after the Philippines started building a shelter for its fishermen on one of the sandbars. China protested, saying the two sides had agreed not to occupy new features in the South China Sea. The Philippines' then-president, Rodrigo Duterte, who maintained a close relationship with Beijing, scrapped the hut building.
The Philippines has remained a notable exception to a recent charm offensive by Chinese leader Xi Jinping as he confronts new tariffs from the U.S. He didn't visit the Philippines during a trip to China's Southeast Asian neighbors earlier this month. Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the current president of the Philippines, has intensified ties with the U.S.
Analysts say the Sandy Cay standoff signals China's increased efforts to assert its claims to the South China Sea.
'This is part of trying to continue to push that narrative, that despite everything the Philippines has done to push back, China's march continues," said Raymond Powell, director of the SeaLight project at Stanford University, which tracks Chinese maritime activity.
'We can expect to see China push that forward in ways big and small, usually small enough that it doesn't generate an aggressive U.S. or international backlash, but just enough to keep reminding, especially the Philippines but also all the neighboring countries, that resistance is futile," he said.
The tit-for-tat over Sandy Cay appeared to continue after the Philippine teams visited on Sunday. Philippine authorities said their teams had spotted what they called the 'illegal" presence of vessels from the Chinese coast guard and maritime militias nearby. China's coast guard countered that the Philippine personnel had landed 'illegally" despite warnings from the Chinese side.
Chinese coast-guard officers subsequently visited the island to investigate, it said.
Write to Gabriele Steinhauser at
Gabriele.Steinhauser@wsj.com
and Austin Ramzy at
austin.ramzy@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Stern action will be taken against those behind malicious campaign against capital Amaravati, says A.P. Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan
Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister and Jana Sena Party (JSP) president K. Pawan Kalyan said on Sunday that the government would take stringent action as per law against those who unleashed a malicious campaign against the capital city of Amaravati and women who parted with their lands for its development. In a release, Mr. Pawan Kalyan said the derogatory comments made by journalist V.V.R. Krishnam Raju on Sakshi TV channel, and its news anchor and senior journalist Kommineni Srinivasa Rao were politically motivated and a part of a well -organised conspiracy. He suggested to the people to understand the intentions of the former Chief Minister, Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, and his media outlets. The 'outrageous statements' on the capital should not be considered as the opinion of a single individual, he said. The TV channel could not escape responsibility by claiming that the said comments were the personal views of Mr. Krishnam Raju, and pretending to respect women. 'These attempts to demean the capital region, which has a rich heritage, are reprehensible,' Mr. Pawan Kalyan said. He pointed out that the capital region had historical and spiritual significance, which was evident from the multiple inscriptions that date back to the Mauryan and Ikshvaku dynasties. Chinese traveller Hiuen Tsang had described this land as one where Buddhism flourished, and Acharya Nagarjuna tread the place, he added. 'How can anyone who has knowledge of these and other relevant facts make despicable comments on it?' Mr. Pawan Kalyan sought to know. He noted that 32% of those who had given their lands for Amaravati belonged to the SC/ST communities, 14% to the Backward Classes, 20% to the Reddy community, 18% to the Kamma community, 9% to the Kapu community, and 3% to the Muslim community.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Unpaid jets, unfinished planes: China's 50% discounted fighter plane sale to Pakistan; citizens ask who is benefiting?
Beijing's fast track delivery plan of 30 J-35A stealth fighter jets to Pakistan at half the price triggered a storm of backlash across Chinese social media platforms. The move, which would mark China's first export of a fifth-generation combat aircraft, is being widely criticised as financially and strategically reckless. The deal is expected to begin deliveries in August 2025. However, the decision has left many Chinese citizens baffled and angry, especially as the J-35A, also known as the FC-31, is still undergoing testing and has not even yet been inducted into China's own air force. One user, posting under the handle @Zhejiang from the Yingyang Medical School, asked, 'Pakistan has also made a lot of fake news. How can it afford to buy it? It hasn't even paid for the J-10.' The comment refers to Pakistan's pending payments for earlier J-10C fighter jets purchased from China. Another user, @CQL0530, criticised Beijing's production priorities, 'China's own production of the J-35 has not yet been built up. How can it be given to them?' Some users dispensed with any diplomacy. 'Bullshit!' wrote another user, quoted by ET. The phrase '2 more powerful printers are coming,' shared by user Cracked Rose, was interpreted by some as a reference to the government printing more money, or jets, to fund the project. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo 'A charity sale', or 'strategic leverage' Beyond the jet's readiness, the announcement's timing has also drawn scrutiny. It comes just days after a terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir, prompting Indian analysts to see the deal as China arming Pakistan amid renewed cross-border tensions. Back home, users are questioning whether the government is, in effect, subsidising a military client state with limited ability to pay. 'It is more in your interest to spend money on building and purchasing industrial equipment and infra,' one commenter wrote. The root of concern is whether China is selling a 'concept jet,' a fighter still in development, as a finished product. While the J-35 is designed to rival platforms like the US-made F-35, it lacks any combat history or proven capabilities. A shaky pitch China previously tried to market the J-10CE, another fighter jet supplied to Pakistan, as 'combat-tested', citing claims from Islamabad that it shot down Indian Rafales during Operation Sindoor. But these claims remained unverified outside Pakistani media and have been met with scepticism. Efforts to sell the J-10CE to countries like Egypt, Brazil, and Uzbekistan have so far failed. Experts point to its reliance on Russian engines, such as the RD-93 and AL-31, which are seen as outdated and increasingly risky given geopolitical tensions and supply chain concerns. Reports suggest that Pakistani pilots are already undergoing training in China to fly the J-35. However, the Chinese government has not issued any official statement on the backlash or confirmed the details of the sale. While India is expected to keep a close eye on how this unfolds, many in China are simply asking, who benefits? If the deal goes ahead, Beijing might frame it as a strategic move to cement influence in the region. But for many ordinary citizens, it's beginning to look like a high-risk bet, funded by the Chinese taxpayer, on an unfinished aircraft sold to a customer with an unreliable credit record.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON, - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday.