
Inside Donald Trump's Turnberry bilateral with Keir Starmer
He even answered questions that hadn't been asked—like how do you restore the ceiling of a late Victorian-era golf club ballroom?
READ MORE
The Prime Minister could perhaps have done with being a little less impassive, like when the President called Sadiq Khan a 'nasty person'.
'He's a friend of mine, actually,' Sir Keir said, though stayed quiet when the President added that the Labour Mayor of London had done a 'terrible job'.
The only person with a more inscrutable coupon than Sir Keir is probably his wife, Victoria, who has, quite purposefully, cultivated one of the lowest profiles of any prime ministerial spouse in recent years.
Lady Starmer and the PM were dropped off at the door to Turnberry at about 12.30pm, and were almost certainly expecting nothing more than a handshake and a couple of minutes of chit-chat.
They got that, yes, including—I was a bit far away and couldn't quite hear over the bagpipes, but one of the US journalists told me—a chat about the size of Ailsa Craig.
But then there was an impromptu press conference on the steps, where President Trump took questions for about 15 minutes.
'They've got to get their act together,' the President said when asked about immigration. 'If they don't, you're not going to have Europe anymore, as you know it, and you can't do that. This is a magnificent part of the world, and you cannot ruin it.'
The Starmers looked on, stony, deadpan, expressionless.
(Image: Andrew Learmonth) I've never known a day quite like it.
I was there because four days ago my name got drawn out of a hat.
There were 13 journalists coming over with the President from the US. So No 10 then made sure there were 13 British journalists—including cameras and the like—attending as part of this media delegation.
Three were to come from Westminster and two from Holyrood.
Apparently, Scottish Labour spin doctors were taking credit for making sure Scottish journalists were in the room.
But so too did the Americans. 'You've got to have the Scots,' they told the UK Government.
Nevertheless, I'm grateful to whoever did the negotiations.
The only fair way to decide which Scottish journalists took part was a sort of reporter raffle.
So, through random luck I found myself in a South Ayrshire car park on a Monday morning waiting for a Downing Street official to whisk me through a security cordon into the Games Room at the Trump Turnberry spa.
READ MORE
I was told in advance there'd be a lot of waiting and to bring a packed lunch.
The US journalists, however, got afternoon tea. Dainty little crustless sandwiches and tasty treats.
The British hacks sat in the corner, some with Tupperware and last night's pasta, and others with their Tesco meal deals.
Despite the rules, some of us managed to sneak some of the Americans' egg rolls and a couple of wedges of millionaire's shortbread.
We learned later that each US media outlet had paid around $20,000 to accompany the President on the trip. The cash covers the cost of Air Force One, the hotels on the way and afternoon tea in Trump Turnberry.
That was easily the most expensive millionaire's shortbread I've ever pilfered.
Nevertheless, the Americans definitely get their money's worth when it comes to access.
We were told Air Force One needed to be up in the air by 3pm, so when we got taken into the Donald J Trump ballroom for a press conference at 2pm we weren't expecting much time.
But the President took pretty much every question he was asked. Some reporters managed three or four.
When he was asked about his relationship with Epstein, I was sure one of the White House PR folk would have whizzed in and ended the whole thing. But no, not then. They just let it run on.
It was getting to the point where we almost ran out of questions.
There were significant world-changing moments in the bizarrely opulent ballroom: the criticism of Putin and Netanyahu, for instance.
It was only when we left the press conference that we learned the bilateral between Sir Keir and Mr Trump had yet to take place.
Diplomacy is weird.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Aston Martin's 24-hour scramble to get lower US tariffs pays off
Aston Martin scrambled to deliver three months' worth of cars to dealers in the US within 24 hours as it rushed to qualify for lower tariffs that came into effect on 30 June. By invoicing the whole quarter's cars on that same day it avoided having to report a sales slump that might have alarmed investors. The operation may not have matched the drama of the James Bond films that have long featured the brand, but it 'was quite exciting, to put it mildly', said Adrian Hallmark, Aston Martin's chief executive. Donald Trump has shaken the global economy with a trade war, causing a particular stir in the car industry with his imposition of a 25% tariff on 3 April on top of an existing 2.5% levy. Germany's Mercedes-Benz said on Wednesday Trump's border taxes would cost it about €360m (£311m) this year, while the sportscar-maker Porsche said it had taken a €400m hit from the levies in the first half of the year. However, in early May, the US president and Keir Starmer agreed a deal to limit tariffs on 100,000 British-made cars per year to 10%. That rate came into force at one minute past midnight on 30 June, the final day of the second financial quarter. Aston Martin Lagonda manufactures all its cars in factories in Gaydon, Warwickshire, and St Athan, south Wales. It shipped 328 cars to dealers in the Americas between April and June but the majority were sent on 30 June. It was a 'mammoth task', Hallmark said. 'This left us with 24 hours to invoice the entire quarter's-worth of vehicle sales in the US.' The one-day scramble illustrates the tariff turmoil causing headaches for goods exporters around the world. Aston Martin revealed that it had raised prices for US customers by 3% to absorb some of the hit from the border taxes. Getting the cars to dealers early would have meant a big financial blow from absorbing the higher tariff rate, while late arrivals that missed the quarter-end would have meant reporting a big slump in sales. So Aston Martin decided to send hundreds of cars to bonded warehouses in the US – where goods can be stored without being subject to tariffs – before delivery firms raced to get them all to dealers before the end of day on 30 June. Those cars attracted the 10% rate, rather than 27.5%. Other carmakers face higher costs. The EU reached a deal with the US to cut tariffs on most goods including cars to 15%. Mercedes-Benz boss Ola Källenius said he did not expect any improvement on that for the car industry, despite lobbying for a lower rate from Germany's carmakers. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Aston Martin also said it had cut production and limited exports to the US to try to limit the financial impact. Even after its 30 June operation, Aston Martin could still be hit later in the year when it launches its million-dollar Valhalla, a mid-engine hypercar that it hopes will be a major contributor to profits. However, it is worried that the quota of 100,000 cars covered by the 10% tariff could be used up before it can get the Valhalla to dealers – potentially adding more than £100,000 to the price if importers must pay the 27.5% rate. British companies exported just over 100,000 cars to the US last year, with the bulk being Range Rovers shipped by JLR. The quota could mean an end-of-year race between British carmakers to get their vehicles into the country, with 'pressure on the number of slots available on the 100,000 quota', Hallmark said.

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
The Government confirmed it had decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) in 2024-25, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position'. The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986. It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls. Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn. 'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said. 'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland. 'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported. 'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship. 'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.' Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing. 'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25. 'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
The Government confirmed it had decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) in 2024-25, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position'. The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986. It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls. Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn. 'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said. 'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland. 'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported. 'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship. 'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.' Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing. 'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25. 'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'