
Urban fires can mean long trips for helicopters to get water. One firefighter had a better idea
Mark Whaling and a crew raced up and down a hill in a tanker truck as they battled a wildfire in Los Angeles County, scrambling to get water from a street hydrant in time to stay ahead of flames moving up a ridge. A helicopter flew in to drop water, but it had to fly a long distance to refill — and a fire that might have been stopped went on to destroy homes.
As they fought that early 2000s blaze, Whaling says, he spotted a sealed, million-gallon water tank nearby that firefighters had no way of accessing. He thought that was ridiculous.
'We don't tell fire engines, 'Protect the city and go find your own water.' We put fire hydrants every 600 feet all around cities,' said Whaling, who has since retired from the county fire department. 'But when it comes to the helicopters, we weren't supporting them as robustly as we should.'
His frustration sparked an idea: the Heli-Hydrant, a relatively small, open tank that can be rapidly filled with water, enabling helicopters to fill up faster for urban fires rather than flying to sometimes distant lakes or ponds.
As wildfires become more frequent, Whaling's invention is getting the attention of officials eager to boost preparedness. First used for the 2020 Blue Ridge Fire in Yorba Linda, 10 Heli-Hydrants have been built across Southern California and 16 more are in progress, according to Whaling.
Helicopters are essential for firefighting. They can drop 1,000 gallons (about 3,785 liters) of water at once — some much more. That's far more than hoses than get on a fire all at once, and can be the best way to attack fires that are difficult for ground crews to reach.
But pilots sometimes have to fly a long way to scoop up water, and in drought-prone areas, natural sources can sometimes dry up or diminish so they're hard to draw from. In Southern California's Riverside County, helicopters have had to fly up to 10 miles (about 16 kilometers) to find water, eating critical time from battling fires.
An innovative solution
On a remote plot in the Southern California town of Cabazon, contractor Glenn Chavez stood on a ladder and peered into an empty Heli-Hydrant. A radio in hand, he clicked a button to activate the system and watched as water roared into the tank. In about six minutes, it filled with 8,500 gallons (32,176 liters).
Chavez, a general contractor, was testing the Cabazon Water District's lastest investment — a second Heli-Hydrant that local officials are counting on to help protect the town. At $300,000, it cost slightly less than the average price of a single home in Cabazon.
'Living in a beautiful desert community, you're going to have risks of fire," said Michael Pollack, the district's general manager. "And to have these Heli-Hydrants is a major advantage. People will have a little bit of comfort knowing that they have another tool for fighting fires in their community."
Pilots can remotely activate the tanks from half a mile away, with the tank typically filling quickly from a city's water system. Helicopters can fill up in less than a minute. Once it's activated, solar panels and backup batteries ensure the system can still be used during power outages. And at night, lights from the tank and a tower nearby guide pilots toward it.
In November, fire responders in San Diego put the product to the test when the 48-acre Garden Fire in Fallbrook, a community known for its avocado groves, prompted evacuation orders and warnings. Helicopters tapped the tank nearly 40 times.
Pilot Ben Brown said its proximity to the fire saved not just time but fuel.
'They're great for when you don't have other water sources,' he said. "The more dip sites, especially in some of the more arid environments in the county, the better.'
But they don't always help
Heli-Hydrants have raised some concerns about their placement in urban areas where houses, buildings and power lines can be obstacles to flight and they might have to squeeze into tighter spaces.
In those cases, firefighters may choose to fly farther to a natural source that gives the helicopter more room, said Warren Voth, a deputy pilot with the San Diego County Sheriff's Department. A pilot's goal is to always to face the wind while entering and exiting an area, for safety, and they need room to accomplish that.
In some cases, the municipal systems needed to fill Heli-Hydrants could go empty during major fires. As the Palisades Fire in Los Angeles burned, three 1-million gallon tanks that helped pressurize city hydrants in the Pacific Palisades ran dry as demand soared and burning pipes leaked water.
Other times, helicopters just can't access them. When winds are fierce, flying is nearly impossible; hurricane-force winds that supercharged the Los Angeles infernos initially grounded firefighting aircraft. When multiple helicopters respond to large blazes, they can't all use the Heli-Hydrant. And smoke can make it hard to see it.
Portable water tanks can accomplish some of the things that Heli-Hydrants do, but can require time, people and equipment to set up.
A Heli-Hydrant gives one community hope
Areas where wildland vegetation intersects with human development have always been vulnerable to fires, but more people are living in them today, and climate change is creating conditions that can make these regions drier and more flammable.
Jake Wiley has seen intensifying wildfires devastate his community. Two blazes — in 2007 and 2017 — collectively scorched more than 400 structures in San Diego. The last one forced Wiley, now general manager for the Rainbow Municipal Water District, to evacuate.
That fire also prompted local agencies to install a Heli-Hydrant — and when the Garden Fire erupted in November, it played a big role helping firefighters protect homes.
'It seems like when you've seen the worst, you haven't yet,' Wiley said. 'Anything we can do helps.'
—————-
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Be aware of the hidden dangers of your guilty pleasures that could cause cancer, including being busy
A sip of wine, a craving for pizza, having a full calendar may all seem like harmless aspects of life but a scientist has revealed such seemingly innocent actions could be putting you on the brink of developing cancer. University of California's Dr Raphael Cuomo claims chronic stress, fast food, alcohol, and drugs are an almost surefire way to set yourself up for a diagnosis with the disease later in life. In Dr Cuomo's new book Crave: The Hidden Biology Of Addiction And Cancer, he noted that the body's repetitive desire to indulge in junk food and addictive behaviors drove the body to the deadly condition: 'Crave reveals how modern habits like vaping, binge-eating, and daily cannabis use hijack our biology.' The expert added: 'These behaviors quietly damage the body's ability to repair itself. Over time, they open the door to cancer. It is not about genetics or bad luck. It is about the choices we make every day.' Over 600,000 Americans and more than 150,000 Brits die of various cancers every year. After studying 'millions of patient records' from across the University of California hospitals and spending months reviewing studies on cancer biology, Dr Cuomo revealed what he says are the top habits most likely to cause the destructive illness. Fast food Dr Cuomo called eating fast food 'slow poison', and noted that its effects could not be seen immediately but might cause long-term damage. Earlier this year, researchers tested more than 300 foods sold at restaurant chains and in grocery stores across America for two microscopic toxins that have been linked to cancer, infertility, and autism. They found that of all fast-food restaurants, the salad chain Sweetgreen and coffeehouse Starbucks scored poorest. Sweetgreen's Chicken Pesto Parm Salad and Starbucks' Matcha Latte was found to contain the highest amount of phthalates, a group of chemicals used to make plastics more flexible and transparent. Studies showed that phthalates, commonly used in food packaging material, imitate the body's hormones and interfere with the production of and response to natural hormones like estrogen and testosterone. Some phthalates were linked to certain cancers, particularly breast cancer and lymphoma. However, Dr Cuomo pointed towards fiber consumption as a critical part of reversing damage as it would help improve gut bacteria, reduce inflammation, and keep cells healthy. Smoking and drinking Smoking causes about 30 per cent of overall cancer deaths in the U.S. and is a leading cause of lung, brain, neck, and bladder cancer. Alcohol consumption's been linked to an increased risk of several types of cancer, including breast, colon, liver, and esophageal cancer. About 20,000 people die of booze-related cancers, annually. Researchers in Germany found that a combination of drinking and smoking significantly raised the risk of colon cancer in young Americans. Researchers analyzed two dozen studies, comparing regular drinkers and smokers with people who abstained from both. Just 100 cigarettes in a person's lifetime - the equivalent of one per week for two years - was linked to a 59 per cent higher risk of colon cancer compared to people who never smoked. They also found drinking alcohol every day raised the risk of developing early onset colon cancer by 39 per cent, even if it's just one or two drinks per day. Alcohol and smoking have both been linked to cancer in the past, as they release chemicals that destroy DNA and cause cells to mutate. Also, each daily can of beer or glass of wine further increased the chance by an additional two per cent. In his book, Dr Cuomo noted that deep sleep is the 'most underestimated tool' to improve damage caused by addictions, such as smoking and drinking. He explained that during consistent deep sleep, the body performs critical tasks such as repairing tissues, regulating hormones, consolidating memory, and clearing metabolic waste. Stress A 2024 study presented at the United European Gastroenterology congress by a group of Chinese researchers noted that a combination of chronic stress and anxiety has been linked to colorectal cancer in young people. They explained when a body is under frequent stress, a number of healthy bacteria that live in the gut start dying off, making it easier for cancer to move in. When the bacteria die off, tumors grow more quickly, leading to more aggressive, rapidly growing colorectal cancers. Research from Trinity College in Ireland suggested these bacteria support the body's immune system, can protect against virus and bacteria, and prevent damage in gut cells. Apart from this, chronic stress can lead to increased levels of cortisol and other stress hormones in the body that can promote cancer growth and its spread to various parts of the body. A constant state of stress can also weaken the immune system's ability to effectively fight off cancer cells. However, Dr Cuomo believes that there are ways to break free from all addictions and prevent cancer development in the body. He said: 'The real threat is not a single cocktail or slice of cake. It is the craving that drives you back again and again. 'That craving is what wears down your body's defenses. I tell people to test their control. Start with one week of abstention. Not forever. Just seven days. That short reset reveals a lot. 'You learn what your body depends on. During that time, focus on physical recovery. Sleep deeply. Move your body. Eat real food. 'Spend time with people you trust. Addiction thrives in isolation. Recovery begins with reconnection.' Additionally, Dr Cuomo suggested replacing the habit by engaging in some form of movement, such as taking regular walks.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I've spent years studying natural disasters... here's how likely an apocalyptic-level event really is
A man who has spent years studying natural disasters has revealed how likely an apocalyptic-level event really is. With doomsday shows and movies like The Last Of Us, Don't Look Up, and 28 Years Later taking over screens, many people are often left wondering: can something like that really happen? Thankfully, expert Anthony Finchum, 31, from Omaha, Nebraska, broke down the chances of an incident occurring in our lifetime that will wipe out the human race. And he explained that while it may make for good cinema, the chances of an event like that really happening are actually pretty slim. 'So this is a difficult question to answer. In practice, there are very few ways that an actual apocalyptic level event could happen,' he explained. Anthony, who runs the Disastrous History podcast, said a 'giant hurricane or wildfire' destroying the entire planet is not possible. And while he explained that things like a 'pandemic, asteroid impact, large volcanic eruption, or unregulated climate change' could potentially end our existence, he added that a lot of 'factors would have to align' for it to reach an apocalyptic level. 'Something like a giant hurricane or a giant wildfire or something along those lines is impossible,' he said. With doomsday shows and movies like The Last Of Us and 28 Years Later taking over screens, many people are often left wondering: can something like that really happen? 'There are upper limits on the strength of just about every disaster based on what the earth's atmosphere can handle weather wise and things of that nature. 'The primary [ways the world could end] are pandemic, asteroid impact, a large volcanic eruption, and unregulated climate change. 'But [to reach] the level of apocalyptic, there's a vanishingly small chance because so many precise factors have to align in order for one to occur.' Originally from Indiana, Anthony has lived through several natural disasters, including several tornadoes and blizzards as well as one 'derecho,' which is an intense wind storm. In addition, throughout his career as a first responder and fire investigator, he has assisted in numerous rescues during hurricanes, tornadoes and fires. He explained to the Daily Mail that he has 'always had an interest' in understanding how and why they occur. He would lay in bed at night researching and reading obsessively on past disastrous events, wracking up unrivaled knowledge on the topic. All of that led to him launching his Disastrous History podcast in 2020, where he uses his knowledge to instruct others on what to do if they find themselves facing a natural disaster. 'I really wanted to educate people that yes, these are bad but they are survivable and recovery is always possible,' he explained. 'I have found that breaking these things down into small and manageable pieces makes them seem less scary as they are happening and give people a way to react properly in a stressful situation. 'I feel that understanding the disasters of the past helps us to grow and prevent disasters of all types from happening in the future.' He also shared vital tips to surviving tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes and fires exclusively with the Daily Mail. For tornadoes, he said the 'best option' is to head down to the basement, and if you don't have one, then he suggested bunkering down in the 'most center section of your home.' 'A tornado has unlimited energy but only a finite time to use it,' he explained. 'The more you barriers you can put between yourself and a tornado the better. 'When you are in a tornado watch, its time to get things together, hard soled shoes, flashlights, first aid kit, charge your phones, things like that so you're ready in case you have to take shelter quickly.' As for hurricanes, Anthony said the way you react depends on where you are located. And if you live near a beach, he explained that 'evacuation is your best option.' In practice, there are very few ways that an actual apocalyptic level event could happen,' he explained. He's seen with his family 'Storm surge and flooding is the main cause of death in hurricanes,' he shared. 'Because warning time for hurricanes is so long, the best option will always be to simply not be there anymore. 'If that is not an option, sheltering from high winds is similar to a tornado. Get to an interior room without windows. 'If flooding becomes a concern go to the highest available floor without going into the attic. Going into the attic could cause you to become trapped with no escape.' If an earthquake hits, the expert said you should 'place yourself under the sturdiest furniture you can find and protect your head and neck.' He also stated that despite contrary belief, it is not recommended to 'stand in a doorway.' Lastly, if your house has caught fire or if there's a wildfire nearby, Anthony suggested you get as far away as possible. 'Get out. Whether it is a building fire or wildfire, your best option for survival is simply to not be there anymore,' he said. 'If it is a building fire, make sure to stay low and move quickly. Smoke will build along the ceiling first with relatively clean air down low which will allow for quick and safe escape. 'As far as wildfires, as soon as you have an evacuation order, it is time to go.' Anthony and his wife, Kaitlin, 35, recently launched a new charity called Stuffie Strong, which brings toys to children who have endured a natural disaster. 'Our goal is to provide kids that have been through various disasters a new stuffed animal to help them get through it,' he explained. 'Often in the aftermath, parents and adults are focused on the necessities, ie. food, clothing, shelter, toiletries, those kinds of things. 'Kids are shunted around without anything to comfort them after having lost everything they've ever known.' In the end, he said he hopes that he can help as many people as he can through both his charity and by sharing his knowledge.


The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
The big idea: should we embrace boredom?
In 2014, a group of researchers from Harvard University and the University of Virginia asked people to sit alone with their thoughts for 15 minutes. The only available diversion was a button that delivered a painful electric shock. Almost half of the participants pressed it. One man pressed the button 190 times – even though he, like everyone else in the study, had earlier indicated that he found the shock unpleasant enough that he would pay to avoid being shocked again. The study's authors concluded that 'people prefer doing to thinking', even if the only thing available to do is painful – perhaps because, if left to their own devices, our minds tend to wander in unwanted directions. Since the mass adoption of smartphones, most people have been walking around with the psychological equivalent of a shock button in their pocket: a device that can neutralise boredom in an instant, even if it's not all that good for us. We often reach for our phones for something to do during moments of quiet or solitude, or to distract us late at night when anxious thoughts creep in. This isn't always a bad thing – too much rumination is unhealthy – but it's worth reflecting on the fact that avoiding unwanted mind-wandering is easier than it's ever been, and that most people distract themselves in very similar, screen-based ways. Smartphones have also increased the pressure to use our time productively, to optimise every minute of our lives. If once a harried commuter might have been forced to stare out of the window or read a book on the train to work, now they may try to catch up on their emails to avoid feeling guilty and inefficient. To sit and do nothing is seen as a waste of time. But that ignores the fact that when we're doing nothing we're often thinking quite hard. What happens to all those difficult or untamed half-thoughts that start to form in the milliseconds before we dig into our pockets and pull out our phones again? Most psychologists studying boredom would agree that, while it can feel unpleasant, it's useful. Like hunger or loneliness, it alerts us to a need, a desire to do something different. According to Erin Westgate, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Florida, we become bored if something fails to absorb our attention, or when we perceive it as meaningless. This is not to say that something needs to be both engaging and meaningful to keep us interested: doing sudoku might be absorbing but relatively meaningless, while reading a Peppa Pig bedtime story for the 500th time is not engaging but may nonetheless feel like a meaningful thing to do. Watching paint dry is both unstimulating and pointless, which is why it isn't a common pastime. In any case, when boredom strikes it should ideally serve as a prompt to do something more engaging or meaningful. If you don't react appropriately to your boredom, or perhaps if engaging or meaningful things aren't available to you for whatever reason, you may find yourself becoming chronically bored. That is associated with a range of problems, including depression, anxiety, poor life satisfaction, lower academic achievement, substance abuse and excessive risk-taking. There is evidence to suggest that chronic boredom is becoming more common, and that this uptick has coincided with the rise of smartphones. In a paper published last year, researchers noted that the proportion of students in China and the US who described themselves as bored steadily increased in the years after 2010, during the first decade of smartphone dominance. Why might digital media have this effect? Research has shown that the main reason we pick up our phones or check our socials is to relieve boredom, but that the behaviour actually exacerbates it. One study, for instance, found that people who were bored at work were more likely to use their smartphones – and subsequently feel even more bored. It may be that checking your phone only addresses part of what you need when you start to feel bored. Digital devices are very good at attracting your attention – in fact, everything you interact with on a screen has been designed to capture, hold and monetise it – but much of what we do online doesn't feel meaningful. It's incredibly easy to plan to look at your phone for just five minutes and resurface two hours later with Mastermind-level knowledge of the latest Blake Lively controversy or your ex's holiday plans. The average American spends more than four hours a day on their smartphone and more than seven hours a day in total online. That adds up to spending 17 years of your adult life browsing the internet. I expect that even the biggest technophiles would agree that this isn't how they want to spend their one precious life. Phones' efficacy at whisking us into superficial stimulation short-circuits our boredom and allows us to swiftly evade messages that we might need to hear, such as 'Why am I feeling this?' or 'What do I need that I'm not getting?' If we pause and listen, then perhaps we can make a choice rather than being manipulated by software engineers. When boredom strikes, we should resist the urge to assuage it instantly and ask ourselves: are we in search of pure entertainment or something more purposeful, an opportunity to connect with friends or our community or something different, something new? The people who choose to embrace boredom, at least for a while, may paradoxically experience less of it. It could even be the first step towards a life that feels more stimulating overall: meaningful, creative and free. Bored and Brilliant by Manoush Zomorodi (Pan Macmillan, £14.99) Digital Minimalism by Cal Newport (Penguin, £10.99) The Antidote by Oliver Burkeman (Vintage, £10.99)