logo
Paddock owner Jon Spanos sues 3 allegedly involved in posting viral video of racist rant

Paddock owner Jon Spanos sues 3 allegedly involved in posting viral video of racist rant

Yahoo12-04-2025

It began with a family grudge.
Anastasios Marros is friends with Sally Spanos' adult sons from her prior marriage, and when Sally divorced her husband and married Jonathan Spanos, Marros 'publicly and privately pledged to ruin' the couple's lives, according to a lawsuit filed last month.
Marros' grudge, according to the complaint, began with 'online disparagement on the social media platform Facebook, as well as heated, verbal barbs directed at (the couple) at events attended by them, including a family funeral.'
On Oct. 19, 2024, it allegedly continued when Marros and Meghan Dundon confronted the Spanoses on a suburban street in York Township. Marros and Dundon share an address in Charlotte, North Carolina, and had traveled to York to attend the wedding of Kostas Sgagias, whose relationship with the couple was not specified in the lawsuit.
The resulting video of the confrontation – in which Spanos uses the 'n-word' and declares, sarcastically, that he is 'a racist' - quickly spread across social media and led to threats of violence against Jonathan and Sally Spanos, including threats of rape, according to the suit.
It also led to economic hardship, the lawsuit asserts, as business at the family's restaurant, The Paddock on Market, a longtime East York institution on East Market Street in Springettsbury Township, fell off.
As a result, the Spanoses and the business have filed a defamation suit against Marros, Dundon and Sgagias, alleging a civil conspiracy to harm the couple and their restaurant. The Spanoses, the suit asserts, 'have suffered and will continue to suffer substantial injury and irreparable harm.' The suit seeks a judgment of a total minimum of $250,000 for its five counts, which include commercial disparagement, defamation/libel, false light/invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy.
Attorney Edward Paskey, representing the Spanoses, wrote in the suit, 'The actions of the defendants were malicious, wanton, willful, oppressive, exhibited an evil motive and showed reckless indifference to the rights of others.'
The couple has 'suffered severe emotional distress including stress, anxiety, insomnia and fear for their safety,' Paskey wrote. The Paddock, the attorney asserted, 'has been irreparably harmed, and has incurred financial loss of revenue.'
Marros' attorney, Farley Holt, described the suit as 'rubbish' and questioned the Spanos' motives in filing it. 'One would think that he would be happy to distance himself from this incident instead of dragging it back up. Why would you bring this back up and air your dirty laundry in public when that's what you're complaining about?'
Paskey responded, "Causing someone to receive threats of being raped is hardly rubbish. The suit, in some ways, is a microcosm of American society today. If we condemn what Dr. Spanos said (which we should and have), we must also publicly condemn the actions of those who respond by planning to ruin the lives of others."
In a statement, Paskey wrote, "The defendants ultimately succeeded in their plan: The Paddock is permanently closed. Dr. Spanos publicly and voluntarily accepted responsibility for using those vile words. The defendants should publicly accept responsibility for their roles rather than try to deflect. They knew this complaint was coming for months and made zero effort to resolve it."
The suit centers on the viral video in which Jonathan Spanos is depicted as yelling a racial epithet known as the 'n-word' and declaring 'I am a racist' during the roadside argument.
Dissemination of the video sparked protests and led to Spanos, a prominent figure in York County, having to resign from the Penn State-York board of directors, and calls for a boycott of The Paddock, which dates to 1947 and has been in the Spanos family for three generations.
It also led to threats against the restaurant and its staff, according to the complaint, prompting the Spanoses to temporarily close, and to the explicit, racially tinged threats of violence against Spanos and his wife.
Shortly after the video blew up on social media, Spanos met with leaders of York County's Black community, who had condemned his language and urged him to reflect on his words and actions. He held a press conference with Black leaders and clergy to apologize and ask for forgiveness, saying he was 'humiliated and embarrassed.'
'To members of my community who are Black and brown, I want to say how truly sorry I am for my language and my behavior,' Spanos said during the press conference. 'The video captured a heated family confrontation in which I intentionally used the most ugly language known to me to lash out in anger. ... I was wrong for not walking away from that volatile situation. I was wrong for responding in anger with hateful language. I was wrong for using a racist term that has caused great trauma in our country, our community and to our neighbors. I was also wrong to state sarcastically in the video that I am a racist.'
Previously: 'Humiliated and embarrassed': Spanos apologizes and asks for forgiveness for racist rant
The community response: Black community leaders spoke after Jonathan Spanos' public apology for racist comments
At about 11:30 a.m. on Oct. 19, 2024, Spanos and his wife were driving on Wyndsong Drive in York Township when he pulled to the curb to speak to a family friend, according to the complaint.
While Spanos and his wife were talking to their friend, the complaint states, Marros and Dundon apparently saw them and pulled in behind them. As Spanos pulled away from the curb, Marros 'made a profane physical gesture' toward the couple.
Spanos stopped and he and Marros confronted one another. Dundon recorded the confrontation with her cell phone. At one point, the complaint states, she told Spanos, in what was described as a 'threatening' manner, 'Ohhhh. You said the 'N' word that's not going to be good for you.'
The suit contends that although the confrontation took place on a public street, 'the interaction was a private discussion' and that Spanos had not given his consent to be recorded.
The confrontation ended and, Paskey wrote in the suit, 'It was at this point that the plot between Marros, Dundon and Sgagias was hatched.'
The suit asserts that Marros and Dundon 'devised a scheme to edit and condense the video taken by Dundon and distribute it to others with the intent to harm' the Spanoses and The Paddock.
'Their scheme succeeded,' Paskey wrote in the complaint.
They sent the video to a friend, Sgagias, who beginning at 7:28 a.m. on Nov. 10, began sharing it via text, according to the complaint. Three hours after he posted the video, according to the complaint, Sgagias called the state police 'inquiring whether his dissemination of the video constituted a crime.'
The suit asserts that Sgagias created an anonymous X account with the title @YorkpaRacist 'at the direction of, or encouragement by, Marros and Dundon.' He used that account to distribute the video, tagging the York Daily Record, The York Dispatch, Penn State-York, the local branch of the NAACP and Democratic U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, a York native, with the intent to 'tarnish the reputation of The Paddock and Dr. Spanos.'
The video 'spread like wildfire across the United States and around the world,' Paskey wrote in the 24-page complaint.
As a result, the Spanoses 'began to receive death threats and threats of violence.' In several calls, according to the complaint, the caller threatened to rape Susan Spanos in calls recorded on voicemail.
The calls, quoted in the complaint, contained 'obscene, vile, racist and threatening' language, Paskey wrote. One sample: 'Your restaurant is going to be shut the (expletive) down, (expletive). Yeah, John, Mr. John Spanos, you (expletive) racist piece of (expletive). And I can't wait till you get (expletive) checked by somebody because I'm going to (expletive) on your (expletive) grave, (expletive).'
The Spanos reported the calls to police, which resulted in the arrest of the caller who later pleaded guilty 'for communicating these obscene, vile, racist and threatening messages to Dr. and Mrs. Spanos,' according to the complaint. (The person was not identified in the complaint, and Paskey said some of the same people who condemned Spanos' actions knew about the threats, "yet there has been no public condemnation from them.")
'But for the actions of Marros, Dundon and/or Sgagias, Dr. and Mrs. Spanos would not have received these threats,' Paskey wrote. 'To be clear, Dr. Spanos regrets the use of inappropriate and ugly words uttered in the video and has voluntarily apologized for his actions. He does not hide from his conduct.
'However, the actions of Marros, Dundon and Sgagias in orchestrating this scheme to publicly harm The Paddock, Dr. Spanos and Mrs. Spanos are extreme and outrageous.'
Columnist/reporter Mike Argento has been a York Daily Record staffer since 1982. Reach him at mike@ydr.com.
This article originally appeared on York Daily Record: Spanoses sue 3 allegedly involved in posting video of racist rant

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Road rule warning to Aussies after driver cops $1,775 fine, 22 demerit points in one go
Road rule warning to Aussies after driver cops $1,775 fine, 22 demerit points in one go

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Road rule warning to Aussies after driver cops $1,775 fine, 22 demerit points in one go

Drivers are being reminded of their responsibility to follow the myriad rules of the road after one L-plater copped $1,775 in fines and a whopping 22 demerit points in one hit this past weekend. NSW Traffic and Highway Patrol are holding the driver of a silver Saab convertible up as an example of what not to do after the male, who held a NSW Learner's class C licence, was caught doing 129km/h on the Hume Highway on Sunday. It was the car's speed in the 110km/h zone near Penrose which initially alerted officers in Mittagong Highway Patrol to the driver's wrongdoing, but the offences didn't stop there. The learner licence holder, who was not displaying yellow L plates on the front or the rear of the car, can only do a maximum speed of 90km/h, making his speed actually 39km over the limit. After being stopped at 4.15 pm, officers then spotted a mobile phone positioned near the steering wheel playing a music video on YouTube. "When questioned about this, the male swiped the screen to a map app and replied 'no, I'm not using it, just looking at the map'," officers said of the interaction. It is illegal for learner and provisional licence holders in NSW to use a phone for "any purpose", even for directions. 😳 Alarming breach of well-known road rule as 8,500 Aussies cop $395 fine 🐉 New Aussie road markings aimed at giving drivers a 'sense of warning' 🛴 Aussies warned over $1,161 fine after parents' shocking e-scooter act on city road When police questioned the female passenger about her role as a supervisor, she replied, "I was asleep," officers said. The offences resulted in numerous fines and demerit points. They included: Exceeding speed over 30km/h, $1045 fine and five demerit points Learner using a mobile phone, $410 fine and five demerit points Not displaying L plates, $320 fine and two demerit points. Because it was a long weekend and double demerit points were in place, the male driver accumulated a whopping 22 demerit points. Because learner drivers can only accumulate a maximum of four demerit points, he was automatically suspended from driving with a pending extension from NSW Transport. The female passenger also copped a penalty infringement for failing to supervise. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Advocates denounce immigration enforcement raid at Southern New Mexico dairy
Advocates denounce immigration enforcement raid at Southern New Mexico dairy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Advocates denounce immigration enforcement raid at Southern New Mexico dairy

Advocates on Monday denounced a recent immigration enforcement raid carried out by Homeland Security Investigations agents that led to the arrests of 11 workers at a southeastern New Mexico dairy farm. María Romano, coordinator of the Lea County office of the New Mexico worker and immigrant rights organization Somos Un Pueblo Unido, said the raid in Lovington — the first of her knowledge in the area — has stoked fear among immigrant communities as tensions surrounding immigration enforcement spike nationwide. "People are sad. They're angry. But more than anything, they're scared," Romano said in an interview in Spanish. In a June 4 post on X, formerly Twitter, the El Paso field office of Homeland Security Investigations — the federal law enforcement agency housed within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — announced agents had arrested 11 "illegal aliens for violations of fraud & misuse of visas, permits & other documents" during a raid at Outlook Dairy in Lovington. ICE's Facebook page noted the raid in a post Saturday, adding, "Criminal employers who hire illegal workers put other employees and our communities at risk. Plus, they undercut their competition by exploiting illegal alien labor, making it harder for legitimate American businesses to stay afloat." Outlook Dairy manager Isaak Bos declined to comment on the raid when contacted by The New Mexican on Monday. He told the Albuquerque Journal the workers provided false paperwork. Of the 11 people arrested during the raid, Romano said 10 were from Guatemala and one was from Mexico. While she doesn't know where the Guatemalans are currently, she said, she believes the Mexican worker is now back in Mexico. ICE did not immediately respond to The New Mexican's request for more information on the raid, including the location of the 11 people arrested. The Lovington raid and Romano's response to it come amid rising tensions between federal immigration enforcement and immigrant communities across the U.S. Thousands of protesters took to the streets in Los Angeles over the weekend to denounce the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. President Donald Trump deployed hundreds of National Guard troops to quell the demonstrations, while California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced plans to sue the president over the move, calling it an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism" in a social media post Monday. U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez, a Democrat who represents much of the southern half of the state, on Monday advocated for the Trump administration to "reverse course to restore peace" and maintain focus on reforming the "broken" immigration system. "Raiding workplaces, turning federal agents and the military against American citizens, and transforming our streets into war zones is not how we enforce our immigration laws," Vasquez said in a statement. He added, "We need real immigration reform rooted in due process, public safety, and compassion, not inflamed tensions and conflicts in the street.' In response to the Lovington raid, Somos Un Pueblo Unido issued a news release calling on local and state officials to "push for humane immigration laws" while demanding transparency from ICE and protecting "the rights of all New Mexicans, regardless of immigration status." The organization also provides materials and organizes workshops to ensure immigrants know — and know how to exercise — their civil rights. It's something Romano encourages people to do. "We've spent many years telling people: 'Understand your rights. Learn your rights. Even if you're undocumented, you have rights,' " she said. Romano added, "We have to be very well-informed about our rights and avoid any missteps — because we already know where we'll end up."

Furious passenger calls in bomb threat to Spirit Airlines after showing up late and getting barred from flight: Feds
Furious passenger calls in bomb threat to Spirit Airlines after showing up late and getting barred from flight: Feds

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Furious passenger calls in bomb threat to Spirit Airlines after showing up late and getting barred from flight: Feds

No one has ever been so eager to get on a Spirit Airlines flight. A passenger called in a bomb threat to the flight company as part of a bungled attempt to get revenge for not being allowed to board a plane in Michigan, according to the United States Attorney's Office. Charles Robinson, 23, had missed his chance to board the airline's Flight 2145 in Detroit — and then got into an argument with the customer service agents when they wouldn't let him board late, according to officials. Advertisement He was told at the gate that he needed to rebook, according to the United States Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Michigan. The FBI arrested Charles Robinson for allegedly calling in a fake bomb threat. FOX 2 Detroit Robinson then allegedly called in a bomb threat for his missed flight in a misguided attempt at revenge at 6:45 a.m., even going so far as to invent a bomber and giving authorities a detailed description of what he looked like, according to prosecutors. The passengers who had boarded the flight needed to deplane and the authorities brought in bomb sniffing dogs to look for explosives, prosecutors said. Advertisement 'No American wants to hear the words 'bomb' and 'airplane' in the same sentence,' U.S. Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr. said in a press release. 'Making this kind of threat undermines our collective sense of security and wastes valuable law enforcement resources.' The FBI arrested Robinson at the airport when he tried to board another flight to Los Angeles, prosecutors said. Robinson, of Monroe, Michigan, was arrested on a criminal complaint for reporting a fake bomb threat for a flight, according to federal prosecutors. Police needed to clear a plane and search for explosives after federal officials said a disgruntled passenger called in a fake bomb threat. FOX 2 Detroit During the call reporting the fake bomb threat, Robinson allegedly said he was calling about Flight 2145 because he had information about that flight, according to prosecutors. Advertisement 'There's gonna be someone who's gonna try to blow up the airport,' he said, according to prosecutors. 'There's gonna be someone that's gonna try to blow up that flight, 2145.' After giving a description of the make-believe bomber, he then added: 'They're going to be carrying a bomb through the TSA,' he said, according to prosecutors. 'They're still threatening to do it, they're still attempting to do it, they said it's not going to be able to be detected. Please don't let that flight board.' Robinson appeared in federal court in Detroit Friday afternoon and was released on bond, according to prosecutors. His next court appearance will be on June 27 for a preliminary examination.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store