Perth and Kinross Council's SNP administration accused of "cutting short democracy"
Members of the public and several councillors are frustrated after Perth and Kinross councillors were asked to vote on the future of Perth and Kinross leisure facilities without debate.
On Wednesday, June 18 councillors approved a £74 million proposal for Perth's new leisure centre PH20 to be built on Thimblerow car park as part of a £97m investment on leisure facilities across Perth and Kinross .
But the crucial decision was pushed through at a meeting of Perth and Kinross Council on Wednesday, June 18 without open discussion.
Around four and a half hours after the meeting started - and several lengthy recesses - council leader Grant Laing tabled a motion to "move straight to the vote with no further debate". He cited the council's standing order 17.1, a procedural motion which - amongst other things - can be used to propose "no further discussion or questioning take place".
His motion was seconded by deputy leader Eric Drysdale and supported by the majority of councillors who voted by 23 votes to 15 to move straight to the vote on leisure facilities.
Councillors had already had the chance to question several protestors - who made passionate deputations against the Thimblerow proposal and for Bell's Sports Centre to be reinstated as a heated multi-use sports venue - and council officers. But councillors had not yet had the chance to share their own views and/or comment on what they had heard.
The Conservatives tabled an amendment, against the SNP leadership's motion, for there to be a debate - as is standard procedure. Labour councillor Alasdair Bailey, Liberal Democrat councillor Peter Barrett and Independent councillor Colin Stewart supported the Conservative group's amendment. Provost Xander McDade abstained.
Following the meeting, Conservative councillor Chris Ahern accused the SNP of "cutting short democracy".
The Perth City Centre councillor said: "I am extremely unhappy with the decision made today by the leader of the council and the administration in cutting short democracy and preventing debate. I can only assume they were scared to hear the truth and didn't want their excuses to be published for the public to see them for what they are."
Blairgowrie and Glens Conservative councillor Caroline Shiers was "extremely disappointed" and added: "I don't recall many occasions when that standing order has been used before except when debates have been going on for some time and councillors are repeating the same arguments - not to stop all contributions before they even started."
A PKC spokesperson said: "On the procedural point, Cllr Laing moved a motion under section 17 of standing orders, where under 17.1 it says that a procedural motion can be to propose that no further discussion or questioning takes place. 17.2 and 17.3 of standing orders sets out what happens when a procedural motion is made."
Liberal Democrat councillor Peter Barrett took part in proceedings remotely. He supported the decision but described the way the meeting was conducted as a "shambles" and "an unedifying spectacle".
Speaking immediately afterwards, the Perth City Centre councillor said: "The only good thing you can say about today's proceedings was that the right decision was made. The rest was a shambles. Anyone watching today's events of the PH2O and Bell's proposals in the council chamber unfold must have been left confused, disappointed and angry.
"What an unedifying spectacle which dragged on for hours. Ages spent offline with the meeting in apparent suspension, the Provost announcing 'two minute recesses' which went on for more than 20, not a single word of debate exchanged, more points of order than a hedgehog has spines and almost as many totally opaque 'points of clarification'.
"Chairing of the meeting is meant to facilitate the swift and efficient conduct of business, the standing orders of the council are meant to support that objective, you'd never in a million years guess either from the live-cast of today's council proceedings. Something has to change and change urgently."
Gareth Thomas watched the entire day's proceedings from the public gallery and was "stunned" by what he felt was a lack of democracy.
He said: "It's amazing to see democracy not at work. No data or evidence. I'm stunned."
Ahead of the meeting, Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network drew up a business plan for how to run Bell's Sports Centre as a heated venue, with plans and revenue cost proposals.
On Wednesday, councillors voted through a proposal for Bell's Sports Centre to be used as "an unheated, covered sports pitch/events space".
Dr Thomas said: "I struggled to find any data for the proposed unheated G3 use for Bell's.
"I fail to see how it can be sensible to commit to a multi-million pound integrated investment on what appear to be back of the envelope (mis)calculations about Bell's."
Perth and Kinross Community Sports Network (PKCSN) chairman David Munro prepared a presentation, which he was unable to display during the meeting due to it being against council policy.
The council protocol for deputations states: "Deputations are verbal only and any visual or written information should be circulated to members of the committee by obtaining their email address from the council website. It is not permissible for members of the public to display visual information on the day of the committee."
His slides - which he later shared with the Local Democracy Reporting Service - compared the Bell's Sports Centre footprint with the Thimblerow site. It showed the six badminton courts - proposed for PH20 - dwarfed by the Bell's dome space in the main arena, which had 17 badminton courts.
The PKCSN chair said they feel like the protests and deputations were "a worthless exercise" and the council's current system "lacks credibility and accountability".
On Thursday, Cllr Laing said: "The provision under standing orders to move straight to a vote is rarely used, and indeed on the past two occasions I can recall them being used I voted against it because I felt there was still useful discussion to be had on those occasions.
"However, yesterday's council meeting had already included several hours where elected members had been able to listen to information and ask questions of both deputees and officers to allow everyone in the chamber to form a decision on how they wanted to vote. It was clear to me from the framing of the questions that everyone in the room had already made up their minds and further discussion would only have taken up more time rather than usefully informing the final decision.
"The people of Perth and Kinross have already waited long enough for a decision to be made. I stand by asking to move straight to that decision, and I am pleased that we can now get on with the job of developing the future of sport and leisure facilities in Perth and Kinross."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Historic vote brings assisted dying closer to becoming law in England and Wales
A majority of MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Kim Leadbeater has been the MP behind the assisted dying bill (Jonathan Brady/PA) This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a poll (James Manning/PA) Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Campaigners in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of the vote (PA) The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
SNP veteran quits party amid rebellion against leader
John Swinney, the Scottish First Minister, has been dealt a blow to his leadership after an SNP veteran quit the party. Fergus Ewing, who has represented the Inverness and Nairn constituency since 1999, will stand as an independent candidate at next year's Holyrood elections. The 67-year-old accused the SNP of having 'deserted many of the people whose causes we used to champion' amid rumours of a wider revolt. SNP rebels are said to be plotting to oust Mr Swinney following the party's disastrous defeat at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. That contest saw Scottish Labour take the seat from the SNP, while Nigel Farage's Reform UK came third. The rebels are also reportedly concerned that Mr Swinney has failed to advance the cause for Scottish independence, and have not ruled out a leadership challenge at the party's October conference. On Friday, opposition politicians claimed Mr Ewing's decision was a hammer blow to Mr Swinney's credibility. 'It speaks volumes about John Swinney and the SNP's appalling failures in government that even nationalist royalty is prepared to twist the knife in this way,' said Edward Mountain, the Conservative Highlands and Islands MSP. 'By standing as an independent, Fergus Ewing has made it clear he simply cannot defend his party's record to voters while out on the campaign trail.' Mr Ewing said he had taken the decision to abandon the SNP 'because I love the people of Inverness and Nairn and the people of Scotland more than my party, which I have been in for more than half a century'. He had been increasingly at odds with the SNP over gender recognition reform and net zero, also raising issues over the deposit return scheme and marine protected areas. Mr Ewing said Holyrood was more fractious and tribal than ever before and accused the SNP of having 'lost its way'. He also said devolution was 'letting Scotland's people down'. He added: 'Too much power rests unchecked in the hands of party leaders, free to choose candidates who will slavishly support them, rather than stand up for the people who sent them to Holyrood. Choosing the pliant over the talented.' 'Faithful servant' Mr Ewing first hinted in March that he could stand as an independent at next year's election. At the time, Mr Swinney said that he was sorry to learn of the possibility, describing him as a 'faithful servant' of his constituents who had contributed much to the Scottish Parliament. Mr Ewing is the son of Winnie Ewing, whose 1967 by-election victory in Hamilton was a historic breakthrough for the SNP, and is the brother of Annabelle Ewing, the Cowdenbeath MSP. He was first elected to the Scottish Parliament when it was re-established in 1999 and held a ministerial portfolio for 14 years in the governments of both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon. Mr Ewing added: 'It's time for Holyrood to live up to the high expectations people rightly held for it, when my mother, Winnie, reconvened our own Parliament in 1999. It came of age some years ago – surely now it's time for it to grow up.'
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
'Ludicrous' policies kicked SNP independence dream into long grass, says Ewing
Veteran MSP Fergus Ewing says 'ludicrous' policies linked to the SNP's coalition with the Greens set back the party's long-term dream of achieving independence. Speaking to STV News after announcing he will stand as an independent at next year's Holyrood elections, Ewing said it 'wasn't an easy decision' but he felt the party had 'deserted many of the people whose causes we used to champion'. Ewing, 67, has represented Inverness and Nairn for the SNP since 1999, but party rules state that membership ceases when a member plans to stand against the party. He said: 'Just for the avoidance of doubt, I haven't left the SNP. It's up to them to decide whether or not they want to do anything about [my membership].' Ewing said he has 'wrestled with his conscious' for a long time out of loyalty to the party and the First Minister. Ultimately, he said he couldn't reconcile his values with the party's current direction. Ewing said he began to have doubts about the direction of the SNP in the latter years of Nicola Sturgeon's government when he said he had to 'bite his tongue quite seriously'. He claims people feel 'scunnered' with the government, and 'let down by the Scottish Parliament that they still very much support'. Ewing added the SNP has 'ceased to be champions for the people of Scotland'. Describing the Greens as a 'fringe' party with 'really extreme socialist policies', Ewing said: 'It was really the fatal deal with the Greens, which unravelled fairly quickly, that really caused me to have serious doubts. Perhaps I've wrestled with them for too long.' He added: 'Why we have focused away into side issues like who should use which toilet just completely baffles me, as I believe it baffles the majority of people in Inverness, Nairn, and Scotland as a whole.' As a result, Ewing believes that trust in the party has been eroded, which the SNP needs to rebuild. 'Independence is in my DNA and I believe that's the ultimate aim for Scotland,' Ewing said. 'You do not want a divided country, and I'm afraid what we have at the moment is a divided country, and the economy is a matter of managed decline,' Ewing said. Ewing said there needs to be a 'relentless focus' on the economy, public service reform, and a focus on righting the NHS over the next ten years to 'win back that trust and confidence'. He added: 'That creates circumstances where people are ready to move to a new chapter of independence,' Ewing said. 'We're nowhere near that now, and there's no point in me trying to deny it.' 'But I'm afraid that's the SNP over the last few years – trying to deny the fact that we've eroded that trust by supporting a whole series of unaffordable, undeliverable, impracticable, and frankly at times ludicrous policies mostly imported from the Green party. 'And we still haven't got rid of that Green legacy. It's still there hanging over us.' Ewing may have blamed Sturgeon's deal with the Scottish Greens for 'most of the problems that we've seen for the SNP over the last four years', but he insisted his decision is not personal. Despite his issues with the direction of the SNP, Ewing said he would not be drawn into fighting against 'any particular individual politician or party'. 'I'm fighting for a better Parliament, and to stand up for the people in Inverness and Nairn who have stood by me, as I hope I have stood by them for 26 years,' he said. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
