Jordan Love has big goals as he heads into his third season as Packers' starting QB
GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Jordan Love doesn't necessarily agree with the assertion that he and the Green Bay Packers took a step back last season.
But the Packers quarterback is certain about this much: It's time for his team and his game to take a major step forward.
Love heads into his third season as a starter coming off a three-interception performance in the team's season-ending NFC first-round playoff loss to the Philadelphia Eagles but believing he's on a team capable of winning the Super Bowl.
Whether Love and his teammates reach that goal depends in part on how much Love improves his game and whether he can avoid the injuries that sidelined him for 2 1/2 games last season. Love begrudgingly admitted those injuries affected his play.
'You're talking about Super Bowl. That's the goal for us,' Love said Wednesday following the first open-to-reporters organized team activity practice of the offseason. 'I'm definitely trying to be that guy to be able to take this team and lead them to that.'
Love suffered a left knee injury in the closing moments of the team's season-opening loss to the Eagles in Brazil, with the injury sidelining him for the next two games, both of which the Packers won with backup Malik Willis under center.
Love then sustained the left groin injury during an Oct. 29 win at Jacksonville, just as his knee was getting back to full health. He admitted that the injuries might've had an effect on his accuracy and mobility, but insisted they were no excuse for not playing better.
'Obviously it's not fun playing through injuries, but sometimes those (are) things you've got to do,' said Love, who finished the 2024 season with a 61.3% completion rate and a 96.7 passer rating, with 25 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. 'There might've been some things that might've been affected, but at the end of the day, I'm still trying to put my best foot forward and I've got to go out there and be the best player I can be.'
Love raised expectations inside and outside Lambeau Field with his torrid finish to the 2023 season, when he completed 70.3% of his passes for 2,150 yards with 18 touchdowns and only one interception (112.7 rating) over the final eight regular-season games. Love then led a first-round playoff upset of the No. 2-seeded Dallas Cowboys on the road.
Packers coach Matt LaFleur disputed the notion Wednesday that Love struggled in 2024, pointing not only to the injuries but the 33 passes his receivers dropped during the regular season — tied for the third most in the league.
'I think there's a narrative out there for whatever reason that he wasn't as productive as the year before,' LaFleur said. 'Well, he missed significant time (with injuries) … and also — let's be honest, we've talked about this — we did have a lot of drops last year.
'So, there's other circumstances that play into it.'
LaFleur said he liked what he's seen from Love this offseason and how he's handling a myriad of new challenges. Those challenges include transitioning from having 71-year-old Tom Clements as his position coach to having 33-year-old Sean Mannion in that role, trying to keep all his wide receivers happy when there are only so many passes to go around and rising to LaFleur's publicly stated challenge that Love needs to be more of a vocal leader in his sixth NFL season.
'He's already doing that,' veteran running back Josh Jacobs said of Love's altered leadership approach. 'He definitely has been more vocal, whether it's at practice or even in the meetings. If he sees something he doesn't like, he's speaking up. … I've definitely seen a big change in him.'
NOTES: Jayden Reed, the Packers' leading receiver the past two seasons, insisted he's not worried about his role in the offense, despite a report that his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, contacted the team looking for clarity about his client's role. 'A lot of people misinterpreted that,' Reed said. … LaFleur said wide receiver Christian Watson, recovering from a torn ACL in his right knee suffered in the Jan. 5 regular-season finale, is 'doing outstanding. I would say he's ahead of schedule, but I'm not a doctor.' … LaFleur confirmed that the team will have two joint practices this summer, one at Indianapolis and another at home against the Seattle Seahawks. ... The Packers will begin training camp July 23.
___
AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
17 minutes ago
- Medscape
Peptide Predicts Cardiac Risk in Women With Unblocked Arteries
In women with angina pectoris but no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), a high concentration of pro-C-type natriuretic peptide (proCNP) is linked to a 73% increased risk for all-cause mortality. The substance also shows a positive association with atherosclerotic markers and a negative association with generalized inflammation. METHODOLOGY: The analysis focused on baseline associations between proCNP concentrations in plasma and clinical data in 1508 women with ANOCA, with exploratory analyses examining correlation patterns between proCNP and 185 cardiovascular plasma markers. Primary outcomes included all-cause death and a composite endpoint of cardiovascular events. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for age and creatine concentration, which have been linked to proCNP-derived peptides in plasma. TAKEAWAY: A high concentration of proCNP (≥ 53.4 pmol/L) was associated with a diagnosis of hypertension ( P = .001) and diabetes mellitus ( P < .001), postmenopausal status ( P < .001), but not age. = .001) and diabetes mellitus ( < .001), postmenopausal status ( < .001), but not age. The researchers identified 38 plasma markers significantly associated with proCNP, showing positive correlation with atherosclerotic markers and a negative correlation with pro-inflammatory markers. Women with high concentrations of proCNP were at increased risk for all-cause mortality (crude HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.73; P = .02) and adjusted HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.99-2.49; P = .06). = .02) and adjusted HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.99-2.49; = .06). No significant difference was found in rates of cardiovascular events between groups (crude HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.62; P = .71; and adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.68-1.56; P = .90). IN PRACTICE: 'The association between high proCNP concentrations and diabetes in women is notable as diabetes is associated with an excess risk of > 40% of fatal ischemic heart disease in women compared with men,' the researchers reported. 'Our findings thus raise the question whether increases in proCNP among elderly women are part of an adaptive vascular response to cardiovascular risk factors after menopause. Taken together, the baseline associations of the present study show high proCNP concentration in women with ANOCA is associated with a cardiovascular risk profile independent of NT-proBNP and low-grade inflammation.' SOURCE: This study was led by Peter D. Mark, MD, PhD, of the University of Copenhagen, in Copenhagen, Denmark. It appears online in the July 1 issue of JACC: ADVANCES . LIMITATIONS: As only women were examined in this study, it was impossible to evaluate whether the findings would be mirrored in men with ANOCA. Biomarkers, except for proCNP and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, were quantified as relative plasma levels rather than absolute concentrations, limiting the interpretation of the statistical analyses. DISCLOSURES: This study received support through the Danish Biotek program via a grant from the Danish Health Ministry. The senior author, Jens P. Goetze, has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk on biochemical method development.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'
Wall Street Journal
41 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Global Markets Mostly Higher; U.S. Futures Down Ahead of Inflation Data
Global markets were mostly higher and U.S. stock futures were lower after U.S and China officials hit the reset button following two days of trade talks, and ahead of the U.S. CPI inflation report due later Wednesday. Little detail from the talks was released, but representatives from the countries said the framework agreed would essentially restore a pact they agreed to in Switzerland last month, a deal that saw both sides lower tariffs.
