Publishers Clearing House issuing consumer refunds worth $18.5M after FTC finds it used ‘deceptive' practices
But while Publishers Clearing House (PCH) is sending checks, it's not to sweepstakes winners.
PCH will send a grand total of $18.5 million to 281,724 recipients as part of a refund to consumers. The company settled with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and agreed to pay the money because of accusations that it made misleading claims to the public.
What exactly was PCH accused of misleading consumers about and what will happen to the company?
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
The FTC complaint against Publishers Clearing House alleges that the company was targeting lower-income and older consumers and misleading them into believing either that they can't enter their sweepstakes without purchasing a product or that entrants could increase their chances of winning by buying these products.
What's more, the FTC complaint also noted that PCH added shipping and handling fees that were deceptive and 'misrepresented that ordering was 'risk-free,' even though consumers who wanted refunds had to return products at their own expense.'
The company also allegedly sent emails with subject lines that were deceptive and designed to make it look like it was related to "official documents."
Consumers entitled to the payout are those who clicked on these 'deceptive' emails and who purchased a product from the company.
While there is no clear timeline on when checks should arrive, the FTC encourages consumers to cash them within 90 days.
Earlier in April, PCH filed for bankruptcy. It entered into proceedings with around $490,000 in cash and around $40 million in debts to its vendors, employees, landlords and service providers.
PCH still owes about $1.8 million to current prize winners and about $26 million over the next 60 years to those who won lifetime prizes.
Back in 2018, the company earned about $879 million, but it started losing significant money soon after partly due to a shift in consumer preferences to online shopping that escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The company has since scaled back on its print marketing efforts.
Beginning in 2024, PCH earns revenue from digital advertising on free-to-play online games that offer consumers a chance to win cash prizes.
Read more: This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs
Sadly, Publishers Clearing House isn't the only company that has recently been accused of misleading consumers.
The California Attorney General sued ExxonMobil for allegedly deceiving Californians for 50 years.
The company is the largest producer of single-use plastics in the world and the California Department of Justice alleges that the company has published misleading statements and slick marketing materials promising recycling would address the amount of plastic waste it produced.
Burger King is another company under similar scrutiny.
A class action lawsuit filed in March 2023 claimed Burger King misled customers through its ads of the Whopper. The lawsuit alleges the ads made it seem that the burgers contained 35% more meat than is actually in the product.
The fast food chain tried to dismiss the lawsuit, but a federal judge denied the motion on May 5, allowing the lawsuit to move forward.
If you believe you've been misled by a company, your first step is to contact the company yourself, keeping track of all communication. In an ideal situation, you can try to resolve the issue directly. Provide any proof or documentation to back up your claims of exactly how you've been misled.
If you need to escalate the matter, many states have consumer protection agencies that may be able to help. Many of these can help you with investigating complaints and mediation. Keep in mind, you may not be the only one with this complaint.
You can also file a complaint directly to the FTC, as it collects any information about unfair or deceptive practices. The data can be used to help take action against the business if necessary. You can file a complaint at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and set up a system to track any similar complaints against the company in the news.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bride wants to refuse $100,000 wedding gift because it comes with strings attached. Ramsey show gives advice
A newly-married woman from San Francisco called The Ramsey Show with a dilemma that pits her and her new husband against the cultural expectations of her extended family. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it The caller states that she and her husband were recently married and although some of her extended family couldn't attend the ceremony, her grandmother and aunt wanted to send a generous monetary gift of around $100,000. But instead of being thrilled, the caller was conflicted. Why? Because in her experience, money from family (and especially her opinionated grandmother), tends to come with strings attached. She worried that accepting the funds would invite unwanted advice and interference in her new marriage. To further complicate matters, her mother disagreed with the couple's decision to decline the gift, calling it "disrespectful." She then offered to accept the money on the newlyweds' behalf and 'pass it along,' adding another layer of pressure. What advice did Ramsey and Kamel give the caller? Dave Ramsey and co-host George Kamel were quick to pick up on the real issue — this isn't about a generous gift; it's about control. Ramsey pointed out that while the gift might not come with explicit conditions, the callers' worry of future meddling was valid. "You understand, though, that when you say 'no thank you,'' there is no pleasant enough way to say that to people who think they have the right to walk into your life and tell you what to do … they're still not going to accept that," he said. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Their advice was firm: Do not accept the money if it compromises your independence or causes stress in your marriage. 'At the time [you] took that vow of 'for richer or poorer, in sickness and health,' that means the rest of you don't get a vote anymore,' Ramsey explained. "[The] ballot box is closed." The hosts emphasized that setting these boundaries is difficult, especially in families where guilt and manipulation are common. Ramsey recommended a book that would help the caller learn to set and keep boundaries. "Get Dr. Henry Cloud's book 'Boundaries,' because when you read it, one of the first chapters is going to tell you you're not crazy. You're not. And that's good. And that this is wrong. And it's not a cultural thing — it's an interference thing." Despite the challenges, Ramsey and Kamel say the discomfort in setting those boundaries will be worth the peace of mind. How to set financial boundaries with family Setting boundaries about money — especially with family — can be emotionally difficult. But it's crucial for maintaining a healthy marriage and protecting your financial well-being. In this situation, the caller is being given money, but in some families, it's about knowing when and how to say no to money requests, rather than offers. So, how do you do it? According to Headspace, the first step is identifying what you're comfortable with. In the caller's case, it meant declining a well-meaning but complicated gift. It's okay to say, 'Thank you, but we've decided not to accept monetary gifts right now.' For you, it might mean saying, "No, I cannot loan/give you money." When it comes to giving money, don't lend more than you're willing or able to part with comfortably. And be clear about expectations. Here are a few tips for drawing clear lines: Be direct but kind: A firm 'no thank you' can be more respectful than a reluctant 'yes.' Don't overly explain your reasoning: This can give family the idea that if they can overcome those reasons, you'll change your mind. 'No' is a complete sentence. Use 'we' language: If you're in a partnership, presenting a united front helps reduce outside influence. Acknowledge good intentions: Let family know you appreciate their generosity and/or trust in the offer or ask, even if you ultimately decline it. Set and repeat boundaries as needed: One conversation might not be enough, especially if your family is used to being involved in your decisions. Remember you're not responsible for others' feelings — or financial health: You can't control what other people do and you aren't responsible for how they feel. Setting boundaries isn't about being cold or ungrateful; it's about clearly defining what you will and won't accept in your life. When it comes to money and family, those lines can easily get blurred. However, by establishing firm, respectful limits, you can protect your peace, values and relationships. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
7 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program
As Gwen Polk prepares the budget she will present to the Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 Board of Education in September, she has learned that she has approximately $6.2 million in additional revenue courtesy of the State of Illinois' evidence-based funding program. Though every school district receives some of the $9.25 billion appropriated by the Illinois General Assembly, Tier 1 districts like Waukegan and North Chicago School District 187 face a harder time adequately funding education, including a smaller property tax base, and receive the most. When the Illinois General Assembly approved the final $350 million in May — $43 million was held for distribution at a later time — Lake County's 13 Tier 1 districts and the Regional Office of Education were awarded 87.5% of the county's total, with District 60 getting 38% — $6.2 million. Polk, District 60's associate superintendent for business and financial services, said the proposed budget currently sits at slightly less than $327 million. With COVID-19 federal relief funds no longer available, the additional money from the state is a big help. 'We're all affected by the fiscal cliff,' Polk said, referring to the federal money schools received nationwide. 'The increase (from the state) is going to help.' Lake County's 47 school districts and the Regional Office of Education collectively received just under $16.3 million in additional evidence-based funding earlier this month from the state, bringing its total to more than $562 million to augment their budgets. For the Waukegan public schools, Polk said evidence-based funding provides for more than half of its total revenue, which also includes property tax income. The approximate district-wide enrollment for the 2025-2026 school year is 14,000. By contrast, Barrington Community Unit School District 220, a Tier 4 district — they receive the smallest amount of evidence-based funding — with approximately 8,100 students, received just over $6.5 million. State Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said evidence-based funding became law in Illinois in 2017 to help all schools get to a level of funding to adequately educate youngsters. 'Education is the great equalizer,' Johnson said, 'If students' schools are adequately funded they they get the support and resources they need. This helps students in low-income areas get those resources.' Originally proposing $550 million for the final round of evidence-based funding, Johnson said that with a tight state budget, $350 million was the most she and her colleagues could get passed. In Waukegan, like most school districts, the bulk of the budget goes toward salaries and benefits for teachers, staff, and administrators. The current evidence-based funding is 4.1% more than a year ago, but not close to full adequacy. With the largest share of evidence-based funding in Lake County, District 60's adequacy level is 72%, well below the ideal amount. Barrington's adequacy level is 119%. Some of the highest adequacy levels are found where the property values are also high. Leading Lake County in adequacy is Rondout School District 72 at 255% which includes parts of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, and Mettawa. Bannockburn School District 106 is at 202% while Lake Forest High School District 115 is at 193% and Township High School District 113 serving Deerfield and Highland Park High Schools is at 190%. District 187 Principal John Price said the adequacy level in North Chicago dropped from 78% to 71%. A year ago, there was a large influx of migrant children that is not the case this year. The district is receiving $1.67 million, the second-highest amount in Lake County. Price said District 187's budget is approximately $80 million, and its evidence-based funding totals just under $40.1 million.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California fires destroyed his home, then his lender destroyed his credit. How forbearance is burning victims
Neil Smith lost everything when the California Eaton Fire destroyed his home in January 2025. With this in mind, you can imagine his relief when Smith learned about a state-led initiative promising a 90-day mortgage forbearance without penalties. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes 'I don't need any more stress, and it was presented to me as an option,' Smith told NBC News. 'However, if I had to do it again, I wouldn't go anywhere near it.' What Smith thought would give him some financial breathing room has instead put him in a financial chokehold. The state's agreement says that when the 90-day forbearance ends, homeowners should be offered repayment options without being required to make an immediate lump-sum 'balloon payment.' Smith was also told his credit score wouldn't take a hit. But Smith says both of those promises were broken, and he's not the only one. 'The whole thing is like going around with a begging bowl' Bill AB 238 was designed to allow owners of properties in California with four or fewer residential units to hit pause on their mortgage payments for 90 days. After that period, the borrower can request to have the forbearance extended in 90-day segments for up to one year. 'These financial protections will enable residents to concentrate on taking care of their immediate needs rather than worrying about paying their mortgage bills,' California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a news release. Under the bill, lenders are not permitted to tag on late fees, raise interest rates or start foreclosure proceedings during the forbearance period. Lenders are also required to keep credit reports clean if homeowners were up to date with their payments before entering the program. The bill was meant to give homeowners some breathing room without wrecking their financial future, but attorney Aimee Williams — whose firm is representing Smith and others — says lenders aren't holding up their end of the bargain. 'Four hundred mortgage servicers signed up to abide by these bare minimum standards for mortgage relief,' Williams told NBC News. 'Homeowners are instead being offered the complete opposite.' Williams says her clients are being told to pay up or risk foreclosure. "They want the whole amount due, and until you pay it off, it's still going to have an adverse effect on your credit," said Smith. "And I'm just going… 'unbelievable.'" Altadena resident Lisa Mason says it all began for her when her mortgage provider enrolled her in the forbearance initiative, but Mason claims she didn't give her consent and was mistakenly enrolled by her provider. This resulted in her automatic payments being stopped and her credit score dropping by 120 points. 'I really think they want me out, they want me to give up… so that they can take the property or that I'll sell it,' said Mason. Neither Mason's nor Smith's mortgage providers responded to NBC News's requests for comment. Meanwhile, Smith says this ordeal has made securing new loans nearly impossible. 'You don't have as many options,' he said. 'The whole thing is like walking around with a begging bowl.' Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. What can California homeowners do? According to NBC News, the Governor's office says it's proud of the agreement with lenders and that it's not acceptable for lenders to break their commitments. The state agency overseeing financial institutions says it has received more than 100 complaints and resolved most of them. However, the homeowners that NBC News spoke with are still awaiting resolution. Those homeowners may have legal recourse, depending on their situation, but they'd be well advised to seek professional advice on whether or not they have a case. Some states, like California, have homeowner protections under the California's Homeowner Bill of Rights, which includes safeguards like notice requirements before filing a Notice of Default. Homeowners affected by this issue need to make sure they do what they can to protect themselves in the meantime. This can include: Documenting everything: Keep every letter, email and statement during your correspondence with your mortgage lender Filing a complaint: Inform the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau about your issue and federal regulators can investigate Seeking legal aid: Get assistance from nonprofit housing rights organizations and foreclosure defense attorneys Exploring other options: Alternative settlements like loan modifications or repayment plans can help you avoid foreclosure risks What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
