State lawmakers should not cut taxes and here's why
House Speaker Murrell Smith during a press conference about income tax legislation at the South Carolina Statehouse in Columbia, S.C. on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. (Photo by Travis Bell/STATEHOUSE CAROLINA/Special to the SC Daily Gazette)
A camel, it has been said, is a horse designed by a committee.
A committee of state GOP leaders recently designed a 'historic' income tax-cut plan.
But what they delivered was a camel: lopsided, ungainly, and reeking of a bad attitude.
Worse, they put the cart before the camel, announcing the tax-cut plan with much ballyhoo and bunkum before realizing that it doesn't cut taxes for most South Carolinians.
It actually raises taxes for 60% of South Carolinians (or nearly 1.7 million tax filers) for tax year 2026, as per estimates released by the state Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office a week after the big announcement.
The bill includes huge tax cuts for some, but those cuts overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy.
Roughly 9,900 tax filers with more than $1 million in income would see their taxes cut by an average of $31,000, according to reporting by S.C. Daily Gazette Editor Seanna Adcox.
Many others would get little or nothing.
The bill was supposed to be fast-tracked for approval, but now House leaders have postponed debate while they explore other options.
No, I'm not making this up.
This was a hugely embarrassing episode of DOGE-level ineptitude by the people who are supposed to be leading our state.
At least the bill was shelved for the moment. But Rep. Brandon Newton, chairman of Ways and Means' tax policy subcommittee, said Republicans remain 'committed to passing income tax reform this year.'
That means another tax-cut camel may soon be galumphing along the dusty road to the Statehouse.
Whatever rough beast emerges out of ongoing discussions, the General Assembly should reject it.
State lawmakers should not cut taxes.
The postponed bill slashed taxes by more than $200 million, with a provision to cut $200 million in taxes every year when revenue projections rise by 5%. A revised bill might cut taxes by that amount as well.
We simply can't afford that. Our state has too many critical needs that should be addressed right now, including infrastructure, education, health care, crime and public safety.
We should remember that the General Assembly just cut taxes over the past few years by a whopping $1 billion, on top of sending $1 billion back as rebates in 2022, limiting the ability of lawmakers to deal effectively with the state's top needs, such as fixing our notoriously awful roads.
A bold new plan called Momentum 2025 offers great hope for upgrading our roads, but it carries a price tag of $1 billion a year. There's no plan, however, to fund Momentum 2025, as Adcox pointed out in an excellent commentary tracing the history of our road woes.
The state faces other critical concerns, such as the teacher shortage that results in potentially thousands of South Carolina students beginning each school year without a fully qualified teacher in the classroom.
We've got dire healthcare challenges in South Carolina as well. An estimated 521,660 South Carolinians under age 65 lack health insurance, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
We should follow the lead of 40 other states in expanding Medicaid, drawing down billions in federal funds and investing some state money to provide health care coverage for an additional 360,000 low-income South Carolinians.
In addition, with Medicaid threatened by cuts on the federal level, state lawmakers may need to step in to protect South Carolina's most vulnerable citizens.
South Carolina also needs to invest more in children, especially in the areas of prenatal care and childcare.
South Carolina ranks near the bottom of the nation for child care affordability. Overall, our state ranks among the worst in the nation for the well-being of children, according to the annual Kids Count.
The S.C. Department of Juvenile Justice, meanwhile, has been plagued by overcrowding and other unsafe conditions.
South Carolina desperately needs to invest more in law enforcement as well. Our state has one of the highest murder rates in the nation and one of the highest rates of fatalities on the road, which includes one of the highest rates of drunken driving deaths.
One study called South Carolina 'the most dangerous state for drunk driving in America.'
A tax cut doesn't solve those problems.
And state lawmakers have made big new promises to South Carolinians this year, including plans to spend $60 million that we can't afford on school vouchers. You can bet Republicans will want to spend a lot more on that in the future as well.
Lawmakers who support a big tax cut argue that it's needed to keep South Carolina growing, but that's not a problem. We're already one of the fastest-growing states in the nation.
Finally, it would be irresponsible to cut state taxes with the U.S. economy in a tailspin as the stock market and consumer confidence plummet.
With Washington in chaos, we need sober heads in Columbia to address our state's most pressing needs, and that doesn't include a big annual tax cut.
State leaders have to be the adults in the room.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Two House Republicans issue megabill threats as Senate ponders changes - Live Updates
Two House Republicans drew firm red lines Friday on changes to the House GOP megabill, threatening to vote 'no' if the Senate made any changes whatsoever to key provisions. Rep. Nick LaLota of New York warned GOP senators against lowering the House's $40,000 cap on the state-and-local-tax deduction, while Rep. Chip Roy of Texas vowed to oppose any attempt to delay or otherwise water down the phaseout of clean-energy tax credits provided for in the House-passed megabill. 'If the Senate waters it down by a dollar, I'm a no,' LaLota posted on X, arguing that the SALT cap as it stands is 'unfair' to his constituents. Roy was equally strict about GOP senators' hesitations on quickly phasing out clean-energy tax credits signed into law under former President Joe Biden — even calling out skeptical Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) by name in a floor speech Friday. Tillis has been critical of the phaseouts, saying the House bill is 'void of any understanding of just how these supply chains work.' 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Roy said. 'Because those god-forsaken subsidies are killing our energy, killing our grid, making us weaker, destroying our landscape, undermining our freedom. I'm not going to have it.'

2 hours ago
Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican appeal and left in place a Pennsylvania court decision allowing people to cast provisional ballots when their mail-in votes are rejected for not following technical procedures in state law. The court released the decision Friday, after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications about orders that had been slated to be released Monday. A technological error also resulted in an opinion being posted early last year. The justices acted in an appeal filed by the Republican National Committee, the state GOP and the Republican-majority election board in Butler County. Pennsylvania's top court ruled last year that the county must count provisional ballots that were cast by two voters after they learned their mail-in ballots were voided because they arrived without mandatory secrecy envelopes. Pennsylvania Democrats had urged the court to stay out of the case.


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at