1st New Zealander reaches space on Blue Origin flight
The flight carried six passengers beyond the Karman Line, which is the internationally established boundary between space and Earth's atmosphere at an elevation of 62 miles, Space.com reported.
Among the passengers was Mark Rocket, who is an aerospace executive from Christchurch, New Zealand, and is that nation's first citizen to reach space.
Rocket changed his surname many years ago in honor of his passion for space travel, TVNZ1 reported on May 22.
"Ever since I was a kid, I've always been fascinated by space technology and space travel," he said. "We live in a solar system, which is vast; a galaxy, which is vast; and this incredible universe, which is just hard to imagine."
Rocvket's fascination with space led to a career in aerospace, and before the flight he said he was looking forward to experiencing "3Gs of rocket-powered flight up to space."
Rocket is the president of Aerospace New Zealand and ownsKea Aerospace, which is developing a solar-powered, unmanned aircraft capable of reaching the stratosphere to collect high-resolution data of the Earth below it.
Other crew members
The flight also carried K-12 STEM teacher Aymette Medina Jorge, former Panamanian ambassador to the United States Jaime Aleman and radiologist GretchenGreen into space, according to Blue Origin.
Also aboard the spaceflight were businessman Jesse Williams and entrepreneur Paul Jeris.
The six passengers were weightless for about three minutes while getting a unique view of the world from space.
Upon landing back on Earth, Green called the experience "perfection."
"There are very few things in life that were true perfection," Green told Space.com. "When I looked out at space and back down to the Earth, [it] was perfect."
32nd successful spaceflight
The spaceflight was the 32nd for Jeff Bezos-owned Blue Origin and its New Shepard program and launched at 8:39 a.m. CDT from Blue Origin's Launch Site One about 30 miles north of Van Horn near the U.S.-Mexico border.
The New Shepard launch vehicle included the capsule that carried its passengers and a booster rocket. The capsule and booster rocket are reusable.
The booster rocket separated from the capsule about 2.5 minutes into the flight, which allowed the capsule to continue its ascent into space before returning to Earth.
The autonomous capsule used a propulsive system to slow its descent while making a vertical landing on a concrete pad near where it launched.
New Shepard is named after Alan Shepard, the first American in space in 1961 and 10 years year was the fifth person to walk on the moon.
The program is intended the ferry humans and scientific payloads into space.
"We thank our customers for trusting us to give them the opportunity to appreciate Earth's fragility from above," said Phil Joyce, senior vice president of New Shepard.
Joyce said the experience "truly transforms those who embark on it."
Blue Origin's New Shepard program has carried 64 people into space and back, including singer Katy Perry and CBS broadcast Gayle King.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Condé Nast Traveler
19 minutes ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
What It's Like to Fly 17 Hours in Air New Zealand's Economy Skycouch
You're boarding a long-haul flight to the other side of the globe. The crowd at the gate seems sparse, and hope springs within you that you might get a row to yourself, that you'll be able to lie down in economy. When a haggard traveler stumbles into such good fortune, it's bliss. But I can gladly report that being able to book such seating in advance, by way of Air New Zealand's Economy Skycouch, softens none of the pleasure. Earlier this summer, I flew the direct, 17-hour route from New York (JFK) to Auckland (AKL) sprawled out on the Skycouch, and I can confirm that this option is excellent and economical. You don't get any of the frills you'll find in Business Premiere (my review of Air New Zealand's more extravagant business class offering can be read here) save for a sheet to spread across the row, plus extra pillows (two) and blankets (three), but it hardly matters because you'll have a likely be sleeping much more of the way than you would in a regular economy seat. A lone traveler enjoys Air New Zealand's Skycouch—booking the upgrade for one passenger is the most comfortable although the least cost-efficient. Courtesy Air New Zealand What is Skycouch, and how much does it cost? Skycouch is a booking option in economy class that you can add during seat selection for an added fee. Skycouch seats occupy certain rows sprinkled across the Economy cabin of Air New Zealand's 777-300ER and 787-9 aircraft. For a flight between New York and Auckland where Skycouch is available, the fee sits in the realm of $750. The exact price varies based on the route and demand. For example, an October flight from Los Angeles to Auckland currently costs $1,200 to add Skycouch (while a business class seat is around $6,000), and a flight from Houston to Auckland in the same month costs $1,400 (compared to a business class fare of $6,500). Selecting Skycouch gives your party a row of three seats to yourselves. The fee, whatever it lands at according to the dynamic pricing, is for your party rather than per ticket, meaning that it is especially cost-effective for parties of two (or three, if the third is a lap child). If you're flying with infants under two years old, the airline provides a Skycouch kit with a harness and "cuddle belt' or an optional infant pod, subject to availability.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: NASA's SpaceX Crew-10 astronauts discuss science mission conducted aboard ISS
The crew returned to Earth on August 9th after spending nearly five months aboard the orbiting laboratory.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
SpaceX's Expensive Starship Explosions Are Starting to Add Up
(Bloomberg) -- When one of SpaceX's Starship vehicles burst into flames during a routine fueling test in June, the Elon Musk-led company decided it was time to bring in reinforcements. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Shortly after the incident, roughly 20% of the engineering group working on the company's flagship Falcon 9 program were reassigned for six months to Starship, a reusable rocket Musk hopes will someday carry humans back to the moon and to Mars, according to people familiar with the company's planning. SpaceX and Musk have a history of tackling engineering problems by throwing additional staff at them: Last year, Boring Co. staff were flown to Las Vegas to get its Prufock machine back online following water damage, according to people familiar with the matter. In 2018, employees of Tesla Inc., Musk's car company, were flown in from across the country to California to help ramp up production of the Model 3. The added muscle for Starship is intended to help improve the craft's reliability and individual component testing, as well as the rate at which the company can produce more of the rockets, one of the people said. SpaceX revealed in August that a pressurized bottle holding gaseous nitrogen had been damaged, causing it to fail and lead to an explosion during fueling. The test-stand incident was the latest in a series of recent setbacks for Starship. In three test launches this year from the company's south Texas facility, two exploded prematurely, and a third failed to deploy its test satellites and spun out of control as it returned to Earth. Those failures have led to increasing questions about whether Starship will be able to fulfill Musk's aims. A New York Magazine story asked: 'Is Elon Musk's Starship Doomed?' SpaceX's impressive track record, including the construction of the Starlink satellite-internet network and its innovation on reusable rocket technology, has had a deep impact on the space industry and US space policy. It has also made SpaceX among the most highly valued private companies in the world. Since its inception, SpaceX has made highly visible test flights that sometimes fail in spectacular ways something of a calling card, with cinematic broadcasts on X, Musk's social-media platform. Its process is designed to learn from failures fast. Yet Starship's recent struggles are revealing how rapidly updating rockets that cost hundreds of millions to make can lead to a cascade of expensive issues. 'When you're changing lots of things in the design at once, all of those ripple effects start adding up,' said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on space policy. 'And it becomes more and more likely that you're not going to catch things and you will have a catastrophic failure during a test flight.' Musk has made bold predictions about Starship. In his telling, it will not only be the first fully reusable orbital rocket, but orders of magnitude cheaper than any rival. Starship would also help meet his loftiest goal: bringing humans to Mars. So far, however, Musk's early projections that it would be safe to carry humans to space by 2023 and land people on the moon as early as this year haven't panned out. 'It's really one of the hardest engineering challenges that exists,' Musk said at an event for Tesla owners in July. 'When we first started talking about Starship, people thought this was impossible. In fact, even within the company, we sort of thought it was impossible.' The misfires haven't deterred investors. The 23-year-old company has continued to raise new capital at rates more befitting a keenly watched startup than a mature, capital-hungry business. Most recently, SpaceX has been planning a sale of stock that would value the company at about $400 billion. Yet there are also signs that for SpaceX to achieve a substantially greater valuation, investors may need to see more progress on Starship. During its latest fundraising effort, in which new investors don't participate, the company had discussed a $500 billion valuation, before lowering it after consultation with backers, people familiar with the matter said. Much will hinge on what happens next. The company is aiming to launch its tenth test flight of Starship as early as Aug. 24. It's possible that SpaceX will be able to continue to absorb more testing failures, but the perception that the company is moving forward in Starship development will be key to their long-term investment success and fulfilling contractual agreements with NASA. Starship Scramble Starship is one large piece of a growing web of programs that make up the SpaceX business plan. The company began with its Falcon rocket program and added the Dragon capsule to deliver cargo and people to space. Now, the majority of its revenue comes from Starlink, which relies on a massive system of satellites in low-Earth orbit that beam broadband internet to Earth. To make Starship work, SpaceX is betting that it can draw resources away from its core rocket program at a time when the company faces weak competition. Some planned launches of SpaceX's Starlink satellites on Falcon 9 rockets would potentially be pushed from the end of this year to early 2026 because of the surge of Falcon engineers working on Starship, the people familiar with the company's planning said. SpaceX currently has about 8,000 Starlink satellites aloft, and removing a few launches from the manifest this year wasn't seen as a show-stopping problem, the people said. Maintaining Starlink's robust financial health is important for SpaceX to absorb Starship's costs. Building one of the rockets — comprised of the Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy booster — costs hundreds of millions of dollars, the people said. When one flight fails, the full cost of the lost vehicle falls on SpaceX, they added. The company is on the hook for other costs, too, including any environmental damage caused when failed rockets tumble back to Earth. Getting Starship right is critical to SpaceX's future. Eventually, Starship would be used to launch larger, more powerful Starlink satellites into space. Over time, the company plans to phase out the Falcon 9, making Starship its workhorse rocket, company executives have said. And above all, Starship is meant to be the primary vehicle to start a base on Mars — the reason that Musk has said he created SpaceX in the first place. A SpaceX representative didn't respond to a request for comment. Moon Landing SpaceX maintains that Starship will be landing people on the moon within the next few years. NASA has awarded SpaceX contracts worth roughly $4 billion to use Starship to shuttle astronauts to the lunar surface. To live up to that bargain, SpaceX will need to demonstrate the ability to refuel Starship more than a dozen times in orbit with back-to-back flights. That maneuver has never been performed anywhere near the scale SpaceX needs — and Starship has not yet completed a full orbit of the Earth. The pressure to move quickly has affected decisions about the design of the rocket, according to a person familiar with the process who wasn't authorized to speak publicly about SpaceX's decision-making. For recent tests, SpaceX has used a Starship prototype known as Version 2, or V2. A few of the design decisions for this version have been made in an attempt to save time and money, the person said. It's a type of risk that SpaceX and Musk like to take, but the consequences of these choices can have cascading explosive effects, which in turn have an impact on public perception. 'I don't think anything that's happened with Starship invalidates SpaceX's approach,' Carissa Christensen, founder and CEO of BryceTech, a space analytics and consulting firm, said. 'That said, the persistent failures over multiple tests are happening in a context of One: high visibility. Two: a company that typically moves very fast and very successfully on innovation and Three: in a world where programmatic objectives depend on this vehicle,' notably NASA's moon mission. The frenetic pace of Starship's development may also be a contributing factor to its missteps, with quickly implemented changes sometimes having unforeseen effects on other parts of the vehicle. For instance, a seal on the vehicle's Raptor engines began to fail after SpaceX started adding more propellant on later flights, according to a person briefed on the matter who was not authorized to discuss the program's inner workings publicly. Many engineers at SpaceX continue to operate under the philosophy that every launch is a learning opportunity and that it's better to fail prematurely and often than wait years to execute a perfect flight. That thinking has been nurtured by the company's large resources and continuing access to vast sums of capital. SpaceX is known to be 'hardware rich,' meaning that it is consistently producing multiple rocket prototypes that are available to test and tweak. It is committed to testing its remaining inventory of V2 Starships despite a consensus at the company that the design is subpar, according to people familiar with the matter. Engineers think there are lessons to learn from launching the rest of the V2s, the people said. Above all, engineers need to get better data from Starship's heat shield tiles to help perfect the vehicle's tiles haven't returned intact during any flights this year. This year, the White House proposed phasing out the Space Launch System, a massive rocket built by Boeing Co., after is third flight. The White House argued that SLS was overbudget and inefficient, and that it should be eventually replaced with commercial alternatives, with SpaceX's Starship an implied option. Ultimately, Senator Ted Cruz included more money for Space Launch System's fourth and fifth flights after Starship's setbacks sowed doubt that it would be ready to replace the Boeing-made vehicle in the near future. SpaceX has repeatedly proven to its naysayers that it can master what was once considered near-impossible engineering. Now, it needs to regain the confidence of doubters who fear that the company might be stuck in the mud. 'The number one thing is visible, demonstrable progress,' Christensen said. 'I think that's going to go a long way toward not creating negative perceptions. And the optimal outcome from that standpoint would be that they successfully reach space with a Starship return.' Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
