BA English vs BA Journalism: Which degree leads to better career options?
Both courses revolve around the written word, but their essence and outcomes couldn't be more different.
O
n one side lies a world of canonical texts, literary criticism, and philosophical inquiry. On the other hand, the charged environment of newsrooms, digital media, and real-time storytelling. Choosing between the two often feels like choosing between depth and immediacy, between reflection and reaction.
Course curriculum: From Shakespeare to the newsroom
A Bachelor of Arts in English is structured to build critical thinking through intensive reading, analysis, and discussion. The curriculum spans British, American, Indian, and world literatures, with a strong focus on theory, linguistics, and creative expression. Students learn to decode meaning, critique cultural narratives, and appreciate language as both art and ideology.
Journalism programmes, in contrast, are built around the dynamics of information.
The syllabus is pragmatic, covering reporting, media ethics, editing, feature writing, photojournalism, and digital storytelling. It trains students to gather, verify, and deliver news in ways that are fast, factual, and engaging.
Where English studies dissect the world through metaphor and context, journalism courses teach students to frame it through fact and relevance.
Skills acquired: Deep thinker or agile storyteller?
An English degree nurtures subtlety.
Students learn how to write with nuance, think critically, and argue persuasively. These are transferable skills, valuable in publishing, academia, content development, advertising, and beyond. However, the professional application of these abilities often requires supplementary credentials or real-world exposure.
Journalism, meanwhile, is grounded in hands-on learning. By graduation, students are familiar with deadlines, interviewing, fact-checking, and platform-specific writing.
This early exposure to industry practices offers a faster launch into the professional world.
Both paths demand clarity, creativity, and command over language, but their tones differ. English teaches the student to slow down and reflect. Journalism insists on moving fast and staying relevant.
Career prospects: Open horizons vs direct routes
An English graduate may not walk into a ready-made job title, but the possibilities are far from limited. Career options include:
Publishing and editing
Content writing and copywriting
Academia and research
Civil services
Creative writing
Communications and corporate training
That said, most of these careers require either a postgraduate degree or technical upskilling to become sustainable and financially rewarding.
Journalism graduates, on the other hand, often find themselves job-ready by the end of their course. Common roles include:
News reporter or anchor
Feature writer or editor
Social media executive
PR professional
Podcast producer or multimedia storyteller
Digital content strategist
The climb can be steep and competitive, especially in today's evolving media landscape, but the degree lays a clearer professional foundation from the start.
Digital shifts and emerging roles
In the last decade, both degrees have experienced a transformation shaped by technology. The traditional divide between the literary and the journalistic is softening.
English graduates who once sought print publishing are now creating content for digital campaigns, e-learning platforms, and branding firms. They're becoming SEO writers, scriptwriters, and literary influencers, proof that a literature degree can indeed find relevance in the digital age.
At the same time, journalists are no longer confined to newspapers and television. With platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Substack, many are launching independent careers, managing their own media brands, and diversifying into content marketing, data journalism, and podcasting.
Versatility is no longer optional, it is the new baseline.
One language, two directions
While both degrees speak the language of ideas and information, the direction in which they take you depends on your ambition, temperament, and adaptability.
If the goal is to explore culture, literature, and the evolution of thought, and if career plans include teaching, research, or creative writing, English offers a rich foundation. If, however, the ambition is to enter the professional world swiftly, impact public discourse, and tell real-time stories, journalism presents a clearer, more targeted route.
Neither is inherently better. Both demand dedication, and both reward those who continue to evolve beyond their degrees.
Ultimately, the decision is not about which degree is superior, but about which one aligns more closely with your vision of work, purpose, and the kind of stories you want to tell.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Air India Crash Points to Cockpit Confusion as Fuel Flow Cut Out
(Bloomberg) -- The Air India jetliner that crashed on June 12 was doomed almost immediately upon taking off, after both engines lost fuel supply and the pilots ran out of time to regain control and avert catastrophe. A preliminary 15-page report filed on July 11 provided the first detailed account of the fateful 32 seconds between takeoff in Ahmedabad and the descent into an urban district just beyond the airport perimeter, where the Boeing Co. 787 exploded, killing all but one of the 242 people on board. Investigators laid out the sequence of events with exact timestamps, providing a harrowing picture of the plane's final moments. But the findings leave unanswered one central question: Why and by whom were two fuel switches in the cockpit moved to a cut-off position as the jet nosed into the air, starving the two powerful engines of thrust just as the plane required the most lift. At the controls for the aircraft's final journey was First Officer Clive Kunder, a pilot with roughly 1,100 flight hours on Boeing's most advanced jet. The report identified him as pilot flying, while Sumeet Sabharwal, the more experienced and senior cockpit occupant in command, was pilot monitoring for the flight. It's common for a captain and co-pilot to switch flying duties, particularly on longer journeys. Under typical pilot protocol, Kunder would have had one hand on the yoke commanding the widebody into the skies, and another on the throttle controlling the plane's speed. The crew captain would have handled air traffic communications and responded to Kunder's instructions. All seemed normal as the Boeing 787 lifted off into a clear sky in the western Indian city en route to London's Gatwick airport. There was no significant bird activity in the flight path, all but ruling out a collision that could have damaged the engines. Then, according to a chronology laid out by Indian authorities, the two fuel switches in the plane's center console were flipped, about one second apart. It's unclear what prompted the maneuver, but it crippled the plane during a critical phase of flight. A fan, known as the ram air turbine, dropped below the plane's belly to provide emergency power, all while the 787 was still within view of airport cameras. On board, the pilots had a brief exchange — the only cockpit conversation mentioned in the report aside from a final 'mayday' call just seconds before impact. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff,' the investigators wrote. 'The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' The report didn't identify which of the two men asked the other about the move. It would take about 10 seconds for the first switch to return to its run position, restoring the flow of fuel to the engine, and 14 seconds for the second to be turned back on. Given the aircraft had barely lifted off and was at a critical phase of its flight, that's an eternity for pilots only a few hundred feet above ground and facing a life-threatening emergency. 'It's just strange,' said Bjorn Fehrm, an aerospace engineer and former fighter pilot who is a technical analyst with Leeham News. 'I would never, ever wait 10 seconds to put them on again. I would put them on in a jiffy.' While both engines were relit, only the first one started to regain power before the 787 plunged to the ground. The sequence of events was gleaned from different data points, including the cockpit voice and flight-data recorders that were recovered from the wreckage. There's no mention in the report of any additional exchanges in the cockpit or of any noises on the flight deck that the sensitive microphones would have picked up. 'The most important information is the voice dialog between the pilots, and we only get one line, which is totally inadequate,' said Fehrm. That leaves other key questions unanswered, including how the two pilots interacted as the aircraft sagged back to the ground, and who was ultimately in control in those frantic final seconds. Why one of the men would have conducted the unusual and highly risky maneuver of manipulating both fuel toggles also remains unknown. The switches are secured with a mechanism that requires a specific movement to shift them between on and off mode. And they are idled only when the plane is on the ground, or in an extreme emergency during flight, such as an engine fire. Given the trajectory of flight, starving the aircraft of fuel seconds after takeoff made it almost impossible to save the plane because the jet had just left the ground, providing very little recovery room. The Boeing 787 crashed just outside the airport boundary, having grazed some trees before plunging into a hostel packed with students. Some 19 people died on the ground, the report found. The preliminary version hinted at another matter to be explored by investigators, without elaborating. It flagged an airworthiness bulletin by the Federal Aviation Administration from 2018 that said that some fuel control switches on Boeing planes including the smaller 737 and the 787 were installed without their locking mechanism engaged. The Air India jet was not inspected for that mechanism fault as the matter was not mandatory. No defect relating to the switches had been reported since the throttle control module was replaced in 2023, the report said. Investigators said that they found no evidence so far that would require them to take actions over the Boeing aircraft or the GE Aerospace engines powering it. 'At this stage of investigation, there are no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers,' according to the report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. The National Transportation Safety Board referred any questions to Indian authorities. Air India said it's unable to comment on specific details of the investigation and it was cooperating with officials. Boeing said it continues to support the investigation and Air India and referred questions to the AAIB. The people conducting the probe are also looking at the backgrounds and experience of the pilots — a normal step for this kind of investigation. Sabharwal had about 8,500 flight hours, according to the report. Both pilots were based at Mumbai and had arrived in Ahmedabad the previous day with 'adequate rest period' prior to the flight, the report said. 'We now know — with some degree of confidence — that both engines rolled back because these fuel switches were activated,' said Jeff Guzzetti, a former accident investigation chief for the US Federal Aviation Administration. 'We just don't know why or how these switches were activated and that's going to be a big part of this investigation.' A final report that seeks to determine the cause of the incident will take months to compile. --With assistance from Anthony Palazzo and Mary Schlangenstein. More stories like this are available on
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Scholars, researchers unite to discuss relevance of Buddha Dharma in 21st century
Dharamshala (Himachal Pradesh) [India], July 14 (ANI): Buddhist scholars, researchers, practitioners, and eminent spiritual leaders who had closely interacted with the 14th Dalai Lama, over several years, including the supreme hierarchy of international and national Buddhist Monks on Sunday discussed three pertinent subjects that 14th Dalai Lama had been concerned with these past years at an International Conference organised by the International Buddhist Confederation (IBC) in commemoration of the 90th birth anniversary of the 14th Dalai Lama. The topics were 'Relevance of Buddha Dharma in the 21st Century', 'Quantum Physics, Neurosciences and Buddhism and on the 'Future of Tibetan Buddhism and the Preservation of its Culture.' Alexander Berzin from Harvard University in Far Eastern Languages, Sanskrit and Indian Studies said the 14th Dalai Lama considered three themes most relevant for the 21st century- the oneness of humanity, bodhichitta and the view of emptiness being the main focuses of his daily practice, and his great commitments. These are, firstly, promoting secular ethics and universal values and introducing their teaching into the modern school systems. Second is the preservation of Tibetan culture, language and environment. Promoting religious harmony is the third, and the fourth is the integration of the ancient Indian teachings on the mind into the curricula of the schools in India. Lobsang Tenzin Negi, the Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Centre for Contemplative Science and Compassion-Based Ethics at Emory University, explored the continued relevance of the Dalai Lama's core spiritual teachings, particularly compassion, mindfulness, and ethical responsibility, especially relevant in today's complex and fast-changing world. He noted that the Dalai Lama had been a pioneering force in bridging science and spirituality, actively engaging with world-renowned scientists and help giving rise to the field of contemplative science, especially the study of compassion. 'His vision and calls to action have directly inspired impactful global programs like SEE Learning and CBCT, which integrate secular ethics and emotional well-being into education and society. Together, these contributions offer a timeless and practical framework, and vital tools, for cultivating empathy, resilience, and a sense of universal responsibility in the 21st century,' explained. Professor Ceon Ramon, Affiliate Professor, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, US, speaking on Quantum Physics, Neurosciences and Buddhism, explained these concepts with examples with the aim to demonstrate the similarities and differences between scientific theories and Buddhist philosophy. Another area of interaction is the combination of quantum and superluminal (faster than light) physics with Buddhist philosophy. He said that with this, one can explain the Buddhist concept of the luminous nature of the mind, which helps to describe the spontaneous transfer of information between two events that are separated in space. Associate Professor Edi Ramawijaya Putra, Sriwijaya State Buddhist College of Tangerang Banten, Indonesia, said the Dalai Lama was concerned about the lack of individual responsibility toward social and global welfare. This deliberately violates the ultimate goal of education itself. Therefore, learners must accentuate themselves that their presence in this world is not merely about individual purpose, but also for the benfits of other being, he explained. Educational stakeholders, including policy-makers worldwide, must start reimagining the curricula that provide more on 'educating the heart' not only 'education the mind'. More importantly, designing outcomes that equips learners' resilience as an equalizer of life through the voltailities, uncertainities, complexities and biases, Prof. Putra mentioned. Kate Saunders, Co-Founder of Turquoise Roof research network and Tibet Watch, London, UK, said Tibetan Buddhism was standing at a critical crossroads, the future will determine not only the preservation of Tibet's ancient spiritual traditions but also the continuity of its cultural identity under unprecedented Chinese control strategies. This presentation examined how China's systematic campaign to eliminate the Dalai Lama's influence extended far beyond Tibet's borders, employing what Beijing characterises as a 'protracted war' to control religious succession while simultaneously promoting 'unyielding Marxist atheism.' The analysis was based on new research revealing the international dimensions of China's reincarnation politics, demonstrating how Beijing's multi-dimensional approach threatens traditional Tibetan governance structures that uniquely interweave religious and political authority based on the belief that leaders are enlightened beings who choose reincarnation to serve humanity. 'At this pivotal moment of global instability, the preservation of Tibetan Buddhism represents more than cultural survival; it embodies a vital force offering practical guidance on compassionate education systems, ethical leadership, and sustainable resilience, providing alternative frameworks that humanity desperately needs to navigate an increasingly fractured world order where pluralism faces systematic assault from transnational authoritarian networks,' she concluded. A special message to IBC by Dalai Lama was read out by Most Venerable Prof. Samdhong Rinpoche, the Guest of Honour at the event. At the event, the Special Guest was Most Ven. Phrarat Vajarasuttiwong Dhammalongkornvibhusit Arayawangso, of Thailand, the Keynote Speaker was Dalai Lama, the 43rd Sakya Trizin Gyana Vajra Rinpoche of Dehradun, India, and the concluding remarks were by Most Ven. Nicholas Vreeland of the USA. In a declaration at the end of a day-long conference in New Delhi on three pertinent subjects close to Dalai Lama's heart: The 'Relevance of Buddha Dharma in the 21st Century', the 'Future of Tibetan Buddhism and the Preservation of its Culture,' and 'Quantum Physics, Neurosciences and Buddhism,' more than 500 participants, both nationals and from around the world unanimously supported the public statement. The key message read that 'from the highlands of Tibet to the farthest corners of the world, the Dalai Lama's teachings had transcended borders and beliefs. Inspiring millions to walk the path of non-violence, harmony, and inner awakening as the revered manifestation of Avalokiteshvara, the bodhisattva of compassion, the Dalai Lama has upheld and revitalised the precious traditions of Tibetan Buddhism, while also emerging as a global voice of conscience in contemporary times. It further stated that the Dalai Lama 'has consistently championed the preservation of rich Tibetan culture and religious freedom, guiding his people with unwavering resolve.' His recent statement announcing the continuation of his reincarnation, and only by Tibetan people without any foreign interference, is a testament to preserving its culture and heritage, as mentioned in the Declaration. (ANI)
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
The unseen emotional burden women carry
For many women in India, the workday doesn't end at the office. It continues at home—in the kitchen, in caring for children and elders, and crucially, in tending to the emotional needs of those around them. This 'triple burden' of paid work, unpaid domestic work and emotional labour is silently shaping women's lives, limiting their autonomy and stealing time from their own domestic and care-giving responsibilities are now widely discussed, a third kind of labour—interpretive or hermeneutic labour—remains largely invisible. Coined by philosopher Ellie Anderson, the term refers to the work of decoding and managing others' emotions, anticipating needs, smoothing over conflict, and being the emotional anchor in personal relationships. It's the unseen effort behind every 'Is he upset or just tired?' or 'How do I bring this up without making him angry?' or simply 'What is he thinking?'.This unequal emotional burden isn't just unfortunate, it's a form of modern-day misogyny. It silently enforces the idea that women exist to serve, soothe and support, while men are entitled to care without ever learning to reciprocate, introspect, or have long performed what sociologist Arlie Hochschild called the 'second shift' — unpaid domestic work after paid employment. Hermeneutic labour adds a third: maintaining emotional equilibrium at home and often at work too. This work is rarely recognised, let alone shared. In heterosexual relationships especially, women often become default emotional managers, while men who are socialised into emotional reticence imbalance begins early. Boys are told to toughen up; girls are taught to care. Over time, men grow up with what psychologists call 'normative male alexithymia'—difficulty identifying or expressing emotions—and women are expected to fill in the gaps. They must sense when something is wrong, offer comfort, avoid triggering sensitive topics, and maintain harmony, even if they are result is what Anderson calls a 'lose-lose' pattern. When women raise concerns, they're often met with denial or dismissal — 'You're overthinking.' If they stay silent, they carry the burden alone. Either way, it's Shrayana Bhattacharya's work offers a particularly powerful lens on this issue. In her interviews with working women across class lines, she found that even women earning money outside the home must still 'earn love' inside it. As she puts it, 'Men must earn money and women must earn love'..This double or rather triple burden keeps women in a state of time poverty, leaving little room for leisure, rest, or self-development. The emotional load becomes a hidden tax on women's time and mental bandwidth. Even financially independent women are expected to serve as family psychologists, peacekeepers and relationship therapists—all without acknowledgement, let alone fair compensation for their unpaid points out that Indian women make up nearly half the population but contribute less than 20% of GDP—a gap fuelled in part by the unpaid work they do. This includes not only cooking and cleaning but also the emotional energy required to sustain households. Time-use data suggests Indian women spend over five hours a day on unpaid labour, compared to just 30 minutes by men. That difference translates into lost career opportunities, missed promotions, and diminished culture reinforces these dynamics. In countless Bollywood films—from Hum Aapke Hain Kaun to Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham—women are cast as the emotional centre of the family. They mediate conflicts, understand silent male protagonists and absorb emotional shocks without complaint. Men, in contrast, often play the 'strong and silent' types— emotionally absent, yet never held accountable for it. The message is clear: real men don't emote, and real women must make up for model extends into workplaces too, where women are more likely to be asked to do the 'office housework'—planning parties, mentoring junior staff, managing team harmony. These tasks are vital but often overlooked when promotions or raises are handed out. Worse, women who reject this role risk being labelled cold or isn't just a cultural issue; it's an economic one. Globally, if women's unpaid care work were counted, it would add over $11 trillion to the world economy annually. In India, economists estimate that redistributing care responsibilities more equitably could boost GDP by up to 30%..But beyond GDP, the costs are personal. Emotional burnout is real. Women who constantly manage others' feelings often suppress their own, leading to higher rates of stress, anxiety, and relationship dissatisfaction. They may ask themselves: 'Am I overreacting?', 'Why do I feel unseen?' The answer often lies in how invisible their labour—especially their emotional labour —has philosopher Kate Manne captures this dynamic in her concept of 'human givers'. In patriarchal societies, women are expected to give care, love, attention and emotional energy, often without expecting anything in ideal woman is always giving; the ideal man is always receiving. Challenging this ideal, even by asking for reciprocity, can provoke backlash. Emotional labour, then, isn't just a burden—it's a tool of gendered first step toward change is recognition. Emotional and interpretive labour are not personality traits; they are learned, practised, and exhausting forms of work. We must stop treating them as 'just how women are'..Second, we need redistribution. Emotional labour should not be gendered. Men must learn to read emotional cues, articulate their feelings and take responsibility for relationship maintenance at home and work. Workplaces should rotate support tasks fairly. And governments must invest in care infrastructure to ease the unpaid workload at we must shift how we talk about emotional work, not as 'soft skills' or 'women's instincts' but as critical contributions to family stability and organisational health. This means valuing, supporting and sharing that work, not hiding it in the margins of women's a society that tells women to 'have it all', we rarely stop to ask: at what cost? When women spend their days earning a paycheck and their nights earning love, something is deeply broken. Emotional labour isn't just a private burden; it's a public issue. It's time we treated it as such..(The writer is a lawyer based in New Delhi and a research fellow at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy)
