Review: Despite uneven pace, a masterful Kendrick Lamar exceeds the hype
The somewhat muted display represented Lamar at his most physically ostentatious. Predominantly reserved and incredibly focused, the MC delivered knockouts with one dynamite delivery after another. Lamar's singular way with words nearly absolved the 160-minute show of its flaws — mainly, the decision to interweave his sets with those of co-headliner SZA into a continuous nine-act whole, and the irreconcilable contrasts that resulted.
In town on his 'Grand National Tour,' Lamar walked the talk. His boasts of being the greatest of all time? Hard to argue at this point. Lamar didn't need the compulsory glitter that complements most massive concerts. Yes, there were fireworks galore, blast-furnace flames, skyward-shot fireballs and mechanical platforms. Pre-recorded interrogation-themed vignettes doubled as preludes. Lamar would've been equally effective if he just had his microphone for his razor-wire voice and stage-spanning video wall to project conceptual imagery — pawn shop and corner liquor-store signage, three-dimensional digital sculptures, provocative collages, coded slogans — tied to songs.
Lamar also brought his black 1987 Buick GNX coupe along for the ride, using it as a recurring prop and occasional entrance-exit device. A 16-person dance team, a descent down a flight of stairs and a choreographed segment where the California native walked atop a long table while his ensemble sat on one side were about as theatrical as things got in his universe.
He focused on narrative devices, demonstrating an elite command of dynamics, syntax, tone, timing, tension and pitch. Aside from a blinged-out 'X' chain hanging from his neck, Lamar eschewed gaudiness and wore only two outfits. No hype men, no special guests, no gratuitous self-promotion. And no overt showboating, even with his voice. Mainly, a batch of biting songs and an effortless flow that often operated as the parallel of a world-class rhythm section.
With his current trek, Lamar joins Jay-Z and Eminem on the short list of hip hop artists who co-headlined stadium tours in North America. Though all three partnered with an R&B singer, Lamar planned an outing — the 39-date tour heads to Europe in July — more ambitious in scope.
He's regularly shattering records. In Seattle, he established the new mark for highest gross revenue ($14.8 million) for a single performance by a rapper. It's already a foregone conclusion that the 'Grand National Tour' will rank as the highest-grossing rap tour in history, adding to a series of feats that place the 37-year-old on the same global phenom platform as Beyoncé, Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift.
Since winning the Pulitzer Prize for music in 2018 for his 'Damn' LP, Lamar has dominated. His 2022 'Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers' record drew widespread acclaim, gave him his fourth consecutive No. 1 album and spawned an international tour that included a headlining Lollapalooza slot. Turns out, he was only warming up. In spring 2024, Lamar engaged in a public feud with Drake, dropped four acclaimed diss singles (with 'Not Like Us' netting five Grammy Awards), released the chart-topping 'GNX' LP and spearheaded the most-watched Super Bowl halftime show in history.
Meet the former Chicago 'theater kid' who stages Kendrick Lamar
Given his winning streak, nobody would've flinched if Lamar framed his portion of the event as a celebration. Yet moments of sheer joy arrived sparingly, a balance in a greater storytelling arc involving introspection, anger, reflection, comfort, struggle, fear, confusion and spirituality. He even reshaped the buoyant Black Lives Matter anthem 'Alright,' trading its definite optimism for something far less certain, with the familiar refrain echoing as a question without a guaranteed answer.
Complications, critiques and conflicts filled his verses. On more than one occasion, Lamar appeared in intense conversation with himself — and prior guises of himself — in attempting to navigate deep-rooted internal strife.
During the piano-laden 'Reincarnated,' he linked his past lives to those of John Lee Hooker and Billie Holiday before zooming back on his present self and its battle for freedom from the devil. As he transitioned into a rendition of Baby Keem's 'Family Ties,' the terms 'Respect' and 'Or' interchangeably flashed on the screen between 'Money ' and 'Power.' Crouching on the hood of his vehicle, a predator ready to strike at any prey that neared, he spat the rhymes to 'Man at the Garden' as mantra in a seeming attempt to convince his toughest critic — himself — he deserves the spoils of this life and the one that could follow.
'This is not a song / This is a revelation,' Lamar declared on 'TV Off.' He took those words to heart, whether toppling enemies with scathing aggression ('Euphoria'), repping his hometown in deceptively laconic fashion ('Dodger Blue') or blending slang, onomatopoeia and pop-culture references into a bass-booming banger ('Squabble Up'). Lamar's lyrical swagger and rhythmic control defied limitations. He treated phrases like shifting puzzle pieces.
Precise and transparent, and garnished with a hint of raspiness, his hydraulic voice cut through every mix. He switched frequencies akin to an analog radio tuner, raced ahead and then cruised along as if behind the wheel of a souped-up car. Lamar dodged and dashed syllables, sliced and syncopated cadences, cleaving language into staggered patterns that danced, taunted, bounced and attacked. He let the rhythm hit 'em with every opportunity.
If only he'd played a single, uninterrupted set and sustained a constant momentum. Lamar's decision to perform snippets of multiple songs also fell short of the intended mark. Potent cuts such as 'King Kunta,' 'Backseat Freestyle' and 'Swimming Pools (Drank)' came across as teases or afterthoughts.
But those were minor missteps compared to the unevenness of Lamar and SZA's traded-off sequences. Both would have been better served with standalone programs and collaborating once within each segment.
SZA made for a fine duet partner on the six songs they performed together. She countered his coarser tendencies with smooth softness on fare such as 'Love' and the heartfelt ballad 'Luther.' Her soulful voice proved up to task on her own material, too. But the similarities between her and Lamar's approaches, along with the sharp divide in their overall musical styles, created a whiplash effect and stunted pacing.
SZA also went overboard with production, pyrotechnics and costume changes. Despite a few standout moments during which she asserted independence ('The Weekend,' a cover of Rihanna's 'Consideration'), she more often was subservient to scenery and symbolism. Indulging in garden motifs, the singer mingled with dancers dressed as insects, straddled a giant grasshopper and, for the acoustic-based 'Nobody Gets Me,' hovered above the stage wearing a pair of wings that transformed her into a sprite. Background visuals reinforced her obsession with bugs and grasslands, which worked to clever purpose during the revenge fantasy 'Kill Bill.'
Unfortunately, many of the vocal and emotional subtleties that SZA showed on a prior tour stop at the United Center faded here. Perhaps in an effort to compensate, the 35-year-old St. Louis native opted for the opposite spectrum. Embracing big melodies and sugary choruses, she trumpeted exaggerated slickness and puffy drama on a healthy number of tunes. With a guitarist by her side doing little else than striking the poses of bygone hair-metal pretenders, SZA sang from her knees and brought back '80s pop rock.
In another context, maybe the throwback succeeds. But on a tour on which Lamar stands as the equivalent of an undefeated prizefighter with no close suitors, a bold visionary taking hip-hop and dialect places seldom explored, the disconnect is too severe.Setlist from Soldier Field on June 8:
Kendrick Lamar
'Wacced Out Murals'
'Squabble Up'
'King Kunta'
'Element'
'TV Off' (Part I)
Lamar and SZA
'30 for 30'
SZA
'What Do I Do'
'Love Galore'
'Broken Clocks'
'The Weekend'
Lamar
'Euphoria'
'Hey Now'
'Reincarnated'
'Humble'
'Backseat Freestyle'
'Family Ties' (Baby Keem cover)
'Swimming Pools (Drank)'
'Sweet Love' (Anita Baker cover) into 'M.A.A.D. City'
'Alright'
'Man at the Garden'
SZA
'Scorsese Baby Daddy'
'F2F'
'Garden (Say It Like Dat)'
'Kitchen'
'Blind'
'Consideration' (Rihanna cover)
'Low'
Lamar and SZA
'Doves in the Wind'
'All the Stars'
'Love'
Lamar
'Dodger Blue'
'Peekaboo'
'Like That' (Future/Metro Boomin cover)
'DNA'
'Good Credit' (Playboi Carti cover)
'Count Me Out' into 'Don't Kill My Vibe'
'Money Trees'
'Poetic Justice'
SZA
'I Hate U'
'Go Gina'
'Kill Bill'
'Snooze'
'Open Arms'
'Nobody Gets Me'
'Good Days'
'Rich Baby Daddy' (Drake cover)
'BMF'
'Kiss Me More' (Doja Cat cover)
Lamar
'N95'
'TV Off' (Part II)
'Not Like Us'
Lamar and SZA
'Luther'
'Gloria'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
7 hours ago
- Engadget
The White House now has a TikTok account
The White House has joined TikTok, the social media app that President Trump wanted to ban during his first term. Its first post shows clips of Trump in various events with Kendrick Lamar's track playing in the background. The New York Times notes that it references a popular video edit of Creed, a boxing movie starring Michael B. Jordan, on the app. In the TikTok post, Trump could be heard saying "I am your voice," while the caption reads "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" Trump's administration believes TikTok helped him win over young voters in the 2024 Presidential election, with the account he used to campaign having over 15 million followers. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. The president wasn't always fond of the platform. He once vowed to ban the app in the US and signed an executive order to outlaw any transaction between the app and its China-based parent company ByteDance for national security reasons. TikTok's "data collection threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans' personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage," the executive order read. After taking office earlier this year, however, Trump quickly put a pause on the law that was supposed to ban TikTok in the US. He even delayed the ban a couple more times to give ByteDance more time to sell its US business. Trump previously claimed that a "very wealthy" group is poised to buy TikTok, but the administration has yet to reveal the identities of the people in it.
Forbes
16 hours ago
- Forbes
Drake/UMG Dispute: Transparency In The Streaming Age
Amid his highly publicized rap battle with Kendrick Lamar, Drake filed a series of lawsuits aimed at Universal Music Group, owner of his label Republic Records. Among other allegations, Drake accuses UMG of manipulating streams to favor Lamar's tracks over his own, causing him financial harm. These are just allegations for now, but they open the door to broader conversations about how major labels leverage their relationships with streaming platforms. These aren't niche issues: global paid streaming subscribers are projected to reach 827 million in 2025, according to research by Goldman Sachs. With that kind of scale, small shifts in visibility or recommendation algorithms can have enormous financial implications. Bots, Algorithms, and Playlist Visibility A significant issue at the heart of this lawsuit and the industry as a whole is the lack of regulation of 'bots,' software accounts that are programmed to repeatedly stream a song or album and, in the process, inflate streams. A Financial Times article found that as much as 10 percent of all music streams are derived from bots or streaming farms. According to allegations in Drake's lawsuit, 'Kendrick Lamar's 'label' (i.e., Interscope) paid him via third parties to use 'bots' to achieve 30,000,000 streams on Spotify in the initial days following the Recording's release with the goal of 'jumpstarting' its spread and turning it into 'a crazy hit' on the platform.' The lawsuit further stresses Spotify's failure to prevent the issue, as the platform itself acknowledged the presence of bots in response to Drake's pre-litigation filing in New York State court. The issue goes far beyond play counts, exposing systemic flaws in algorithms and playlist placements that serve as the industry's real digital gatekeepers for artist exposure. In 2020, the Federal Trade Commission scrutinized promotional practices in the streaming era, examining how labels influence playlist placement and algorithmic recommendations. Streaming was supposed to remove gatekeepers, but playlist algorithms have instead created new ones. It's hard enough for many of them to break into a platform's curated playlist, let alone reach the level of clout necessary to access customized licensing terms with that platform. Even well-established artists struggle to break through without curated playlist placement, let alone access to preferential licensing terms with DSPs. Streaming has reshaped music promotion, concentrating leverage around algorithms and data feeds. That shift affects everyone from bedroom producers to stadium headliners. Among Drake's other allegations, he claims UMG charged '...Spotify lower than usual licensing rates for the Recording in exchange for Spotify affirmatively recommending the Recording to users who are searching for other unrelated songs and artists,' and that UMG partnered with Apple's Siri to play Kendrick's track unprompted in response to unrelated voice requests. Tom Gray, founder of the #BrokenRecord campaign, echoed this sentiment in his testimony to the UK Parliament's Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, stating: 'The reality is that playlisting is the new payola. The gatekeepers have changed, but the game remains the same.' Without major label backing, independent artists face an uphill battle. Playlist inclusion can feel like a lottery, and without it, algorithmic momentum is hard to build. That cycle of fewer playlists, less visibility and lower per-stream rates makes it tough to break through, even for artists with strong followings or touring chops. This isn't just a visibility issue; it's an economic one. Goldman's reporting shows that recorded music revenue growth has slowed dramatically, missing 2024 projections by over 4 percentage points. When top-line growth slows, competition over playlist slots and per-stream payouts only intensifies. Metrics, Trust, and Power Royalties used to flow from physical CDs or iTunes downloads. Now, the industry runs on clicks, skips, and saves. And with that shift, power has moved to the platforms themselves, a setup that makes manipulation easier and oversight harder. Streaming payouts are complicated even in the best-case scenario. But when bots and backend deals enter the picture, things get murkier. It's not just a transparency problem. It's a trust problem. Even well-known artists say streaming numbers don't always mean financial sustainability. And for independent creators trying to make a living, inflated data hurts twice: they get buried in discovery algorithms and shortchanged in payout models. As Drake's legal team puts it, 'Streaming platforms, like Spotify, use streaming data to proportionally allocate and disperse payments, which means streaming fraud diverts funds from artists whose songs are legitimately streamed by real consumers to those who use automation to falsely create the appearance of legitimate streaming.' This isn't a new complaint. Artists, indie labels, and advocates have been calling for transparency for years. Groups across Europe and the U.S. have pushed for access to backend data and more clarity around algorithmic curation. Without it, the market remains tilted and opaque. Streaming data now functions as career currency. It shapes touring budgets, brand deals, sync placements and almost every downstream opportunity. And for the artists who don't have a label machine behind them, the opacity of that system makes it harder to compete on anything close to a level playing field. That imbalance also locks artists out of fast-growing income opportunities. Goldman estimates that if just 20% of paying subscribers worldwide are 'superfans' (meaning those willing to spend 2x the average fan) it could unlock over $4.2 billion in additional revenue. But if that growth depends on algorithmic exposure and playlist favor, it's not likely to benefit those who need it most. The stakes aren't limited to the U.S., as Goldman projects that 70% of all new streaming subscribers by 2030 will come from emerging markets. If algorithmic opacity remains the norm, these regions risk replicating the same inequities seen in the current system, just on a bigger scale. As the dust continues to settle from Drake's filings, the bigger question is whether the industry will start demanding real transparency – or whether we'll just keep optimizing for the algorithm. Legal Entertainment has reached out to representation for comment, and will update this story as necessary.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Drake Seeks Kendrick Lamar's Contract, Evidence of Domestic Violence In Legal Fight
Drake is looking for ammunition in his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us.' In a discovery bid, Drake, born Aubrey Graham, urged the court to force UMG and chief executive Lucian Grainge to turn over the label's contract with Lamar, as well as information relating to allegations of domestic violence and other crimes committed by the Compton rapper. More from The Hollywood Reporter Daryl Hall and John Oates Legal Dispute Ends in Arbitration Demi Lovato Says Reuniting With Jonas Brothers and Performing 'Camp Rock' Songs Was "Healing" Fan-Made 'Life of a Showgirl' Merch Drops Online Hours After Taylor Swift Album Announcement Lamar (Interscope Records) and Drake (Republic Records) are represented by different divisions of UMG. Their rap battle turned to court earlier this year when the Toronto rapper claimed that UMG spread defamatory assertions that he's a pedophile by making secret payments and offering reduced licensing rates to third parties to promote the song, with the goal of devaluing his music and brand amid contract negotiations. The feud started with Drake's 2023 J. Cole collaboration 'First Person Shooter,' in which the pair proclaimed itself the 'big three' alongside Lamar. In response, the Compton rapper rejected the idea that they're his equals in 'Like That.' Several diss tracks followed, with the musicians hurling increasingly spiteful insults at each other relating to accusations of domestic abuse, exploitation and pedophilia. It culminated with Lamar's release of the anthemic West Coast banger in May, leading to spectators crowning him the winner of the battle. Discovery is ongoing. UMG previously gave Drake's lawyers its contract with Lamar, but the Toronto rapper takes issue with redactions in the 22-page document, 'rendering it virtually unreadable and incomprehensible,' his legal team writes in the court filing. Other requests for documents from UMG include information relating to Interscope's monthly revenues and profits and the value of Lamar's recording catalogue for the past five-and-a-half years. Drake says it's relevant to his theory that the label was motivated by increasing profits derived from the allegedly defamatory statements in 'Not Like Us.' The Toronto rapper suspects that Grainge, who allegedly encouraged competition between UMG labels, played a major role in UMG's promotion of the song. He seeks communications and documents from him of allegations of domestic violence and other crimes committed by Lamar. In 'Family Matters,' Drake's penultimate diss track in his feud with Kendrick Lamar, the Toronto rapper says that his West Coast adversary abuses his wife and isn't the father to his son. 'When you put your hands on your girl, Is it self-defense 'cause she bigger than you?' Drake sings. 'They hired a crisis management team. To clean up the fact that you beat on your queen.' UMG has maintained that Grainge has 'no meaningful involvement in the matters and decisions at issue in this litigation.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire
