logo
Could cloud seeding ease Arizona's drought? Lawmakers renew debate over 'geoengineering'

Could cloud seeding ease Arizona's drought? Lawmakers renew debate over 'geoengineering'

Yahoo26-02-2025
As Arizona contends with one of the most severe long-term droughts on record, scientists and water managers have considered weather manipulation techniques to increase the state's sporadic precipitation.
But Republican lawmakers have advanced a bill in the Legislature, Senate Bill 1432, that would ban geoengineering projects in Arizona, casting doubt on the efficacy and safety of such methods.
If passed, the bill would prohibit geoengineering in Arizona that disseminates chemicals or substances into the air that could manipulate sunlight intensity, reflecting solar radiation back to space.
The bill was revised to exclude weather manipulation and cloud seeding, a technique Salt River Project has researched that could increase precipitation and safeguard Arizona's water supply.
SB1432 passed the Senate Natural Resources Committee and was sent to the full Senate for a vote. A similar bill in the House, HB2056, has not advanced.
Geoengineering and weather manipulation have become entangled with conspiracy theories and controversy, and scientists and lawmakers across the country are wading into new territory as they explore solutions to drought and climate change.
But what is geoengineering, and is weather manipulation possible or even effective in Arizona, one of the driest states in the country?
'Geoengineering is being conflated with smaller-scale efforts like weather modification,' said Eric Betterton, a professor emeritus in hydrology and atmospheric sciences at the University of Arizona. 'Theoretically, it could work here, but it's yet to be proven.'
As climate change worsens due to the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere, scientists have explored geoengineering as a potential solution, or at least a way to mask the symptoms of a warming climate.
Geoengineering is often associated with weather manipulation, but the two fields largely differ.
Geoengineering is a blanket term to describe large-scale interventions in environmental processes to offset climate change. It focuses on the atmosphere's composition, while weather manipulation aims to influence existing weather conditions.
According to Betterton, there are two primary geoengineering tactics: carbon removal and solar geoengineering.
Carbon geoengineering removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and injects it underground to reduce global warming.
Solar geoengineering injects sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere and reflects sunlight, limiting the amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere.
Carbon removal has been conducted on a large scale in the U.S. and Europe, and solar reflection has been investigated on smaller scales due to the controversial nature of injecting chemicals into the atmosphere.
'The idea is one injects sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere, and it is converted to sulfate aerosols,' Betterton said. 'They become like a white haze and reflect some of the sunlight coming in and thereby cooling Earth.'
But solar reflection can occur naturally. Scientists have observed an influx of sulfur dioxide and aerosols into the stratosphere after major volcanic eruptions. These eruptions can cool the planet, with effects lasting several years.
Betterton acknowledges the long-term effects and unintended consequences of solar geoengineering are unknown and should be pursued carefully following peer-reviewed, scientific studies.
While SB1432 is the latest example of lawmakers and public wariness towards geoengineering, there's serious disagreement around it even in the scientific community.
'There is a lot of controversy,' Betterton said. 'Some scientists believe by even considering geoengineering, you reduce the importance of minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. In other words, you're giving up.'
Other scientists believe it's important to discover the implications of geoengineering by doing small-scale experiments in case carbon reduction efforts fail.
While scientists can't summon thunderstorms to Arizona or direct snowstorms to the Northeast, tactics are being explored to alter existing weather conditions.
But they can't create something from nothing — there has to be enough moisture and clouds in the atmosphere to attempt weather manipulation.
Cloud seeding and hail suppression stem from cloud modification, but their efficacy is still uncertain. 'For cloud seeding, first you need clouds,' Betterton said. 'If you don't have clouds, you have nothing to work on.'
Scientists release silver iodide from airplanes in most cloud-seeding operations, spurring ice formation and allowing precipitation to occur sooner.
Betterton conducted a cloud seeding program in the 1990s near Sedona. His team took advantage of the Mogollon Rim, where winter westward winds generate clouds as they rise over the topography.
Like the rest of the scientific community, they weren't confident cloud seeding was all that effective.
'The problem is, when you modify the clouds, does that result in precipitation at the surface? We could not show that, and no one has really been able to show that,' Betterton said.
Some believe cloud seeding could create a long-term 5% to 10% increase in precipitation, but there is not enough data to say so confidently.
Hail suppression is another weather manipulation technique being explored. Scientists intentionally overseed a cloud in an attempt to prevent the formation of hail. It isn't as prevalent in Arizona, but agricultural areas have explored the technique to minimize hail damage.
The Southwest has been in a drought since 1994, one of the worst on record. But even outside of long-term drought, Arizona is dry.
The statewide average is about 12 inches of rain annually since measurements began in 1816 and about 11 inches during the current drought. Some places get even less rain, with Phoenix accumulating an average of 7.22 inches.
Geoengineering and cloud seeding could theoretically offset the effects of drought and climate change in Arizona.
Betterton believes that even if cloud seeding has minimal impacts on overall precipitation, it is still a worthwhile endeavor if scientists can prove it works and is conducted safely.
'Any way you can increase precipitation would improve Arizona's amount of water,' he said.
Theoretically, cloud seeding is possible in Arizona during the winter, because scientists can rely on cloud formation over the Mogollon Rim.
'The problem during the summer is we do get those big convective clouds, but you never know where they're going to pop up,' Betterton said. 'So how do you get the cloud seeding material to the cloud that you don't even know is going to be there until it actually occurs?'
But there is no active cloud seeding in Arizona. It is becoming more prevalent across the West, and nine U.S. states actively cloud seed: California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming.
SRP has conducted research exploring the feasibility of cloud seeding over the White Mountains, but it was limited to computer models and no cloud seeding occurred.
'SRP is not participating in any cloud seeding flights at this time, and there are no plans in the near future,' said SRP spokesperson Patty Garcia-Likens.
Meanwhile, several states have introduced legislation to ban geoengineering.
Even if the geoengineering ban passes, it doesn't mean the area won't be affected by such activities occurring elsewhere.
'There's no way they can legislate against geoengineering,' Betterton said. 'Because it could take place in California, over the Pacific or in Asia if someone flies an airplane up into the stratosphere and releases sulfur dioxide, it's going to circulate around Earth.'
Arizona legislators question the safety of injecting chemicals into the atmosphere or clouds to alter the weather or climate change, but some environmentalists see it as a distraction from bigger issues.
'To me, it's just so infuriating that they're focusing on this but they won't address climate change, which is modifying weather,' said Sandy Bahr, the director of the Sierra Club's Grand Canyon Chapter.
Hayleigh Evans writes about extreme weather and related topics for The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. Email her with story tips at hayleigh.evans@arizonarepublic.com.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Geoengineering, weather modification spurs Arizona Legislature debate
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump easing environmental rules for space companies
Trump easing environmental rules for space companies

The Hill

time3 days ago

  • The Hill

Trump easing environmental rules for space companies

Energy & Environment The Big Story Trump wants to cut environmental reviews for space industry President Trump signed an executive order Wednesday easing regulations for commercial rocket launches and spaceport development, in a move likely to boost Elon Musk's SpaceX. The order calls for eliminating or expediting environmental reviews for rocket launches. It also seeks to evaluate state and local restrictions on spaceport development, in addition to expediting environmental and administrative reviews for building the infrastructure for launches. 'Ensuring that United States operators can efficiently launch, conduct missions in space, and reenter United States airspace is critical to economic growth, national security, and accomplishing Federal space objectives,' Trump's order reads. It aims to 'substantially' increase commercial space launches and 'novel space activities' by the end of the decade. Environmental advocates were immediately wary of the move. The Center for Biological Diversity slammed the order as 'reckless,' arguing it puts people and wildlife at risk from rockets that often explode and 'wreak devastation on surrounding areas.' 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way,' Jared Margolis, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement. 'This is clearly not in the public interest.' The order will likely be a boon to Musk's SpaceX, one of the biggest players in the commercial space industry. The spacecraft and satellite communications firm has conducted more than 100 launches so far this year. Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Duffy says climate science will 'move aside,' with NASA only focusing on space exploration Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy said Thursday that climate and earth science at the agency will 'move aside' as it refocuses solely on space exploration. Full Story Trump picks Democrat to lead energy regulatory commission a surprising move that passes over the panel's one Republican member. Full Story Humans may have 'locked in' drought-inducing climate pattern: Study Greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans may have 'locked in' a climate pattern responsible for long-term megadrought across the U.S. West, a new study has found. Full Story What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Indiana loses $130 million as EPA cancels low-income solar program (Indianapolis Star) Auditor: Plan To Cool Hawaiʻi Classrooms A '$120 Million Disaster' (Honolulu Civil Beat) What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Trump issues Social Security proclamation President Trump signed a proclamation marking the 90th anniversary of the establishment of Social Security, while boasting changes in his recent tax law aimed at providing relief to seniors. Read more Judge temporarily blocks Medicaid data sharing with ICE officials A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from sharing the personal data of Medicaid enrollees with immigration officials. Read more

NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust
NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust

The Hill

time4 days ago

  • The Hill

NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust

National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya claims the federal government recently cancelled millions of dollars' worth of mRNA research contracts because the general public does not trust the technology. Bhattacharya explained the reason behind the abrupt contract cancellations, first, during an episode of Republican political strategist Steve Bannon's podcast 'War Room' last week and again in an opinion piece recently published in The Washington Post. In the article, Bhattacharya called the mRNA platform a 'promising technology' and acknowledged that it may lead to breakthroughs in treatment for diseases like cancer. 'But as a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust,' he wrote. 'No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.' Bhattacharya's explanation for the administration's pivot away from mRNA technology differs from that of his boss, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy announced last week the agency would wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and cancel $500 million worth of contracts related to the technology. He said that mRNA technologies funded during the pandemic failed to meet current scientific standards and that the federal government would shift its focus to whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms. Bhattacharya expressed concern in the article about mRNA vaccines' ability to direct human cells to produce spike proteins to trigger an immune response. He argues the scientific community does not have a clear understanding of where mRNA product stays in the body, for how long, and whether other proteins are created in the process. Scott Hensley, a microbiology professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine, told STAT that these are also issues with vaccines that use live but weakened viruses like the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, which federal health agencies have deemed safe and effective. 'This is why we complete human clinical studies before vaccines are widely used in humans,' he told the outlet. 'The mRNA and live attenuated vaccine platforms have both proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials.' He blamed public distrust in mRNA on the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandates during the pandemic. Bhattacharya expressed concern in the article about mRNA vaccines' ability to direct human cells to produce spike proteins to trigger an immune response. He argues the scientific community does not have a clear understanding of where the mRNA product stays in the body, for how long, and whether other proteins are created in the process. 'Science isn't propaganda,' he wrote. 'It's humility. And when public health officials stopped communicating with humility, we lost much of the public, an absolute necessity for any vaccine platform.'

Anna Paulina Luna Tells Joe Rogan About Her UFO Experience in Air Force
Anna Paulina Luna Tells Joe Rogan About Her UFO Experience in Air Force

Newsweek

time4 days ago

  • Newsweek

Anna Paulina Luna Tells Joe Rogan About Her UFO Experience in Air Force

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During an interview with Joe Rogan on his eponymous Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Wednesday, U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna recounted her experience with an unidentified flying object (UFO) while serving in the Air Force. Newsweek reached out to Luna's office for comment via email. Why It Matters Luna, a Florida Republican, has been among lawmakers calling for greater transparency from the federal government, including on UFO investigations. Questions about UFOs have captivated the American public for decades. While many people may associate UFOs with aliens, the government has generally focused on whether the objects are from U.S. adversaries and pose national security risks in its investigations. The government has never confirmed the existence of extraterrestrial life, but theories about the possibility of life outside the planet endure. A YouGov poll from September 2024 found that a majority of Americans—53 percent—believe aliens definitely or probably exist. That poll surveyed 1,135 adults from September 17 to September 20, 2024, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points. What To Know On the podcast, Luna, 36, told Rogan that during her time at Portland Air National Guard—where she worked as an airfield manager—she encountered an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP). In efforts to describe a broader range of unexplained sightings, the U.S. government shifted to the term UAP in lieu of UFO, as the latter refers specifically to flying objects. Luna said an airspace incursion occurred one day while she was working. But when she asked a pilot for more information, she said they told her they were not allowed to talk about it, she told Rogan. "No one really wanted to address it, and so from what I gathered, that had likely been a UAP," she said. "So that kind of was my perspective." She said she did not look at it with a "crazy lens of perspective" because she believes "you never know if we're the only ones out there, essentially." U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna attends a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on April 1 in Washington, D.C. U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna attends a House Oversight Subcommittee hearing on April 1 in Washington, asked why she did not assume it could have been another country's military craft, but Luna said the way the pilot discussed it made her believe otherwise. "He didn't want to, from what I gather, get taken off flight status, and he was like, 'I really can't discuss it. We couldn't identify it, essentially.' And it had outperformed them," Luna said. The Florida Republican leads a House Oversight Committee on "disclosure," which focuses on government transparency on matters from UFOs to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. She said the task force was formed after pilots at Eglin Air Force Base came forward to accuse the Air Force of covering up instances of UAP incidents. The panel's investigations have indicated there is technology out there that "would rival what we know currently with physics" and that the U.S. does not have "the ability to reproduce" it. What People Are Saying Luna also said on the podcast: "Based on the photos that I've seen, I'm very confident that there's things out there that have not been created by mankind." The Department of Defense All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) wrote in a June 2024 report: "It is important to underscore that, to date, AARO has discovered no evidence of extraterrestrial beings, activity, or technology." What Happens Next Luna's task force will continue exploring questions about UAPs and other mysteries that have fueled concerns over government transparency.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store