
6 key EU food imports exposed to biodiversity loss and climate change
Commissioned by philanthropic initiative the European Climate Foundation, UK consultants Foresight Transitions examined the vulnerability of staple crops maize, rice and wheat, as well as cocoa, coffee and soy - key commodities for EU agrifood production and exports.
They found that more than half the imports of these six foodstuffs were from climate vulnerable countries with limited resources to adapt. For three - wheat, maize and cocoa - two-thirds of imports come from countries whose biodiversity is deemed not to be intact.
'These aren't just abstract threats,' says lead author of the report, Camilla Hyslop. 'They are already playing out in ways that negatively affect businesses and jobs, as well as the availability and price of food for consumers, and they are only getting worse.'
As the world's biggest producer and exporter of chocolate, it is the EU's chocolate industry - worth an estimated €44 billion - that faces the biggest threat from these twin environmental factors.
Around 97 per cent of chocolate's primary ingredient, cocoa, comes from countries with a low-medium or below climate score, as per the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index. This tool combines a country's vulnerability to climate damages with its access to financial and institutional support.
And 77 per cent of cocoa comes from countries with a medium or below biodiversity rating, according to a ranking of biodiversity intactness from the UK's Natural History Museum, which compares the current abundance of wild species to pre-modern levels.
The researchers mapped trade data from Eurostat onto these two rankings of environmental security for all six commodities.
In the case of cocoa, European imports come from a few main countries in West Africa - Ivory Coast, Ghana, Cameroon, Nigeria - all of which are experiencing overlapping and intensifying climate and biodiversity impacts.
'The European Union has forked out an increasing price for cocoa imports as a result of these environmental pressures, with the total value of imports increasing by 41 per cent over the last year,' says Hyslop.
'The increasing value has also been driven by climate-related increases in the price of sugar, highlighting the environmental 'double whammy' facing not only chocolatiers but other kinds of producers using multiple environmentally-sensitive inputs.'
Chocolate prices have gone up 43 per cent in the last three years, according to a recent analysis by green think tank Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), with 'chocflation' evident on supermarket shelves.
While previous studies have assessed the climate vulnerability of food imports, the new research stands out for its focus on biodiversity loss and how these two environmental factors interact.
'Climate impacts are made worse by declining biodiversity, which leave farms and surrounding ecosystems far less resilient to climate and other shocks,' explains Hyslop.
'Not only are less biodiverse farms less resilient to crop disease - these diseases often emerge due to decreased biodiversity.'
On top of this, yields are diminished by the clearing of native vegetation, which can alter local microclimates. While practices such as monocropping - where a crop like wheat is exclusively grown - deplete the soil on which food production depends.
One response to this rising insecurity in Europe's supply chains is to produce more food on the continent.
But, argues Dr Mark Workman, director of Foresight Transitions and co-author of the report, this 'reshoring' would by itself be a wholly insufficient response.
'Not only would the EU struggle to grow some of these commodities in large quantities, it is facing its own climate and biodiversity threats - not to mention the unpalatable land-use implications of significant reshoring of food production.'
Hyslop underscores the global nature of the climate crisis, too. While higher rainfall in 2024 left cocoa rotting in West Africa, she writes, floods in the UK and France decreased wheat production, and high temperatures in Eastern Europe disrupted maize crops - making imports crucial for food security.
'It is therefore entirely in the self-interest of EU policymakers to get serious about investing in the climate resilience of partner producers as well as overseas trading infrastructure such as ports that support this trade and are also subject to environmental stresses,' adds Workman.
'This is an important message to convey at a time when overseas aid budgets are often being pitted against investments in defence and security - but the truth is they are two sides of the same coin.'
Policy recommendations the report sets out include measures to support smallholder farmers, who supply the majority of cocoa to the EU. And, 'the most obvious' one, strong climate mitigation policies, which will have positive benefits for all supplier countries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
43 minutes ago
- France 24
German gas drive fuels fears of climate backsliding
Chancellor Friedrich Merz's coalition has made reviving Europe's struggling top economy a priority and argues that reliable and affordable energy supplies are crucial for the country's manufacturing titans. But critics charge the bid to boost fossil fuel production is ideologically driven and highlights a shift away from green policies under the new government. Merz leads a coalition that includes his centre-right CDU party and junior partners the centre-left SPD -- but without the Greens, who were in the last administration. The economy ministry, headed by Katherina Reiche of the CDU, is vocally backing a target of building new gas plants with about 20 gigawatts of power production capacity by 2030. Reiche, a former energy company executive, has argued it is important to "move very quickly" towards building the plants "in order to maintain a high level of security of supply in our country". The goal is to have a backup source of power in times there are shortfalls of renewables, which sometimes happens when the sun is not shining or there is not enough wind. Supporters say more supply is needed in the short term as nuclear power has been switched off in Germany and coal should follow suit in the coming years. They argue natural gas -- which emits greenhouse gases but is less polluting than coal -- can bridge the gap until enough renewables come online. Under German climate law, the share of renewable electricity consumed in the country should rise to 80 percent by 2030. It stood at around 55 percent in 2024, according to the federal environment agency. - Energy focus- Earlier this month, the government agreed gas production could begin off a North Sea island in an area straddling the border with the Netherlands, with a Dutch company planning to extract the fossil fuel, sparking condemnation from environmentalists. Plans to build more gas plants are not new, and the previous government also wanted to expand capacity, but the new targets are around double those of the past. Underlining the new government's changing priorities, Reiche's ministry has been renamed the "Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy" -- under the Greens in the previous, SPD-led coalition, it was called the "Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action". She also appeared at one point to question Germany's legally binding target of achieving greenhouse gas neutrality by 2045, sparking tensions with SPD environment minister Carsten Schneider. An economy ministry spokesman told AFP that Reiche "stands by" the current climate goal. "The government is committed to achieving these targets with the political measures at its disposal -- while maintaining Germany's position as an industrial location," he said. 'Dramatic setback' The Greens have regularly attacked Reiche while more than 380,000 people have so far signed a petition by campaign group Campact warning her policies risk "a dramatic setback in climate policy". But criticism is emerging even within the conservatives. The Climate Union, grouping CDU and other conservative politicians, has warned subsidies for new gas plants could push up power costs, the Handelsblatt financial daily reported. Energy think tank Agora Energiewende estimates that only a maximum of 10 gigawatts of extra gas plants would be needed by 2030 to supplement other power sources. "This will ensure security of supply -- even if coal-fired power plants are taken off the grid as planned," Philipp Godron, the head of the group's power programme, told AFP. Meanwhile, questions remain over how quickly the plants can be built, while the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, still needs to give its approval. The economy ministry spokesman told AFP that talks with the EU for putting out tenders for a "significant portion" of the plants were "well-advanced". He also stressed that any new gas-fired plants must be "decarbonised in the long term", for example by switching them to green hydrogen, which was necessary "in view of the decarbonisation of the electricity system and compliance with EU law".

LeMonde
10 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump wields Alaska and Texas gas as global power play
By inviting Vladimir Putin to Alaska on August 15, Donald Trump is putting the territory the United States bought from tsarist Russia in 1867 back on the world's geopolitical map. The 82-kilometer-wide Bering Strait locks the passage from the Pacific to the Arctic, now increasingly free of ice, for the two nuclear powers. Trump is also putting Alaska back on the world energy map. Since taking office, Trump has urged companies to "Drill, baby, drill." His so-called tariff negotiations have pressured allies into buying American liquefied natural gas (LNG): $750 billion over three years from the European Union (EU), $100 billion from South Korea and an unspecified amount from Japan. Meanwhile, Taiwan, the Philippines and Vietnam have expressed interest in US LNG but have not signed binding agreements. These promises and forced expressions of interest are one thing, but the reality on the ground is another. The European pledge, in particular, is completely unrealistic, as we'll get back to later. There are two possible routes to buy natural gas. One is the Gulf of Mexico, where LNG tankers currently depart with Texan shale gas bound for Europe. However, this option is not ideal for Asian buyers, who must sail south of the equator, cross the expensive Panama Canal and then traverse the Pacific.


Euronews
14 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump–Putin talks propel Russian markets to 3-month high
Russian markets are reacting positively to the upcoming visit by President Vladimir Putin to the United States — his first since 2015 — with the MOEX Russia Index climbing above 2,950 points, its highest level since late April. The index initially rose last Wednesday as Putin met with Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow. It then began to climb again as the location of the Trump-Putin summit was announced on Friday. On Tuesday at around 15.15 CEST, the MOEX was trading at 2,959.63, a bump of 1.2% compared to its close at around 2,924.63 on Friday. Investors are hopeful about a diplomatic breakthrough at the upcoming Trump–Putin meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, likely counting on an easing of sanctions or new trade channels being unlocked. The jump was buoyed by Russian energy giants, with Gazprom shares climbing 3.65% and Novatek surged 5.44%, according to the Moscow Times. Geopolitical buzz Geopolitical buzz can swing markets as investors are encouraged by the possibility of conflict resolution or escalation. Just the prospect of high-level talks can trigger climbs in sectors tied to trade, energy or infrastructure. However, uncertainty or lack of results can just as quickly reverse the gains, which could happen if the much-anticipated summit does not produce any tangible results — something that is likely due to the fact that European powers are so far not involved in the talks between Trump and Putin. It also remains unclear how Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be incorporated in the talks, as he and European powers insist there can be no lasting deal without Kyiv agreeing to it as well. Before the 2022 sanctions caused by the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the MOEX Russia Index was trading near record highs above 3,800 points in late 2021, backed by strong oil prices and post-pandemic recovery momentum.