UK lifts ban on Pakistani airlines after improvement in air safety standards
The claim came after a Pakistan International Airlines crash killed 97 people on May 24, 2020, in the southern city of Karachi.
Wednesday's announcement follows a broader international recognition of Pakistan's efforts to improve air safety.
#PIA is all set to resume flights to 🇬🇧
It became possible after adherence to the most stringent flight safety standards, reviewed by the UK's Air Safety Committee. Special thanks to @PakPMO, @KhawajaMAsif, @OfficialPCAA, @ukinpakistan & @JaneMarriottUK for personal interest &…
— PIA (@Official_PIA) July 16, 2025
Earlier this year, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency also lifted its five-year ban, allowing the national flag carrier Pakistan International Airlines to resume direct flights to Europe.
British High Commissioner Jane Marriott said that after 'extensive engagement' between the UK's Air Safety Committee and the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority, restrictions on Pakistani airlines have now been lifted.
However, Ms Marriott said individual airlines will still need to apply for operating permits from the UK Civil Aviation Authority.
'I'm grateful to aviation experts in both the UK and Pakistan for their collaborative work to meet international safety standards,' she said.
'While it will take time for flights to resume, once the logistics are in place, I look forward to using a Pakistani carrier when visiting family and friends.'
The high commission emphasised that decisions on delisting countries or carriers from the UK Air Safety List are made through an independent safety process overseen by the Air Safety Committee.
With more than 1.6 million people of Pakistani heritage living in the UK, and thousands of British nationals residing in Pakistan, it said the move will help families to reconnect and potentially boost bilateral trade ties.
Pakistan's defence minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif welcomed the decision.
Speaking at a televised news conference on Wednesday, he attributed the ban to what he described as 'baseless' remarks made by former aviation minister Ghulam Sarwar Khan.
He said Mr Khan's claim tarnished the country's image and triggered significant financial losses for Pakistan International Airlines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
18 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Popular sweets brand has brought back nostalgic flavour & it's already on supermarket shelves
There's a lot of love for this treat SO SWEET Popular sweets brand has brought back nostalgic flavour & it's already on supermarket shelves Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A POPULAR sweet originally launched as a one-off celebration for Valentine's Day has been brought back to the market for good. The tasty treats are already being snapped up on supermarket shelves. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 The favourites are now on sale for good after calls from the public The decision by British sweet maker Swizzels to bring back Squashies Love Hearts comes after demand from the public. The beloved classic costs from just £1.15 a packet and are now available in Morrison's, Sainbury's and Asda. Swizzels, which manufactures the sweet, is the UK's largest family-owned independent sweet maker. Texture and shape It is also one of the few confectionary makers still to make sweets in the UK. The sweet's unusual mix of texture and shape proved a hit with consumers after its launch for Valentine's Day in 2012. Squashies Love Hearts mix together the soft and foamy texture of Squashies with the well-known design of Love Hearts, which has been used on everything from T-shirts to birthday cards. They are now available in six fruity flavours, including Pineapple, Lime and Blackcurrant. Other available flavours include Lemon, Cherry, and Orange. Clare Lynch, senior brand manager at Swizzels, said the company was prompted to bring the sweets back for good following public demand. "What began as a limited-edition launch for Valentine's Day has resulted in one of our most requested products to date and we couldn't ignore the calls from consumers for the return of this iconic combination," said Clare. The sweet manufacturer has also launched its own set of Squashies Love Hearts emojis to commemorate their return to stores. Walkers launches two new permanent crisp flavours in UK stores for first time in decades Sweet makers have realised bringing back brands that were once popular with the public but since discontinued can prove to be a hit with consumers. Iconic retro sweets Opal Fruits, for example, have been spotted on supermarket shelves for the first time in more than 27 years. The beloved 1980s classic costs just 31p to buy and was infamously discontinued by its manufacturer years ago. Opal Fruits were one of the nation's most popular sweets. The soft, fruit-flavoured taffy products first hit the market in 1959 and came in a range of delicious flavours. A touch of flavour Each pack contained blackcurrant, lemon and lime, orange and strawberry treats. However, The Wrigley Company – the products manufacturer – changed the name of the product to Starburst. Opal Fruits are only available in their original packaging as special edition promotions. Aldi has also brought back an iconic retro sweet that shoppers remember having when they were kids. Fritt Chewy Candy bars have been spotted on shelves at the discount supermarket. They're currently selling for 95p each.
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Absa CEO targets retail growth in South Africa and scale on the continent
JOHANNESBURG, Aug 18 (Reuters) - The CEO of South Africa's Absa Group (ABGJ.J), opens new tab says he will focus on modernising and building its retail banking business, promising stability after becoming the lender's sixth new head since longstanding chief Maria Ramos left in 2019. South Africa's third-largest bank by assets has been trying to innovate and improve performance since splitting from former British parent Barclays over the three years to 2020, but the churning of CEOs has weighed on Absa's profitability. Following Maria Ramos' retirement in 2019 after a decade leading the bank, it was headed by two other permanent and three interim CEOs before Kenny Fihla joined the lender in June. "There's no doubt that our retail business in South Africa was effectively trapped in a time (when) others were innovating and getting better ways of delivering to the client," Fihla said in an interview on Monday. "We were stuck in a particular era." In June, the bank reversed its former CEO Arrie Rautenbach's strategy of splitting its retail banking business into three units, instead merging them into one. "We're starting to see some early wins (in our retail business) in terms of the growth in client numbers and the growth in the number of clients who are transacting with us from the digital platform," Fihla said. "Once we have appointed permanent leaders to run all of these businesses, I think we are likely to see an increase in the pace of execution and far greater momentum developing going into 2026." Areas of focus for the bank include enhancing mobile and digital platforms and embedding artificial intelligence. It has also introduced value-added services, enhanced its rewards programme and added financial coaching tools, it said in a statement. On the rest of its Africa portfolio of 11 countries, Fihla wants to increase the bank's market share and scale and also look to merge its two businesses in Tanzania. "We'll also be looking at other larger markets where we do not have a presence," he said. In Nigeria, where the bank has a representative office, "we'd want to do more," Fihla said. "But the environment must be right before we can think about significant scaling up." ($1 = 17.5654 rand)
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Reform has to distance itself from extremists
According to the National – a worrying phrase, I admit, given the Scottish newspaper's obsessive adulation of anyone pro-Scottish independence and its obsessive hostility to anyone who opposes it – this weekend saw a Scottish Reform councillor share a platform with a member of a far-right group at a protest outside a Falkirk hotel housing asylum seekers. What is most interesting about this story is not the protest itself, or even the Reform councillor's presence. It is the response of Reform to one of its councillors sharing a platform with this person and saying or doing nothing about it. Despite the widespread labelling of anyone who believes that our borders should be controlled as far right, and despite the usual bias of the National, the facts it has reported seem clear. At the protest, Claire Mackie-Brown shared a platform with one Richard McFarlane, a member of Patriotic Alternative, which describes itself as a 'ethno-nationalist organisation that campaigns for the rights and wellbeing of White Britons.' Last year, the government's anti-extremism advisor described Patriotic Alternative as 'a racist and anti-Semitic far-right group founded in 2019 by former BNP youth leader Mark Collett.' Cllr Mackie-Brown can be forgiven if she had no idea who McFarlane was when he began to speak. But once he did, no one could have been in any doubt about his views. In his seven-minute speech he asserted that, 'we need to give them the fingers, and say we are white, we are British, we are proud'. He concluded: 'Keep Britain white, keep Britain British.' According to the protest organiser, neither the Reform councillor nor the Patriotic Alternative member were invited to speak: 'The microphone was open to anyone who wished to share their personal concerns or experiences. No speakers were formally invited or endorsed by the organisers it was a platform for local people. If individuals with affiliations to political groups or outside organisations chose to speak, that was entirely their choice and not something we had pre-arranged or promoted.' That's fair enough, and in those circumstances it's easy to see how a local residents' protest was overrun by the far-right. But that is far from being a one-off. One of the recurring themes of these protests up and down the country is how they attract the far-right. Which makes it all the more obvious, and all the more important, that mainstream politicians from mainstream parties should have a serious and convincing response when the far-right are present. At the very least, that needs to involve denouncing the racism and the white nationalism of extremists. Otherwise, it becomes easy to label all the protests as being far-right, and to label representatives of parties such as Reform which stand alongside them as being part of the far-right. As far as one can tell from reports, which have not been contradicted, that did not happen this weekend in Falkirk. Cllr Mackie-Brown appears to have said nothing in response. But while Cllr Mackie-Brown may have been out of her depth and blindsided by what she heard, one might expect that Reform itself would have a ready-made response to such issues. And it has: but the response is useless. Reform told the National: 'Councillor Claire Brown was there to represent Reform and her concerned constituents, she is not responsible for the other people attending and will continue to stand up for residents on this extremely important issue.' Of course she isn't responsible for the other speakers. No one has suggested she is. But as a representative of Reform, she – and anyone else in a similar situation – has to react. You can't simply pretend you are in a bubble, removed from scene, when someone you are standing with is ranting 'Keep Britain white.' It's a similar point to what has been happening on the 'Free Palestine' hate marches. The argument is made that the majority present are ordinary, decent people simply concerned about the deaths in Gaza. They may indeed be. But if you turn up at a march to discover that a proportion of your fellow marchers are Jew haters, chanting anti-Semitic slogans and waving anti-Semitic banners, then you have a choice. You can leave, distancing yourself. Or – as has been happening – you can continue on the march and, even worse, come back the following week, again saying and doing nothing to condemn the hate around you. And in doing so you not only remove any claim to decency, you become part of the problem. Reform has the same choice to make. Does it pretend that it is not part of the same protest when the far-right arrives? Or does it denounce and condemn racists for leaching onto a legitimate protest by ordinary and decent local residents? This will be a recurring theme for Reform as its elected officials and members – entirely legitimately – attend protests outside asylum hotels and are joined by far-right agitators. Unless Reform finds a way to properly distance itself from them, it will be tarred with their brush.
