logo
Did light exist at the beginning of the universe?

Did light exist at the beginning of the universe?

Yahoo23-06-2025
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Nowadays, the dark of night is interspersed with the light of stars. But before the stars were born, did light shine at the beginning of the universe?
The short answer is "no." But the long answer reveals light's extraordinary journey. At first, the early universe's light was "trapped," and it took several hundred thousand years for it to escape. Then, it took about 100 million years for stars to form.
By examining the speed and direction in which galaxies were moving, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered the universe was expanding. This 1929 discovery suggested that the cosmos was once smaller, with scientists eventually calculating that the entire universe was concentrated into one, infinitely dense point about 13.8 billion years ago, until the Big Bang happened.
"With the Big Bang, space was created and expanded, along with everything in the universe," Andrew Layden, chair of physics and astronomy at Bowling Green State University in Ohio, told Live Science.
The only way all the matter that now makes up the universe could fit in a tiny spot "is if it was energy at that time," Layden said. Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 revealed that energy and mass can be interchangeable, Layden explained.
As the universe expanded, the density of its energy decreased, and it cooled. The first particles then began to form within the first second after the Big Bang, according to Las Cumbres Observatory. These included the photons that make up light, as well as the protons, neutrons and electrons that make up atoms. By about three minutes after the Big Bang, protons and neutrons could fuse together to create the nuclei of atoms such as helium, according to NASA.
"Think of fog and dew," Layden said. "Particles in a high-energy state are dispersed like water in fog, and when the energy gets low enough, they can condense out like droplets of dew."
Related: Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?
However, although photons of light existed since the first second after the Big Bang, they could not yet shine across the universe. This is because the early cosmos was so hot that "electrons were moving too fast for atomic nuclei to hold them in orbit around them," Layden said. "The universe was just this very hot, dense soup."
All the electrons zipping around freely in the early universe meant that light could not move around very much. "As light tried to travel in a straight line during this time, it always bumped into electrons, so it could not go very far," Layden said.
A similar situation is found within the sun, Srinivasan Raghunathan, a cosmologist at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, told Live Science. "You can imagine a photon of light created by nuclear reactions at the center of the sun trying to come out to the sun's surface," he said. "The center of the sun is extremely hot, and so there are a lot of free electrons present. This means light cannot travel in straight lines."
The distance from the center of the sun to its surface is about 432,450 miles (696,000 kilometers). The speed of light in a vacuum is about 186,000 miles per second (300,000 km/s), but in the sun, "it takes about 1 million to 2 million years for light to escape from the center of the sun to its surface," Raghunathan said.
However, about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the expansion of the universe let the cosmos cool enough for atomic nuclei to glom onto electrons. "When that happens, all those electrons are no longer free," Layden said. "This happens at about 3,000 Kelvin [4,940 degrees Fahrenheit, or 2,725 degrees Celsius], the surface temperature of a coolish reddish star."
Within a short number of years, "everything goes from being a hot dense soup to a clear universe where light can travel freely," Layden said. "At that moment, the first photons in the universe can escape."
The light typical of the universe when it was about 3,000 kelvins was in near-infrared to visible wavelengths, Layden noted. However, as the cosmos expanded over the course of more than 13 billion years and cooled to an average temperature of about 2.73 Kelvin (minus 455 F, or minus 270 C), the universe's first light stretched to longer microwave wavelengths.
Astronomers first detected this leftover radiation from the Big Bang, called the cosmic microwave background, in 1964.
RELATED MYSTERIES
—What is the smallest particle in the universe? (What about the largest?)
—What would happen if the speed of light were much lower?
—Where do electrons get energy to spin around an atom's nucleus?
Analyzing these microwaves has yielded many insights. For instance, the gravitational pull of galaxies can distort light — a phenomenon called gravitational lensing. Examining the amount of distortion the cosmic microwave background has experienced at different points in the sky can help scientists reconstruct the large-scale structure of the universe — the arrangement of galaxies and the giant voids between them across the cosmos, Raghunathan said.
After the light from the Big Bang was released, the universe experienced a period known as the cosmic dark ages. Eventually, after millions of years, the gravitational pull of clouds of gas led these clumps of matter to collapse in on themselves.
"This created the first generation of stars, and the universe had galaxies full of stars by about 1 billion years after the Big Bang, beginning the cosmic dawn," Layden said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alfie Allen has a (new role on) 3 Body Problem.
Alfie Allen has a (new role on) 3 Body Problem.

The Verge

time28 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Alfie Allen has a (new role on) 3 Body Problem.

Dive into the world of Netflix's 3 Body Problem See all Stories Posted Jul 31, 2025 at 5:28 PM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Charles Pulliam-Moore Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Books Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Entertainment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Netflix Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Streaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All TV Shows

Radioactive Wasp Nest Found in Decommissioned Nuclear Weapons Plant
Radioactive Wasp Nest Found in Decommissioned Nuclear Weapons Plant

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Radioactive Wasp Nest Found in Decommissioned Nuclear Weapons Plant

As if wasps couldn't get any scarier, a chilling discovery near Aiken, South Carolina, suggests they're comfortable making their nest in a former nuclear bomb facility. On July 3, employees conducting a regular checkup of radiation levels at the Savannah River Site (SRS)—a former nuclear weapons production facility dating back to the 1950s—found themselves staring down at something that probably should not have been there. That something was a wasp nest measuring more than 10 times the federally permitted radiation limit. Nearly three weeks after this bizarre discovery, Department of Energy (DOE) officials published a report on the incident, in which they assured local residents that no new leaks had been found in the waste tanks. Rather, the nest likely became radioactive from leftover contamination dating back to when the site was fully operational. As per procedure, the workers sprayed the nest with insecticide and bagged it—along with the dead bees—as radioactive waste, according to the report. 'The delay in reporting was to allow time for reviewing previous wildlife contamination for consistency in reporting criteria,' officials said. 'No further action was required in the field. There is no impact from [the] event on other activities and operations.' The SRS was built in the early 1950s to produce tritium and plutonium-239 for the manufacture of nuclear weapons. Close to the turn of the century, the U.S. government transitioned the plant from a weapons manufacturer to a producer of fuel for nuclear plants, in addition to cleaning up decommissioned structures. Overall, DOE and its contractor Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), which manages the site, concluded that the incident, while understandably unsettling, shouldn't be of significant concern to the public 'Upon discovery of the contaminated nest, the immediate area was secured and surveyed; no contamination was found in the area,' SRMC told the Aiken Standard. 'There were no impacts to workers, the environment, or the public.' The company also said that further surveys of the nest revealed there weren't any wasps left on the nest, adding that even if there were, the individual insects 'would have significantly lower levels of contamination.' Watchdogs of the site aren't so impressed by the official explanations. Savannah River Site Watch criticized the report for being incomplete, failing to address where the contamination came from, how the wasps encountered the radiation, and, most importantly, whether a yet-uncovered leak could have left another radioactive wasp nest in the vicinity. 'I'm as mad as a hornet that SRS didn't explain where the radioactive waste came from or if there is some kind of leak from the waste tanks that the public should be aware of,' Tom Clements, executive director of Savannah River Watch, told CBS News. Identifying the type of wasp nest could have revealed the source of the contamination, Clements said, since some wasps build nests from dirt while others use materials that can point to specific locations. It's unclear, however, whether this apparent lack of effort reflects ignorance or negligence on the part of the officials.

Clouds force last-minute delay for astronaut launch to the International Space Station
Clouds force last-minute delay for astronaut launch to the International Space Station

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Clouds force last-minute delay for astronaut launch to the International Space Station

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — Thick clouds prompted SpaceX to call off Thursday's planned launch of four astronauts to the International Space Station for NASA. The countdown was halted at the one-minute, 7-second mark. SpaceX's next launch attempt from Kennedy Space Center is Friday, although the weather forecast is less favorable. The U.S., Japanese and Russian crew will spend at least six months at the space station, replacing colleagues launched in March as the fill-ins for NASA's two stuck astronauts. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who's temporarily leading NASA, was at Kennedy Space Center for the launch attempt. The morning started out with ideal weather, but the wind picked up and the clouds rolled in. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. By Marcia Dunn, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store