
Boulder terror attack suspect appears in federal court; judge finds probable cause to move forward with hate crime charge
The man charged with committing a terror attack in Boulder appeared in federal court in Denver on Wednesday. Mohamed Soliman is facing dozens of state and federal charges, including a hate crime charge.
The judge found probable cause to move forward with that federal hate crime charge.
Investigators say Soliman, 45, threw Molotov cocktails at a group of people marching in support of Israeli hostages on the Pearl Street Mall on June 1. Several people were hospitalized with severe burns. Authorities consider 15 people and a dog victims of the attack.
Soliman will be back in state court for a hearing next month.
Soliman allegedly planned the attack for a year and was driven by a desire "to kill all Zionist people."
His defense attorney, David Kraut, urged Magistrate Judge Kathryn Starnella not to allow the case to move forward. Kraut said Soliman's anti-Zionist statements and his online search for a "Zionist" event to attack showed he targeted the demonstrators because of their perceived political views -- their assumed support for the nation of Israel and the political movement of Zionism. An attack motivated by someone's political views is not considered a hate crime under federal law.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Hindman said the government alleged that the attack was a hate crime because Soliman targeted people based on their national origin -- their perceived connection to Israel. Prosecutors are not alleging that Soliman targeted demonstrators, who carried Israeli and American flags, because he believed they were Jewish, noting that he has said that not all Jewish people are Zionists.
Starnella acknowledged that some of the evidence undercut the government's allegation that the demonstrators were targeted because of their perceived national origin but said other evidence supported it. At this stage, the government gets the benefit of the doubt on questions about evidence, she said.
Investigators say Soliman told them he had intended to kill the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration, but he threw just two of his over two dozen Molotov cocktails while yelling "Free Palestine." Soliman told investigators he tried to buy a gun but was not able to because he was not a "legal citizen."
Mohamed Soliman in federal court earlier this month
Robyn Cochran-Ragland
Federal authorities say Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been living in the U.S. illegally with his family.
During his Wednesday appearance, Soliman's lower right arm and hand were wrapped in a thick bandage, with handcuffs around his wrists. Police previously said he was taken to a hospital for unspecified injuries right after the attack. FBI agent Timothy Chan testified at Wednesday's hearing that Soliman burned himself as he threw the second Molotov cocktail.
Soliman did not carry out his full plan "because he got scared and had never hurt anyone before," police wrote in an arrest affidavit.
Soliman is charged separately in state court with multiple counts of attempted murder, assault and offenses related to more than a dozen additional Molotov cocktails police say he did not use.
Run for Their Lives, the group targeted in the attack, started in October 2023 after Hamas militants from the Gaza Strip stormed into Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 others hostage.
Federal authorities are seeking to deport Soliman's wife and their five children. They range in age from 4 to 18 years old and are being held in an immigration center in Texas, according to court documents.
The White House said in a June 3 social media post that one-way tickets had been purchased for the family members, adding: "Final boarding call coming soon."
A Colorado federal judge temporarily blocked their deportation with a restraining order on June 4. The case has since been transferred to Texas, where a federal judge on Wednesday extended the restraining order another two weeks.
Lawyers for the family had asked to keep the order in place, even though government lawyers said in court documents that the family would be deported under the normal process, not an expedited one because the lawyers did not address the earlier comments from the White House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump Announces Special Change To White House
President Trump Announces Special Change To White House originally appeared on The Spun. President Donald Trump has officially made changes to the White House grounds. Well before Trump assumed office in 2017, presidents always had their say on what type of decorations would be added to the White House. That being said, the 47th president of the United States has elected to install a pair of nearly 100-foot-tall flagpoles. Trump shared this news on Tuesday night with his social media followers. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I will be putting up two beautiful Flag Poles on both sides of the White House, North and South Lawns. It is a GIFT from me of something which was always missing from this magnificent place," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The digging and placement of the poles will begin at 7:30 A.M. EST, tomorrow morning. Flags will be raised at approximately 11 A.M. EST. These are the most magnificent poles made – They are tall, tapered, rust proof, rope inside the pole, and of the highest quality. Hopefully, they will proudly stand at both sides of the White House for many years to come!" The first flag was raised on the South Lawn this Wednesday afternoon. Several members of Trump's family were in attendance for this ceremony. "They've needed flagpoles for 200 years," Trump said, via Fox News. "It was something I've often said." Trump said he paid for these two flagpoles. He told reporters that each one cost about $50,000 each to complete. Apparently, that's how important this cause was to him. It'll be interesting to see if these flagpoles stick around after Trump's term is Trump Announces Special Change To White House first appeared on The Spun on Jun 18, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arrest made in slaying of 78-year-old Vietnam veteran
FORT PIERCE – Fort Pierce Police on June 18 reported the arrest of a son in connection with the 2022 homicide of his father, 78-year-old Jorge Fuentes Sr., the agency stated. Jorge Alberto Fuentes, Jr., 31, was arrested by police and the U.S. Marshals Service Task Force in Palm Beach County on a first degree murder charge following the death of his father, a Vietnam veteran. The elder Fuentes was found May 6, 2022, in his home in the 1200 block of Wyoming Avenue with several gunshot wounds. Juliana Walker, police spokesperson, said no one from the police department was available to speak about the case June 18. Police did not provide information about why they believe Fuentes Jr. is responsible for his father's death. Jorge Fuentes Sr. lived in the Wyoming Avenue house south of Virginia Avenue for about 30 years. He was born in El Salvador and came to the United States in the mid 1960s, and was drafted into the U.S. Army, one of his sons, James Fuentes, has said. James Fuentes and his brother, John Fuentes, have said their father had a second wife and additional children. James Fuentes has said his father and the second wife were estranged and in the process of divorcing. John Fuentes, 53, on June 18 said the son arrested in the incident is the first born from his father's second marriage. John Fuentes said he feels "great" about the arrest. "I'm just hoping that everyone else that was involved gets caught as well and is brought to justice," John Fuentes said. "This is definitely some closure, not fully, but definitely the beginning of some closure." The elder Fuentes served in Vietnam, receiving a Purple Heart, James Fuentes has said. Vehicle 'cloning' investigation: Vehicle 'cloning' case; 3 arrests in Indian River, St. Lucie counties 'Extremely hardworking': Man dead after motorcycle crash in PSL remembered 'He was involved in the Tet Offensive,' James Fuentes said. 'I remember him telling me that, and he got discharged in '68.' The Tet Offensive, which began in early 1968, involved a massive series of coordinated attacks by Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces against many areas throughout South Vietnam. On April 5, 2023, a memorial service for Jorge Fuentes Sr. was held at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. The cemetery is the final resting place for more than 400,000 active duty service members, veterans and their families. Will Greenlee is a breaking news reporter for TCPalm. Follow Will on X @OffTheBeatTweet or reach him by phone at 772-267-7926. E-mail him at This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: Man jailed after police accused him of killing his 78-year-old father
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP senators back up Trump on Israel-Iran conflict as MAGA base splits on issue
Senate Republicans largely lined up behind President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict between Iran and Israel and said they trusted Trump's judgment on whether the United States ought to involve itself. Trump said again Wednesday that he has not decided whether the U.S. should get more involved in the He signaled to reporters that he would decide at the last moment, stating he'd make the decision 'one second before.' The issue of getting more involved in the conflict has divided Trump's MAGA base, with some pointing to his campaign promise to keep America out of foreign wars. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a defense hawk who said he spoke to Trump last night, endorsed the use of force if diplomatic efforts fail. "Either you want them to have a nuclear weapon, or you don't," Graham said. "And if you don't, if diplomacy fails, you use force." MORE: Israel and Iran are waging an existential battle. What does it mean for the US?: ANALYSIS Most Republicans said that they agreed with Trump that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. "I think this is something on which the entire world can agree: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, or the ability to deliver a nuclear warhead, period," Sen. John Kennedy said. "American foreign policy is always a balance between ... between values and interests. The value here is obvious to everyone. Iran cannot have a bomb. It's just unthinkable, and I support the president unconditionally on that," Kennedy said. Sen. Mike Rounds said there is evidence that Iran was getting closer to building a nuclear weapon. "If Israel has a plan which is appropriate to take care of the problem, then we don't need to be there, but we should never take or eliminate options that are available to the president in exercising his authority as the commander-in-chief," Rounds said. Sen. Kevin Cramer said he would support Trump's decision if he decided to enter the conflict, but would also support a decision to instead "assist Israel in getting the job done." "Iran's made that really crystal clear. They pledged to wipe out the United States of America. I prefer not to let them get here," Cramer said. "I prefer preemptive prevention of war rather than having to end one after it gets to our soil, right?" MORE: Israel-Iran live updates Cramer said Trump has been handling the crisis "brilliantly"and applauded Trump's suggestion that he may or may not get involved. "I think that's pretty honest, right? I may or I may not. I think that that the element of of surprise, if you will, is maintained by an answer that doesn't tell you what he's going to do," he said. "It'd be crazy for the president to give a warning, if you will, of what he may do." Both Republicans and Democrats said they would like Congress to have a role in determining whether the U.S. gets involved in the conflict, but Republicans were much less forceful. "I would love to see Congress have a role, but we certainly don't have time in the midst of what we all see going on for Congress to sit and cogitate for six or eight months," Kennedy said. Democrats, on the other hand, said Trump should get Congress' approval before taking any military action. MORE: Trump on his 'unconditional surrender' demand to Iran: 'I've had it' "At some point, the president must come to Congress if there is to be active, kinetic military involvement that constitutes war. That's the Constitution, Sen. Richard Blumenthal said. "And I believe that the president has to face accountability at some point, for the use of military force in combat, in a war. And the question is, when that point is." Other Democrats said the U.S. should be trying to de-escalate the conflict rather than inflame it. "We don't need to escalate in Iran. That doesn't make anyone in the Middle East safer, and it certainly doesn't make the United States any safer right now, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said. "The role of the United States should be to help de-escalate, to push for negotiations, not to try to set more things afire."