logo
Wall Street Bulls Look Optimistic About Duolingo (DUOL): Should You Buy?

Wall Street Bulls Look Optimistic About Duolingo (DUOL): Should You Buy?

Yahoo21-05-2025

When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?
Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL).
Duolingo currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.94, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 18 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.94 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.
Of the 18 recommendations that derive the current ABR, nine are Strong Buy and one is Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 50% and 5.6% of all recommendations.
Check price target & stock forecast for Duolingo here>>>While the ABR calls for buying Duolingo, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.
Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.
In other words, their interests aren't always aligned with retail investors, rarely indicating where the price of a stock could actually be heading. Therefore, the best use of this information could be validating your own research or an indicator that has proven to be highly successful in predicting a stock's price movement.
Zacks Rank, our proprietary stock rating tool with an impressive externally audited track record, categorizes stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), and is an effective indicator of a stock's price performance in the near future. Therefore, using the ABR to validate the Zacks Rank could be an efficient way of making a profitable investment decision.
Although both Zacks Rank and ABR are displayed in a range of 1-5, they are different measures altogether.
The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.
Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.
On the other hand, earnings estimate revisions are at the core of the Zacks Rank. And empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.
Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.
Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.
Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for Duolingo, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 10.3% over the past month to $2.92.
Analysts' growing optimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to soar in the near term.
The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for Duolingo. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>
Therefore, the Buy-equivalent ABR for Duolingo may serve as a useful guide for investors.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NPWR Deadline: Rosen Law Firm Urges NET Power, Inc. (NYSE: NPWR) Stockholders with Losses in Excess of $100K to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights
NPWR Deadline: Rosen Law Firm Urges NET Power, Inc. (NYSE: NPWR) Stockholders with Losses in Excess of $100K to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights

Business Wire

time3 hours ago

  • Business Wire

NPWR Deadline: Rosen Law Firm Urges NET Power, Inc. (NYSE: NPWR) Stockholders with Losses in Excess of $100K to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds investors that a shareholder filed a class action on behalf of purchasers of securities of NET Power, Inc. (NYSE: NPWR, between June 9, 2023 and March 7, 2025. NET Power is a clean energy technology company. For more information, submit a form, email attorney Phillip Kim, or give us a call at 866-767-3653. The Allegations: Rosen Law Firm is Investigating the Allegations that NET Power, Inc. (NYSE: NPWR) Misled Investors Regarding its Business Operations. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) NET Power was unlikely to complete Project Permian (NET's efforts to develop its first utility-scale plant) on schedule, and the project was likely to be significantly more expensive than defendants had represented, because of, inter alia, supply chain issues and numerous site- and region-specific challenges; (2) accordingly, defendants' projections regarding the time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were unrealistic; (3) the increased time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were likely to have a significant negative impact on NET's business and financial results; and (4) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against NET Power, Inc. Shareholders who want to serve as lead plaintiff for the class must file their motions with the court by June 17, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here. All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses. About Rosen Law Firm: Some law firms issuing releases about this matter do not actually litigate securities class actions. Rosen Law Firm does. Rosen Law Firm is a recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improving corporate governance structures, and holding company executives accountable for their wrongdoing. Since its inception, Rosen Law Firm has obtained over $1 billion for shareholders. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

QFIN or SYM: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?
QFIN or SYM: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

QFIN or SYM: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Investors looking for stocks in the Technology Services sector might want to consider either Qifu Technology, Inc. (QFIN) or Symbotic Inc. (SYM). But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now? We'll need to take a closer look. There are plenty of strategies for discovering value stocks, but we have found that pairing a strong Zacks Rank with an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system produces the best returns. The proven Zacks Rank emphasizes companies with positive estimate revision trends, and our Style Scores highlight stocks with specific traits. Qifu Technology, Inc. and Symbotic Inc. are sporting Zacks Ranks of #1 (Strong Buy) and #5 (Strong Sell), respectively, right now. This means that QFIN's earnings estimate revision activity has been more impressive, so investors should feel comfortable with its improving analyst outlook. But this is just one factor that value investors are interested in. Value investors also tend to look at a number of traditional, tried-and-true figures to help them find stocks that they believe are undervalued at their current share price levels. Our Value category highlights undervalued companies by looking at a variety of key metrics, including the popular P/E ratio, as well as the P/S ratio, earnings yield, cash flow per share, and a variety of other fundamentals that have been used by value investors for years. QFIN currently has a forward P/E ratio of 6.38, while SYM has a forward P/E of 133.59. We also note that QFIN has a PEG ratio of 0.57. This metric is used similarly to the famous P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also takes into account the stock's expected earnings growth rate. SYM currently has a PEG ratio of 4.45. Another notable valuation metric for QFIN is its P/B ratio of 2.10. The P/B is a method of comparing a stock's market value to its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. By comparison, SYM has a P/B of 37.63. Based on these metrics and many more, QFIN holds a Value grade of A, while SYM has a Value grade of F. QFIN is currently sporting an improving earnings outlook, which makes it stick out in our Zacks Rank model. And, based on the above valuation metrics, we feel that QFIN is likely the superior value option right now. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Qifu Technology, Inc. (QFIN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Symbotic Inc. (SYM) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.公布2025會計年度第一季財務業績
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.公布2025會計年度第一季財務業績

Business Wire

timea day ago

  • Business Wire

Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.公布2025會計年度第一季財務業績

德州斯普林--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(美國商業資訊)-- Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPIH)今天公布了截至2025年4月30日的第一季財務業績。 總裁兼執行長Saleh Sagr指出:「第一季銷售額為4670萬美元,較去年同期的3430萬美元成長1240萬美元,增幅36.2%。歸屬於普通股的淨收入為500萬美元,較上年第一季的140萬美元成長360萬美元,增幅達243%。」 Sagr先生繼續說道:「目前未完成訂單為1.311億美元,相較2025年1月31日的1.381億美元減少700萬美元。然而,相較2024年4月30日的6310萬美元,該公司的未完成訂單大幅增加6800萬美元,增幅達108%。我們對現有未完成訂單水準感到鼓舞,其仍為去年第一季末報告之未完成訂單水準的兩倍以上。」 總裁兼執行長Saleh Sagr表示:「第一季業績代表公司實現了前所未見的業務表現,無論是銷售額還是歸屬於普通股的淨收入,均為2017年從MFRI轉變為Perma-Pipe以來第一季的最高水準。此外,第一季歸屬於普通股的淨收入約占公司2024會計年度全年業績的55%。」 Sagr先生評論道:「我們對各市場的業務活動水準感到滿意,這推動了第一財季整體銷售額和收益的成長。此外,美洲和中東及北非(MENA)地區的業績表現令人振奮,兩個地區在第一季取得了不相上下的業績。」 Sagr先生總結道:「公司第一季業績的強勁表現為2025會計年度剩餘季度提供了顯著的發展動力。我們認為公司已做好充分準備,將繼續利用這一動力,進一步參與MENA地區的發展計畫,並在北美地區取得更多市場佔有率。」 2025會計年度第一季業績 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,淨銷售額分別為4670萬美元和3430萬美元。增加的1240萬美元(增幅36%)主要是由於中東和北美的銷售量增加。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,毛利分別為1670萬美元(占淨銷售額的36%)和1050萬美元(占淨銷售額的31%)。增加的620萬美元主要是由於業務量增加以及產品組合帶來的更高利潤率。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,一般和行政支出分別為770萬美元和610萬美元。增加的160萬美元是由於本季度薪資支出和專業服務費的增加。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,銷售支出保持穩定,分別為110萬美元和120萬美元。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,淨利息支出保持穩定,分別為40萬美元和50萬美元。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,其他支出保持穩定,均低於10萬美元。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,公司的有效稅率(ETR)分別為21%和30%。ETR的變動是由於各司法管轄區的盈虧構成不同。 截至2025年4月30日的三個月和2024年4月30日的三個月,歸屬於普通股的淨收入分別為500萬美元和140萬美元。增加的360萬美元主要是由於本季度銷售量增加以及更好的專案執行。 關於Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.(簡稱「公司」)是針對石油和天然氣採集、區域供熱和製冷以及其他應用的預絕緣管道和洩漏偵測系統的全球領導者。公司利用其廣泛的工程和製造專長開發管道解決方案,以解決多種液體安全高效運輸的複雜挑戰。公司總計在六個國家的14個據點經營業務。 前瞻性陳述 本新聞稿中包含的某些陳述和其他資訊可以透過使用前瞻性術語來辨識,構成《1933年證券法》(修訂版)第27A條和《1934年證券交易法》(修訂版)第21E條所定義的「前瞻性陳述」,並受到其中包含的安全港條款的約束,包括但不限於有關公司未來預期業績和營運的陳述。這些陳述應被視為受到公司營運和業務環境中存在的許多風險和不確定性的影響。這些風險和不確定因素包括但不限於以下內容:(i)石油和天然氣價格的波動及其對公司產品客戶訂單量的影響;(ii)公司以優惠價格購買原物料並與供應商保持良好關係的能力;(iii)使用公司產品的政府專案支出減少,以及公司的非政府客戶在流動性和獲得資本資金方面面臨挑戰;(iv)公司償還債務和續延即將到期的國際信貸便利的能力;(v)公司有效執行策略計畫以及實現持續盈利和正現金流的能力;(vi)公司收取與中東專案有關的長期應收帳款的能力;(vii)公司解讀稅收法規和立法變化的能力;(viii)公司利用其淨經營虧損結轉的能力;(ix)由於公司在「超時」確認收入時估計不準確,導致以前記錄的收入和利潤逆轉;(x)公司未能建立和維護有效的財務報告內部控制;(xi)公司產品的訂單接收、執行、交付和驗收時間;(xii)公司就大額合約的進度帳單安排進行成功談判的能力;(xiii)現有競爭對手的激進定價以及新競爭對手進入公司經營的市場;(xiv)公司製造無潛在缺失產品的能力,以及向可能為公司提供有缺失材料的供應商追償的能力;(xv)公司未完成訂單中訂單的減少或取消;(xvi)公司國際業務營運特有的風險和不確定性;(xvii)公司吸引和留住高階管理人員和關鍵員工的能力;(xviii)公司實現成長計畫預期效益的能力;(xix)流行病和其他公共衛生危機對公司及其營運的影響;以及(xx)網路安全威脅對公司資訊技術系統的影響。請股東、潛在投資人和其他讀者在評估前瞻性陳述時仔細考量這些因素,並注意不要過分依賴此類前瞻性陳述。此處所做的前瞻性陳述僅反映本新聞稿發表之日的情況。無論是由於新資訊、未來事件還是其他原因,我們概不承擔公開更新任何前瞻性陳述的義務。有關可能影響我們業績的因素的更多詳細資訊,請參閱我們向美國證券交易委員會遞交的文件,這些文件可在 以及我們網站的「投資人中心」(Investor Center)部分( 公司財政年度截止日為每年1月31日。本報告所述2025年、2024年及2023年財務資料,分別對應截至2026年1月31日、2025年1月31日及2024年1月31日止的財務年度。 有關公司截至2025年1月31日財政年度財務業績的更多資訊,包括管理層對公司財務狀況和經營成果的討論與分析,載於公司截至2025年1月31日的10-Q表年報,這些資料將於本報告發表之日或前後遞交給美國證券交易委員會,並可透過 和 查閱。如欲瞭解更多資訊,請造訪公司網站。 PERMA-PIPE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.及子公司 簡明合併資產負債表 (以千為單位) (未經稽核) 2025年4月30日 2025年1月31日 資產 流動資產 $ 120,700 $ 108,802 長期資產 57,615 56,439 資產總額 $ 178,315 $ 165,241 負債與股東權益 流動負債 $ 61,751 $ 54,063 長期負債 26,459 28,073 負債總額 88,210 82,136 非控制權益 12,238 10,967 股東權益 77,867 72,138 負債和權益總額 $ 178,315 $ 165,241 Expand 免責聲明:本公告之原文版本乃官方授權版本。譯文僅供方便瞭解之用,煩請參照原文,原文版本乃唯一具法律效力之版本。

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store