Northland College faces intervention after ERO report on absenteeism
'I accept [ERO] data has a place in the story of every school.
'Now the data is not where we want it to be.
'But I'm confident we're in a better position now than in the last few years.'
The report says the school urgently needs to improve student progress and achievement, as less than half of students achieve NCEA Level 1, a small majority achieve Level 2, and very few students achieve Level 3 or University Entrance (UE).
However, the Government yesterday announced a radical shake-up of NCEA that will see it abolished and replaced with two new qualifications at Year 12 and 13.
Under the new scheme, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy.
The ERO report stated few students in Year 9 and 10 are at expected curriculum levels in reading, writing, and mathematics.
The review also says 'very few' students attend school regularly.
The school, which has around 300 students, needs to 'act immediately' to improve regular attendance and reduce chronic absence levels, and to improve teaching practices and support systems.
Allen, who has been principal since January 2021, said there were a range of social challenges facing the school and wider community.
'Northland College is a reflection of a broader crisis in education that exists in Kaikohe and beyond.
'There are elements of transience and poverty and social challenges that are not new in this community,' he said.
'They've been well known to leaders in the community, and staff and the board, and well known to the ministry and ERO.
'Kaikohe has an amazing community with amazing whānau, and beautiful kids here at school ... but I recognise we need to do more.'
Northland College may have a Commissioner appointed again after its latest ERO review.
Allen said the school leadership team had developed an immediate plan in response to the review, including more focus on literacy and numeracy.
Mentors had also been employed to work with students to support engagement, he said.
Allen said some positive shifts regarding attendance had been seen.
Northland College previously required intervention in 2012. The Government replaced the board of trustees with a limited statutory manager after buildings were found to be in need of urgent attention.
The college also received a scathing ERO report in 2017, when on-going concerns were identified, including inadequate systems to ensure student safety and staff accountability.
That year, the school celebrated a $14 million rebuild, which marked a new start for students and staff.
The latest report recommends that the Minister consider intervention under section 171 of the Education and Training Act 2020.
The act specifies nine types of intervention, ranging from minimal support, such as a request for information, to appointing a statutory manager or commissioner.
Ministry of Education north acting leader Leisa Maddix said most Northland schools operate successfully.
'But a small number develop difficulties ... that they cannot resolve without outside help.
'Where we do step in, an intervention aims to bring expertise and a fresh perspective.
'For Northland College, the ERO report clearly outlines areas of concern that are to be addressed with urgency and we will meet with the board to discuss the level of intervention to ensure better outcomes for students.'
Northland MP Grant McCallum said the school needs to work with the community 'to achieve better outcomes for its students'.
'My number one concern is for the education of the students; we need the whole community to focus on that.'
Northland currently has interventions in three primary schools, three composite schools (Years 1-15), and one secondary school.
A commissioner was appointed to run Dargaville High School after an ERO assessment found fewer than half of its students were regularly attending school, with the same number failing NCEA level one.
Barbara Alaalatoa was appointed as commissioner for the school board on June 25.
The review office said it would revisit Northland College in early 2026 to assess progress.
Jenny Ling is a senior journalist at the Northern Advocate. She has a special interest in covering human interest stories, along with finance, roading, and animal welfare issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA's demise is a lesson in failed educational policy
New Zealand students ranked above the OECD average in maths, reading and science literacy in the 2022 Pisa (Programme for International Student Assessment) report. But there has been a decline in scores across all three subjects in the last 20 years. We should not move on from the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) without asking how it happened and why we persisted with a scheme so obviously flawed. If I tell you Trevor Mallard was the Minister of Education in 2002 when the NCEA was implemented, you may think no further explanation is needed. When he was Speaker of the House, Mallard responded to protesters coming to Parliament by turning on the sprinklers and playing Barry Manilow songs over the public address system. But, in fairness, the NCEA was not his idea. I was in Parliament when it was promoted. It was his associate minister, Steve Maharey, by profession a sociology lecturer, who drove it through. Maharey was a true believer in 'cognitive learning', what he called 'personalised learning', more commonly known as 'pupil-led learning': the notion that children learn by discovering knowledge for themselves rather than being directly taught. We do learn from experience and finding out information is an important skill. But to master any worthwhile subject, we must first be taught essential foundation knowledge. A simple example: to write coherently, one must know grammar. You cannot do chemistry without being taught the periodic table, or mathematics without learning times tables. The NCEA allowed pupils to choose to skip learning challenging content essential for subject knowledge in favour of collecting soft credits. It is also unfair to blame only Maharey. In the British comedy Yes Minister, politicians come and go while the real power lies with senior civil servants. So too in New Zealand. The NCEA was the creation of senior bureaucrats in the Ministry of Education. It is a department that has promoted a string of fads, from open-plan classrooms, 'look-and-guess' reading and that built schools so badly designed they have had to be demolished. The ministry has created a school system where absenteeism is rife. Really big mistakes are usually made by clever people. Stupid people are rarely able to make a big mistake. Those promoting pupil-led learning were clever, articulate and convinced that they knew best. What they claimed is superficially attractive. Rote learning can crush creativity, but the alternative they imposed was worse. Act MP Deborah Coddington summed up our view at the time: 'One of the most dangerous experiments ever foisted on New Zealand children.' John Morris, Auckland Grammar headmaster, correctly predicted that the NCEA would mean 'the dumbing-down of academic standards'. Some New Zealand schools have never adopted pupil-led learning, opting for the Cambridge exam instead. National's then education spokesman Sir Bill English warned that if problems weren't fixed, 'NCEA will lose credibility'. This belief that it just needed a few tweaks led the Key Government into continuing with a system that was flawed. The flaws were visible from the start. Students and schools gamed the system. In 2004, Cambridge High School claimed a 100% NCEA pass rate by giving pupils credits for picking up litter. In 2013, nearly 25% of internal assessments were marked incorrectly, yet the credits still counted toward NCEA grades. In 2017 then Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced a review of the NCEA. The Government launched a trial of of new NCEA literacy and numeracy tests in 2022. The results were shocking. More than 40% of students failed at least one test in the June 2023 exams. The Herald has reported that Labour's current education spokeswoman, Willow-Jean Prime, didn't respond to NCEA meeting offers. By contrast, in just 18 months, Education Minister Erica Stanford has announced the end of the NCEA and its replacement with externally marked exams. Critics complain this will mean teachers 'teaching to the test'. Exactly. Exams will result in teacher-led learning. Pupils being taught reading, writing and arithmetic, essential for passing exams. For two decades, NCEA's designers insisted their system was the future. The future has arrived, and it has failed. The real lesson is not just that the NCEA must go, but that the political class must never again be permitted to impose unproven ideology-driven experiments on our children.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA overhaul explainer: What we know and don't know, and who might fall through the cracks
'The proof will be in the pudding,' says Rangitoto College principal Patrick Gale, who chaired the reform advisory group to the Government. There are a variety of opinions on how that pudding is shaping, and it's still early days; feedback on the proposals is open until September 15, with Cabinet releasing final decisions in November. The idea is that the new system will keep the best of NCEA's flexibility, but with enough structure and prescription to provide confidence about what students have learned for parents, tertiary education providers and employers. But even the discussion document on the proposals says it's likely student achievement will dip during the transition, while sector leaders warn an over-correction will result in our most disadvantaged students falling through the cracks. There are concerns pulling back on NCEA's flexibility will favour students from richer backgrounds, while the disadvantaged fall through the cracks. Photo / 123rf How did we get here? NCEA has become so flexible that it's being gamed, damaging its credibility. You can gain Level 2 or 3 with a mash-up of mostly internal assessments across several subjects, for example, and then not show up to the exam at the end of the year. This isn't universal, as Education Minister Erica Stanford stressed last week, and NCEA remains a decent qualification for many students. But after more than two decades, it's still confusing for many parents, employers and tertiary education providers. Briefings to the minister, including from the New Zealand Qualifications Authority, warned of a credibility crisis, a lack of coherent vocational education pathways , and an over-reliance on internal assessments. Nearly half of Year 12 students who achieved Level 2 last year did so 'without engaging in a full programme of coherent subject-based learning', while a third of Year 12 and 13 students with Level 2 or 3 relied on unit standards from 'disparate' subjects. The Government wants to curb this flexibility in exchange for more structure and prescription, with a subject score out of 100 that is more easily understood. Instead of NCEA Level 1, students will work towards a Foundational Skills Award in Year 11, a NZ Certificate of Education (NZCE) in Year 12, and a NZ Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) in Year 13. Maths and English will be compulsory subjects in Year 11. It's unclear whether the Foundational Skills Award will differ from the current online numeracy and literacy tests. Students will need to pass four out of five subjects to gain NZCE or NZACE. The proposed new record of achievement. Supplied / Ministry of Education How University Entrance accommodates the new qualifications remains to be seen. It currently requires, among other things, a minimum of 14 credits at NCEA Level 3 in each of three approved subjects. 'The proposed system increases that minimum to four subjects to pass, but it is not yet clear what subjects these will be in, which will be one of the things we consider,' University NZ said in a statement. 'University Entrance is a robust indicator of a student's readiness for degree-level standards, and we would expect that to continue under a new system.' Best of both worlds – in theory The flexibility of NCEA, however, is what was – and still is – lauded by some schools. It provided an easier way to reward students for what they'd learned, especially if their preferred way of learning didn't fit neatly into the traditional classroom, or via an end-of-year exam. This was particularly useful for those with special learning needs because of, for example, their dyslexia, ADHD or autism. Assessments were made in a fundamentally fairer way too, with students' work compared to a certain standard. In the old School Certificate-Bursary system, students were compared to each other and their marks were weighted to fit the standard deviation curve. The new system will remain standards-based, though how that will be compatible with a subject score out of 100 is one of the details yet to be worked out. 'A raw number grade, like 54%, doesn't actually show what you understand,' said Post-Primary Teachers Association president Chris Abercrombie. 'The standards base can show, for example, 'Chris is really good at writing essays, he's not very good at graphs'.' PPTA president Chris Abercrombie says the timeframes for replacing NCEA are tight but not impossible. Photo / Supplied It would be ideal to have a high level of detail about what a student knows, as well as an overall score that indicates the student's knowledge of the subject's curriculum. 'We're not entirely sure how exactly it's going to work. A percentage grade and a standards-based assessment kind of don't go together, per se,' Abercrombie said. 'It'll be really interesting to see exactly what it looks like.' Some flexibility, but not too much A key magic trick will be swinging the pendulum towards a more rigid system in a way that retains enough flexibility to benefit those with special learning needs, but not so much that credibility starts to crumble. The chief concern is who will fall through the cracks if the swing is too great. 'If there's an overcorrection, we know it'd be neurodiverse, the low socioeconomic, the students with specific learning needs,' Abercrombie said. 'We don't want that because that was the point of NCEA, to be a bit fairer. We're worried this is potentially an overcorrection, leading to more students leaving school without a qualification.' Special assessment conditions, commonly used for the likes of ADHD students, are being retained, with NZQA looking at ways to strengthen them. Again, what this will eventually look like is still being worked through. A greater emphasis on external assessment, which is being proposed, should make it harder to game the system. The internal-external split is another detail yet to be worked out and is likely to vary subject to subject, including whether an end-of-year exam is suitable. NCEA is thought to make learning easier for the neurodiverse and the new system aims to keep enough flexibility to retain this benefit. Photo / 123rf 'An exam is a good way to assess someone's memory, but it's not necessarily a good way to assess certain skills or certain knowledge,' Abercrombie says. 'Art, for instance, that's often an internally done portfolio that's marked externally. The students work on it during the year and then it's sent off to be marked.' Will more students fail? More failures are obviously not the intent. But if students are passing by gaming the system, and that won't happen so easily in the new system, then fewer students will pass, all other things being equal. The counter to this is that's the point and the new system will remedy the declining credibility of the current set-up. Not that all other things are staying equal. The Government has already moved towards structured literacy and mathematics (though there is contention over the latter's legitimacy), an increase in learning support funding, and refreshed curriculums with a focus on knowledge-rich content (though teacher feedback has seen the timeline for the rollout pushed back). Even if it all goes well, such a radical change is unavoidably disruptive. Educational achievement is 'likely to decline in the short term compared to NCEA' before lifting again, says the discussion document on the proposed changes. There is also concern about creating an inflexible two-tier system, one for academic students and another for vocational pathways. 'We don't want to lock some 13-year-old into a pathway they don't want to be on when they're 17 or 18,' Abercrombie said. Minister of Education Erica Stanford wants to phase out NCEA over five years. Photo / Dean Purcell Is it all too much, too quickly? The proposed timeline is to phase out NCEA over five years, with the current system and the new system – including the old curricula and refreshed curricula – running parallel for some of those years. This is a lot for schools and teachers, on top of the workforce challenges that already exist. The timeline makes sense, said Rangitoto College principal Patrick Gale. 'It saves a double change of adapting the existing system to new curriculum as it rolls through and then adapting once again to a new assessment system, if decided upon. 'Effective resourcing of new curriculum and associated materials is essential. This was not done well with previous NCEA Level 1 adjustments.' Abercrombie says the timeline is 'not impossible, but tight'. 'Teachers are going to be teaching the old curriculum, the new curriculum, the current NCEA and the new qualifications, all at the same time. A lot of the new curricula aren't even due until the end of this year. That doesn't leave a lot of time for feedback. 'That's a lot of work at a time where we've got shortages; we don't have enough subject specialist teachers. 'We just really need the confidence that the ministry and the minister have a clear resourcing and implementation plan for this.' The implementation timeline. Supplied / Ministry of Education Unease over AI marking Last week Stanford hailed the use of AI for marking, which was already in use for literacy and numeracy corequisite exams. Abercrombie said there were potential benefits in reducing teacher workloads, but the general feeling among PPTA members was that AI 'isn't there yet to be able to confidently mark'. As it evolves, he said it should only be used where it made sense, for example in marking a mathematics question rather than an essay about a Shakespeare play. 'There's also another element. Students like having their teacher mark their work and give them feedback. Teaching is about relationships. Hopefully it's not done in a way that is going to undermine that relationship. 'We'd hate to get into a situation where the computer says you've failed.' Derek Cheng is a senior journalist who started at the Herald in 2004. He has worked several stints in the press gallery team and is a former deputy political editor.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Oral Questions for 12 August 2025
Questions to Ministers CAMERON BREWER to the Minister of Finance: What recent reports has she seen on the economy? Rt Hon CHRIS HIPKINS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's statements and actions? CHLÖE SWARBRICK to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? CARL BATES to the Minister of Education: What announcements has she made regarding NCEA? Hon GINNY ANDERSEN to the Minister for Economic Growth: Does she agree with the Minister of Finance, who said about the additional 16,000 people unemployed that they "shouldn't take it personally"; if not, why not? Dr VANESSA WEENINK to the Minister for Building and Construction: What reports has he seen on building and construction? Hon PEENI HENARE to the Minister of Health: Does he agree with Hon Dr Shane Reti when he said, "I want to see IMPBs (iwi-Maori partnership boards) powered up to support the health outcomes for your whanau and your communities"; if so, what does that look like? JENNY MARCROFT to the Minister for Rail: What recent statements has he made regarding rail? RIMA NAKHLE to the Minister for Building and Construction: What announcements has the Government made about building and construction? ARENA WILLIAMS to the Acting Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (Grocery Sector): Has the Government's focus changed since the Prime Minister said in December 2023 that it would have a "laser focus on bringing down the cost of living"; if not, is she confident that she has the Prime Minister's backing to bring down the cost of groceries? DEBBIE NGAREWA-PACKER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's statements and actions? Hon MARAMA DAVIDSON to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
