I Have Beef With Tallow
What happens when you swap your Vanicream for rendered cow fat? I tried it so you don't have to. Photograph: Amazon; Getty Images
If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. This helps support our journalism. Learn more. Please also consider subscribing to WIRED
Who needs vaccines and Vanicream, when you have raw milk and beef tallow? That's what the internet thinks, anyway. TikTok (or TallowTok) is currently slathered with devotees hailing beef tallow (yes, the rendered fat from a cow) as a miracle moisturizer. As of March 2025, there have been more than 68.5 million posts on tallow. Brands cash in, while influencers flaunt before-and-after transformations, render tallow from suet, or smear beef lard on their skin, thinking it's tallow (it's not).
The backlash against industrialized beauty mirrors anxieties about ultra-processed food. The same people avoiding seed oils in their diets are now seeking beef-fat balms for their faces—it's not a coincidence that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is selling 'Making Frying Oil Tallow Again' merch. But in a rush to eliminate toxins and stick it to big corporations, you may have overlooked other risks. I bought some on the internet and smeared it on myself to figure it out.
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from. A Brief History of Tallow
Cow fat as face cream is not as far out as you might think. For centuries, terrestrial animal fats—beef tallow, lard, and lanolin—were staples in skin care. The Babylonians used ash and rendered fat to craft soap. Over time, tallow found its way into early-candle-making and medicinal remedies. Nineteenth-century ointments relied on them to treat everything from burns and chapped skin to wounds and ingrown nails. Traditional soap was a mix of tallow and coconut oil, and early lipsticks blended animal fat and beeswax. Some tattoo artists will still recommend beef tallow soaps to better preserve ink.
By the 1990s, advances in cosmetic chemistry favored plant-based and synthetic alternatives that offered greater stability and consistency. Safety concerns surrounding bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) also prompted companies to distance themselves from animal-derived ingredients. Though byproducts like collagen, hyaluronic acid, and keratin evolved with modern skin care, tallow was (mostly) left behind.
But now, beef tallow is back.
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
This revival is part of a cultural obsession with ancestral living. It's the same impulse driving the popularity of the carnivore diet, bone broth, and unpasteurized milk. Grand View Research reports that the U.S. tallow market brought in $627.9 million in 2023 and is projected to surpass $1 billion by 2030. At its core is the rejection of modernity, the belief that industrialization has corrupted nature and that the past held purer solutions. The beauty industry, with its preservatives, emulsifiers, and laboratory formulations, has become the enemy. Tallow, by contrast, is framed as a return to the untainted.
Beef tallow is rich in triglycerides and also contains essential vitamins A, D, K, E, and B12. Some studies suggest that tallow can increase fatty acid concentration in the skin, making it a moisturizing agent. However, comparative studies have found that alternatives like pumpkin seed oil and linoleic acid offer superior hydration. While some might tout its 'natural' benefits, that word is more marketing than fact.
Retailers like Sephora, Ulta Beauty, and Whole Foods have their own 'clean' beauty standards, each with different ingredient bans. The FDA doesn't approve cosmetics before they hit the market, meaning labels like 'clean' and 'toxin-free' are pretty much meaningless.
Photograph: Amazon Cliganic Organic Jojoba Oil
Photograph: Amazon Maple Holistics Organic Pumpkin Seed Oil Face Full of Meat
I'm not scared of beef tallow. I've willingly slathered snail mucin on my skin (and I still do). But I did take a few steps after ordering a jar of this ancient beauty remedy via Amazon Prime. (Side note: This product is no longer available on Amazon or the company's site, which is concerning.) For example, I decided to use it only at night, reasoning that the last thing I needed was to smell like meat sweats during my morning workout.
My immediate reaction was yuck. It looked like curdled cheese but, surprisingly, didn't smell like much. I applied it quickly and went straight to bed before I could dwell on the fact that I had basted myself. To my surprise, I woke each morning to skin that felt soft and hydrated. My seasonal seborrheic dermatitis didn't flare up as much, but I also broke out more than usual.
Nothing really bad happened to me in the week that I tried it (except that I grossed out my partner and myself), but I may have gotten lucky. There have been a few recalls on commercially produced tallow, and DIY tallow skin care, in particular, raises red flags.
Rendering animal fat requires careful heating and purification to remove impurities. Without proper sterilization, bacterial contamination is a serious concern. Plus, tallow's composition varies depending on the animal's diet and processing method, making it almost impossible to predict how an individual's skin will react. More research is needed to understand how different skin types respond to tallow, as existing studies use varied methodologies and reference points.
While tallow does have moisturizing properties, its occlusive nature isn't ideal for all skin types, especially oily or acne-prone individuals. Animal fats are rich in saturated fatty acids, which can be comedogenic and exacerbate breakouts for certain skin types. Tallow can also trigger dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
In the end, beef tallow's resurgence isn't really about skin care—it's about trust, control, and the desire to strip away the complexities of consumerism. It's easy to romanticize the past when you don't have to live in it. But just because something is natural doesn't mean it's better. After all, we don't put lead in makeup anymore. If you're still tempted to smear cow fat on your face, consult a dermatologist before overhauling your skin care routine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
American's Trip to Italy Leads to Shocking Revelation About US: 'So Much Resentment'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An American traveler who went to Italy on a two-week trip returned with a new perspective—and a lot of resentment—regarding American food. Sharing her experience on Reddit this week, user Temporary-Night-275 said she was able to eat foods in Italy that would have triggered bad reactions back home. Dietary Changes Felt "My mood was better, my awareness was better," the original poster (OP) wrote. "I could eat wheat (I'm extremely gluten intolerant and it messes with my autoimmune disease if I eat it among a multitude of other symptoms) with gluten pills with minor bloating. "I had some of the best food, best health feelings (other than muscle soreness from walking so much) I've ever had in my life." Stock image: Dishes of processed food. Stock image: Dishes of processed food. Photo by carotur / Getty Images Processed food has been shown to "most likely" shorten your life. According to researchers, Americans are "addicted" to it. 'I want to move' The difference, the Redditor believes, lies in how food is produced and regulated. "Sugar and wheat and whatever else is just so much harder on my body here than Italy," she wrote. The OP added that she generally eats healthy, even at home. "I want to move," she wrote, adding, "It sucks here. Government sucks, food sucks, work sucks. "I got the freshest food at a market (quite a bit of it too) for so cheap. Food that would cost me $20-25 was roughly $11. "I hate it here." 'Infinitely better' User Temporary-Night-275 elaborated that the food tasted "fresher" and the texture was "infinitely better," in response to an invitation to comment from Newsweek. "Things just had way better flavor and texture overall and I could tell I was eating better food just by the lack of sugar taste," she wrote, adding, "Even the chips just tasted like quality. "My skin cleared up significantly and I was neglecting my skin routine," she added. The OP said she did have some bloating from the gluten, but no additional symptoms like itching and diarrhea. "So I still felt symptoms, but when you [haven't eaten] gluten for 10 years and have some light bloating after eating pizza, a cornetti and then pasta, I'll take that as a win," she wrote. 'The quality of our food is garbage' Many Reddit users agreed with the OP, amid 1,300 comments within two days online. "My brother's [significant other] is from Singapore," an individual shared, "They regularly mention how sugary and sweet everything is in the U.S. "With health trends like fasting and keto, I almost feel like that speaks for itself. Our food is so bad here people choose to not eat, or completely cut out certain foods they sell here because it will help lose/manage weight. "But the issue isn't even the type of food. It's what's in our food. Other countries have diets that are extremely carb heavy and you'll still see people that are skinny and relatively healthier. "The quality of our food is garbage." A fellow contributor said they spent three weeks in the U.S. and took them 3-4 months to recover: "It's the land of the free: free to sell crap to the customers." Another critic said that their Canadian mother has "endless gut issues" and is gluten intolerant. "Every time she goes to Spain, her stomach stays flat and she feels great. It's terrifying!" Other Factors at Play? Fellow Redditors argued that other factors could be at play. "The U.S. ranks third in the world for food quality and safety. Check out the Global Food Security Index," a user commented. "Most people don't feel good in the U.S. because we're overworked and have barely anything to show for it. Our cities being entirely centered around cars is the biggest issue aside from the lack of cheap and accessible health care here." 'Depressed in America' User Temporary-Night-275 told Newsweek that she was serious about moving and it may be in her 5-year plan. "Between health care, better food, better work-life balance in a lot of other countries, I just want something that makes me feel well," the OP continued. "I'm depressed in America, learning more what happens every day in our government and the s*** food were given [...] "It was magical being able to eat good food again. I definitely am planning my next trip to Italy." Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on WSID at Newsweek. To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
CNET
4 hours ago
- CNET
Breathe Easy This Allergy Season With 50% Off a Morento Air Purifier
Springtime is rough for a lot of us with all manner of plant life shooting pollen into the air with reckless abandon. But a good air purifier can help keep allergies at bay, at least within the safety of your own home, and right now you can get your hands on the Morento air purifier while it's 50% off at Amazon. That means it's down to just $80, and it's a great way to clear that air up. Make sure you act fast if you want it though, as there's no telling how long this deal will last. The Morento air purifier -- full name Morento HY4866-WF -- can handle rooms up to 1,076 square feet, which is going to be enough for most bedrooms or living rooms. Along with that, it has an air quality display to help you see how well it's doing, and it even comes with a couple of extra filters. That's just good news for general usability, because we all forget to order new ones the first time around. The result of all of this is that you can get rid of pollutants and allergens in the air, and that can help immensely when you're in the middle of allergy season, or if you've got pets you're suffering with a bit. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. In addition to being generally good at clearing the air, it's also smart, meaning you can control it with Alexa, Google Assistant or the accompanying app so that you can turn it on or off without having to get up or set it to run on a schedule that suits you. Given the power and functionality of this device, not to mention the discount, there's no denying that this is one of the best air purifier deals going on right now. Just make sure you act fast to avoid missing out on it. Why this deal matters A solid air purifier can actually improve some peoples' quality of life a fair bit. The ability to take out things like smoke is good, but the real winner here for many of us is the ability to filter out allergens like pollen and dust. Hayfever season is in full swing at the moment, so being able to save 50% on breathing properly is a great deal.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans' new Medicaid red tape will push Missouri to the brink and block healthcare for millions
New paperwork and work rules for Medicaid will impose new burdens on state government systems (Getty Images). This week, Senators have started their consideration of President Trump's big tax bill, which was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May. Missouri U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley was clear in his priorities for the legislation, writing in early May that 'slashing health insurance for the working poor is … both morally wrong and politically suicidal.' President Donald Trump was blunter, telling lawmakers not to 'f**k around with Medicaid.' The bill passed by the House, does not pass their test – it does not, as Trump and Hawley claim, contain 'NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS.' Instead, it will kick millions of people off of Medicaid by piling on new red tape. And it will bury under-resourced state Medicaid offices in so much paperwork that they will be at risk of collapse. Together, these forces will mean that eligible Americans in Missouri and around the country will not have access to their Medicaid. Many will be left without health care as they prepare to bring a child into the world, face a new cancer diagnosis, or manage a chronic illness. In other words, if this bill passes, Medicaid will be cut for Missourians when they most need it. The House bill imposes new bureaucratic requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries, forcing them to file piles of new paperwork about their jobs, schools, disabilities, or sick family members to keep the health insurance they are already eligible for under the law. These so-called 'work requirements' do not boost employment as advertised – experiments in other states have repeatedly failed to do so. This is, in part, because the vast majority of Medicaid beneficiaries who can work already do. That makes sense – you can't buy food and pay rent with a health insurance card. The reason this bill reduces the cost of Medicaid by billions of dollars is that it assumes regular people will get tangled in the red tape of proving they are eligible for Medicaid. Experts project that over 10 million eligible people will lose their health care because of all the paperwork, including over 180,000 Missourians. But we believe that even this prognosis is too optimistic. Most analyses only consider the difficulty that people will have proving that they are entitled to Medicaid under the law, but not the difficulty states will have in administering the new paperwork requirements. We have spent the last several years modernizing the systems that deliver benefits to millions of Americans, including Medicaid. What we have learned is that state Medicaid systems, including MO HealthNet, are already on the brink – and lack the resources and resilience to take on the onslaught of requirements and deadlines about to hit them. Trump's tax legislation, the new requirements it imposes, and the lightning-fast timeline it requires, are setting Medicaid up for a collapse. Here's how it could play out. States are responsible for determining Medicaid eligibility. They allow people to enroll in one of four ways – by mailing in documents, enrolling online, applying over the phone, or walking into a physical office. Each of these pathways is already at a tipping point. Medicaid agencies around the country have staff vacancies as high as 30 percent, which means there are already too few workers to open mail, process applications, answer the phones, and staff walk-in centers. As a result, even under the current system, eligible people can see their Medicaid lapse because their paperwork is not processed in time. Missourians have recent experience with the effects of an overburdened Medicaid system. By law, Medicaid applications are supposed to be processed in 45 days, but as of last May, Missouri missed that deadline 72% of the time – the worst record in the nation – causing the federal government to step in to help for the second time in two years. The wait time on the Medicaid call center was 56 minutes in February 2024. The House bill will immediately explode the workload for state Medicaid offices. Medicaid beneficiaries will need to prove their eligibility twice a year instead of annually. And then it piles on the new paperwork rules. Missouri will have to figure out how to verify that a beneficiary is working, going to school, or meeting the new requirements some other way. They'll need to send out millions of paper notices, emails, and text messages to notify enrollees about the changes and train staff to handle the deluge of documents that will flood in. Just hours before the bill passed, Congress quietly moved up the deadline for states to make these changes, requiring implementation by the end of 2026 or sooner. And all this new bureaucracy rests on technology that is already failing. We've seen just how broken states' health care infrastructure is – Luke helped uncover state software errors that improperly terminated coverage for nearly 500,000 eligible kids across 29 states after the pandemic. The added strain imposed by this legislation will crash websites, jam call centers, and trigger even more software errors – trapping working people in the chaos. Under these conditions, failure isn't just likely — it's inevitable. We don't need to guess at how this plays out. When Arkansas tried to implement Medicaid work requirements in 2018 the results were disastrous. People received confusing instructions about how to prove they were working and many never knew about the requirement. The state's website repeatedly crashed. In the end, more than 18,000 people lost coverage, employment rates did not budge, and the state wasted $26 million on a failed experiment. In some states, that will mean lines around the block at overwhelmed county offices. In others, dropped calls, system outages, and piles of unprocessed renewals. These challenges compound. When the website breaks, you call. When your call drops, you drive to the office. Attrition will spike as the overmatched Medicaid staff are increasingly under siege, overtime is mandatory, and time off is cancelled. Smaller and smaller numbers of staff will bear larger and larger workloads until the system collapses. And, eligible Americans – working adults, kids, seniors, students, and adults with illnesses and disabilities – will still have no Medicaid. Hospitals will provide more uncompensated coverage, putting some – especially rural hospitals and children's hospitals – at risk of failure. This bill sets up state Medicaid agencies to fail at their most basic task – ensuring that eligible people have health insurance. It doesn't matter to a pregnant mom why her Medicaid is cut, she is going to miss prenatal visits and skip her toddler's check-up. If Hawley wants to stand up for over one million Missourians who rely on Medicaid, he should oppose this bill. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
