
Miqdaad Versi and the troubling war on ‘Islamophobia'
So if the media is not a pit of anti-Muslim falsehood and hatred, what is the CfMM's true objective?
Versi's organisation is called the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), until this week part of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), of which he is also spokesman. It claims to specialise in challenging false, negative and 'Islamophobic' reporting by the British media about Muslims and Islam, through monitoring 'thousands of articles and broadcast clips daily' and complaining to regulators and media outlets about those which fall short.
The CfMM claims that media falsehoods are 'widespread', with almost 10 per cent of news stories involving Islam 'misrepresenting Muslims, misusing terminology or misinterpreting Islamic beliefs and practice'. As Versi puts it:
Sixty per cent of articles [about Muslims] analysed [by CfMM] associated negative aspects and behaviour with Muslims or Islam… Little wonder Islamophobia is so common in society.
These claims have been widely repeated in politics and are widely believed in Muslim Britain.
When we at Policy Exchange looked into it, however, we found that CfMM simply doesn't substantiate these serious and damaging charges. In the group's entire seven-year existence, the rulings database at Ipso, the press self-regulator, shows a grand total of one case brought by CfMM from which Ipso required a newspaper to make a correction: in December 2020, more than four years ago. In a further three cases brought by CfMM, the latest three years ago, Ipso found that a breach of its editors' code had occurred but that the newspaper had already corrected the error, with no further action required.
CfMM complains directly to news outlets too. But it has made wildly varying claims about the number of articles it has monitored (from several million to several tens of thousands) and the number of successful complaints it has brought as a result (from 300 to 22.) Even taking its highest claimed number of successful complaints (300) and its lowest claimed number of articles monitored (55,500), that is about 0.5 per cent, nowhere near a tenth.
In submissions to regulators and consultations, CfMM repeatedly reuses the same, or some of the same, twenty or so news stories, often many years old, as examples of inaccurate and 'Islamophobic' journalism. In the group's latest published submission, in 2023, the newest examples given were from 2020. Some old favourites had been published as long as 15 years before.
Remarkably, the CfMM's '60 per cent' tally of negative stories appears to include factual accounts of Islamist terror attacks. The 'top three offenders', it says, are the wire services Reuters, AP and AFP, sources of almost entirely sober, factual and straight reporting – at the opposite end of the spectrum from the usual suspects of the right-wing tabloids.
So if the media is not, as it turns out, a pit of anti-Muslim falsehood and hatred, what is the CfMM's true objective? It is, in the group's own words, 'taking control of the narrative' about Islam. It appears to be to pressurise journalists to accept a partisan view of the faith held by the MCB and its activists.
CfMM tells journalists they should never use the terms 'Islamism', 'Islamic extremism' or 'Muslim extremism' at all. It attacks news outlets for describing terror groups, including Hamas and Islamic State, as Islamist. It appears to claim that moderate Muslims abandon their 'religious identities' for a 'version of Islam that has been sanctioned by the state', and that they may even be liberals or government spies.
CfMM seeks to pressurise journalists into a conservative view of Islam, describing the hijab, the headscarf for women, as 'normative'. They attacked a Muslim writer, Qanta Ahmed, for 'misrepresenting Muslim behaviour and belief' after she wrote in The Spectator that there was 'no basis in Islam for the niqab', the full-face veil.
CfMM has criticised TV dramas for showing Muslim characters who do not want to wear a hijab, or who drink alcohol, or who are gay. It has openly taken the side of intimidating mobs staging banned anti-gay demonstrations outside primary schools (news reporting which criticised those demos was, it says, 'Islamophobic'.)
CfMM claims to support free speech. But it says that press regulators must discourage 'insults' against Islam. Nor, it says, should the media be allowed to accuse the authorities of failing to investigate wrongdoing because the perpetrators are Muslim, as in Rotherham. It describes the reporting of grooming gangs as based on 'shoddy' underpinnings, and has repeatedly attacked those, such as the late Andrew Norfolk of the Times and GB News' Charlie Peters, who have done most to expose it.
How much does this matter? Potentially, quite a lot. Versi and CfMM have been welcome guests in media offices and at Ipso, claiming to be 'instrumental' in drawing up the regulator's guidance on Islam. A senior BBC News manager spoke at a CfMM event only last month, and it has been 'feeding in' to BBC policy. Major newspaper editors and celebrity reporters have endorsed some of CfMM's worst, most questionable research. CfMM organises regular workshops and training events in news organisations. It says it teaches journalism students at 'all the top universities', and actually has done so at several.
And now, CfMM has a powerful new weapon in sight. It and the MCB are part of the wider campaign for an official definition of Islamophobia – something which, in the campaign's words, should be used to control and police activity 'far beyond' anything that can currently 'be captured as criminal'. This includes setting 'appropriate limits to free speech' when talking about Muslims. The government has stated its support for a definition. The man it has appointed to draw one up, Dominic Grieve, wrote a supportive foreword to the report in which these words appeared.
Most investigative journalism looks at governments, public bodies and companies. But there's another set of people who need just as much scrutiny, and who can act with just as much shoddiness: the activist groups, working away behind the scenes, to skew society and the national conversation in wrong and dangerous directions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White pupils are the least likely group to get into a top university - with just one in 10 expected to land a spot
White pupils are the least likely group to get into a top university for the third year running, analysis suggests. Official data from the Department for Education (DfE) shows only 11.7 per cent of white pupils are attending the highest-ranking third of universities by age 19. This compares with 12.1 per cent of black pupils, 15.5 per cent of those who are mixed race and 18.6 per cent of Asians. The underperformance of white students is partly driven by British pupils from low-income families – one of the lowest-achieving sub-categories. Only 3 per cent of these pupils made it into 'high-tariff' universities – defined as the top for entry requirements. It comes after Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson pledged last week to make raising standards for white working-class pupils a priority. She said it was a 'national disgrace' that so many were 'written off' at school and failed to achieve their potential in exams. Alan Smithers, professor of education at Buckingham University, said: 'It is striking how well young people from the ethnic minorities do in education in this country. The underperformance of white students is partly driven by British pupils from low-income families – one of the lowest-achieving sub-categories. Only 3 per cent of these pupils made it into 'high-tariff' universities – defined as the top for entry requirements (file image) 'Some of those who were born abroad come from countries where if you don't earn, you don't eat. 'They understand the crucial role that education plays in living the good life, whereas young people in this country have grown used to being supported by the state.' The rate of entering university was also lower for British-born pupils than for those who had a migrant background. Entry for native English-speakers was 42.8 per cent, while for those whose first language is not English it was 60.9 per cent. Professor Smithers said the data suggested universities were welcoming to ethnic minorities, following claims from some campaigners that they are institutionally racist. He added: 'The myth of university racism comes from the US and has been taken up by sociology departments in this country, which can become training grounds for activists who spend their years on campus seeking out every small sign that can be interpreted as racism.' The rate of entering university was also lower for British-born pupils than for those who had a migrant background. Entry for native English-speakers was 42.8 per cent, while for those whose first language is not English it was 60.9 per cent A DfE spokesman said: 'This Government is committed to supporting the aspiration of every person who meets the requirements and wants to go to university – regardless of their background. 'We know baked-in inequalities remain in our education system, which is why universities must do more to expand opportunity and improve outcomes for disadvantaged students.' The analysis of 2023/24 data – the latest available – covers pupils who attended English state schools, not those in private schools or Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
How a chaotic 24 hours unfolded ahead of Trump and Zelenskyy's crunch White House talks
If there's one thing the past 24 hours has confirmed, it's that it's still Donald Trump's world, and we're all just living in it. In the aftermath of the Alaska meeting, the US president's deal-making skills came under question when he seemingly walked away empty-handed. But it was clear he had retained his ability to catch everyone off guard, as a meeting between him and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy unexpectedly became a last-minute White House peace summit. 0:56 The invitation to European leaders drifted out, and within hours, the cast list had grown to include six more, as world leaders dropped everything to fit in with Mr Trump's unpredictable timetable. There were signs of disorganisation behind the scenes. When the British Prime Minister's spokesman was asked who the invite had come from - the White House or the Ukrainian president - they replied: "A bit of both." 2:09 Meanwhile, the meeting of the coalition of the willing - a Starmer and Macron-led group of Ukraine's European allies - had a nervous feel to it as members resolved to stand firm with Ukraine - even if it puts them at odds with the US. At times, it sounded like they were trying to convince themselves they could do it. And as all of this frantic diplomatic reaction played out, the man in the middle of it all headed to the golf course - calm at the centre of the diplomatic storm he created as his allies swirl around him.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Illegal migrants brought to UK in ‘dangerous' £350 dinghies sold online by backstreet factories in China
BACKSTREET factories in China sell £350 dinghies online to people smugglers bringing illegal migrants to Britain, a Sun probe found. Workshops 5,000 miles away churn out flimsy vessels to order for unscrupulous gangs in northern France — offering discounts for bulk purchases. 2 The National Crime Agency said the dinghies were becoming 'ever more dangerous and un-seaworthy, increasing the risk to life'. Our probe found that the factories, all in Shandong and Zhejiang provinces, advertise through Chinese e-commerce site and state their main export market is western Europe. They say the boats, typically 8m-long, can carry more than 30. In reality, double that cram on them. Last week, a 10m-long boat brought 106 into British waters. At least 469 fully-loaded dinghies have crossed to the UK so far this year, carrying 27,881, the majority young men. This week a shipment of 20 small boats destined to ferry migrants across the Channel to the UK was seized in Bulgaria. Another 25 were confiscated at the same location in July thanks to intelligence gathered by British law enforcement passed on to the Bulgarian National Customs Agency. It comes after the Foreign Office sanctioned Chinese firm Weihai Yamar Outdoors Product Co for advertising online inflatable boats for the specific purpose of people smuggling. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The Labour government claimed it would smash the gangs but can't even stop the Chinese-made boats being sold in France. Small boat crossings under Labour are on brink of hitting 50,000 - one illegal migrant every 11 mins since the election 'This is a weak government which has lost control of our borders. They aren't prepared to take the tough action needed to end this madness so the situation will get worse.' Alibaba said: 'Search terms or product listings such as 'refugee boat' or 'immigrant boat' are in violation of our listings policies and won't return positive search results.' It said the inflatables advertised were 'designed, certified, and intended for lawful purposes'. 2