Activists' push for near-total abortion ban leads to split among SC Republicans
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Two spines sit in the Statehouse on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, before activists with Students for Life Action planned to bring them to representatives' offices. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
COLUMBIA — The 'inflammatory tactics' by an anti-abortion group demanding a near-total ban in South Carolina prompted most members of the Legislature's Family Caucus to leave the group and rebuke its GOP leader.
A resignation letter Wednesday to Rep. John McCravy, the caucus' leader, was co-signed by 29 of its 48 House members.
The mass departure came soon after McCravy, whose official caucus title is moderator, stood at the Statehouse with members of the activist group whose tactics included going to the churches of GOP leaders and putting fliers on windshields asking churchgoers to tell their fellow congregant 'Act NOW. Don't Let Any More Preborn Babies Die!'
At a news conference Wednesday, the next-to-last day of the 2025 legislation session, members of Students for Life Action showed reporters the two plastic spines they planned to deliver to House Speaker Murrell Smith and Judiciary Chairman Weston Newton, telling them to 'grow a spine' and bring up McCravy's bill for a vote.
The proposal, similar to previous bills McCravy has introduced that failed in the Senate, would ban nearly all abortions from the onset of pregnancy, with no exceptions for victims of rape or fatal fetal anomalies.
'Chief among our concerns is your continued refusal to condemn the deeply troubling behavior of out-of-state, third-party groups that have descended upon South Carolina churches to provoke and disrupt worship services,' reads the resignation letter to McCravy, provided to reporters. (Students for Life Action is a Virginia-based group with members in South Carolina.)
It comes a week after Majority Leader Davey Hiott, R-Pickens, confirmed he left the group he co-founded in 2017 with McCravy. Beyond differences in opinion over how to proceed with the abortion ban, Hiott accused McCravy of making homophobic and antisemitic comments about fellow legislators, which the Greenwood Republican vehemently denied.
Wednesday's letter made no mention of those comments.
Rep. John McCravy, R-Greenwood, talks during a Students For Life Action news conference pushing for a near-total abortion ban on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
The Family Caucus, which McCravy called 'the conscience of the Republican Party,' functions as a support group of sorts for socially conservative Christians interested in promoting issues that support children and families, Rep. Richie Yow, R-Chesterfield, told reporters.
That used to include members of the agenda-setting House Republican Caucus and the hardline Freedom Caucus, as well as a single Democrat. The archconservative Freedom Caucus didn't join the mass resignation, instead jumping to McCravy's defense.
McCravy has not left the majority Republican Caucus, and the Freedom Caucus has not asked him to join them, he told reporters Wednesday.
Abortion
Yow, a Baptist pastor, said what the activists did is not OK, no matter what the issue.
'Their harassment of churchgoers — on Palm Sunday, no less — crosses a moral line,' read the letter to McCravy. 'Your silence as the moderator of this caucus, along with your continued support and engagement with the groups that employ those tactics, is unacceptable.'
Their fliers claimed Smith and Newton were holding up McCravy's near-total abortion ban. The activist group also sent text messages and bought advertisements targeting the legislative leaders, a spokeswoman said.
If the group's tactics were aggressive, they were justified to push for what they see as right, said Kristan Hawkins, the organization's president.
'I think educating citizens in a House member's district about what he's really doing in Columbia is actually our job,' Hawkins told the SC Daily Gazette. 'That's our job as human rights activists.'
Members of House leadership, including Hiott, repeatedly asked McCravy to step in and ask the group to stop. McCravy refused, he said.
'I don't think that's appropriate,' McCravy told the Gazette. 'I think that's unethical.'
He declined to say whether he thought visiting representatives' churches crossed a line.
'College students are going to be more enthusiastic than probably older people like me,' McCravy said. 'I don't want to dampen that enthusiasm.'
House leaders said they aren't opposed to McCravy's bill, which received three hours of testimony but no vote during a subcommittee meeting earlier this year. Smith and Hiott are co-sponsors with McCravy. Newton is not.
Previous attempts by the House to pass near-total abortion bans have failed repeatedly in the Senate, so leaders decided to avoid the lengthy debate until the legislation has a better chance in the upper chamber, Newton told the Gazette.
Plus, there are still lawsuits pending on South Carolina's existing six-week ban, including a challenge before the state Supreme Court on whether the language in the law — which does not actually give a number of weeks — means the ban should start at nine weeks instead.
Amid the March 4 hearing on McCravy's bill, Hiott put out a statement urging fellow representatives to press pause until the state Supreme Court rules.
But McCravy believes the House should have passed the bill anyway.
'If you give up just because you hear a rumor that somebody might not do something, you're never going to win,' McCravy said Wednesday. 'So, we don't give up.'
The group's tactics aren't new, though they're newly against House Republicans.
In 2023, members of Students For Life Action delivered smaller spines to the five female senators who helped defeat McCravy's proposals of a near-total ban following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling overturning Roe v. Wade.
That delivery backfired, as the women took the Senate podium to proudly display proof of having a backbone and refused to back down. What ultimately became law in 2023, over the objections of the women who dubbed themselves Sister Senators, was a ban at six weeks, with exceptions for victims of rape or incest and fatal fetal anomalies. The three GOP female senators lost their re-election bids last year.
Hawkins, head of the activist group, said the larger spines for Smith and Newton were to help them 'grow up a little bit.'
'These spineless, feckless attacks against John McCravy, against pro-life students in South Carolina — it's beyond the pale,' Hawkins said Wednesday.
One of the fliers advocacy group Students for Life Action distributed, including at churches. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
But Newton said the group hasn't affected him one way or the other. The lobbying clearly didn't cause him to bring up the bill in the session's waning days. Nor has it made him less inclined to start the debate, he said. He told the Gazette he considers it more of a distraction from legislating.
Comments about other legislators
Hiott told The Post and Courier he resigned his membership partly over McCravy's offensive comments about two fellow legislators. Hiott declined to comment further to the Gazette.
The alleged comments date back to last session, when Hiott claimed McCravy complained to him and other House leaders that Newton, a Bluffton Republican, appointed a 'gay' and a 'Jew' to serve as subcommittee chairs on the House Judiciary Committee. The comments could only be referring to then-Rep. Jason Elliott, the Legislature's first — and still only — openly gay member of the Legislature and now a state senator; and Rep. Beth Bernstein, the state's only Jewish legislator.
Newton told the Gazette that McCravy repeated his comments about Elliott directly to him, telling the chairman he 'didn't want to serve on a subcommittee with that gay.'
Elliott, R-Greenville, did not respond to requests for comment from the Gazette. Bernstein, D-Columbia, said she heard about the remarks secondhand several times.
McCravy said he has good relationships with both Bernstein and Elliott and wouldn't disparage them in any way.
'I would never refuse to serve on a committee because of someone's characteristics or preferences,' McCravy told the Gazette.
He did have private conversations questioning Newton's decision to make Elliott and Bernstein subcommittee chairs because of disagreements over policy issues, he said.
'I don't have anything against either of those people personally in any way,' McCravy said.
Friction on the Judiciary Committee dates back to the end of last year, when McCravy asked to be removed from the powerful committee that vets many of the bills on the Family Caucus' priority list. He denied that his request had anything to do with his fellow committee members, instead citing disagreements with Newton over policy.
The two have publicly butted heads over proposals about betting and alcohol sales. McCravy is a staunch gambling opponent who doesn't imbibe.
Newton, on the other hand, is a co-sponsor this year of legislation legalizing a casino off Interstate 95 in Orangeburg County. The bill advanced through his committee to the House floor last week. On Wednesday, the House voted to 'continue' the bill, meaning it can't be taken up again until 2026.
Other measures the two have publicly disagreed about include bills to create a legal way to bet on horse races, allow people to drink cocktails anywhere in an airport terminal, and enable people order alcohol for delivery to their homes.
But Newton said it was McCravy's claims that the chairman was funded by alcohol lobbyists, followed by the comments about Elliot, that 'led to this unraveling.'
Wednesday's letter, however, cited none of that.
Instead, it said the caucus has become the antithesis of what it's supposed to be while bringing the unwanted divisions of Washington, D.C., to the South Carolina Statehouse.
'We believe this is both unwise and spiritually corrosive,' it read.
South Carolina House of Representatives
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Most Americans support legal access to abortions in most cases: Survey
Most Americans still support legal abortions despite a wave of rollbacks following the Supreme Court's decision overturning the federal right to access the procedure over three years ago, a new survey shows. The AP-NORC Research Center poll, published Thursday, revealed that 64 percent of participants said abortion should be legal in all or most cases. About 27 percent of people said the procedure should be illegal in most cases and 9 percent said it should be illegal in all cases. The results were split along party lines. A majority of Democrats, 85 percent, and independents, 67 percent, said they believe abortion should be lawfully permitted in cases of medically terminated pregnancies and use of an abortion pill. On the opposite side, 15 percent of Democrats and 33 percent of independents disagreed, according to the survey. More than half, 58 percent, of Republicans said abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, while 41 percent of GOP respondents shared an opposite view. The poll also found that an overwhelming majority of respondents, regardless of their political party, said abortions should be allowed if the mother's health is at risk due to pregnancy or in the case of rape, incest or potential fetal abnormality. As states reflect on the impact of the 2022 Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health case — which overturned Roe v. Wade — the survey asked in which cases should medical abortions should be approved. Around 70 percent said abortions, which have increased since the landmark ruling, should be allowed in cases of maternal medical emergencies. A small majority, 56 percent, also said mothers should be permitted to travel to obtain an abortion in a different state if it's illegal where they reside. The AP-NORC poll was conducted from July 10-14 featuring 1,437 U.S. adults. The overall margin of error is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cuomo: Mamdani has advantage as the Democrat on ballot
New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo said in a Thursday interview that his opponent, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, has an advantage as the Democrat listed on the general election ballot this November. The former New York governor — who launched an independent bid after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary — said he fears voters will flock to the democratic socialist assemblyman simply because he's listed as the Democrat. 'A multi-candidate field favors Mamdani — because he's a socialist on the Democratic line. I'm a Democrat on an independent line,' Cuomo said in an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'Because politics is all upside down in this country right now,' he added. 'But you have a lot of people who knee-jerk go to the Democratic line, right? About 70 percent of the voters are Democrats in the general election, and he'll be on the Democratic line. So multi-candidate field favors him,' Cuomo said. Cuomo formally announced he is running as an independent in New York City's mayoral race on July 14, shortly after losing the primary election to Mamdani. Mamdani defeated Cuomo by about 12 points, 56 percent to 44 percent, in the third round of ranked choice voting in the primary. Cuomo joins Mamdani, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in the general election race. Mamdani's critics fear that a crowded general election could result in his opponents splitting the vote, easily handing Mamdani a victory. Cuomo has proposed an arrangement whereby he and Adams agree to drop out of the race by mid-September if neither is in the lead against Mamdani.


Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Justice Department will meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's imprisoned girlfriend
Advertisement A Justice Department spokesman did not immediately return a message seeking comment on Thursday. The person who confirmed the meeting insisted on anonymity to describe a closed-door encounter to The Associated Press. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up A lawyer for Maxwell confirmed on Tuesday there were discussions with the government and said Maxwell 'will always testify truthfully.' The House Committee on Oversight issued a subpoena on Wednesday for Maxwell to testify before committee officials in August. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence and is housed at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. She was sentenced three years ago after being convicted of helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. Officials have said Epstein killed himself in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. Advertisement Earlier this month, the Justice Department said it would not release more files related to the Epstein investigation, despite promises that claimed otherwise from Attorney General Pam Bondi. The department also said an Epstein client list does not exist. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that Bondi told Trump in May that his name was among high-profile people mentioned in government files of Epstein, though the mention does not imply wrongdoing. Trump, a Republican, has said that he once thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy' but that they later had a falling out. A subcommittee on Wednesday also voted to subpoena the Justice Department for documents related to Epstein. And senators in both major political parties have expressed openness to holding hearings on the matter after Congress' August recess. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, has introduced legislation with bipartisan support that would require the Justice Department to 'make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to Epstein and his associates. House Speaker Mike Johnson and the Republican majority leader, Representative Steve Scalise, both of Louisiana, have said they will address whatever outstanding Epstein-related issues are in Congress when they return from recess. Epstein, under a 2008 non-prosecution agreement, pleaded guilty in Florida to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. That allowed him to avert a possible life sentence, instead serving 13 months in a work release program. He was required to make payments to victims and register as a sex offender. In 2019, Epstein was charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan for nearly identical allegations. Advertisement ___ Williams reported from Detroit.