logo
Activists' push for near-total abortion ban leads to split among SC Republicans

Activists' push for near-total abortion ban leads to split among SC Republicans

Yahoo08-05-2025
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Two spines sit in the Statehouse on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, before activists with Students for Life Action planned to bring them to representatives' offices. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
COLUMBIA — The 'inflammatory tactics' by an anti-abortion group demanding a near-total ban in South Carolina prompted most members of the Legislature's Family Caucus to leave the group and rebuke its GOP leader.
A resignation letter Wednesday to Rep. John McCravy, the caucus' leader, was co-signed by 29 of its 48 House members.
The mass departure came soon after McCravy, whose official caucus title is moderator, stood at the Statehouse with members of the activist group whose tactics included going to the churches of GOP leaders and putting fliers on windshields asking churchgoers to tell their fellow congregant 'Act NOW. Don't Let Any More Preborn Babies Die!'
At a news conference Wednesday, the next-to-last day of the 2025 legislation session, members of Students for Life Action showed reporters the two plastic spines they planned to deliver to House Speaker Murrell Smith and Judiciary Chairman Weston Newton, telling them to 'grow a spine' and bring up McCravy's bill for a vote.
The proposal, similar to previous bills McCravy has introduced that failed in the Senate, would ban nearly all abortions from the onset of pregnancy, with no exceptions for victims of rape or fatal fetal anomalies.
'Chief among our concerns is your continued refusal to condemn the deeply troubling behavior of out-of-state, third-party groups that have descended upon South Carolina churches to provoke and disrupt worship services,' reads the resignation letter to McCravy, provided to reporters. (Students for Life Action is a Virginia-based group with members in South Carolina.)
It comes a week after Majority Leader Davey Hiott, R-Pickens, confirmed he left the group he co-founded in 2017 with McCravy. Beyond differences in opinion over how to proceed with the abortion ban, Hiott accused McCravy of making homophobic and antisemitic comments about fellow legislators, which the Greenwood Republican vehemently denied.
Wednesday's letter made no mention of those comments.
Rep. John McCravy, R-Greenwood, talks during a Students For Life Action news conference pushing for a near-total abortion ban on Wednesday, May 7, 2025. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
The Family Caucus, which McCravy called 'the conscience of the Republican Party,' functions as a support group of sorts for socially conservative Christians interested in promoting issues that support children and families, Rep. Richie Yow, R-Chesterfield, told reporters.
That used to include members of the agenda-setting House Republican Caucus and the hardline Freedom Caucus, as well as a single Democrat. The archconservative Freedom Caucus didn't join the mass resignation, instead jumping to McCravy's defense.
McCravy has not left the majority Republican Caucus, and the Freedom Caucus has not asked him to join them, he told reporters Wednesday.
Abortion
Yow, a Baptist pastor, said what the activists did is not OK, no matter what the issue.
'Their harassment of churchgoers — on Palm Sunday, no less — crosses a moral line,' read the letter to McCravy. 'Your silence as the moderator of this caucus, along with your continued support and engagement with the groups that employ those tactics, is unacceptable.'
Their fliers claimed Smith and Newton were holding up McCravy's near-total abortion ban. The activist group also sent text messages and bought advertisements targeting the legislative leaders, a spokeswoman said.
If the group's tactics were aggressive, they were justified to push for what they see as right, said Kristan Hawkins, the organization's president.
'I think educating citizens in a House member's district about what he's really doing in Columbia is actually our job,' Hawkins told the SC Daily Gazette. 'That's our job as human rights activists.'
Members of House leadership, including Hiott, repeatedly asked McCravy to step in and ask the group to stop. McCravy refused, he said.
'I don't think that's appropriate,' McCravy told the Gazette. 'I think that's unethical.'
He declined to say whether he thought visiting representatives' churches crossed a line.
'College students are going to be more enthusiastic than probably older people like me,' McCravy said. 'I don't want to dampen that enthusiasm.'
House leaders said they aren't opposed to McCravy's bill, which received three hours of testimony but no vote during a subcommittee meeting earlier this year. Smith and Hiott are co-sponsors with McCravy. Newton is not.
Previous attempts by the House to pass near-total abortion bans have failed repeatedly in the Senate, so leaders decided to avoid the lengthy debate until the legislation has a better chance in the upper chamber, Newton told the Gazette.
Plus, there are still lawsuits pending on South Carolina's existing six-week ban, including a challenge before the state Supreme Court on whether the language in the law — which does not actually give a number of weeks — means the ban should start at nine weeks instead.
Amid the March 4 hearing on McCravy's bill, Hiott put out a statement urging fellow representatives to press pause until the state Supreme Court rules.
But McCravy believes the House should have passed the bill anyway.
'If you give up just because you hear a rumor that somebody might not do something, you're never going to win,' McCravy said Wednesday. 'So, we don't give up.'
The group's tactics aren't new, though they're newly against House Republicans.
In 2023, members of Students For Life Action delivered smaller spines to the five female senators who helped defeat McCravy's proposals of a near-total ban following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling overturning Roe v. Wade.
That delivery backfired, as the women took the Senate podium to proudly display proof of having a backbone and refused to back down. What ultimately became law in 2023, over the objections of the women who dubbed themselves Sister Senators, was a ban at six weeks, with exceptions for victims of rape or incest and fatal fetal anomalies. The three GOP female senators lost their re-election bids last year.
Hawkins, head of the activist group, said the larger spines for Smith and Newton were to help them 'grow up a little bit.'
'These spineless, feckless attacks against John McCravy, against pro-life students in South Carolina — it's beyond the pale,' Hawkins said Wednesday.
One of the fliers advocacy group Students for Life Action distributed, including at churches. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
But Newton said the group hasn't affected him one way or the other. The lobbying clearly didn't cause him to bring up the bill in the session's waning days. Nor has it made him less inclined to start the debate, he said. He told the Gazette he considers it more of a distraction from legislating.
Comments about other legislators
Hiott told The Post and Courier he resigned his membership partly over McCravy's offensive comments about two fellow legislators. Hiott declined to comment further to the Gazette.
The alleged comments date back to last session, when Hiott claimed McCravy complained to him and other House leaders that Newton, a Bluffton Republican, appointed a 'gay' and a 'Jew' to serve as subcommittee chairs on the House Judiciary Committee. The comments could only be referring to then-Rep. Jason Elliott, the Legislature's first — and still only — openly gay member of the Legislature and now a state senator; and Rep. Beth Bernstein, the state's only Jewish legislator.
Newton told the Gazette that McCravy repeated his comments about Elliott directly to him, telling the chairman he 'didn't want to serve on a subcommittee with that gay.'
Elliott, R-Greenville, did not respond to requests for comment from the Gazette. Bernstein, D-Columbia, said she heard about the remarks secondhand several times.
McCravy said he has good relationships with both Bernstein and Elliott and wouldn't disparage them in any way.
'I would never refuse to serve on a committee because of someone's characteristics or preferences,' McCravy told the Gazette.
He did have private conversations questioning Newton's decision to make Elliott and Bernstein subcommittee chairs because of disagreements over policy issues, he said.
'I don't have anything against either of those people personally in any way,' McCravy said.
Friction on the Judiciary Committee dates back to the end of last year, when McCravy asked to be removed from the powerful committee that vets many of the bills on the Family Caucus' priority list. He denied that his request had anything to do with his fellow committee members, instead citing disagreements with Newton over policy.
The two have publicly butted heads over proposals about betting and alcohol sales. McCravy is a staunch gambling opponent who doesn't imbibe.
Newton, on the other hand, is a co-sponsor this year of legislation legalizing a casino off Interstate 95 in Orangeburg County. The bill advanced through his committee to the House floor last week. On Wednesday, the House voted to 'continue' the bill, meaning it can't be taken up again until 2026.
Other measures the two have publicly disagreed about include bills to create a legal way to bet on horse races, allow people to drink cocktails anywhere in an airport terminal, and enable people order alcohol for delivery to their homes.
But Newton said it was McCravy's claims that the chairman was funded by alcohol lobbyists, followed by the comments about Elliot, that 'led to this unraveling.'
Wednesday's letter, however, cited none of that.
Instead, it said the caucus has become the antithesis of what it's supposed to be while bringing the unwanted divisions of Washington, D.C., to the South Carolina Statehouse.
'We believe this is both unwise and spiritually corrosive,' it read.
South Carolina House of Representatives
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly
'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly

USA Today

time19 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Terrific guy': The Trump-Epstein party boy friendship lasted a decade, ended badly

Long before the little black book, before the conspiracy theories, before one died by suicide in jail and one ascended to the White House, Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump were poster boys for '90s New York City excess. Parties. Models. Mansions. They danced with cheerleaders at Mar-a-Lago and dined with celebrities in Manhattan. Trump flew on Epstein's private jet between New York – where they lived blocks apart − and Florida, where they owned mansions 2 miles from each other. Their lives intersected over decades, with Epstein once claiming he introduced Trump to his third wife, Melania. 'Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were both horny rich guys with an eye for young models,' Michael Gross, author of the 1995 book 'Model: The Ugly Business of Beautiful Women,' told USA TODAY. Now, their friendship plagues Trump's second term in the White House. More: Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? DOJ turns to Jeffrey Epstein's ex-partner. Trump hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing in the Epstein case, but he is among the dozens of politicians, actors and tech leaders connected to the billionaire who was first convicted in 2008 of paying teenage girls for sex acts and accused in 2019 in a sprawling sex trafficking scheme. Epstein died before he went to trial on those charges. Though dead nearly six years, Epstein now dominates Trump's agenda amid a tornado of outrage since the White House and Department of Justice tried to close the book on the case after the president and his closest allies – including the attorney general and the FBI director – spent years claiming Democrats had suppressed evidence of an Epstein 'client list' and a wider child abuse conspiracy. More: Can Trump pardon Ghislaine Maxwell? When does Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator get out? "We already know almost everything there is to be known about the Epstein files. The story isn't Epstein anymore. It's Donald Trump talking about Epstein," says Mike Rothschild, author of "The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything. Trump's MAGA movement has rebelled after being promised lurid Epstein revelations by the very officials who now say there are none. On July 22, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, sent the House of Representatives on an early summer recess to prevent passage of a bipartisan measure forcing the DOJ to release its Epstein documents. "The GOP is so intent on not talking about Epstein and not releasing any details, it makes you wonder if there is something they don't want released," Rothschild said. "It starts driving you toward conspiracy theory." More: Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released On July 22, Trump said the Epstein furor was 'sort of a witch hunt,' and railed against the media, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. One day later, the Wall Street Journal and CNN reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump in May that he was named multiple times in the government's files on Epstein. But long before Epstein's conviction and questions about who might want his secrets buried, he and Trump were charter members of a decadent New York party scene. When Donald met Jeffrey Epstein and Trump met, it's believed, in 1990 when Epstein bought a mansion 2 miles from Trump's Mar-a-Lago club and estate. Born seven years and a borough apart in New York, Epstein was from Brooklyn and Trump from Queens. They partied hard, but neither drank alcohol. Trump was living loud in 1990. He had divorced his first wife, Ivana, with whom he had three children, and was dating model Marla Maples. Epstein was rich and single, a former high school teacher running his own financial advisory firm. Trump was known for hosting parties at the Plaza Hotel, which he owned at the time, that attracted rich men and younger women. 'If they were checking IDs, it was to make sure the girls were young enough,' Gross, who's known Trump for more than 40 years, said jokingly. It wasn't enough to simply invite models to events: Trump started his own agency and Epstein invested in one. Trump launched Trump Models in 1999. It represented Melania Knauss, who would later become his wife, and signed on teen models such as Alexia Palmer. More: Speaker Mike Johnson to shut down House early amid Jeffrey Epstein drama Epstein would later invest in Jean-Luc Brunel's MC2 modeling agency. Brunel had been banned from his former agency in Europe after accusations of abuse. Trump and Epstein were 'representative of a type that has nibbled at the edges of the modeling business. If you're in the market for women as sex toys, a higher echelon of that is models. They are, by definition, beautiful women. They also are beautiful young women,' Gross says. 'You can go from there.' Brunel was suspected of transporting girls or young women for Epstein. In 2022, less than three years after Epstein's death, he died by suicide in a French jail. 'Rhythm is a Dancer' In July 2019, after Epstein's arrest on federal sex trafficking charges, Trump said in the Oval Office that he was 'not a fan' of the financier. But it wasn't always that way. In 1992, Epstein joined Trump for a party at Mar-a-Lago, where a video shows Trump chatting and laughing next to Epstein. Trump sways to the Eurodance hit 'Rhythm is a Dancer,' as the pair hang with cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins. Later that year, Trump and Epstein would again meet at Mar-a-Lago, at an invite-only event for a 'calendar girl' competition organized by George Houraney, according to the New York Times. The Florida businessman had created the event at Trump's request. "At the very first party,' Houraney told the Times, 'I said, 'Who's coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming.' It was him and Epstein.' Epstein moved into one of the largest private homes in Manhattan in 1995, a townhouse previously owned by billionaire Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner. Trump was 1 mile away in a penthouse at Trump Tower. 'Terrific guy,' he famously told New York magazine in 2002 for a story that called Epstein an "international money man of mystery." 'He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump said. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." 'I sort of get away with things' When his modeling agency never quite took off, Trump turned to beauty pageants. In October 1996, he bought Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Miss Teen USA. In a 2005 interview with Howard Stern, Trump bragged about his access to contestants, some of whom were as young as 14. 'I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and no men are anywhere …. I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it,' Trump told Stern. 'The girls are standing there with no clothes on, and so I sort of get away with things like that,' he said. Tasha Dixon was competing in the Miss USA pageant in 2001 in Gary, Indiana, when she, a former Miss Arizona, met Trump. He walked in, she told CNN, as contestants changed into their bikinis. The theme that year was empowering women. "Who do you complain to? He owns the pageant,' she said. As Trump approached his third marriage − and alleged affairs, which he denies, with an adult film star and a former Playboy playmate − court testimony shows his friend Epstein was abusing teenagers. Sometime in the summer of 2020, a 16-year-old Mar-a-Lago locker room assistant was recruited into Epstein's circle by Epstein's procuror and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. She would later accuse Epstein of years of sexual abuse. Virginia Giuffre died by suicide last April at the age of 41. A lenient plea deal Epstein received from Florida state and federal prosecutors in 2008 included restitution to 36 victims. A 2019 federal indictment cited "dozens" of victims. The breakup In 2003, the Wall Street Journal reported, Epstein received a leather-bound volume of tributes from friends for his 50th birthday. A lewd message in the book was attributed to Trump, the paper reported. It ended: 'Happy Birthday − and may every day be another wonderful secret.' (Trump denied writing the letter and has sued the Wall Street Journal over the report.) A year after Epstein turned 50, Trump, in his book "Trump ‒ How to Get Rich," described a call from a person he called "the mysterious Jeffrey." "As mysterious as Jeffrey is, he's one of the few people I know who can get by on just a first name," Trump wrote. "My staff never asks for a last name in his case, which in a way puts him up there with Elvis." But that year, Epstein and Trump fell out over an oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach called Maison de l'Amitie − the House of Friendship. Trump outbid Epstein for the estate, paying $41 million, and in 2008 flipped it for $95 million to a Russian billionaire. Other reports say they broke after Ghislaine Maxwell solicited the daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member and her father complained to Trump. 'The fact is that the president kicked him out of his club for being a creep," said White House Communications Director Steven Cheung. Maxwell is now serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. After her 2020 arrest, when asked if Maxwell might cut a deal with prosecutors, Trump said: "I just wish her well." On July 24, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as a criminal defense lawyer for Trump, flew to Florida to meet Maxwell at a women's prison. 'Boring stuff' Trump and Epstein appear to have not spoken for 15 years before his death. As Epstein continues to dog his presidency, Trump says he's bewildered by the attention. 'I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody," he told reporters. "It's pretty boring stuff.'

What James Carville doesn't get about voter priorities
What James Carville doesn't get about voter priorities

Fox News

time20 minutes ago

  • Fox News

What James Carville doesn't get about voter priorities

Writing in the New York Times on Monday, longtime Democratic political strategist James Carville outlined a compelling message for Democrats to unite around ahead of the 2026 midterms. Carville urged Democrats to delay the "civil war" that will eventually erupt between the party's moderate and progressive wings, and to coalesce around a single "oppositional message" focused entirely on repealing President Donald Trump's agenda. With all due respect to Mr. Carville, his myopic focus on a strategy of resisting Trump above all else is simply too narrow to be truly effective. Put another way, a Democratic agenda built entirely around repealing the Republican agenda may be enough for 2026, but it falls far short of what Democrats must do if they hope to take back the White House in 2028. Indeed, nowhere in the Times piece is any description of actual policies that Democrats should advance as an alternative to what Republicans are offering, either next year or in three years. There are no calls for an entirely new economic agenda, one that replaces Democrats' tendency for profligate spending with a more fiscally conservative plan focused on managing the debt while also protecting the social safety net. In many ways, Democrats today should look to former President Bill Clinton, who was able to reduce the debt, leave a budget surplus and still protect vital social programs. Moreover, the word "immigration" is not even mentioned. This comes despite 2024 election polling showing that immigration was a top issue for voters, and exit polls showing voters trusted Trump over former Vice President Kamala Harris by a 16-point margin (52% to 36%), per Fox News. To that end, if Democrats hope to take back more than just one chamber of Congress, the party needs an agenda that prioritizes securing the border, combined with a pathway to citizenship for legal migrants and Dreamers. And, while I do agree with Mr. Carville that the midterms will be decided based on kitchen table issues rather than foreign policy, that does not mean Democrats can afford to ignore this issue. As a party, Democrats must advance an agenda that positively asserts democratic values at home and abroad. This entails rejecting the belief of the far left – and increasingly the far right – that any use of American power is inherently bad. To be sure, formulating an entirely new Democratic agenda takes time. And it will require the emergence of moderate candidates at a time when Zohran Mamdani's win in New York City has energized the progressive wing of the party. Nevertheless, as the 2024 election made clear, Democrats cannot afford to run from the center toward the far left. What the party needs is a candidate who can win, not one chosen because they passed progressives' ideological purity test. Interestingly, Carville cites former President Clinton as a figure who emerged as Democrats' "savior" in 1992. But Clinton was able to do so because, at a time when the party was moving further to the left, Clinton dragged the party toward the middle on the economy and crime. Finally, the crux of Carville's message – "we demand a repeal" of Trump's agenda – overlooks the core factor behind who Americans cast a vote for. Voters choose candidates who have plans and policies that will improve their lives. Slogans, no matter how catchy, may work for the midterms, but if Democrats then fail to deliver actual change between 2026 and 2028, its unlikely voters will trust them. Quite simply, voters want a strong economy, safe streets, a government that is not excessively bloated and secure borders, not candidates whose only agenda is resisting the president. Now, this is not to say that the agenda outlined by Carville will not be successful next year – it very well may. Rather, it is to point out that even if it helps Democrats reclaim the House of Representatives, it will not be enough to take back the White House in 2028. For that, the party needs to advance its own agenda, one that addresses the above issues and actually provides a real, viable alternative to the Trump-GOP agenda.

Trump, Obama and the Question of Treason
Trump, Obama and the Question of Treason

New York Times

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump, Obama and the Question of Treason

President Trump believes that President Barack Obama committed treason, a crime that may be punishable by death. Seeking a distraction from his current political travails, Mr. Trump is attempting to relitigate the nearly decade-old controversy over Russian involvement in the 2016 election. Mr. Trump is wrong on the facts and the law, and his sensational allegation serves only to demonstrate how completely he has degraded contemporary political discourse. Mr. Trump denounced Mr. Obama after Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, asked the Justice Department to investigate whether intelligence officials in the Obama administration faked evidence of Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. When the question of who should be targeted in the investigation was posed at an Oval Office press availability, Mr. Trump said: 'It would be President Obama. He started it. … This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries.' Mr. Trump also mentioned former President Joe Biden, former F.B.I. Director James Comey, the former director of national intelligence James Clapper and former C.I.A. Director John Brennan as other possible defendants. President Trump's history of intemperate remarks has earned him a perverse kind of immunity; the more outrageous his statement, the faster it is often dismissed. But Mr. Trump doesn't deserve this bloviator's privilege. He's not just the president, but, more to the point, he's the overseer of an unusually compliant Justice Department, and his offhand condemnation of his predecessor is as significant as it is chilling. Indeed, Mr. Trump made sure that the investigation of purported treason swiftly took on a life of its own. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that a Justice Department 'strike force' would investigate the allegations against Mr. Obama and the others, and a pair of Republican senators, Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, have called for the appointment of a special counsel to lead the inquiry. Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution, and it's set out there, in relevant part, as giving 'aid and comfort' to our enemies. Regurgitating a claim that Mr. Trump and his allies have made for years, Ms. Gabbard said that President Obama, after Hillary Clinton was defeated by President Trump in the 2016 election, 'directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store