
The best phone cameras of 2025, tried and tested by a smartphone expert
This article contains affiliate links. The products or services listed have been selected independently by journalists after hands-on testing or sourcing expert opinions. We may earn a commission when you click a link, buy a product or subscribe to a service.
Besides placing calls, sending text messages, and playing time-wasting games on the train, the best smartphones have evolved to become the primary means of capturing images and taking video for the vast majority of people.
Handsets such as the iPhone 16 and Google Pixel 9 are now incredibly adept at photography, employing all sorts of high-end technology such as advanced image algorithms, cutting-edge processors, and top-of-the-line sensors to produce a convincing approximation of a classic bulky camera being wielded by a professional.
While it's true that the best camera is the one you have on you, the results will vary between devices. As an experienced tech journalist and smartphone expert, I have spent countless hours assessing the current crop of flagship phones, along with a few cheaper alternatives, to see what they have to offer on the photographic front. You can read my reviews below, followed by answers to some frequently asked questions. But if you're in a hurry, here's a quick look at the top five.
The best camera phones: At a glance
JUMP TO REVIEWS
How to choose the best phone camera
First, the good news: any flagship phone released in 2025 will be able to capture excellent images in most lighting conditions. It's difficult to make a bad decision here. However, each phone has its particular strengths and quirks, if not outright weaknesses.
Your average flagship handset, which typically costs £800 or more, will consist of a multitude of cameras. You'll have a regular main camera for the majority of image-taking tasks, a special ultrawide sensor for landscape shots and usually a zoom lens. You can also expect a modern phone to feature a good-quality front camera for selfies and video calls. All should be capable of shooting 4K resolution video footage at high detail.
While the general standard of phone cameras is high, it's worth establishing your own photographic tastes and habits before deciding what features you need. Do you snap mostly stills or video footage? Are you a selfie fanatic, or do you love zooming in on your subject from afar? Do you like your phone to do all the hard work for you, or would you prefer a degree of manual editing control?
Whatever your answers to these questions, one of the following phones in this guide should be ideal for you.
How we test camera phones
I tested each of these top camera phones by judging them against five key metrics: design and features; display; performance and battery life; software and AI; and crucially, their camera capabilities.
As we are predominantly concerned with the performance of each camera, the following reviews focus on this particular aspect. I used each of the phones featured here as my main handset for several weeks or even months, capturing the same photos and videos on each camera to directly compare how each device performed in various lighting conditions. Nighttime images, in particular, are the trickiest test.
I did, of course, use each phone for more than just photography to make sure it could handle day-to-day tasks like making calls, text messaging and using different apps on the go. Where available, I have also linked to our full reviews of these phones.
The best camera phones of 2025
1. Best Buy Phone Camera: Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Often, people's top photography pick is the best iPhone they can get which this year is the iPhone 16 Pro. While it isn't the best at absolutely everything, Apple's top-of-the-line smartphone offers by far the easiest to use point-and-shoot experience on the market. This is now aided by a physical camera button on the right edge of the handset, though its positioning isn't the most comfortable.
The shots it is capable of capturing, however, are near excellent, with a natural, highly detailed look to images that stand in stark contrast to some of its rivals. If you prefer your photos to have a certain visual style, such as adding colour filters, then Apple provides some of the most sophisticated (though still easy to use) customisation options on the market.
Apple's Night Mode captures arguably the best low-light shots right now, which it handles automatically as the darkness creeps in. When it comes to video, meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro is the undisputed champion, capturing broadcast-standard footage at up to 4K resolution at a high frame rate of 120fps.
Away from the camera, the iPhone 16 Pro is an excellent compact handset (the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers the same specifications, but with a larger screen and battery) with some of the fastest processing performance available.
Build quality is impeccable, with a light yet strong titanium body that only the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (listed below) can match. Apple's 6.3-inch display, meanwhile, looks gorgeous with loads of brightness, and the iOS 18 software is as clean and intuitive as ever, though Apple's AI helper isn't anywhere near as advanced as Google's.
Read our full iPhone 16 Pro review.
Key specifications
Screen: 6.3-inch AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Cameras: Triple (48MP main, 48MP ultrawide, 12MP 5x zoom), 12MP selfie
Processor: Apple A18 Pro
Storage: 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Operating system: iOS 18
Dimensions: 150 x 72 x 8.3mm
Weight: 199g
Colours: Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium
2. Best Value Phone Camera: OnePlus 13
The OnePlus 13 isn't anywhere near as cheap as our budget phone camera pick, the Google Pixel 9a (£499). However, it does cost less than most other phones on this list, despite being much less of a compromise in the camera department.
You're still getting three strong cameras here, including a large 50-megapixel main camera, a 50-megapixel ultrawide, and a 50-megapixel zoom. The latter can zoom up to 3x, which isn't the farthest on this list, but the quality of the close-up shots is still impressive.
Swedish camera specialist Hasselblad has partnered up with OnePlus, adding a distinctively vibrant look to the OnePlus 13's images. It's not as true-to-life as Apple's pictures, but it's easy on the eye and looks great when sharing on social media.
Besides offering an accomplished trio of cameras, the OnePlus 13 is a fabulous all-around smartphone. With a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip inside, it's as fast as any other handset on this list, while its 6.82-inch screen can rival any with its sharpness and high brightness.
This is the phone I recently picked out as having the best battery life, thanks to its enormous 6,000mAh battery and speedy 100W wired charging. It's also well-built, with the same IP68-rated water resistance as its rivals (meaning it can be submerged for up to 30 minutes), a fancy faux leather finish option and a physical alert switch on the side that can be used for silencing your phone in a hurry.
Key specifications
Screen: 6.82-inch AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Cameras: Triple (50MP main, 50MP ultrawide, 50MP 3x zoom), 32MP selfie
Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite
Storage: 256GB, 512GB
Operating system: Android 15 with OxygenOS 15
Dimensions: 163 x 77 x 8.5mm
Weight: 213g
Colours: Black Eclipse, Arctic Dawn, Midnight Ocean
3. Best Phone Camera for Selfies and AI: Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google's current flagship, the Pixel 9 Pro, is probably the closest Android alternative to the iPhone 16 Pro. It's another compact, flat-edged phone with perfectly aligned hardware and software. Like Apple, Google makes both of these elements in-house.
Also like the iPhone, the Pixel 9 Pro takes consistently fabulous photos without any tinkering required on your end. Google's image processing is some of the best out there, producing beautifully rich HDR (high dynamic range) shots, which means that they convey bright highlights and darker areas (such as shade) equally well within a single image.
While it's a fine all-rounder, the Pixel 9 Pro's cameras stand out from the opposition in two areas. First, its 42-megapixel front camera captures the best selfies of any phone that I've used. Like the main camera, these shots are sharp, vibrant and full of contrast.
Where the Pixel 9 Pro camera truly excels, however, is its AI image editing tools. Google lets you fundamentally adjust the entire look of a shot, removing or adding objects and people with just a simple tap of the screen. You can even add yourself seamlessly to a group shot, with great results.
It is also a generally excellent smartphone with a bright, sharp and compact 6.3in display and a clean design. Google's Android software is one of the most refined, with advanced AI and a class-leading seven years of future updates planned. Google's Tensor G4 processor, meanwhile, isn't as fast as the other phones on this list, but it does the job well enough for everyday use.
Read our full Google Pixel 9 Pro review.
Key specifications
Screen: 6.3-inch AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Cameras: Triple (50MP main, 48MP ultrawide, 48MP 5x zoom), 42MP selfie
Processor: Google Tensor G4
Storage: 128GB, 256GB, 512GB
Operating system: Android 15
Dimensions: 153 x 72 x 8.5mm
Weight: 199g
Colours: Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian
4. Best Phone Camera for Landscape Shots: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
If you find yourself shooting as many landscape pictures as regular snaps or selfies, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the best choice. It's not just that the phone's 50-megapixel ultrawide camera takes sharper or even downright superior shots to the other phones on this list, but it is also able to keep a more natural-looking tone in images.
In most smartphones, the ultrawide camera tends to be the worst of the collection, where shots look noticeably cooler or warmer, or even a little dimmer and lacking in quality. No phone mitigates those differences better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
This is also a solid all-around camera setup. Samsung's punchy colours aren't to everyone's taste, but the shots it captures are always well-lit and rich in colour, so they stand out on a social media feed. The Galaxy S25 Ultra also offers excellent zoom performance, thanks to a pair of telephoto cameras allowing you to zoom as far as 100x.
More generally, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a brilliant phone with a robust titanium design, top-level performance, a big and beautiful display, as well as extensive AI features and software support. It also offers an integrated S Pen stylus, which can be accessed via a little slot in the bottom left corner of the handset. This enables you to scrawl out digital notes and doodles on the phone's screen.
Read our full Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review.
Key specifications
5. Best Budget Phone Camera: Google Pixel 9a
While we are generally considering the best of the best here, it is possible to get a reliable phone camera while spending considerably less money. The Google Pixel 9a costs half the price of the Google Pixel 9 Pro above, but the photos it captures are often comparable.
The Pixel 9a's 48-megapixel main camera isn't as advanced as the Pixel 9 Pro's. However, it employs the very same Google image processing features, driven by an identical Tensor G4 processor, resulting in shots with a recognisable 'Pixel look'.
That involves extremely clear and well-detailed shots that land somewhere in the middle between Samsung's punchy vibrancy and Apple's more natural tone. They're extremely easy on the eye and when shooting on an incredibly sunny day, I was shocked at how close the Pixel 9a's main camera got to its big brother.
The difference is more obvious when you shoot as the light dims. The Pixel 9 Pro's larger sensor is capable of capturing more light in the environment. The sensor in the 9a gives more of a fuzzy look. The phone's other cameras, consisting of a 13-megapixel ultrawide and 13-megapixel selfie camera on the front, are also less capable than their Pro counterparts, though still rather splendid for the price.
It's a similar story in general use, where the Pixel 9a offers a comparable experience to its big brothers. Its 6.3-inch display is clear and sharp, while performance is snappy and battery life is good enough to last a full day of picture taking. Google's Android 15 is one of the best around, and you get the same seven-year update promise as the rest of the Pixel 9 range.
Read our full Google Pixel 9a review.
Key specifications
Screen: 6.3in AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Cameras: Dual (48MP main, 13MP ultrawide), 13MP selfie
Processor: Google Tensor G4
Storage options: 128GB, 256GB
Operating system: Android 15
Dimensions: 155 x 73 x 8.9mm
Weight: 186g
Colours: Obsidian, Porcelain, Iris, Peony
6. Best Phone Camera for Enthusiasts: Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Score: 8/10
We like: Excellent cameras across the board, optional Photography Kit add-on, large battery and fast charging
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is the best Android phone camera for those who want to go the extra mile with their photography. It has four fabulous cameras to play around with, including Xiaomi's powerful image processing, but it also offers something extra.
If you opt for the additional Photography Kit, which costs an additional £169, you'll receive a special case that effectively turns the Ultra into a high-end camera. There is a satisfying two-stage shutter button, a manual zoom control, a dedicated video recording button and a small dial to change the exposure (effectively altering the brightness of the final image).
Once fitted, I found that it's easier and more satisfying to spend that extra time framing my shots, thanks to the large hand and thumb grips. The hand grip even contains a little extra battery capacity, which meant that it didn't run dry on intensive shoots.
That's not all the Xiaomi 15 Ultra has going for it. The main 1-inch 50-megapixel sensor is one of the largest around, which means it's excellent at capturing more light. This results in sharp, beautifully presented images.
If you like to get up close and personal without stifling (or even alerting) your subjects, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is your best choice. With a 50-megapixel 3x and a 200-megapixel 4.3x telephoto camera, it captures the most detailed zoomed-in shots I've ever seen from a phone, and excels even at 30x zoom and beyond – a high level of zoom that trips up most smartphone cameras.
The downside is that this is an incredibly large and heavy smartphone to deal with day to day and Xiaomi's operating system is messy and a minefield to navigate. Xiaomi will only support the phone with four years of updates, too, which places it at the back of the pack on this list. Performance and screen quality are unimpeachable, however, and I had no qualms with the battery life.
Key specifications
Screen: 6.73-inch AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Cameras: Quad (50MP main, 50MP ultrawide, 50MP 3x zoom, 200MP 4.3x zoom), 32MP selfie
Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite
Storage: 512GB
Operating system: Android 15 with HyperOS 2
Dimensions: 161 x 75 x 9.35mm
Weight: 226g
Colours: Black, Silver Chrome, White
Also consider:
The Sony Xperia 1 VI is about due for an update, but it still offers some of the most extensive manual camera control options around, including the best physical shutter button on the market and a unique 3.5x-7.1x variable zoom. Sony's low-intervention approach to image processing means you won't get the best point-and-shoot results, but it rewards extra care and attention if you take the time to edit the pictures after they are captured.
7. Best Phone Camera for Action Shots: Honor Magic 7 Pro
£1,099.99
Buy Now
Price at
Honor
The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a relative unknown, but it has a couple of interesting camera features that force it into the reckoning. If you take a lot of pictures with fast-moving subjects, whether that's a fidgety child or your local sports team, Honor's smartphone has a powerful feature it calls 'Smart Capture'.
Activate this in the camera app and the phone will lock on and monitor your subject. When it detects quick movement, it will automatically capture the optimal shot, freezing them in motion. I put this to the test by performing star jumps in front of the camera, and the Honor Magic 7 Pro captured me perfectly mid-jump without so much as a hint of motion blur or lack of detail.
Another neat camera trick is what's known as a 'variable aperture' on the main lens, which lets you switch between f/1.4 and f/2.0 on the fly. This allows for some extra level of control over the background depth of field effect (known as bokeh, the amount of blur behind your subject).
Honor's flagship phone goes big on the zoom, too, with a 200-megapixel 3x lens. Using AI, it can create sharp zoom shots up to 100x, though in testing, this worked better on non-organic subjects, with zoomed-in faces and foliage looking rather mushy.
Outside of photography, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is another highly capable smartphone, with the same Snapdragon 8 Elite chip that powers several of our top picks. Its 6.8-inch display gets extremely bright, and this is the rare Android phone to include a secure face unlock system like Apple's Face ID. Honor's customised Android interface is sadly as unappealing as Xiaomi's, but it's sufficiently customisable and works well enough.
Key specifications
Best phone camera FAQs
Is the camera on the latest iPhone Pro or Samsung Galaxy S Ultra better?
The iPhone 16 Pro has the better all-round camera system, with more natural-looking shots and greater quality video capture, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes superior zoomed images.
What phone camera performs best in low-light conditions?
I found that the iPhone 16 Pro provided the best balance between brightening up my pictures and retaining the shadowy areas of the image.
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is capable of zooming the farthest at 120x zoom, but it also takes the sharpest images at lower, more practical zoom levels such as 30x.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ohio food banks strain as Trump slashes federal aid programs
COLUMBUS, Ohio On a warm spring morning, volunteers at the Mid-Ohio Food Collective plucked cucumbers from a greenhouse where a state psychiatric hospital once stood and the land lay fallow. Now the state's largest food bank is working that ground again, part of an urgent effort to shore up supplies amid shrinking federal support, including deep funding cuts under President Donald Trump. They are planting more. Prepping soil for fruit trees, and installing hives for honey. In the greenhouse, crates of romaine and butterhead lettuce were packed for delivery, bound for a pantry across town. Back at headquarters in Grove City, staff chased leads from grocers, manufacturers, even truckers looking to unload abandoned freight. Every pallet helped. Every pound counted. In a state that handed Trump three straight wins, where Trump flags flap near food aid flyers pinned on bulletin boards, the cost of his austerity push is starting to show. 'Food banks will still have food,' said Mid-Ohio CEO Matt Habash. 'But with these cuts, you'll start to see a heck of a lot less food, or pantries and agencies closing. You're going to have a lot of hungry, and a lot less healthy, America.' For decades, food banks like Mid-Ohio have been the backbone of the nation's anti-hunger system, channelling government support and donations from corporations and private donors into meals and logistics to support pantries at churches, non-profits and other organizations. If a food bank is a warehouse, food pantries are the store. Outside one of those – the Eastside Community Ministry pantry in rural Muskingum County, Ohio – Mary Dotson walked slow, cane in hand. The minute she stepped through the doors, her whole body seemed to lift. They call her Mama Mary here, as she's got the kind of voice that settles you down and straightens you out in the same breath. The regulars grin as Dotson, 77, pats shoulders, swaps recipes. She had tried to do everything right: built a career, raised five children, planned for the quiet years with her husband. But after he died and the kids moved away, the life they'd built slipped out of reach. Now her monthly Social Security check is $1,428. She budgets $70 of that for groceries, and she gets $23 in food benefits as well. She started as a volunteer at Eastside. Simple math convinced her to become a customer. 'I figured if I'm going to take these things,' Dotson said, 'I'm going to work here, too.' Campaign fodder The Mid-Ohio Food Collective was born out of church basements and borrowed trucks nearly a half-century ago, when factory closures left more families hungry. It's now the state's largest food bank, feeding more than 35,000 Ohio families a week. It supplies more than 600 food pantries, soup kitchens, children and senior feeding sites, after-school programs and other partner agencies. When Trump returned to office in January, Mid-Ohio was already slammed. Pantry visits across its 20 counties hit 1.8 million last year, nearly double pre-COVID levels, and are continuing to grow this year. The biggest surge came from working people whose paychecks no longer stretch far enough due to pandemic-era inflation under Joe Biden's presidency, staff said. Then came the Trump cuts. In March, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cancelled the pandemic-era Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, which funded about $500 million annually for food banks; and froze about $500 million in funding for The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), one of the agency's core nutrition programs that supplies food to states to pass on to food banks for free. Much of the food Mid-Ohio distributes is donated, but donations alone can't stock a pantry consistently. Its current $11.1 million purchasing budget, built from federal, state and private dollars, helps fill the gaps. The March cuts wiped out about 22% of Mid-Ohio's buying power for next fiscal year – funds and food that staff are trying to replace. In early December, Mid-Ohio ordered 24 truckloads filled with milk, meat and eggs for delivery this spring and summer. The food came through the TEFAP program, using about $1.5 million in government funding. The first delivery was scheduled to show up April 9. The only thing to arrive was a cancellation notice. USDA said in a statement Secretary Brooke Rollins is working to ensure federal nutrition spending is efficient, effective, and aligned with the administration's budget priorities. More cuts could come. Last month, the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed Trump's tax and spending bill. It called for $300 billion in cuts to food benefits for low income people under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which fed nearly 1.4 million Ohioans in January, according to the latest state data. If the cuts survive the Senate and are passed into law, it annually would cost Ohio at least $475 million in state funding to maintain current SNAP benefits, plus at least $70 million for administrative program costs, said Cleveland-based The Center for Community Solutions, an independent, nonpartisan policy research group. That would consume nearly every state-controlled dollar in Ohio's Department of Job and Family Services budget, roughly 95% of the general revenue meant to help fund everything from jobless claims to foster care. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and other lawmakers in this GOP supermajority state capitol, facing a constitutional requirement to pass a balanced budget, told Reuters that extra money for food banks isn't there. The proposed fiscal 2025 Ohio budget would set food bank funding back to 2019 levels – or about 23% less than what it spent this year, in a state where nearly one in three people qualify for help. Federal safety-net programs have become campaign fodder, too. At a recent Ohio Republican Party fundraiser in Richland County, Ohio, voters in suits and Bikers for Trump gear alike listened to Vivek Ramaswamy, the tech millionaire turned presidential candidate now running for Ohio governor. He spoke out against 'a culture of dependence on the entitlement state that has festered in our country for 60 years.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Critical minerals part deux: China's dominance
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Decades ago, China foresaw what the U.S. didn't - a future dependent on critical minerals. Now, the U.S. is playing catch up as China's export controls threaten global supply chains. Join Laurie Chen, Ernest Scheyder and Jarrett Renshaw to hear the latest on critical minerals, particularly what China's dominance means for the modern world. Listen to part one here. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield, opens new tab China's rare earth export curbs hit the auto industry worldwide, opens new tab Global alarm as China's critical mineral export curbs take hold, opens new tab


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how
A federal judge has approved terms of a sprawling $2.8 billion antitrust settlement that will upend the way college sports have been run for more than a century. In short, schools can now directly pay players through licensing deals — a concept that goes against the foundation of amateurism that college sports was built upon. Some questions and answers about this monumental change for college athletics: Q: What is the House settlement and why does it matter? A: Grant House is a former Arizona State swimmer who sued the defendants (the NCAA and the five biggest athletic conferences in the nation). His lawsuit and two others were combined and over several years the dispute wound up with the settlement that ends a decades-old prohibition on schools cutting checks directly to athletes. Now, each school will be able to make payments to athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). For reference, there are nearly 200,000 athletes and 350 schools in Division I alone and 500,000 and 1,100 schools across the entire NCAA. Q: How much will the schools pay the athletes and where will the money come from? A: In Year 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes, a number that represents 22% of their revenue from things like media rights, ticket sales and sponsorships. Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne famously told Congress 'those are resources and revenues that don't exist.' Some of the money will come via ever-growing TV rights packages, especially for the College Football Playoff. But some schools are increasing costs to fans through 'talent fees,' concession price hikes and 'athletic fees' added to tuition costs. Q: What about scholarships? Wasn't that like paying the athletes? A: Scholarships and 'cost of attendance' have always been part of the deal for many Division I athletes and there is certainly value to that, especially if athletes get their degree. The NCAA says its member schools hand out nearly $4 billion in athletic scholarships every year. But athletes have long argued that it was hardly enough to compensate them for the millions in revenue they helped produce for the schools, which went to a lot of places, including multimillion-dollar coaches' salaries. They took those arguments to court and won. Q: Haven't players been getting paid for a while now? A: Yes, since 2021. Facing losses in court and a growing number of state laws targeting its amateurism policies, the NCAA cleared the way for athletes to receive NIL money from third parties, including so-called donor-backed collectives that support various schools. Under House, the school can pay that money directly to athletes and the collectives are still in the game. Q: But will $20.5 million cover all the costs for the athletes? A: Probably not. But under terms of the settlement, third parties are still allowed to cut deals with the players. Some call it a workaround, but most simply view this as the new reality in college sports as schools battle to land top talent and then keep them on campus. Top quarterbacks are reportedly getting paid around $2 million a year, which would eat up about 10% of a typical school's NIL budget for all its athletes. Q: Are there any rules or is it a free-for-all? A: The defendant conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12) are creating an enforcement arm that is essentially taking over for the NCAA, which used to police recruiting violations and the like. Among this new entity's biggest functions is to analyze third-party deals worth $600 or more to make sure they are paying players an appropriate 'market value' for the services being provided. The so-called College Sports Commission promises to be quicker and more efficient than the NCAA. Schools are being asked to sign a contract saying they will abide by the rules of this new structure, even if it means going against laws passed in their individual states. Q: What about players who played before NIL was allowed? A: A key component of the settlement is the $2.7 billion in back pay going to athletes who competed between 2016-24 and were either fully or partially shut out from those payments under previous NCAA rules. That money will come from the NCAA and its conferences (but really from the schools, who will receive lower-than-normal payouts from things like March Madness). Q: Who will get most of the money? A: Since football and men's basketball are the primary revenue drivers at most schools, and that money helps fund all the other sports, it stands to reason that the football and basketball players will get most of the money. But that is one of the most difficult calculations for the schools to make. There could be Title IX equity concerns as well. Q: What about all the swimmers, gymnasts and other Olympic sports athletes? A: The settlement calls for roster limits that will reduce the number of players on all teams while making all of those players – not just a portion – eligible for full scholarships. This figures to have an outsize impact on Olympic-sport athletes, whose scholarships cost as much as that of a football player but whose sports don't produce revenue. There are concerns that the pipeline of college talent for Team USA will take a hit. Q: So, once this is finished, all of college sports' problems are solved, right? A: The new enforcement arm seems ripe for litigation. There are also the issues of collective bargaining and whether athletes should flat-out be considered employees, a notion the NCAA and schools are generally not interested in, despite Tennessee athletic director Danny White's suggestion that collective bargaining is a potential solution to a lot of headaches. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been pushing Congress for a limited antitrust exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits but so far nothing has emerged from Capitol Hill. ___