Age UK is accused of 'betraying' elderly residents after plans to sell care home flats in upmarket British seaside town
Age UK, formerly known as Help The Aged, says it has made the 'hard decision' to look at selling its property known as Woodcot in Salcombe, Devon.
The house had been left to the Plymouth Guild of Social Services by philanthropist Elizabeth Jennings in 1976 before being passed on to the charity.
Worried friends and relatives of elderly people living in its apartments have now condemned Age UK for what they call a 'betrayal' of its goodwill mission.
And local councillors have also raised concern, telling MailOnline today of their worries about what might now be in store for vulnerable residents at risk.
The converted Georgian home in Salcombe was previously owned by philanthropist Elizabeth Jennings, who gifted it to the Plymouth Guild of Social Services in 1976.
It was later handed on to Age UK and has been used as retirement rentals for elderly people.
But the charity is now looking at selling the buildings, with reports suggesting at least two investors are involved in talks.
Salcombe Town Council has asked for the properties - which currently have four individual tenants as well as one couple living there - to be granted protected status as an 'Asset of Community Value' in a bid to South Hams District Council.
The town council's mayor Jasper Evans told MailOnline of concerns about a lack of information from Age UK on the future of the flats overlooking Salcombe Harbour.
He said: 'It's a Grade II listed property on a lovely spot and there are real worries now we've found out Age UK are exploring a potential sale.
'We're absolutely concerned about what the future holds for the people currently living there and what might happen for them next.'
Mr Evans said he and his council colleagues had put questions to Age UK and were awaiting answers, though had been told there were high maintenance costs as well as under-occupancy as factors behind the possible sell-off.
He added: 'What happens with Woodcot is a highly sensitive topic for many people living here and we're keen to hear from residents.'
Family members of people currently living there accused the owners of a 'betrayal', with one activist reporting Age UK to the Charity Commission.
She told the Telegraph: 'Should charities be disposing of extremely valuable assets to raise income whilst at the same time evicting the people who they are supposed to be helping?
Woodcot had been left to the Plymouth Guild of Social Services by philanthropist Elizabeth Jennings in 1976 before being passed on to the charity formerly called Help The Aged
'Not to mention the impact that the loss of the property will have on the local community. It's a betrayal and it's quite shameful of Age UK.
'Many people, my own mother included, have lived out their final years there in contented peace and quiet. It is a truly fabulous place.
'It is very much part of the local community. How does selling the property for development benefit the people they are supposed to be helping, or the wider community - many of whom want to live there?'
An elderly resident who moved into Woodcot two decades ago described being told previously by Age UK she would 'never have to move' - only to receive the bombshell information in recent weeks that the home could soon be sold.
She said: 'I feel, along with the other residents, that we should be allowed to stay here for the rest of our lives.
'Instead we face the prospect of being evicted so the house can be sold off at huge profit to developers for luxury apartments - it's just not right.'
The property originally built in 1797 by London merchant James Yates has more recently been converted into self-contained apartments.
Age UK says no one has yet been evicted from their homes at Woodcot, where average house prices approach £1million, nor received notice to depart.
A spokesman for the charity said: 'We can confirm that sadly we've made the hard decision to explore selling Woodcot.
'We're looking into a number of things before a final decision about a sale is made and therefore do not expect anything to happen until 2026 at the earliest.
'None of the tenants have been evicted and no notice to terminate any tenancies has been given.
'We decided to speak to the tenants and let other key people in Salcombe know at this very early stage because we thought it important to be transparent about our thinking.
'However, doing this early does mean that unfortunately we don't have a lot more information or answers to questions at this stage.
'We're committed to communicating with and supporting tenants through this difficult time.'
The spokesman added: 'We understand that the property is much loved locally and that different views and beliefs have developed over time about the nature of the transfer of Woodcot to us and the role of the property in the community.
'However, many of these aren't founded. The transfer of the property to Help The Aged did not include any restrictions that would stop it being sold or required Help The Aged as a charity to run it as a residential home for older people.
'All charities have a legal responsibility to ensure they are making the best use of all the funds and resources available to them to deliver their charitable objectives and that's why we believe it is right for us to explore a sale.'
Salcombe earned its nickname, punning on the affluent west London area of Chelsea, as almost half its dwellings are owned by outsiders - often using their properties as second homes or holiday lets.
MailOnline told last month how residents were celebrating after a developer failed in trying to overturn a rule that newbuild homes should only be sold to locals.
The Planning Inspectorate ruled that Valentine London could only sell its four new luxury apartments in Salcombe to people planning to live there full-time.
South Hams District Council had brought in the locals-only rule in its 2019 Salcombe Neighbourhood Plan.
Salcombe has in recent years become one of Britain's most expensive seaside towns, even rivalling Sandbanks in Dorset which is often described as a 'millionaire's playground'.
MailOnline has contacted Age UK and South Hams District Council for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Siblings united after woman guessed long-lost brother would be called James
A woman has found her long-lost brother after guessing what her late mother Ann would have called him. Jess Basey-Fisher, 53, was told in 2019 that Ann had given birth years before meeting her father Nicholas. She gave the baby boy up for adoption, but Ms Fisher was 'determined' to find her brother. The only information Ms Fisher, a nurse who lives in Carleton St Peter, Norfolk, had was that her mother had met the father of her older brother at a ball at a US airbase in Sculthorpe. She was then sent away to London to give birth. 'I was determined to find my older brother,' she told the BBC. Ms Fisher tracked down her brother's birth record from 1962 on the Ancestry website by guessing what his first name would have been. 'I knew the surname, and I just had a hunch that she would have called him something like James, and it turned out to be correct,' she said. After finding his birth record, she reached out to a social worker who then tracked James down on Facebook in 2021. He had been renamed Alistair Dalgliesh and was now 62. The social worker contacted Mr Dalgliesh but heard nothing back. Ms Fisher assumed her brother did not want any contact from his biological family. Ms Fisher tried to contact Mr Dalgliesh herself in October through social workers, and a conversation started. 'That was an incredible moment for me. And I found out my brother lives in Australia,' she said. 'I was really happy to be found' Over a two-hour chat on FaceTime, the siblings laughed at how similar they looked and how Mr Dalgliesh's mannerisms resembled those of Ann. Ms Fisher said they also shared the same interest in history and music. 'I was really happy to be found,' he said from his home in Queensland. 'I had such a great upbringing with amazing parents, and I feel very lucky. Ms Fisher told her brother that Ann had died, but he wished he had met her. 'My only regret is that I didn't get to tell her I had a great life,' Mr Dalgliesh said. He called his sister a month after they first spoke to tell her he had been diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer. Ms Fisher then stayed in Australia for five weeks to help her brother through chemotherapy. Mr Dalgliesh is set to stay with Ms Fisher in Norfolk this October. She said she wished her mother could have shared her secret before she passed away, adding: 'I feel devastated for her and I feel cheated out of knowing Alistair for longer. But we are going to make the most of the time we have left.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
I don't plan to have children. That doesn't mean I want them banished from my life
It struck me recently that, as a woman in my 30s, I am almost never asked about my plans to have children. Even in the few instances I have been, the question arose naturally in a related conversation and each time, when I said 'Oh I don't think I want children', the other person responded politely and didn't push any agenda. We could draw conclusions on what this says about other people's impressions of my lifestyle or my mothering instincts. But let's choose to see this anecdote in a positive light. I imagine that, even as recently as 10 years ago, I would have had to endure endless hectoring and intrusive comments about the so-called 'biological clock'. Or about ending up lonely in my old age or having a life which feels somehow empty or unfulfilled, as if that never happens to people with children. I think I don't really get asked this because now fewer of us are having children. Last year, the fertility rate in England and Wales (which measures how many children are born per woman during her childbearing years) was the lowest on record, at 1.44 children. The number of babies born was also the lowest it has been since the 1970s. Figures like this are usually bandied about as a source of doom and gloom regarding the state of the world. People are not having children only because they can't afford to, we are told, or because they fear impending environmental collapse. No doubt this is true for some people. But this focus may eclipse another, more straightforward reason: more of us are realising that if we don't want children we simply don't have to have them. In the space of a few generations many (although not all) of the restrictions placed on women's lives, in particular, have been dropped. It is commonplace for women to go to university and pursue the career of their choosing. The pressure to have a family has lessened. And I think the relief of that pressure is worth celebrating. (After all, in our time of environmental and social collapse we must take our silver linings where we can find them!) Still, I have wondered recently if one negative corollary to these changing norms is a pervasive and growing anti-child sentiment. I notice it everywhere. There is constant social media discourse about the annoyance of having to interact with children in pubs or cafes or parks. Now we're into school holidays I can detect the grumbling ramping up. There are noticeably more children in my local pub as some of the regular patrons have started families. It often feels as if a war is brewing, with locals of all ages hissing and whispering, their eyes narrowed if families leave 15 minutes later than the child curfew. Occasionally there is bad behaviour from the parents too. Recently a few dads brought a group of eight or so children of various ages to spend a sunny day inside watching a football match they were clearly not interested in. Naturally they all charged around the pub like horses in a western, barging into people and knocking over glasses. But I think we can accept there will be bad examples of every demographic and that this group would have had a great time at the park. It isn't just that one pub. There was a story recently about more pub landlords, facing a tough climate in the midst of the cost of living crisis, choosing to ban young children from pubs to manage this tension. I empathise with the difficult position they feel they have been put in. But to me it feels like a choice they shouldn't have to make. Quite often now, too, when I'm in restaurants or cafes, if a parent enters with a child or a pram, people start tutting and muttering, or rolling their eyes. God forbid if the baby starts to cry, as babies do. It strikes me as very rude and also counterproductive. If you greet an adult in a hostile way you won't get the best out of them. Why would it be different for a child? Even as someone not primarily affected by all this tutting and muttering I find it tiresome. It feels melodramatic, joyless and, dare I say, also quite childish. Consider too that, in general, women still do the bulk of childcare. What do we expect them to do? Sit in the house all day wearing black, pushing their babies back and forth in one of those metal Victorian prams with the big spokes, so the rest of us needn't be troubled by their existence? Is it really such a big deal to hear a baby briefly cry in the afternoon in a pub? If that is the price to pay for their mum being out and about in the world I think it's a more than fair one. It feels strange, to me, to draw us all into two camps of 'has children' or 'doesn't have children'. Those labels cover such a vast array of different lifestyles and choices, as well as circumstances which are sadly forced, rather than chosen. But whether or not we end up having children, it serves us well to consider how we welcome families of young children into our public spaces. After all, few of us end up living a life completely 'free' of children. My own isn't. As I come into my 30s the women around me are having children. I already have two godchildren. I have a feeling I might end up with 10 or so. And if I'm ever rich, maybe I will hire them all a holiday villa when they turn 18 and they can bond over the honour of having me for a godparent. I imagine I'll end up with nieces and nephews too. Or stepchildren. Who knows? Time brings all kinds of different, unexpected relationships into our lives. The children I see about in the cafes or pubs in my neighbourhood are a part of the community like anyone else. The idea of public spaces cleanly absent of children seems to speak to a fantasy of a world where the lives we live are totally detached from the lives of the people around us. But of course they aren't. And if this fantasy were reality, our lives would be very small and boring. Rachel Connolly is the author of the novel Lazy City
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Hundreds gather at Bournemouth beach for mass baptism in the sea
Hundreds of people have taken part in an outdoor service which saw 92 people baptised in the from five churches across Bournemouth gathered next to Boscombe Pier for the Baker, senior minister at Lansdowne Church, led the ceremony described as a celebration of said the public display was to "bring together Christians who believe in Jesus Christ and want to tell the world that". Mr Baker said the church was "alive and kicking" in Bournemouth and it had seen a "quiet revival" post said it felt like a festival and the churches were planning to do similar events in the future for people who were "unashamed" of their faith. Liam Brownen, 35, from Ringwood, was one of those baptised at the Bournemouth collective church beach baptism said the church had helped him to overcome his struggles with drug and alcohol addiction."The second I gave my life to Christ I was instantly relieved of the bondage of addiction," he added that the baptism "means everything to me. I owe my life to Christ so to be baptised in his name is unbelievable". You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
