logo
As egg prices soared at the supermarket, so did producer profits

As egg prices soared at the supermarket, so did producer profits

Washington Post08-04-2025

The avian influenza outbreak has had far-reaching consequences: More than 120 million hens have been slaughtered and egg prices have risen to record levels. In his address to Congress, President Donald Trump called the situation 'out of control.'
Yet for some corporate egg companies, these are good times.
On Tuesday, the nation's largest egg producer, Mississippi-based Cal-Maine, is expected to announce another round of earnings to cap three years of extraordinary profits, which have surged since the avian flu outbreak in 2022.
By wiping out millions of laying hens, the avian flu has slowed egg production for many companies. But the outbreak also has driven up prices enough for some companies to recoup losses and, for Cal-Maine, to record substantial profits. Cal-Maine's financial reports show it has been able to more than double its price for a dozen eggs, from about $1.30 a dozen before the outbreak to as high as $3.30 a dozen, while their feed costs to produce an egg have been relatively stable.
At the same time, Cal-Maine and other large egg companies have received tens of millions from the USDA, which has been doling out relief payments to help egg companies restock after the virus strikes.
Cal-Maine, which produces about 20 percent of the nation's egg supply, has benefited from the government program twice. After the virus led to the slaughter of 1.5 million hens at its facility in Chase, Kansas, the USDA paid Cal-Maine more than $22 million, according to the federal spending website, usaspending.gov, and outbreak reporting from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Similarly, after the virus led to the slaughter of 1.6 million hens in Farwell, Texas, the USDA set aside another $21 million for the company.
As a result, even though the avian flu reduced the ranks of the company's hens by about 4 percent, the USDA payments and higher egg prices sent its profits soaring.
Officials with Cal-Maine did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
The company isn't even the biggest beneficiary of USDA payments so far. Hillandale, which has operations in Ohio and Pennsylvania, received $53 million, according to the federal figures. Versova, a family of companies with farms in Iowa and Ohio, has been allotted more than $107 million.
Those outfits, which are private, do not release profit figures. Neither does Iowa-based Rembrandt Foods, which has received $26 million in payments — when it was owned by billionaire Glen Taylor, according to local news reports at the time. It's unclear whether Taylor, who did not respond to requests for comment, still owns a stake. Versova, Rembrandt Foods and Hillandale did not respond to requests for comment.
'For those companies to be bailed out and then turn around and set exploitative prices, it just adds insult to injury for consumers,' said Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, one of several industry critics decrying government payments to big egg producers. 'Absolutely, it's unfair.'
While large egg-producers with multiple far-flung locations like Cal-Maine may thrive during the outbreak, industry analysts said smaller farms stricken with the virus are far more likely to suffer — because while prices may be high, their single location may not be producing any eggs. It can take months, even as long as a year, for smaller farms to restart production after an infection. The USDA payments defray the cost of the birds, but they do not pay for the down time in production.
While the USDA payments 'do not come close to covering the financial toll when an egg farm must depopulate its flocks and rebuild its business, in many cases it means the difference between recovering or going out of business,' Emily Metz, president of the American Egg Board, said in statement. 'A larger egg producer with multiple locations is better equipped to survive the loss of a flock than a producer with a single location, but it's important to know that regardless of the size of operations, a bird flu detection is absolutely devastating to any egg farm.'
Egg producers are poised to receive even more government relief. In a little-noticed move late last month, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced that compensation for affected egg farms would rise from $7 per lost chicken to almost $17 — a huge increase for farms that count as many as 5 million hens.
Earlier this year, Cal-Maine president Sherman Miller said that 'without question, we have recently faced significant challenges within our company and the entire egg industry due to the ongoing outbreaks.' At the time, he was announcing quarterly profits of $219 million, which dwarfed those of pre-flu times.
In the year before the outbreak, Cal-Maine's quarterly profits averaged $5 million; over the last four quarters, profits have averaged $138 million. The number of eggs it produced rose less than 10 percent over that time, meaning much of the profit comes from higher egg prices and government relief payments.
As reported infections — and henhouse 'depopulations' — have declined since February, consumers have seen a drop in prices. Prices remain higher than before, however, and the uncertain course of the virus means they remain vulnerable to another spike.
'There are no clear-cut answers on how to stop this thing or when it's going to stop,' said Brian Moscogiuri, vice president of Eggs Unlimited, an egg supplier and broker.
Moscogiuri noted that the pace of henhouse infections stalled in the spring of 2023. But then it returned. The outbreaks appear to be linked to the migration patterns of wild birds.
'The industry is trying to repopulate as quickly as possible,' he said.
The flu outbreaks, which lead to the mass killings of hens, have been blamed for the huge price jumps. Over the fall and winter, for example, more than 50 million laying hens were killed; consumer egg prices nearly doubled, from an average of $3.20 in August to $5.90 in February, according to figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Federal law gives the USDA authority to slaughter birds in facilities where there has been an infection. The disease spreads quickly in poultry facilities and the mortality rate for infected chickens can be as high as 100 percent, according to the CDC. The USDA pays the affected farms, to encourage them to report the outbreak.
Early reporting 'allows us to more quickly stop the spread of the virus to nearby farms,' Lyndsay Cole, an assistant director of public affairs at the USDA, said by email. She noted that while the indemnity payments cover the costs of destroyed birds and eggs, they do not cover the losses that come with the disruption of closing down a facility for cleanup.
The USDA is still seeking more permanent solutions for the avian flu's effect on the egg industry. Rollins said she was working with billionaire Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service to find savings that could be devoted to the effort.
'We will repurpose some of those dollars by investing in long-term solutions to avian flu,' she wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.
Sebastien Pouliot, an agricultural economist and former Iowa State University professor who studied egg economics, said it makes sense that some of the large companies with multiple far-flung operations would be making money during the avian flu scare. Even if one of their facilities is temporarily closed by the virus, those losses will be mitigated by the government, and the eggs sold by their remaining facilities will fetch far higher prices. Whether a company benefits from rising egg prices also depends on how much of their production is sold under long-standing contracts at lower prices.
Regardless of farm size, said Metz, of the American Egg Board, the payments serve an important purpose.
'First and foremost, food security is national security. When you look at the indemnity [payment] programs, this is national disaster relief,' she said, adding that 'no amount of money can compensate for the emotional toll that this disease exacts on farmers and their employees. Farmers spend their lives raising hens; depopulation is agonizing and traumatic—it runs counter to everything these farmers know and do daily.'
While consumer frustration is understandable, she said, egg prices are essentially a product of changes in supply and demand.
'This is an incredibly complex issue,' she said. But 'if you are looking for a bogeyman, it's the bird flu.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead
3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Over the last six months, General Mills's shares have sunk to $54.81, producing a disappointing 17.1% loss while the S&P 500 was flat. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation. Is now the time to buy General Mills, or should you be careful about including it in your portfolio? Get the full breakdown from our expert analysts, it's free. Even with the cheaper entry price, we're sitting this one out for now. Here are three reasons why there are better opportunities than GIS and a stock we'd rather own. Revenue growth can be broken down into changes in price and volume (the number of units sold). While both are important, volume is the lifeblood of a successful staples business as there's a ceiling to what consumers will pay for everyday goods; they can always trade down to non-branded products if the branded versions are too expensive. General Mills's average quarterly sales volumes have shrunk by 1.6% over the last two years. This decrease isn't ideal because the quantity demanded for consumer staples products is typically stable. When analyzing revenue growth, we care most about organic revenue growth. This metric captures a business's performance excluding one-time events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures as well as foreign currency fluctuations. The demand for General Mills's products has barely risen over the last eight quarters. On average, the company's organic sales have been flat. Forecasted revenues by Wall Street analysts signal a company's potential. Predictions may not always be accurate, but accelerating growth typically boosts valuation multiples and stock prices while slowing growth does the opposite. Over the next 12 months, sell-side analysts expect General Mills's revenue to drop by 4.3%, a decrease from This projection is underwhelming and indicates its products will face some demand challenges. General Mills isn't a terrible business, but it isn't one of our picks. Following the recent decline, the stock trades at 12.9× forward P/E (or $54.81 per share). While this valuation is reasonable, we don't really see a big opportunity at the moment. We're fairly confident there are better stocks to buy right now. We'd suggest looking at one of our top software and edge computing picks. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Written by Andrew Button at The Motley Fool Canada Air Canada (TSX:AC) stock has been taking a beating in recent years. In 2020, in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the stock fell all the way from $54 to $12, as the travel restrictions in that period caused the company's revenue to decline 80%. The company's stock later rallied when the first COVID vaccine was announced, but subsequently gave up the gains for reasons that are less clear. Today, Air Canada is in a much better place than it was in 2020. It's profitable. It has repaid much of its debt. Its revenue has recovered to its pre-COVID level and then some. Nevertheless, at around $19, AC stock is still nowhere near its pre-COVID stock price. What's going on here? There are a few lingering issues for Air Canada that have investors worrying about the stock, even though the underlying company is in a much better place than it was before the crash. The question is, why the apparent discrepancy? In this article, I will explore the reasons why Air Canada stock is still at a relatively low level and why I think it will be at a higher one in five years' time. One reason why some investors are concerned about Air Canada is because of the large amounts of capital expenditures (CAPEX) the company is undertaking in the next three years. CAPEX refers to spending on fixed assets like property, plant and equipment. In the case of an airline, it mainly refers to spending on new aircraft. Air Canada expects $3.4 billion in CAPEX in 2025, $4.3 billion in 2026, and $4.9 billion in 2027. After 2027, the CAPEX spend is expected to decline. The amounts of CAPEX above are fairly large. Notably, they exceed the company's past amounts of free cash flow, seeming to imply that Air Canada will be cash flow negative in the years ahead. Is this CAPEX such a big risk for Air Canada? In my opinion, no. Airplanes tend to be in service for decades, meaning that a lot of CAPEX now does not mean a lot of CAPEX in the future. Also, Air Canada's revenue has far surpassed levels seen in past years, so unprecedented CAPEX does not necessarily mean chronic cash burn. Overall, I don't think Air Canada's CAPEX is going to ruin the company. Another reason why people are concerned about Air Canada is because of Donald Trump's trade wars. Earlier this year, Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Canada, ostensibly to counter the flow of fentanyl into the United States. In response, many Canadians pledged to cancel vacations to the United States. Later, data collection firms reported that Canada-U.S. air travel did decline — one story claimed by as much as 70%. Air Canada said that it saw an impact but denied that its U.S. travel hours went down by 70%. Again, this strikes me as not that big of a risk. Canadians are most likely replacing U.S. travel with inter-provincial travel and overseas travel. Air Canada's most recent earnings release confirms this: revenue was stable year-over-year, and free cash flow was positive. On the whole, Air Canada looks like a bargain at 8.8 times earnings and 1.6 times operating cash flow. I think it will be worth more in five years' time than it is today. The post Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Andrew Button has positions in Air Canada. The Motley Fool recommends Air Canada. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025

Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building
Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building

Hamilton Spectator

time23 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Shortly after they began guarding a Los Angeles federal building Friday, U.S. Marines detained a man who had walked onto the property and did not immediately hear their commands to stop. The brief detention marked the first time federal troops have detained a civilian since they were deployed to the nation's second-largest city by President Donald Trump in response to protests over the administration's immigration arrests. The Marines were activated earlier this week but began their duties Friday. The man, Marcos Leao, was later released without charges and said the Marines were just doing their jobs. A U.S. Army North spokesperson said the troops have the authority to temporarily detain people under specific circumstances. He said those detentions end when the person can be transferred to 'appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel.' Leao's detention shows how the troops' deployment is putting them closer to carrying out law enforcement actions. Already, National Guard soldiers have been providing security on raids as Trump has promised as part of his immigration crackdown . Leao, a former Army combat engineer, said he was rushing to get to a Veterans Affairs appointment when he stepped past a piece of caution tape outside the federal building. He looked up to find a Marine sprinting toward him. 'I had my headphones in, so I didn't hear them,' Leao said. 'They told me to get down on the ground. I basically complied with everything they were saying.' Leao was placed in zip ties and held for more than two hours by the Marines and members of the National Guard, he said. After Los Angeles police arrived, he was released without charges, he said. The Los Angeles Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'I didn't know it was going to be this intense here,' he said later. A U.S. official told the AP that a civilian had stepped over the line. He was warned they would take him down and they did, according to the official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. About 200 Marines out of the 700 deployed arrived in the city Friday, joining 2,000 members of the National Guard that have been stationed outside federal buildings this week in Los Angeles. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. Before the unusual deployment, the Pentagon scrambled to establish rules to guide U.S. Marines who could be faced with the rare and difficult prospect of using force against citizens on American soil. The forces have been trained in de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, the military has said. But the use of the active-duty forces still raises difficult questions. 'I believe that this is an inevitable precursor of things yet to come when you put troops with guns right next to civilians who are doing whatever they do,' said Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps. prosecutor and military judge. He said it's an example of Trump's attempt to unravel the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars active-duty forces from conducting law enforcement. ___ Watson reported from San Diego and Baldor from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store